Casa De Manana is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in La Jolla, San Diego County, California — state license #374603439, licensed for 249 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 13 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated April 24, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

1 home in view

Casa De Manana

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 249 residents · La Jolla, CA · San Diego County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374603439, held since 2013 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
849 Coast Blvd · La Jolla, San Diego County
Phone
(858) 454-2151
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryVerified in record
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careApproved for 12 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
FACILITY SERVES TWO-HUNDRED AND FORTY-NINE ELDERLY RESIDENTS; AGES SIXTY (60) AND ABOVE; EIGHTY-FIVE (85) OF WHOM MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY; APPROVED FOR TWELVE (12) BEDRIDDEN RESIDENTS; HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR TWELVE (12) RESIDENTS.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 13 times and filed 13 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 24, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 14, 2026
Occupancy at the July 2, 2025 visit
213 of 249 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 6 documents with transcribed findings, dated November 8, 2021 to July 2, 2025. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 6 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 9 of 13 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Apr 24, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 26, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is financially abusing a resident while in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)Tiffany Holmes contacted the facility to deliver findings for a complaint investigation via tele-virtual. LPA identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit and the basic elements of the complaint with Marivel Johnson, Executive Director. LPA previously conducted interviews with residents, staff, and outside sources, made observations, and obtained and reviewed pertinent records. LPA conducted the initial visit on March 20, 2025 and conducted a tour of the facility. It was alleged that the staff is financially abusing a resident while in care. Interviews and review of medical records revealed that Resident 1 (R1) did not have any cognitive impairment, and did not require assistance with money or activities. Interviews with R1 revealed the person they loaned the money too was a long time family friend. Interviews revealed that it was a loan, and that the person also gave R1 a rolex watch to hold on to as collateral until the loan was paid bathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 2, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250313133703
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff mishandled the residents medications Staff do not take universal precautions while providing care Staff do not properly maintain the facility Staff did not prevent a resident from wandering Resident sustained an unexplained injury while in care Staff did not ensure a resident consumed an appropriate amount of fluids while in care Staff did not meet a resident's incontinence needs while in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tiffany Holmes conducted a complaint investigation visit to deliver findings for the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Catherine Sullivan, Executive Assistant & Rita Moreno, Director of Health Services and shared the findings. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews and records review. It was alleged staff mishandled the residents medications . Interviews revealed that the staff carry a secured case that holds the residents medications. They deliver the medications to each resident from a pre poured cup. The staff wear gloves and sanitize/wash their hands when working with the medications and while dispersing them. Interviews revealed the staff give the residents the medications and make sure the residents have something to drink along with taking the medications. It was also alleged that staff do not take universal precautions while providing care. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 2, 2024 · control 08-AS-20220920143303
Mar 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility does not provide reasonable accommodation for resident to receive phone calls. Facility failed to provide food of good quality.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Debbie Correia conducted an unannounced visit to conclude a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA Correia was greeted by Marketing Receptionist Wilson, identified herself and met with Executive Director (ED) Kurt Norden and explained the purpose of the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of facility, outside source, and resident records reviews. The investigation also included outside source and staff and interviews. It was alleged the facility did not provide reasonable accommodations for Resident (R1) to receive phone calls. A resident records reviews revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on September 30, 2011, with a primary diagnosis of Hypertension and Congestive Heart Failure (CHF). R1 resided in a private room located in the independent unit of the facility. An interview conducted with the ED revealed resident rooms all have a personal land line with their own phone number. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2024 · control 08-AS-20201215143254
20231 state visit · 1 document
Sep 13, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not meet residents mobility needs Licensee did not ensure residents have access to activities

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Ruiz conducted an unannounced complaint visit to conduct follow up and deliver findings regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA was greeted by, identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit and the basic elements of the complaint with Executive Director Kurt Norden. During today’s visit, LPA observed residents in care and interviewed residents and staff. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with residents, staff, and outside sources, records review, and a tour of the facility. It was alleged that the Licensee did not meet residents’ mobility needs and the Licensee did not ensure residents have access to activities. Interviews and review of medical records revealed that Resident 1 (R1) did not have any cognitive impairment, used a walker and wheelchair, and required assistance with ambulation and escorting to activities. Continued on LIC9099-C page... Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 13, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230519130944
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints0typical 2
Total complaints6typical 7
State visits on file13typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2013.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202622020253302024330202311020222202021220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?
How are care plans reviewed when a resident’s needs change?

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (858) 454-2151

Is Casa De Manana licensed?

Yes — Casa De Manana is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in La Jolla (San Diego County): California license #374603439, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 249 residents. State records list 13 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated April 24, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Casa De Manana care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Casa De Manana with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordFACILITY SERVES TWO-HUNDRED AND FORTY-NINE ELDERLY RESIDENTS; AGES SIXTY (60) AND ABOVE; EIGHTY-FIVE (85) OF WHOM MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY; APPROVED FOR TWELVE (12) BEDRIDDEN RESIDENTS; HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR TWELVE (12) RESIDENTS.

How much does Casa De Manana cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Casa De Manana's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Casa De Manana accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Casa De Manana is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

213 of 249 beds occupied (86%) when the state visited on July 2, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Casa De Manana?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 13 state visits and 13 dated documents since 2021 for Casa De Manana; 6 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated July 2, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

6 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is financially abusing a resident while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)Tiffany Holmes contacted the facility to deliver findings for a complaint investigation via tele-virtual. LPA identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit and the basic elements of the complaint with Marivel Johnson, Executive Director. LPA previously conducted interviews with residents, staff, and outside sources, made observations, and obtained and reviewed pertinent records. LPA conducted the initial visit on March 20, 2025 and conducted a tour of the facility. It was alleged that the staff is financially abusing a resident while in care. Interviews and review of medical records revealed that Resident 1 (R1) did not have any cognitive impairment, and did not require assistance with money or activities. Interviews with R1 revealed the person they loaned the money too was a long time family friend. Interviews revealed that it was a loan, and that the person also gave R1 a rolex watch to hold on to as collateral until the loan was paid baCDSS inspection report, July 2, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250313133703

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff mishandled the residents medications Staff do not take universal precautions while providing care Staff do not properly maintain the facility Staff did not prevent a resident from wandering Resident sustained an unexplained injury while in care Staff did not ensure a resident consumed an appropriate amount of fluids while in care Staff did not meet a resident's incontinence needs while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tiffany Holmes conducted a complaint investigation visit to deliver findings for the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Catherine Sullivan, Executive Assistant & Rita Moreno, Director of Health Services and shared the findings. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews and records review. It was alleged staff mishandled the residents medications . Interviews revealed that the staff carry a secured case that holds the residents medications. They deliver the medications to each resident from a pre poured cup. The staff wear gloves and sanitize/wash their hands when working with the medications and while dispersing them. Interviews revealed the staff give the residents the medications and make sure the residents have something to drink along with taking the medications. It was also alleged that staff do not take universal precautions while providing care. (continued on LIC 9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 2, 2024 · control 08-AS-20220920143303
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not provide reasonable accommodation for resident to receive phone calls. Facility failed to provide food of good quality.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Debbie Correia conducted an unannounced visit to conclude a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA Correia was greeted by Marketing Receptionist Wilson, identified herself and met with Executive Director (ED) Kurt Norden and explained the purpose of the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of facility, outside source, and resident records reviews. The investigation also included outside source and staff and interviews. It was alleged the facility did not provide reasonable accommodations for Resident (R1) to receive phone calls. A resident records reviews revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on September 30, 2011, with a primary diagnosis of Hypertension and Congestive Heart Failure (CHF). R1 resided in a private room located in the independent unit of the facility. An interview conducted with the ED revealed resident rooms all have a personal land line with their own phone number. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, March 26, 2024 · control 08-AS-20201215143254

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not meet residents mobility needs Licensee did not ensure residents have access to activities
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Ruiz conducted an unannounced complaint visit to conduct follow up and deliver findings regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA was greeted by, identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit and the basic elements of the complaint with Executive Director Kurt Norden. During today’s visit, LPA observed residents in care and interviewed residents and staff. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with residents, staff, and outside sources, records review, and a tour of the facility. It was alleged that the Licensee did not meet residents’ mobility needs and the Licensee did not ensure residents have access to activities. Interviews and review of medical records revealed that Resident 1 (R1) did not have any cognitive impairment, used a walker and wheelchair, and required assistance with ambulation and escorting to activities. Continued on LIC9099-C page... UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, September 13, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230519130944

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 13 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
0
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
6
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
13
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Casa De Manana?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Front Porch Communities And Services, who operates 15 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(858) 454-2151
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Casa De Manana? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.