Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Activcare at Mission Bay

Large community·Licensed for 60·San Diego, California

Licensed since 2014Licence #374603584
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Starting rate$8,650 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 60Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit55 of 60 beds occupiedDecember 30, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitDecember 30, 2025CDSS inspection record

Activcare at Mission Bay is a large care community in San Diego — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 60 residents since 2014.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Activcare at Mission Bay

Is Activcare at Mission Bay licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Activcare at Mission Bay licensed for?

60 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Activcare at Mission Bay been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 7 state visits over the same years.

Is Activcare at Mission Bay still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Activcare at Mission Bay cost?

$8,650 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for memory care shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.

Among 19 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Diego that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,320 to $6,521 a month, and the middle figure is $4,595 (n = 19 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Activcare at Mission Bay take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Rac Mission Bay/Income Prop. Grp/Activcare Lv Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women and Newborns is 4.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Activcare at Mission Bay keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 15 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Activcare at Mission Bay license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ACTIVCARE AT MISSION BAY”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #374603584. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 60 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Rac Mission Bay/Income Prop. Grp/Activcare Lv Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 7 state inspection visits since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 7 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is December 30, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 45 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 15 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 15 residents

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
APPROVED FOR AGES 60 AND OVER; 45 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 15 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAVIER FOR 15. APPROVED FOR LOCKED PERIMETERS.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 15 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$8,650a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$8,650a month

Likely $8,650–$9,250

With a studio and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$8,650this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for memory care shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $8,650–$9,250
$8,650
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $8,650–$12,750
$10,650
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for memory care shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.

9 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$9,950.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 9 nearby homes behind this estimate
  • Wesley PalmsSan Diego · 0.7 mi · Large community
    $5,772Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Oakmont of Pacific BeachSan Diego · 1.6 mi · Large community
    $6,795Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Canyon VillasSan Diego · 1.8 mi · Large community
    $4,642Listed on Seniorly · independent living studio · seen September 9, 2026
  • Novellus ClairemontSan Diego · 2.7 mi · Large community
    $2,695Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
  • Golden Living Health ManagementSan Diego · 3.3 mi · Large community
    $2,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Monarch Cottages La JollaLa Jolla · 4.0 mi · Large community
    $14,852Listed on Seniorly · memory care shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
  • White Sands La JollaLa Jolla · 4.1 mi · Large community
    $4,692Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Casa De MananaLa Jolla · 4.4 mi · Large community
    $4,555Listed on Seniorly · independent living studio · seen September 9, 2026
  • VI at La Jolla VillageSan Diego · 4.6 mi · Large community
    $6,712Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026

Where it is

  • 2440 Grand Avenue, San Diego, CA 92109Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 7 documents for this home, and its records count 7 visits since 2014. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on December 30, 2025 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2021
State visits
7
Most recent visit
December 30, 2025
Occupied at that visit
55 of 60 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated December 14, 2022 to December 30, 2025. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 2
  • Total complaints2typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2014.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20252202024110202311020221102021220

The last 36 months — 4 of 7 documents

20252 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not take steps to prevent the spread of a communicable disease.

Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Janet Ngallo conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint to Business Office Manager Be Le and Marketing Director Jeremy Przybylek. On January 13th, 2025, it was alleged that facility did not take steps to prevent the spread of a communicable disease. The department's investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, LPA observations, interviews with outside sources, facility staff, and records review. (Cont. on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (Cont. from LIC 9099) Regarding the above-mentioned allegation, staff members and outside sources were interviewed. LPA attempted to interview several residents, however due to their major neurocognitive disorders, they were not considered reliable historians for the purpose of this investigation. Resident Power of Attorney(POA) interviews were conducted as all residents in the facility have some diagnosis of major neurocognitive disorder and reside in a secured memory care unit. Staff interviews did not corroborate the allegation, as staff consistently reported that infection control protocols were followed during the time of the outbreak, including the use of PPE, multiple in-service trainings on identifying and managing scabies, proper use of gowns and gloves, and handling contaminated clothing. During the interview with the Executive Director(ED), it was stated that the same 3–4 residents who were initially infected experienced recurring cases of scabies. However, all other residents who contracted the disease were treated successfully and did not experience reinfection. The ED stated the facility consulted multiple physicians and specialists, followed public health guidance, and repeatedly treated and monitored affected residents. Outside source interviews (Resident 1 and 2's POA's) did not corroborate the allegation, as Outside Source 1 and Outside Source 2 (OS1 and OS2) consistently stated that the facility had consistent communication during the outbreak and that they had no concerns. Outside sources consistently stated that the outbreak was addressed professionally and that the facility did an excellent job at monitoring and communicating the status of the outbreak at the time. (Cont. on LIC 9099-C pg. 2) (Cont. from LIC 9099-C pg. 1) Outside source 3 (OS3)(Previous resident 3's POA) stated that the facility did attempt to call about the rash on their resident and that once OS3 agreed to use the facility’s dermatologist, the treatment finally worked and OS3 was satisfied with the care. While OS3 felt communication could have been clearer, OS3’s own account shows the facility tried to notify them and provided effective medical support. Review of the facility records did not corroborate the allegation as documentation showed that staff received in-service training on contact precautions, scabies, and PPE station maintenance supported by email correspondence and caregiver sign-in sheets. Progress notes for R1, R2, R3, and R4 reflected multiple instances of rash-related medication administration and POA notification, with additional records confirming that residents received physician-prescribed treatment and were evaluated by a dermatology specialist who ordered multiple medication treatments. Email correspondence from the Department of Public Health revealed that the facility reported the scabies outbreak and was provided guidance materials for prevention and control. The facility’s infection control plan additionally outlined comprehensive precautionary measures consistent with the practices staff described during interviews. During the facility visit, the LPA observed residents well-groomed and clean. LPA observed storage areas which contained adequate and appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), including masks, gloves, gowns, and test kits. Based on interviews, direct LPA observations and records review, a preponderance of evidence does not exist to prove that the alleged violation occurred, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Marketing Director Jeremy Przybylek, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided and their signature on this report confirms receipt of the Licensee Rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 30, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250113162207
Dec 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janet Ngallo conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Executive Director Dawn DeStefani. According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity of sixty (60) residents, of whom fourty-five(45) can be non-ambulatory, and fifteen (15)may be bedridden. The facility has a hospice waiver for fifteen(15) residents and is approved for locked perimeters. LPA Ngallo, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no toxic chemicals/poisons accessible to residents. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. (Continued on LIC809-C) The facility's ambient internal temperature as well as hot water temperature at taps accessible to residents were all compliant. No pools or bodies of water on the premises. Per Executive Director DeStefani, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were present. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA Ngallo reviewed multiple staff and resident records/files. LPA records review did not raise any licensing concerns. The files which LPA reviewed contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. No deficiencies were observed or cited during today's annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Dawn DeStefani to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 4, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Dec 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hannah Rodgers conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was greeted by, identified themselves to and discussed the purpose of the visit with Program Director Bernadette Bowman. The facility's license shows a maximum capacity of 60 non-ambulatory elderly residents, of which 15 may be bedridden. Hospice waiver for 15. During today’s inspection there were 50 non-ambulatory residents in care, with 12 residents on hospice. LPA with Program Director Bowman toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected a sample of rooms. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, and showers were in working order. LPA observed 8 resident showers not equipped with non-skid mats or strips. Program Director Bowman confirmed that resident showers are not equipped with non-skid flooring. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. The facility contained at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food, all safely stored. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present. No toxic chemicals or poisons were accessible to residents. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water exist on the premises. Per Program Director Bowman, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all in working order. Fire extinguisher(s) were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit was complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA reviewed facility records. The files reviewed by LPA contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. One deficiency was cited in accordance with CCR Title 22. An exit interview was conducted with Program Director Bowman to whom a copy of this report, LIC809-D, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 27, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted a 1-year Required Annual Licensing inspection. Upon displaying her identification and explaining the purpose of the visit, LPA was granted entry into the facility. LPA was greeted and escorted during the tour by Jeremy Przybylek, Family Advisor. Executive Director Dawn DeStefani later joined the visit. The facility serves sixty (60) elderly residents; approved for forty-five (45) non-ambulatory; fifteen (15) bedridden; hospice waivers for fifteen (15) and is also approved for locked perimeters. A tour of the facility was conducted which included a sample of resident units, the dining area, recreation rooms, and food storage areas. There are four wings on site connected by one central room. Signal systems are in place and operational. PPE supplies are onsite. Passageways were free from obstructions. Facility does feature delayed egress doors or a locked perimeter. Each resident had clean and sufficient bed linens. All residents’ rooms were equipped with required furnishings. Lighting was present in the bedrooms. Residents’ bathrooms were observed to be sanitary and operational. Toilets and showers were equipped with grab bars. Hot water temperature in residents’ bathrooms were compliant. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were in working order. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] Facility has a two-day supply of perishable food and a seven-day supply of nonperishable food items. Food supply is replenished frequently by outside vendors. Food was observed to be properly stored and labeled. The food service area was observed to be neat and clean. Food menus and activities schedule were posted. Chemicals and cleaning supplies were stored in a locked closed room not assessable to residents. Centrally stored medications were properly stored and locked in cabinets. Medication logs and medications reviewed were current and medications appear to be administered according to the label instructions. Staff records review verified that all staff records were complete and compliant. Resident records were reviewed and confirmed compliant. Administrator’s certification is current. LPA reviewed the theft and loss policy and procedures. LPAs conducted a review of In-service training procedures. LPA observed that residents were being treated with dignity by staff, and there were sufficient staff on duty to meet resident’s needs. No deficiencies were cited during today's annual inspection; however, technical violation was issued. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director DeStefani, to whom a copy of this report, the LIC 9102TVs, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided at the end of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 28, 2023

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Diego County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Diego County