Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

St. Paul's Towers

Large community·Licensed for 320·Oakland, California

Licensed since 1985Licence #11400627
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,200 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,250–$5,350
  • Home sizeLicensed for 320Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit198 of 320 beds occupiedJanuary 24, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 31, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderFront Porch Communities and ServicesSince 1985 · 15 licensed homes

St. Paul's Towers is a large care community in Oakland — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 320 residents since 1985. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about St. Paul's Towers

Is St. Paul's Towers licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is St. Paul's Towers licensed for?

320 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has St. Paul's Towers been cited?

1 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 1985, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 19 state visits over the same years.

Is St. Paul's Towers still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does St. Paul's Towers cost?

$4,200 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,250–$5,350. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 communities with 50 or more beds within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 5 other homes of a similar licensed size in Oakland that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,441 to $5,820 a month, and the middle figure is $4,800 (n = 5 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does St. Paul's Towers take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Front Porch Communities and Services, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Front Porch Communities and Services — at least 15 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Alta Bates Summit Medical Center is 0.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can St. Paul's Towers keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

St. Paul's Towers license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ST. PAUL'S TOWERS”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #11400627. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 320 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Front Porch Communities and Services, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 1985, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 19 state inspection visits since 1985, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 1985, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 19 state visits in that period.
  • 6 complaints and 3 substantiated allegations on file since 1985, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 31, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved by the state
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 3 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE 60 AND OLDER. FORTY (40) MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. LICENSE SUBJECT TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF HOSPICE WAIVER FOR THREE (3) RESIDENTS.

938 - CONTINUE CARE CONTRACT (CCC)

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Medicines

    Level of medication service: reminders only

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

    caring.com · 2026-09-09

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

  • Works with hospice

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Level of medication serviceReminders only

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Diabetes care

    Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Incontinence care

    Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Renal diet

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Pharmacy services on site

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Nights & staffing

  • Nurse coverageNurse on Staff (Part time)

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,200a month to start

Likely $3,250–$5,350

From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,200a month

Likely $3,250–$5,500

With a studio and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,200likely $3,250–$5,350

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 communities with 50 or more beds within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,250–$5,500
$4,200
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,950–$8,600
$6,200
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 communities with 50 or more beds within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

8 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,550–$7,750.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 8 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 100 Bay Place, Oakland, CA 94610Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 19 documents for this home, and its records count 19 visits since 1985. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated August 31, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
19
Most recent visit
August 31, 2026
Occupied · January 24, 2025 visit
198 of 320 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 6 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated August 22, 2022 to January 24, 2025. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 6 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations2typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations3typical 2
  • Total complaints6typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 1985.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020253412024331202322020227802021110

The last 36 months — 8 of 19 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Aug 31, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Annual/Random

On 08/31/2026 at 10:30 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) David Doidge arrived unannounced to conduct 1-Year Annual Required inspection. LPA met with Executive Director Kathleen McCarron and explained the purpose of the visit. LPAs toured the facility including but not limited to residents’ apartments, bathrooms, multiple activity rooms, kitchen, and common areas. LPA observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Hallway temperature was maintained at 75 degrees Fahrenheit. The hot water temperature in a shared bathroom was measured at 113.7 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. There is a minimum of one week supply of nonperishable and 2-day of perishable foods. Centrally stored medications, sharps and toxic chemicals are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 01/15/2026. Emergency Disaster Plan was last posted on 10/29/2025. First aid kit was observed to be complete. Fire and emergency disaster drills are conducted monthly. The last fire was conducted on 08/20/2026, LPAs reviewed five (5) residents records and five (5) staff records, all were complete. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 31, 2026
20253 state visits · 4 documents
Nov 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On 11/07/2025 at 10:15 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Doidge arrived unannounced to conduct a case management regarding two SOC341s reported by the facility to the department on 11/02/2025. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Connie Yuen and explained the purpose of the visit. Spoke with ED regarding the incidents. ED reported one male got access to the building through a loading dock while deliveries were being made. The intruder gained access to a service elevator and rode it up to the seventeenth floor. The intruder got into a resident’s room by checking for unlocked doors. Inside a room, the intruder went into a resident’s bedroom and slapped the resident, R1, awake. The resident shouted at the intruder to leave the room. The intruder grabbed some of the resident’s personal belongings and dropped them, breaking some of the items. Security was notified and the intruder was escorted to lobby and asked to leave the building. Oakland police were notified. Before Oakland police arrived, the intruder walked around the building and again gained access to the building through the loading dock where deliveries were being made. This time the intruder climbed upped a fire latter near the electrical box for the building, climbed over a balcony wall and entered a resident’s patio door. Inside the intruder rummaged around some drawers, and was caught by a resident, R2. R2 pressed R2’s pendant, a nurse came to check in on R2 and removed the intruder from R2’s room. The nurse escorted the intruder out of the room and back to security. The nurse informed ED that he did not smell of alcohol but seemed to be on drugs as he was no coherent. The intruder was again escorted to the lobby and asked to leave. Oakland police did not take a police report from R1. Continued on LIC809C Continued form LIC809 ED has installed new cameras, hired a second NOC shift security and implemented new security procedures to prevent this from happening again. The new security precautions include monitoring all deliveries with one security staff watching and another from the monitors at the security desk. New cameras cover more areas, and new lock have been placed to secure fire gates. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2025
Nov 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On 11/07/2025 at 12:00 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Doidge arrived unannounced to conduct a case management regarding an Unusual Incident Report LIC624 (UIR) received by the department on 11/06/2025. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Connie Yuen and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA obtained and reviewed the Physician’s Report (602), Appraisal Needs and Services Plan (ANS), and R1’s personal Care Providers PCP) information. R1 is able to leave the facility unassisted and will usually leave with PCP. On this day, R1 left with PCP and while out to lunch the PCP became intoxicated and walked away from R1. R1 was found by Berkely police and taken to his Responsible Party (RP) who brought R1 back to the facility. R1 was evaluated by nursing staff and was not injured. R1 informed the facility that his PCP was driving irradicably, and clearly drunk. ED and R1’s RP spoke. RP informed ED that RP had fired the PCP. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2025
Jul 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 07/08/2025 at 01:25 PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) David Doidge and Andrew Christy arrived unannounced to conduct 1-Year Annual Required inspection. LPAs met with Executive Director Connie Yuen and explained the purpose of the visit. LPAs toured the facility including but not limited to residents’ apartments, bathrooms, multiple activity rooms, kitchen, common area and courtyard. LPAs observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Hallway temperature was maintained at 75 degrees Fahrenheit. The hot water temperature in a shared bathroom was measured at 116.5 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. There is a minimum of one week supply of nonperishable and 2-day of perishable foods. Centrally stored medications, sharps and toxic chemicals are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 01/14/2025. Emergency Disaster Plan was last posted on 10/17/2024. First aid kit was observed to be complete. Emergency disaster and fire drill were last conducted on 06/21/2025. LPAs reviewed five (5) residents records and five (5) staff records, all were complete. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 8, 2025
Jan 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff financially abused residents in care. Facility staff did not notify residents' and their authorized representatives of incident.

On 01/24/2025 around 09:05 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) L. Holmes conducted unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Cherry Marcelo, Nursing Home Administrator, Staff #1 (S1). LPAs L. Holmes and D. Doidge conducted the intial 10-day complaint visit on 09/23/24. During the course of the investigation and visit, LPA L. Holmes conducted interviews, requested resident roster, staff roster, police report, APS report, Ombudsman contact information, resident returned checks, facility memos, notifications and documents regarding the alledged actions of Staff #4 (S4) against residents and notification to the Responsible Parties (RP). Continued on LIC9099C... Substantiated ...continued from LIC9099. Facility staff financially abused residents in care. On 08/16/24, S2 reported to the Oakland Police Department (OPD) that Witness #4 (W4) had a check taken from her apartment and fraudulently written on 08/05/24 and cashed on 08/12/24. On 08/30/24, S2 reported a second incident to OPD. S1 shared with S2 that Resident #3 (R3’s) check was stole, cashed and written by S4; a third and same incident occurred with R4. On 09/08/24, W3 emailed Staff (S2, S3, S5, S6) to alert them that he/she had discovered checks were stolen from R1 and had been cashed by W4 per the signatures. On 09/13/24, S2 reported to OPD that R5 discovered a check had been written against his/her account on 09/05/24. S2 reported to OPD and LPA that S5 was able to identify S4 from the merchant’s camera footage. A series on fraudulent incidents continued to occur affecting but not limited to R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, & R13. S7 reported that the Executive Director advised him/her to suspend all investigation measures and that Regional Human Resources would be taking over. S3 confirmed that W4 no longer worked at the facility as of 09/24/24. Facility staff did not notify residents' and their authorized representatives of incident. After LPA investigated the allegation facility staff financially abused residents in care, interviews with S1, S2 and records reviewed revealed that the ED did not inform all of the St. Paul Tower residents of financial abuse amongst residents until 09/26/24 and LPA confirmed from S1 during the visit that the RPs were informed via an emailed memo on 10/11/2024. Based on interviews, observations, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies are cited from Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC9099D. Failure to submit proof of correction by plan of correction due date, and any repeat violations within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted, a copy of this report and appeal rights provided to Cherry Marcelo, S1.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 24, 2025 · control 15-AS-20240918171632

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.269(a)(10) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 7, 2025

1569.269 Enumerated rights; severability (a) Residents of residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following rights: (10) To be free from...financial exploitation...punishment, humiliation, intimidation, and verbal, mental, physical ... - This requirement is not met as evidence by: -Based on records reviewed and interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section above once staff financially abused residents which poses/posed a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 24, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee & ED to assist residents with reconciling financial records and assist residents with securing lost funds via police reports, credit reporting agencies and their banking institutions and conduct in-service training by POC.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 7, 2025

87211 Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following. (1) A written report … to the person responsible for the resident within seven days … (D) Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident …-This requirement is not met as evidence by: which threatens the welfare, safety or health …-This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on records reviewed and interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section above when ED did not report the financial abuse incidents to all residents within seven days which poses/posed a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 24, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee & ED to ensure that regulatory incidents are reported to all residents and RPs, and that all are aware of the incident of fraudulent abuse & conduct in-service training by POC.

20243 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 11/4/2024 at 9:40AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) G. Luk arrived unannounced to amend report previously issued on 10/2/2024 and to assess civil penalty. LPA met with Healthcare Administrator, Cherry Marcelo and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA amended report (LIC9099C and LIC9099D) previously issued on 10/2/2024. LPA printed the amended reports and provided a copy. Facility will look for the original reports and mail it back to LPA. LPA assessed civil penalty of $500 for deficiency issued on 10/2/2024 regarding an individual who was not fingerprint cleared. LPA printed civil penalty and appeal rights and provided a copy. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the reports was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 4, 2024
Oct 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not check background of caregiver prior to caregiver providing care to residents.

On 10/2/2024 at 1:50PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) G. Luk and D. Doidge arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation and deliver findings in regards to the allegation above. LPAs met with Executive Director, Connie Yuen and Director of Resident Health Services, Angela Zamarripa. During the course of investigation, LPA G. Luk interviewed 2 staff, complainant, and witness. LPA reviewed and obtained staff roster, resident roster, physician's report, emergency contact information, admission agreement, and care plan. Interview with staff and complainant revealed that a private caregiver was not fingerprint cleared prior to providing care to resident (R1). S3 stated that facility's Resident Services Manager would handle the on boarding process for private caregivers which includes fingerprint clearance and cannot be at the facility until clearance is complete. (Continue on LIC9099C...) Substantiated ***This is an amended copy of report issued on 10/2/2024*** Based on LPA's information obtained during investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Heath and Safety Code are being cited on the attached LIC9099D. Civil penalty of $500 is being assessed. Exit interview conducted with Connie Yuen. A copy of this report, civil penalty, and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2024 · control 15-AS-20240423151822

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 1569.17 · Plan of correction due date: Oct 3, 2024

***This is an amended copy of report issued on 10/2/2024*** Fingerprints and criminal records...An individual shall be required to obtain either a criminal record clearance or a criminal record exemption from the State Department of Social Services... This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on investigation, licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having private caregiver fingerprint cleared which poses an immediate health and safety risk to the persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2024

Plan of correction: ***This is an amended copy of report issued on 10/2/2024*** Executive Director has agreed to create a plan to address fingerprint clearance for private caregivers and submit the plan to CCLD by POC date. Civil penalty of $500 is being assessed.

Aug 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 08/09/2024 at 10:20 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Ardalan Gharchorloo and David Doidge arrived unannounced to conduct 1-Year Annual Required inspection. LPAs met with Nursing Administrator Cherry Marcelo and explained the purpose of the visit. LPAs toured the facility including but not limited to 3 residents’ apartments, bathrooms, multiple activity rooms, kitchen, common area and courtyard. LPAs observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Hallway temperature was maintained at 72 degrees F. The hot water temperature in a residents’ shared bathroom was measured at 118.2 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. There is a minimum of one week supply of nonperishable and 2-day of perishable foods. Centrally stored medications, sharps and toxic are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 06/17/2024. Emergency Disaster Plan was last posted on 06/20/2023. First aid kit was observed to be complete. Emergency disaster drill was last conducted on 06/20/2024. LPAs reviewed 6 residents records and 5 staff records. LPA also reviewed a sample of resident’s medications. The following documents were reviewed for the facility file: LIC 610E Emergency Disaster Plan, and Current Administrator’s Certificate. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 9, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Front Porch Communities and Services, licensed since 1985, operates 15 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

  • Kitchenette in the unit

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Outdoor spaceGarden

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Common areasIndoor Common Areas

    Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • LaundryDone by staff

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Visitor parking

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • AmenitiesHot Tub Spa

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Housekeeping

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Meals, preferences & familiar food

  • Meals are cooked in the home's own kitchen

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Meals served in the room

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Family may eat with the resident

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Meals provided

    Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Activities & the rhythm of a day

  • Activity types offeredActivities On-site

    Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Trips outside the home

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Religious services off site

    Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Faith, culture & language

  • Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Pets, routines & independence

  • Residents may bring a pet

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Pet types the home excludesCats · Small dogs

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved

  • Transport for group outings

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Alameda County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Alameda County