Spring Lake Village is a continuing-care retirement community in Santa Rosa, Sonoma County, California — state license #490107656, licensed for 679 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 11 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated October 2, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

11 homes in view

Spring Lake Village

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Continuing-care retirement community · Large community, 679 residents · Santa Rosa, CA · Sonoma County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #490107656, held since 1993 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
5555 Montgomery Drive · Santa Rosa, Sonoma County
Phone
(707) 538-8400
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryVerified in record
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 40 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 2 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
679 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 2 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 40. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS IN MEMORY CARE UNIT.State service designation938 - CONTINUE CARE CONTRACT (CCC)the CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 14 times and filed 11 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated October 2, 2025.

Most recent state visit
October 2, 2025
Occupancy at the February 7, 2025 visit
357 of 679 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 5 documents with transcribed findings, dated June 24, 2022 to February 7, 2025. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 5 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 9 of 11 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20253 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure facility was kept free of mold

Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of investigating this complaint. LPA met with the Administrator and privately with the residents of the apartment which is the subject of this complaint. The following determinations are made: An anonymous Complainant has alleged that staff have not ensured that facility is free from mold; Resident (R1) first noticed possible mold in apartment, located in the independent section of the facility, and notified management on 1/26/2025; Management responded on 1/27 with a maintenance team and remediation group assessed the situation and determined there was mold in the bathroom and laundry room of the apartment; repairs were began immediately; R1 states that the facility management responded to R1's report quickly and that there has been ongoing repairs made to the areas where mold was found; R1 has stated satisfaction with the facility's response and indicates the response was timely. Based upon observations and statemethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 7, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250130111931
20243 state visits · 4 documents
Aug 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff refused to administer medication to resident

At approximately 8:20AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to continue a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegation and met with Executive Director, Bill Keck and Health Care Administrator, Dan Skillman. During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, and made observations. There is an allegation that “Staff refused to administer medication to resident.” Complainant alleges that facility did not provide medication to Resident 1 (R1) on 12/17/2023, 12/18/2023, 12/19/2023, 12/20/2023, 12/21/2023, and 12/22/2023. Complainant alleged that Morphine was not provided to R1 on the following dates, 12/20/2023, 12/21/2023, and 12/22/2023 when R1’s private caregivers requested it, and that facility did not provide Lorazepam (Ativan) to R1. Complainant stated that R1’s private caregivers had documentation on when medication was requested and when medication was refused to be given. Attempts to obtain private caregiver cothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 10, 2024 · control 21-AS-20231222163620
May 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Fraudulent Billing

Christina Hadley investigated the allegations into possible violations of contuning care statutes. During the course of the investiation it was determined that the facility experienced a glitch in their electronic billing system. This matter has since been addressed and affected residents have either been credited for overcharges, or billed additionally for charges that should have been billed but had not. Although this glitch caused an inconvenience to some residents, there is no proof that this incident was done with ill intent or malice. As of this date, the Executive Director attests to the fact that the system is working properly and that the community has had no new complaints/concerns from residents about being billed multiple times for services. A finding that the complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that alleged abuse occurred. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 10, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240202174028
Apr 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Personal Rights (Fraudulent Billing)

Christina Hadley investigated the allegations into possible violations of contuning care statutes. During the course of the investiation it was determined that the facility experienced a glitch in their electronic billing system. This matter has since been addressed and affected residents have either been credited for overcharges, or billed additionally for charges that should have been billed but had not. Although this glitch caused an inconvenience to some residents, there is no proof that this incident was done with ill intent or malice. As of this date, the Executive Director attests to the fact that the system is working properly and that the community has had no new complaints/concerns from residents about being billed multiple times for services. A finding that the complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that alleged abuse occurred. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 26, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240202174028
20232 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 29, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 21, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints0typical 2
Total complaints5typical 7
State visits on file14typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 1993.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2025330202434020233302022220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — Sonoma County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?
How are care plans reviewed when a resident’s needs change?

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (707) 538-8400

Is Spring Lake Village licensed?

Yes — Spring Lake Village is a licensed continuing-care retirement community in Santa Rosa (Sonoma County): California license #490107656, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 679 residents. State records list 11 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated October 2, 2025, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Spring Lake Village care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Spring Lake Village with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record679 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 2 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 40. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS IN MEMORY CARE UNIT.

How much does Spring Lake Village cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Spring Lake Village's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sonoma County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Spring Lake Village accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Spring Lake Village is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

357 of 679 beds occupied (53%) when the state visited on February 7, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Spring Lake Village?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 14 state visits and 11 dated documents since 2022 for Spring Lake Village; 5 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated February 7, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unfounded. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

5 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure facility was kept free of mold
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of investigating this complaint. LPA met with the Administrator and privately with the residents of the apartment which is the subject of this complaint. The following determinations are made: An anonymous Complainant has alleged that staff have not ensured that facility is free from mold; Resident (R1) first noticed possible mold in apartment, located in the independent section of the facility, and notified management on 1/26/2025; Management responded on 1/27 with a maintenance team and remediation group assessed the situation and determined there was mold in the bathroom and laundry room of the apartment; repairs were began immediately; R1 states that the facility management responded to R1's report quickly and that there has been ongoing repairs made to the areas where mold was found; R1 has stated satisfaction with the facility's response and indicates the response was timely. Based upon observations and statemeCDSS inspection report, February 7, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250130111931

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff refused to administer medication to resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 8:20AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to continue a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegation and met with Executive Director, Bill Keck and Health Care Administrator, Dan Skillman. During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, and made observations. There is an allegation that “Staff refused to administer medication to resident.” Complainant alleges that facility did not provide medication to Resident 1 (R1) on 12/17/2023, 12/18/2023, 12/19/2023, 12/20/2023, 12/21/2023, and 12/22/2023. Complainant alleged that Morphine was not provided to R1 on the following dates, 12/20/2023, 12/21/2023, and 12/22/2023 when R1’s private caregivers requested it, and that facility did not provide Lorazepam (Ativan) to R1. Complainant stated that R1’s private caregivers had documentation on when medication was requested and when medication was refused to be given. Attempts to obtain private caregiver coCDSS inspection report, May 10, 2024 · control 21-AS-20231222163620
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFraudulent Billing
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Christina Hadley investigated the allegations into possible violations of contuning care statutes. During the course of the investiation it was determined that the facility experienced a glitch in their electronic billing system. This matter has since been addressed and affected residents have either been credited for overcharges, or billed additionally for charges that should have been billed but had not. Although this glitch caused an inconvenience to some residents, there is no proof that this incident was done with ill intent or malice. As of this date, the Executive Director attests to the fact that the system is working properly and that the community has had no new complaints/concerns from residents about being billed multiple times for services. A finding that the complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that alleged abuse occurred. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 10, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240202174028
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedPersonal Rights (Fraudulent Billing)
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Christina Hadley investigated the allegations into possible violations of contuning care statutes. During the course of the investiation it was determined that the facility experienced a glitch in their electronic billing system. This matter has since been addressed and affected residents have either been credited for overcharges, or billed additionally for charges that should have been billed but had not. Although this glitch caused an inconvenience to some residents, there is no proof that this incident was done with ill intent or malice. As of this date, the Executive Director attests to the fact that the system is working properly and that the community has had no new complaints/concerns from residents about being billed multiple times for services. A finding that the complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that alleged abuse occurred. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 26, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240202174028

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not allowing indoor visitations
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erik Gonzalez Campos arrived unnanounced to open a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Skilled Nursing Administrator, Dan Skillman. There is an allegation that facility is not allowing indoor visitations. Upon entering the facility LPA was screened for COVID and required to perform a rapid test before being granted access indoors. LPA conducted interviews and toured the facility. Per Dan Skillman current policy is to require visitors to test before entering. Unvaccinated visitors are not being allowed to visit indoors even with a negative COVID test. Facility has reported cases of COVID to Community Care Licensing since 04/29/2022. Per interview assisted living/memory care had their second round of negative testing on 6/16/2022, prior to this, this section of the facility had been under quarantine guidelines as directed by local public health (LPH). Continued on LIC 9099C UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, June 24, 2022 · control 21-AS-20220621142438

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 14 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
0
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
5
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
14
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Spring Lake Village?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Front Porch Communities And Services, who operates 15 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(707) 538-8400
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Spring Lake Village? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.