Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

We Care Elderly Care

Mid-size home·Licensed for 8·Richmond, California

Licensed since 2020Licence #79200977
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,500 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,350–$7,250
  • Home sizeLicensed for 8Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit4 of 8 beds occupiedMay 13, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJune 26, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderBean, LurinzaSince 2020 · 3 licensed homes

We Care Elderly Care is a mid-size care home in Richmond — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 8 residents since 2020. Dementia care and hospice care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about We Care Elderly Care

Is We Care Elderly Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is We Care Elderly Care licensed for?

8 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has We Care Elderly Care been cited?

1 Type A and 1 Type B citations since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 15 state visits over the same years.

Is We Care Elderly Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does We Care Elderly Care cost?

$5,500 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,350–$7,250. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 33 other homes of a similar licensed size across Contra Costa County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $5,825 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 33 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does We Care Elderly Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Bean, Lurinza, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Richmond Campus is 2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can We Care Elderly Care keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”

We Care Elderly Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “WE CARE ELDERLY CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #79200977. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 8 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Bean, Lurinza, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 15 state inspection visits since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 1 Type B citations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 15 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is June 26, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 3 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careNot on file · ask the home
  • BedriddenApproved by the state

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 4 AMBULATORY, 3 NON-AMBULATORY AND 1 BEDRIDDEN.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

5 questions to ask the home — nothing on file yet
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver not on file

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,500a month to start

Likely $4,350–$7,250

From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,500a month

Likely $4,350–$7,350

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$5,500likely $4,350–$7,250

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,350–$7,350
$5,500
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,150–$10,250
$7,500
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

24 homes like this within 15 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,000–$7,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 4155 Bell Ave, Richmond, CA 94804Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 14 documents for this home, and its records count 15 visits since 2020. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 14, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
15
Most recent visit
June 26, 2026
Occupied · May 13, 2025 visit
4 of 8 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated July 14, 2021 to May 13, 2025. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations2typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 1

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 327 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2020.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020252212024450202323120222202021111

The last 36 months — 8 of 14 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Apr 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 04/14/26 at 3:25 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L Holmes conducted an unannounced 1-Year Required inspection. LPA met with Jeremy Tatum, Care Staff (S1) and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator (ADM) Brittany White authorized S1 to act on her behalf and sign the reports. LPA observed administrator has a current administrator certificate # 7026223740 which expires 09/20/2027. LPA and S1 toured the facility including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common area and back yard. The facility consists of four (4) bedrooms and two (2) bathrooms. A comfortable temperature is maintained at the facility. LPA observed adequate lighting for the comfort and safety of the residents in all rooms. The hot water temperature in the residents’ shared bathroom was measured at 118 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms were equipped with grab bars, soap and were sanitary. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher observed full. First aid kit was observed to be complete and no bodies of water were present. Two (2) staff records were reviewed. LPA also reviewed four (4) resident records and they were current and complete. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 14, 2026
20252 state visits · 2 documents
May 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not administer medication(s) to resident(s) as prescribed.

On 05/13/25 around 3:30 PM, L. Holmes Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) arrived unannounced to deliver the findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Jeremey Tatum, Care Staff, and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation and visits, LPA toured the facility, requested an updated staff and resident roster, reviewed staff schedules, ID/Emergency Information, Unusual/Incident Reports (UIRs), Physician’s Reports (LIC602s), Death Reports (DR), conducted interviews, and reviewed emails pertaining to Residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7). LPA reviewed R1’s Admissions Agreement, interviewed Staff (ADM, S1, S2, S3) and Witnesses (W1, W3, W4). Continued on LIC9099C... Substantiated ...continued from LIC9099. On 09/18/24, R1’s physician prescribed the application of Neosporin to R1’s left ear twice daily until healed. R1’s ear appeared to be red in color and chaffed from the photo W1 presented. On 10/30/24, W1 provided the prescription, additional photos and a medication discharge list dated 10/22/24 for R1. R1’s CSMDR and Medication Discharge list did not include Neosporin; furthermore, R1’s LIC602 additional notes states to notify MD if R1 experiences the above symptoms. Interviews and records reviewed revealed that R2’s medication discharge list dated 12/20/24 did not include R2’s remaining Oxycodone. R2 stated that he/she should have had about 20-25 pills remaining. R2 stated that S1 said the medication had to be thrown away, was wet or something like that. S1 submitted an LIC624 to CCLD on 12/19/24 stating the pills fell on the floor and had been documented for destruction. S1 did not indicate the number of pills destroyed on the LIC624. S1 documented what appeared to be 22 pills were disposed on 12/19/24. R2 stated that she was not provided with any remaining pills or the prescription bottle, not even the wet prescription bottle and top. Based on LPA’s observations, interviews and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies are cited from Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC9099D. Failure to submit proof of correction by plan of correction due date, and any repeat violations within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted, appeal rights and a copy of this report provided to Jeremey Tatum, Care Staff ...continued from LIC9099A Allegations: Unsubstantiated Questionable Deaths. Two deaths occurred around the same time at the facility on 10/02/24 and 10/13/24. R6 and R7 both had preexisting illnesses and later a change in their existing conditions. R6’s death was reported to the facility by R6’s family after being admitted to the hospital on 09/26/26 for pneumonia. On 10/01/24, W5 confirmed that S1 requested hospice care for R7 who exhibited signs of declining health due to increased falls, lack of speech, and decreased appetite. R7 was diagnosed with failure to thrive before S1 was able to obtain hospice care services at the facility. Licensee does not ensure that residents are provided adequate care and supervision while in care. The allegation refers to R1 being unattended while using the bathroom at the facility. LPA attempted to interview W2 who witnessed the allegation. LPA confirmed W2’s contact information with W1. LPA attempted to make phone contact with W2 on two additional occasions throughout the investigation and was unsuccessful. R1’s LIC624 dated 09/20/24 states that R1 is unable to bathe, groom or care for his/her own toileting. LPA was unable to confirm or deny the allegation occurred. S2 stated that he/she was not aware of any problems and did not know R1 would not be returning to the facility when R1 was picked up on 10/16/24. S1 reported that W1 has never called or answered phone calls from the facility, nor did W1 verbalize having and grievances about the services rendered. As of today’s date, LPA has not been successful in contacting W2. Administrator is not on the facility premises a sufficient number of hours. LPA reviewed the facility’s staffing scheduled and confirmed S1 scheduled hours at the facility. S1 stated, “All staff collaborate to cover shifts that are open to ensure proper coverage for care of residents based on census.” If S1 is not available upon arrival when LPA is conducting a case management, complaint or inspection visit, S1 will arrive in 10-15 minutes upon request. Continued on LIC9099... ...continued from 9099C. Staff did not allow resident to have possession of their personal belongings. Interviews revealed that R1, R2, R3, R4, R5 and W3 did not have any complaints of not being in possession of resident’s personal belonging. LPA toured R2’s room, closet and dresser drawers. R2 was in possession of his/her shoes, clothing, toiletries items and memorabilia that was displayed on the walls. R3 stated that he/she loves art, has far too much, and had what R3 needed at the facility. W3 stated that R4 doesn’t always make the best choices, wants to move, but hasn’t had any other complaints from R4 or R5. Staff do not respond to residents' requests for assistance in a timely manner. After review of complaint and interviews with W1, W3, S1, S2, S3, R2 and R3, there was no mention of staff not responding to residents’ request for assistance in a timely manner. R3 stated. “There were sometimes I would have said, “I would like to be changed” but they were kind and would bring me things.” W4 stated he/she was not aware of any problems or issues at the facility; W4 speaks with R2 about once a month. Based on LPA’s observations, interviews and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, therefore the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided to Jeremey Tatum, Care Staffthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 13, 2025 · control 15-AS-20241025113739

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(e) · Plan of correction due date: May 13, 2025

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care e) For every prescription...the licensee provides assistance there shall be a signed, dated written order from a physician, on a prescription blank, maintained in the residents file, and a label on the medication. Both the physician's order and the label shall contain at least all of the following information. -This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not properly administering medication and documenting it's destruction.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 13, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee/ADM to provide CCLD vendored training (TBD) to all staff and provide proof by POC date.

Apr 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 4/22/2025 at 1:25 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L Holmes conducted an unannounced 1-Year Required inspection. LPA met with Earnest Manning, Care Staff (S1) and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator (ADM) Brittany White, arrived around 20 minutes later. LPA and S1 toured the facility including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common area and back yard. The facility consists of four (4) bedrooms and two (2) bathrooms. A comfortable temperature is maintained at the facility. LPA observed adequate lighting for the comfort and safety of the residents in all rooms. The hot water temperature in the residents’ shared bathroom was measured at 119.2 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms were equipped with grab bars, soap and were sanitary. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher observed full. First aid kit was observed to be complete and no bodies of water were present. Disaster drill last completed 04/2025. Three (3) staff records were reviewed. LPA also reviewed four (4) resident records and they were current and complete. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the appeal rights and this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 22, 2025
20244 state visits · 5 documents
Oct 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

On 10/29/24 around 09:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Holmes arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management (CM). Upon arrival, LPA met with Lurinza Bean, Licensee (S1) and spoke with Brittany White, Administrator (ADM) by phone and explained the reason for the visit to both. -At around 10:35 AM, LPA and S1 toured the facility including, but not limited to bathrooms, kitchen, common areas, laundry area, dining area, garage, staff room, and backyard. LPA observed and confirmed that there is an Additional Dwelling Unit (ADU) in the backyard and it does not have a City of Richmond building permit for use per S1 and W1. Deficiency is cited on the attached LIC 809D. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights provided to Lurinza Bean, Licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 29, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 87305(a) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 5, 2024

87305 Alterations to Existing Building or New Facilities (a) Prior to construction or alterations, all facilities shall obtain a building permit. -This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interviews and records reviewed, the licensee did not comply with the section above by not having the ADU permitted which posed or poses a potential safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 29, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee to apply for building permit and provide proof to CCLD by POC; Licensee to self certify that regulation has been reviewed and update CCLD biweekly throughout the application and approval process.

Oct 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks

On 10/29/24 around 09:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Holmes arrived unannounced to conduct an initial 10-day complaint visit and Health and Safety Check. Upon arrival, LPA met with Lurinza Bean, Licensee (S1) and spoke with Brittany White, Administrator (ADM) by phone and explained the reason for the visit to both. Upon arrival LPA observed one (1) Care Staff monitoring the facility and attending to the residents that were in there room. LPA and S1 toured the facility including, but not limited to bathrooms, kitchen, common areas, laundry area, dining area, garage, staff room, and backyard. The facility consists of 4 (four) bedrooms. All outdoor and indoor passageways are free of obstruction. There were no bodies of water. A comfortable temperature was maintained however the residents preferred 63 degrees Fahrenheit (F). LPA observed lighting in all areas to be adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Hot water temperature in the shared residents' bathroom was measured at 113.9 degrees (F). All toilets, hand washing, and bathing areas were safe, sanitary and in operating condition with paper towels, and soap observed at all hand washing stations. Linen and hygiene products available for all residents. PPE, sanitizer, and paper goods remained sufficient. Fire extinguisher last inspected 03/03/24 and smoke/carbon monoxide detectors were operational. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided Licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 29, 2024
Oct 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 10/23/24 around 9:45 AM, L. Holmes Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) arrived unannounced to conduct a case management regarding an Unusual/Incident Reports (UIR) and Death Report (DR) for Resident (R1) LPA met with Lurinza Bean, Licensee (S2) and explained the purpose of the visit; ADM Brittany White arrived shorlty after. On 10/01/24 ADM reported the following, “On 9/26/2024 R1 was having a virtual MD appointment, and We Care is requesting the primary care MD approve a request for a hospice evaluation due to recent decline. During appointment, the MD verbally instructed that Licensee, S2 to send R1 to ER for evaluation due to noted change in condition. 911 was alerted. Upon arrival to community, they successfully transported pt to ER for further medical evaluation. Pt conservator informed. Permission given for Hospice Evaluation Continue communicating to St. Mary's Hospital that pt needs a hospice evaluation.” During the visit on 10/09/24, LPA reviewed the file for R1 including but not limited to R1's After visit summary for 09/2024 & 07/2024, and Identification and Emergency Information. On 10/14/24, ADM sent R1’s Physician’s Report (LIC 602) and DR for death dated 10/13/24. After careful review of R1’s medical history with LPM Y. Flores-Larios, LPA returned to review R1’s Medication Administration Records (MAR) and Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Record )LIC 622) for accuracy. ADM stated that she will provide additional faxes and emails to support the change in R1's condition. -At around 10:59 AM, LPA found that the records were inaccurate for a sample of seven (7) out of eleven (11) medications on the MAR and LIC 622 when compared to the after visit summary medication list on 06/04/2024. Deficiencies are cited on the attached LIC 809D. Failure to correct the deficiencies and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights provided to Licensee, Brittany White, Administratorthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87475(e) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 25, 2024

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (e) For every prescription and nonprescription...shall be a signed, dated written order from a physician, on a prescription blank, maintained in the residents file, and a label on the medication... -This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records reviewed, the licensee did not comply with the section above by not having R1’s medication to be administered available which posed an immediate safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee and ADM to have physicians consolidate/update medication lists for all residents by 10/30/24. All residents' medication shall be available. Document refusals date and time, follow physician’s orders, and perform staff training for all personnel that administer medication by 10/25/24; submit proof of training with names of attendees to CCLD on or before 10/25/24.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87506(b)()14 · Plan of correction due date: Oct 23, 2024

87506 Resident Records (b) Each resident’s record shall contain at least the following information: (14) Current centrally stored medications as specified in Section 87465, Incidental Medical and Dental Care Services.-This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records reviewed, the licensee did not comply with the section above by not having all of R1’s medications recorded on the LIC 622 which posed an immediate safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee and ADM to audit all residents LIC 622s, follow physician’s orders, and perform staff training for all personnel that administer medication by 10/25/24; submit proof of training with names of attendees to CCLD on or before 10/25/24.

Oct 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 10/09/24 around 11:20 AM L. Holmes, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) arrived unannounced to conduct a case management regarding Unusual/Incident Reports (UIRs) for Residents (R1, R2) and a Death Report for R2. LPA met with Lurinza Bean, Licensee (S2) and explained the purpose of the visit. On 10/01/24 ADM reported the following, “On 9/26/2024 R1 was having a virtual MD appointment, and We Care is requesting the primary care MD approve a request for a hospice evaluation due to recent decline. During appointment, the MD verbally instructed that Licensee, S2 to send R1 to ER for evaluation due to noted change in condition. 911 was alerted. Upon arrival to community, they successfully transported pt to ER for further medical evaluation. Pt conservator informed. Permission given for Hospice Evaluation Continue communicating to St. Mary's Hospital that pt needs a hospice evaluation.” On 10/01/24 ADM reported the following, “On 9/26/2024 at approximately 12:30 PM R2 was observed in her bedroom unresponsive after x3 attempts of arousal by tapping shoulder and verbally calling out her name. Licensee, S2. 911 was alerted. Ambulance arrived and safely transported to Kaiser ER for further medical evaluation. Per ER, R2 will be admitted for further evaluation r/t Pneumonia. R2 remains admitted to hospital as of 10/1/2024. Continue to follow up with RP and Kaiser Hospital for patient’s current status.” On 10/03/24, LPA received a DR for R2; date of death 10/02/24. On 10/04/24 LPA extended condolences to the family and facility, requested a death certificate, LIC602 and any other relevant care notes that happened within the months prior to R2’s death. During the visit LPA reviewed the files for R1 and R2 including but no limited to R1's After visit summary for 09/2024 & 07/2024, R2's for 06/2024 & 09/2023 and Identification and Emergency Information for both. Continued on LIC809C... ...continued from LIC809. -At around 12:17 PM, LPA L. Holmes observed that R2 did not have an updated physician's report. The report in R2's file was dated 03/29/21. Deficiency is cited on the attached LIC 809D. Failure to correct the deficiencies and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights provided to Licensee, Lurinza Bean.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 9, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87458(c) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 11, 2024

87458 Medical Assessment (c) The licensee shall obtain an updated medical assessment when required by the Department. -This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Licensee did not provide CCLD an updated medical assessment when requested on 10/04/24 and 10/09/24 for R2.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 9, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee to review the regulation, certify in-service training for all staff, and provide the latest LIC602 for R2 by POC date. Death Certificate to be provide to CCLD upon receipt.

Apr 2, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 4/2/2024 at 9:50am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carol Fowler conducted an unannounced 1-Year Required inspection. LPA met with Administrator/Caregiver Lurinza Bean, and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator, Brittany White, arrived at 10:35am. LPA toured the facility with Administrator including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common area and back yard. The facility consists of five (5) bedrooms and two (2) bathrooms. LPA did not observe any bodies of water. A comfortable temperature is maintained at 68 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. The hot water temperature in the residents’ shared bathroom was measured at 114.2 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last purchased on 03/03/2024. Emergency disaster plan last updated 5/24/2022. First aid kit was observed to be complete. Three (3) staff records were reviewed. LPA also reviewed five (5) resident records and they were current and complete. Continued on LIC809C. Continued from LIC809C. Deficiencies LPA observed: At 10:46am LPA Observed unlocked cabinets located in the hallway and kitchen which contained chemicals such as Ajax, Comet Awesome cleaner, Glade Carpet Cleaner, Fabuloso, WD-40, Lysol, Raid, 409, and a knife. At 10:50am LPA Observed 5 piles of wood planks located in the back yard. The following forms are to be updated and submitted to CCLD by 04/10/24: -Resident Roster -LIC500 Personnel Report -LIC308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility -LIC610 Emergency Disaster Plan The deficiencies were observed (see LIC809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulation, Failure to submit proof of corrections (POC) by plan of correction due date and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the appeal rights and this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 2, 2024

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Bean, Lurinza, licensed since 2020, operates 3 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Contra Costa County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Contra Costa County