Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Sutro Heights

Mid-size home·Licensed for 14·San Francisco, California

Licensed since 2021Licence #385601097
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Starting rate$5,000 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 14Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit12 of 14 beds occupiedMay 20, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitMay 20, 2026CDSS inspection record

Sutro Heights is a mid-size care home in San Francisco — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 14 residents since 2021. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Sutro Heights

Is Sutro Heights licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Sutro Heights licensed for?

14 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Sutro Heights been cited?

7 Type A and 14 Type B citations since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 31 state visits over the same years.

Is Sutro Heights still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Sutro Heights cost?

$5,000 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 11 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Francisco that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,155 to $5,500 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 11 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Sutro Heights take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Sutro Heights Corporation, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

UCSF Medical Center is 2.8 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Sutro Heights keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Sutro Heights license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “SUTRO HEIGHTS CORPORATION”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #385601097. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 14 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Sutro Heights Corporation, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 31 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 7 Type A and 14 Type B citations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 31 state visits in that period.
  • 11 complaints and 27 substantiated allegations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is May 20, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 7 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 2 residents

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR CAPACITY OF 14; 7 AMBULATORY; 7 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 2 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN; 2ND FLOOR FOR AMBULATORYRESIDENTS ONLY; NON-AMB AND BEDRIDDEN ON 1ST FLOOR ONLY; 3RD FLOOR NOT LICENSED FOR RESIDENTS; HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 4 RESIDENTS.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

  • Respite / short-term stays

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Help with bathing or showering

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Assistance with transfers

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Medication management

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Works with residents’ own health care providers

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Diabetic / carbohydrate-controlled diet

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Help with dressing and grooming

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Building is wheelchair accessible

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Diabetes care

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

Nights & staffing

  • 24-hour supervision claimed

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Emergency call system

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$5,000a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$5,000a month

Likely $5,000–$5,600

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$5,000this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $5,000–$5,600
$5,000
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,000–$9,100
$7,000
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.

9 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,000–$6,250.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 9 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 659 45Th Street, San Francisco, CA 94121Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 23 documents for this home, and its records count 31 visits since 2021. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on May 20, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2021
State visits
31
Most recent visit
May 20, 2026
Occupied at that visit
12 of 14 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 11 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated December 27, 2021 to May 20, 2026. 11 of the 11 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (8), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 11 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 11 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations7typical 0
  • Type B citations14typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations27typical 0
  • Total complaints11typical 1

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 327 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2021.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202633020251102024573202357220221422021111

The last 36 months — 12 of 23 documents

20263 state visits · 3 documents
May 20, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Staff inappropriately gave resident alcohol

On 05/20/2026 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian conducted an unannounced complaint inspection to deliver findings regarding the complaint allegations received. LPA met with staff, Shirley Aguado, LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator, Laymer Pamintuan, was contacted over the phone and grant permission to staff, Lea Pantangco, to sign all required documents. Regarding the allegation that staff inappropriately gave resident alcohol, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed records. There was insufficient corroborating documentation and witness statements to determine whether the alleged incident occurred. Although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove whether the allegations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report is reviewed and a copy of this report is left at the facility. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2026 · control 14-AS-20260227114134
Apr 1, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On 4/1/2026 LPA Grace Donato made an unannounced Case Management-Incident visit. LPA met with Staff Lea Pantangco. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. CCLD received an incident report regarding a resident (R1) who eloped from the facility on 3/27/2026. R1 asked another resident (R2), to open the door out of the house. While caregiver S1, was getting groceries on the lower level, R2 was trying to be helpful and let R1 outside. Based on records review R1 has neuro cognitive issues and may not able to leave the facility unassisted. LPA interviewed ADM through the phone and it was mentioned that a staff left the residents on the 2nd floor to get some groceries downstairs. R2 opened the door for R1 and R1 was able to go out. LPA observed all doors have alarms that has keys to be able to turn it off. The main door on the 2nd floor where R1 went out has the keys kept in the drawer by the door, easily accessible by other residents. R1 has returned back to the facility after a few hours. Deficiency was observed during the visit and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and Health and Safety Code. See LIC809-D. Report is reviewed with the assistant administrator and a copy is provided with appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 1, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87464(f)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 2, 2026

87464 Basic Services: (f) Basic services shall at a minimum include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c). This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, records review and observation, R1 was able to leave the facility unassisted which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 1, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee/administrator shall submit a plan in writing on how to ensure residents who are unable to leave the facility unassisted are being monitored and are being provided adequate supervision to ensure safety. Licensee to submit by POC due date.

Mar 17, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 3/17/2026, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra arrived at the facility to conduct the Annual 1-year required inspection. LPA toured the physical plant. This is a 3-story building with 9 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, a kitchen, living room, dining room, office and backyard. All bedrooms had the required furniture and sufficient lighting. No accessible bodies of water or hazards were observed. The facility was maintained at a comfortable temperature. The facility's fire alarms and carbon monoxide detectors were observed to be in working order. The facility's fire extinguishers were last checked on April 9th, 2025 and were observed to be fully charged. The facility had the required 7 days of non perishables and 2 days of perishables on site. No food was expired. The facility's first aid kit was observed to have all the required items. All sharp objects, soap, detergents, and poisons were observed to be locked and in-accessible to persons in care. LPA reviewed 6 staff records and 5 resident records. All were observed to be complete. A review of Centrally Stored Medications indicated that medications for residents were properly labeled with instructions on dosage and times of day and matched the Centrally Stored Medication Records(CSMR) kept at the facility. During the tour of the physical plant, LPA Calandra observed that R1 and R2 had full bed rails. A type A citation was provided for this deficiency. Deficiencies are cited under the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Failure to correct said deficiencies by the POC due date may result in civil penalties. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of the report along with Appeal Rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 17, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Mar 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 3/6/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola conducted an unannounced Annual Required – 1 yr. inspection for this facility and was greeted by Lea Pantango and Caregiver Julio Yap. The facility currently provides care for 9 residents some of which with a diagnosis of dementia. LPA continued with a tour of the facility with staff, facility found to be clean and at a comfortable temperature with all exits free from obstruction. Resident’s bedrooms, common areas, kitchen & food storage areas were inspected. Fire Extinguishers located throughout the facility were found to be charged. Smoke detectors were present in each common room and resident bedroom. Carbon monoxide detector located in hallways were tested an in working order. Emergency disaster plan is reviewed and completed. There was a sufficient supply of both perishable and nonperishable foods as required by Title 22 Regulations, with food stored in the kitchen refrigerator found to have appropriate coverings, enough for residents in care. There was a supply of hygiene products and paper products available for residents. Resident's bedroom have lighting & appropriate furnishings and bedding items. Restrooms for resident use were equipped with non-slip mats, grab bars and kept in good condition. During inspection, LPA observed container of powder bleach in resident restroom not kept in secured storage. Staff immediately removed the cleaning supply and stored properly. There is a large outdoor patio equipped with appropriate shading for resident use. Medications are stored in the kitchen and found to be secured. Upon spot review of medications, LPA found that the facility has centrally store medication records updated and in order. LPA conducted a sample file review for residents and found 3 resident appraisals not signed or completed. Upon a sample review of staff files LPA found that all caregiver staff have current 1st aid and CPR certification, annual training, health screening reports on file. LPA requested the following documents be sent to CCL by COB 3/20/2024: LIC 308 Designated Facility Responsibility LIC 500 Personnel Summary LIC 610 Emergency Disaster Plan Deficiency cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation. Appeal rights given. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 6, 2025
20245 state visits · 7 documents
Jul 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Staff are not providing medications as prescribed to resident(s) in care

Based on observations by medical professional and review of medication records, this allegation is substantiated. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Client #1 was prescribed Cephalexin on 8/8/23 but facility failed to obtain the antibiotic medication because the client did not pick it up. Staff did not make arrangements to pick up or have antibiotic delivered until 7 days later. In addition, Olodaterol/tiotropium inhaler was not refilled, as staff was observed giving client the inhalation device without the medication cartridge installed. Deficiency of the California Code of REgulations, Title 22 is cited on a following page. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 25, 2024 · control 14-AS-20230817153442

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 26, 2024

INCIDENTAL MEDICAL CARE The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement was not met, as staff failed to obtain antibiotic prescribed to client #1 on 8/8/23 in a timely manner. Licensee failed to ensure that client received Rx medication when prescribed, which posed an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 25, 2024

Plan of correction: Plan/proof of correction to address timely administration of prescribed medications will be submitted to CCLD BY DUE DATE

Jul 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Facility grounds are unkept and full of debris - Staff does not ensure that resident's room is ventilated

Based on observations made on 10/2/23 during initial complaint visit, this allegation is substantiated. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met. In backyard, a mattress covered with a ripped mattress cover was observed on top of a patio table and chairs, a plush blanket was draped over a hedge, two wheelchairs were stored under stairs, and numerous empty cardboard boxes were scattered. In addition, boxes, filled plastic bags, tables and overgrowth of plants obstructed the ground level passageway leading from street to backyard. See Facility Evaluation Report of 10/2/23 for Type B deficiency cited. Front room on ground floor was created by construction of wall in bedroom. Wall has since been removed after citation issued on 10/2/23; see Facility Evaluation Report. The small front room formed by the wall had no window. Deficiency of the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 is cited on a following page. Substantiated Based on staffing schedules observed when complaint investigation was initiated, it could not be determined that night staff was sufficient. However, LPA observed documentation of hoyer lift training for 4 staff. Pertaining to client's privacy, it was acknowledged by client during interview that bedroom door is often left open. He stated that this was not a concern. During previous complaint visit, bed linens were observed draped on foliage in backyard to be aired out. Staff were advised that this practice is not appropriate. According to staff, laundry is done daily and clothes washer and dryer are operable.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 25, 2024 · control 14-AS-20230922090634

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 8, 2024

MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement was not met, as licensee failed to ensure that backyard and access to backyard are free of debris. This posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 25, 2024

Plan of correction: Administrator to submit plan of correction BY DUE DATE to ensure that grounds are at all times free of debris and accessible to residents, staff and visitors

Jul 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

During complaint investigation--which included review of medication administration procedures and staff training--deficiencies of the following California Code of Regulations, Title 22/Health and Safety Code are observed. Citations appear on a following page. Civil penalty of $100 is issued for violation of Criminal Record Clearance. Per Health and Safety Code 1569.69, in facilities licensed to provide care for 15 or fewer persons, the employee shall complete 10 hours of initial training. This training shall consist of 6 hours of hands-on shadowing training, which shall be completed prior to assisting with the self-administration of medications, and 4 hours of other training or instruction, as described in subdivision (f), which shall be completed within the first two weeks of employment. Each employee who received training and passed the examination required in paragraph (5) of subdivision (a), and who continues to assist with the self-administration of medicines, shall also complete 8 hours of in-service training on medication-related issues in each succeeding 12-month period. Citation appears on a following page.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 25, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355 · Plan of correction due date: Jul 26, 2024

CRIMINAL RECORD CLEARANCE All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility obtain a CA clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by the Department. This requirement is not met, as staff RC is working with clientsfor over 30 days and does not yet have criminal record clearance. He was fingerprinted but not yet clieared. Licensee failed to ensure that staff working with clients have criminal record clearance, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 25, 2024

Plan of correction: Staff RC must obtain Criminal Record Clearance to continue to have client contact. Plan/proof of correction to be submitted to CCLD BY DUE DATE.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.69 · Plan of correction due date: Aug 8, 2024

HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE Each RCFE... shall ensure that each employee of the facility who assists residents with the self-administration of medications meets all of the... training requirements listed on page one of this report. This requirement was not met, as staff who handle medications--including giving pre-poured medications to clients--have not received required medications training. Licensee failed to ensure that required medications training is given to staff who handle clients' medications, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 25, 2024

Plan of correction: Proof of required medications training for staff SA and JQ will be sent to CCLD BY DUE DATE

Jul 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Resident's call button is not answered in a timely manner by facility staff - Client file is not maintained - Client did not receive medications as prescribed

Based on LPA Jeung's observations on 9/13/23--as well as information from witnesses--these allegations are substantiated. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met. During facility inspection on 9/13/23, emergency call system was not installed in 3 out of 5 client rooms on ground level. This included the room where former client #1 was residing in room #7. On 9/1/23, client #1 was alleged to have fallen at 2am and called out for staff assistance, as there was no emergency call button. Client waited for over an hour until male staff responded and helped client to get up from the floor. ****Type A Deficiency citation was issued on 9/13/23. See Facility Evaluation Report***** As noted on Facility Evaluation Report on 9/13/23, there is no client file maintained for client #2, who shares second floor room #3 with client #1. Client #2 was admitted on 9/1/23. Continued on next page. Substantiated Continuation: Client #1 was admitted on 8/31/23 after 5pm, but it cannot be confirmed that medications were brought to facility upon admission. On 9/13/23, LPA observed Rx medications for 18 days (almost 3 weeks) in bubblepacks. Of the 18 days of Rx medications observed in bubblepacks, it appears that client was given medications for 6 out of the 12 full days that client has been a resident. Client #1 reports that she was not given medications for the first 3 days; on the 4th day, staff gave her medications. It is observed that daily doses of pills are contained in bubblepacks printed with dates and times; however, some medications for future dates are missing, so staff are not giving medications on the dates indicated on bubblepacks. Deficiencies of the California Code of REgulations, Title 22 are cited on a following page. It cannot be determined if the hygiene needs of client #3 were met by staff. LPA observed client during initial complaint visit on 9/13/23 and did not detect that staff neglected her hygiene needs. Client was discharged in November 2023.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2024 · control 14-AS-20230908153602

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 26, 2024

87465(a)(4) INCIDENTAL MEDICAL CARE The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement was not met, as client #1 was not provided with Rx medications for first 3 days of admission on 8/31/23. Licensee failed to ensure that clients are given medications as prescribed by MD, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2024

Plan of correction: Plan of correction to be submitted to CCLD BY DUE DATE

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87506(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 26, 2024

87506(a) RESIDENT RECORDS The licensee shall ensure that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for each resident in the facility or in a central administrative location readily available to facility staff and to licensing agency staff. This requirement was not met, as facility had not maintained a file for client #2 during initial complaint visit on 9/13/23. Licensee failed to maintain a current record for client #2, who was admitted on 9/1/23, This posed an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to client in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2024

Plan of correction: Plan of correction shall be sent to CCLD BY DUE DATE, and shall include how this will be avoided in future.

May 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: POC

On May 10, 2024, at 12:32 PM, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra arrived at the facility to conduct the plan of correction visit. LPA Calandra was greeted by Julio Yapp, Caretaker. LPA Calandra called Administrators, Charlene Pamintuan and Juliet Pacado, but neither were available to join the visit. LPA Calandra toured the physical plant (speficially the backyard) and verified that the plans of correction had been completed. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. The Plan of Correction letter was delivered to Julio Yapp, Caretaker. This report was reviewed with Julio Yapp, Caretaker and a copy of the report left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 10, 2024
Apr 2, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

On April 2, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra arrived at the facility at 4:32 PM, to complete the Annual Inspection. LPA Calandra was greeted by Julio Yapp, Caregiver and explained the purpose of his visit. Charlene Pamintuan and Laymer Pamintuan, Administrators arrived later during the visit. LPA Calandra toured the physical plant and observed that the backyard fence was in severe disrepair and leaning in towards the facility. LPA Calandra also observed wooden boards in the outside passageway obstructing the facility's emergency exit. LPA interviewed 3 residents and 3 staff. Type B citations were provided for the backyard fence and wooden boards. Deficiencies are cited under the California Code of Regulations. Failure to correct said deficiencies may result in additional civil penalties. This report was reviewed with Charlene Pamintuan, Administrator and a copy of the report along with appeal rights was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 2, 2024
Mar 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On March 21, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra arrived at the facility at 8:45 AM to conduct the Annual 1-year required inspection. LPA Calandra was greeted by Julio Yap, Caretaker and explained the purpose of his visit. Laymer Pamintuan, Administrator and Charlene Pamintuan, Administrator, and Juliet Pacaldo, Licensee/Administrator joined the visit later. LPA Calandra toured the physical plant. This is a 2 story building which consists of 7 bedrooms and 3 bathrooms, a kitchen, living room, dining room, office, laundry room, backyard, and front entry area. The fire extinguishers were observed to be fully charged and last checked on September 7, 2023. No accessible bodies of water or hazards were observed in the backyard or hallways. The facility was maintained at a comfortable temperature of 72 degrees Fahrenheit. Fire Alarms and Carbon Monoxide detectors were observed to be fully functional. Water temperature was measured above the required 125 degrees Fahrenheit. In the presence of the LPA, Laymer turned down the temperature of the water. LPA Calandra reviewed 5 resident files. All were observed to be complete. LPA Calandra also reviewed 5 staff files. A review of Centrally stored medications indicated that medications for residents were properly labeled with instructions on dosage and times of day and matched the Centrally Stored Medication records(CSMR) kept at the facility. The Annual Inspection will be completed at a later date. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. This report was reviewed with Administrator, Charlene Pamintuan and a copy of the report left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 2, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

LPAs Calandra and Jeung observed deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, which are cited on a following page.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2023

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87203 · Plan of correction due date: Oct 3, 2023

FIRE SAFETY All facilities shall be maintained in conformity with the regulations adopted by the State Fire Marshal for the protection of life and property against fire and panic. This requirement is not met, as a wall is erected between first 2 rooms. Fire clearance was approved for one large room. There is a window in one of the rooms, but not the room closest to the street. Licensee failed to ensure conformity with fire clearance, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2023

Plan of correction: Wall separating first 2 front rooms on ground level will be eliminated. Proof of correction to be sent to CCLD BY DUE DATE.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87307(d)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 3, 2023

PERSONAL ACCOMMODATIONS/SVCS All outdoor and indoor passageways and stairways shall be kept free of obstruction. In the ground level passageway leading from street to backyard, there are boxes, filled plastic bags and tables obstructing free and clear exiting. In addition, overgrowth of plants limits the width of passageway to backyard. Licensee failed to ensure that passageway is free of obstruction, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2023

Plan of correction: Ground level passageway shall be free of obstructions and access to backyard shall be available to wheelchairs. Proof of correction to be sent to CCLD BY DUE DATE.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

  • Rooms come furnished

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Outdoor spaceGarden · Walking paths

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Telephone in the room

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Common areasDining room

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • LaundryDone by staff

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Visitor parking

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • AmenitiesMove-in coordination

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Housekeeping

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

Meals, preferences & familiar food

  • All-day or flexible dining

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Food allergy management

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Meal timesScheduled meals

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Meals provided

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

Activities & the rhythm of a day

  • Activity types offeredMovie nights

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

Faith, culture & language

  • Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish · Tagalog

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved

  • Transportation

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Francisco County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Francisco County