Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Greenridge Senior Living
Mid-size home·Licensed for 38·Richmond, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$5,050 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,650
- Home sizeLicensed for 38Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit21 of 38 beds occupiedNovember 18, 2025 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitJuly 14, 2026CDSS inspection record
Greenridge Senior Living is a mid-size care home in Richmond — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 38 residents since 2022. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.
Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Greenridge Senior Living
Is Greenridge Senior Living licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
How many residents is Greenridge Senior Living licensed for?
38 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Has Greenridge Senior Living been cited?
0 Type A and 3 Type B citations since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 12 state visits over the same years.
Is Greenridge Senior Living still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Greenridge Senior Living cost?
$5,050 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,000–$6,650. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 33 other homes of a similar licensed size across Contra Costa County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $5,825 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 33 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Greenridge Senior Living take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Arpd, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Richmond Campus is 3.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Greenridge Senior Living keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 10 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Greenridge Senior Living license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “GREENRIDGE SENIOR LIVING”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #79201152. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed for 38 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed to Arpd, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- First licensed in 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 12 state inspection visits since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 3 Type B citations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 12 state visits in that period.
- 4 complaints and 3 substantiated allegations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is July 14, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 9 residents
- Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 10 residents
- BedriddenNot on file · ask the home
State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR CAPACITY OF 38 RESIDENTS OF WHICH 29 ARE AMBULATORY AND 9 NON-AMBULATORY; HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 10 HOSPICE RESIDENTS.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 10 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
4 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation not on file
Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$5,050a month to start
Likely $4,000–$6,650
From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$5,050a month
Likely $4,000–$6,800
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$5,050likely $4,000–$6,650
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,000–$6,800
- $5,050
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,750–$9,700
- $7,050
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
24 homes like this within 15 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$7,000.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Tara Hills Care HomePinole · 2.7 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Lafayette GardensLafayette · 11 mi · Small home$5,600Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Caring Angels Care HomeLafayette · 11 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Lakeshore Residential CareOakland · 11 mi · Mid-size home$3,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Maureen HousePleasant Hill · 12 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Dimond CareOakland · 12 mi · Mid-size home$6,000Listed on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026
- Haven House of San RafaelSan Rafael · 13 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Daniel Rest HomeSan Rafael · 13 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- J & C Care CenterOakland · 13 mi · Mid-size home$4,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Elisabeth Care HomePleasant Hill · 13 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Ramona Care HomePleasant Hill · 13 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Blue Horizon LivingConcord · 14 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- A Ohana Home for SeniorsConcord · 14 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Aspen Senior LivingConcord · 14 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Bermuda Residential Care HomeConcord · 14 mi · Small home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Marin TerraceMill Valley · 14 mi · Mid-size home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Heatherwood Memory CareWalnut Creek · 14 mi · Mid-size home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Kimochi HomeSan Francisco · 14 mi · Mid-size home$4,335Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Villa Marin Ambulatory Care UnitSan Rafael · 14 mi · Mid-size home$15,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Golden Home Extended CareSan Rafael · 14 mi · Mid-size home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Better Living of Walnut CreekWalnut Creek · 14 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Welcome Home Senior Residence (Walnut Creek)Walnut Creek · 14 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Bello Gardens Assisted LivingSan Anselmo · 14 mi · Mid-size home$4,800Listed on Seniorly · memory care private room · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
- Aaron's Advance Care HomeWalnut Creek · 14 mi · Small home$3,395Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 2150 Pyramid Drive, Richmond, CA 94803Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2022, the state has filed 11 documents for this home, and its records count 12 visits since 2022. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 14, 2026.
- On file since
- 2022
- State visits
- 12
- Most recent visit
- July 14, 2026
- Occupied · November 18, 2025 visit
- 21 of 38 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated July 20, 2023 to November 18, 2025. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations3typical 1
- Substantiated allegations3typical 2
- Total complaints4typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2022.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 6 of 11 documents
Jul 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 07/14/2026 at 9:30 am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Y. Brown conducted an unannounced annual 1-year required inspection. LPA met with facility manager Tamika Hill and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility’s fire clearance was approved for thirty-eight (38) residents, nine (9) may be non-ambulatory. LPA toured the facility including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common area and outdoor area. All indoor passageways are kept free of obstruction. There are no bodies of water observed. A comfortable temperature for residents is maintained at 74 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Hot water temperature in the residents shared bathroom was measured at 120.0 degrees Fahrenheit. All toilets, hand washing, and bathing are safe, sanitary and in operating condition. The supply of extra hygiene was available for residents. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide combination were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 7/13/2026. LPA reviewed four (4) staff and five (5) resident records. Emergency disaster plan was last reviewed on 6/2026. Emergency fire drills were last conducted on 7/2/2026. LPA reviewed a sample of medication. Continued on LIC809C. Continued from LIC809. Updated copies of the following documents were requested for facility file and are to be submitted to CCL by 07/21/2026: LIC610D: Emergency disaster plan LIC500: Personnel Record The following deficiencies were observed: At 11:15 am, LPA observed missing 20 hr training from four (4) staff members. At 11:30 am, LPA observed missing first aid certificates from four (4) staff members. Deficiencies are cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC809D. Failure to submit proof of corrections (POC) by plan of correction due date and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted with Tamika. A copy of the appeal rights and this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 14, 2026
Nov 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Unlawful eviction
On 11/18/2025 at 10:50AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carol Fowler arrived unannounced to deliver findings in regards to the allegation above. LPA met with Manager, Tamika Hill and informed her the reason for the visit. During the course of investigation, LPA C. Fowler interviewed staff, R1, and Witness 1. LPA reviewed and obtained admission agreement, physician's report, care plan, emergency information, eviction notice, eviction letter, care plan, progress notes, and copy of first payment from RP. (Continue on LIC9099...) Unsubstantiated (continue from LIC9099) After reviewing eviction notice, the 30-day notice does meet requirements in regulation 87224. Facility filed an eviction letter and notice to the RP, which was delivered to RP home by Greenridge staff, Manager, Tamika Hill and Business Office Manager, Carry Townson. R1 is being evicted due to non-payment of the rate for basic services and the inability of the facility to meet the resident's needs due to diagnosis. Interview with S1 revealed that R1's RP has not issued payment for rent. S1 stated that S1 is not aware of the last payment made by RP. The facility has attempted to contact the RP multiple times, but calls were not answered. Voicemail's were left with no return calls to the facility. S1 also stated that R1 is in need of a higher level of care. Additionally R1 has not received any medication for approximately two months and is exhibiting behaviors such as elopement and combativeness due to R1's diagnosis. Interview with W1 revealed that W1 called RP and left a voicemail. The RP returned the call but W1 was not able to answer. W1 attempted to call back several times but has not received a return call. W1 also confirmed that R1 has not received any medication for approximately two months and is exhibiting behavioral concerns. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 18, 2025 · control 15-AS-20251113115058
Aug 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not comply with reporting requirements. Licensee did not ensure medications were administered by an appropriately skilled professional. Staff did not maintain accurate records for residents.
On 08/14/25 around 09:00 AM L. Holmes, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), arrived unannounced to deliver the complaint findings for the investigation. LPA met with Tamika Hill, Manager and explained the purpose for the visit; Patrick Blanc, Administrator, was in a meeting and not available during the visit. LPA toured the facility, requested and reviewed the following, but not limited to staff roster with scheduled hours & contact information (LIC 500), staff training records, resident roster, resident records including but not limited to Residents' (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7): LIC602, ID/Emergency Contact information, Progress/Hospice/Home Health Notes (March - April 2025), Centrally Stored Medications/Destruction Records, Medication Administration Records, and Physician's Orders, Death Report for R7. LPA conducted resident, and staff interviews. Administrator Personnel records and remaining documents to be provided to CCLD by 04/09/25. Substantiated ...continued from LIC9099 Allegations: SUBSTANTIATED Staff did not comply with reporting requirements. On 04/02/25 and 08/06/25, LPA requested the Death Report for R7 from S1 and S2. S2 is new to the position and stated he/she would have to research the details. On 03/27/25, LPA advised S1, S2 and S3 of Title 22 reporting requirements. On 08/06/27, S2 confirmed that additional Hospice and Death Reports had not been reported for R3, R4, R5 and R7. Staff did not maintain accurate records for residents. On 04/02/25 and 08/06/25, LPA requested the Death Report for R7 from S1 and S2. S2 is new to the position and stated he/she would have to research the details. The additional Hospice and Death Reports for R3, R4, R5 and R7 were not available or in the files. On 08/06/25, LPA provided S2 with the Unusual Incident Report (LC624) and Death Report (LIC624A) forms to assist with maintaining accurate records for residents’ incidents, hospice, and deaths. On 08/08/25 LPA received R4’s LIC602 that was incorrect with the sex of the resident and not signed by a physician. Licensee did not ensure medications were administered by an appropriately skilled professional. On 04/02/25, 04/21/25, 08/06/25 and 08/07/25, LPA requested the LIC602 and staff training records for those that assisted R1 to confirm and determine R1’s primary condition and medication management requirements. Records dated 04/22/25 revealed that R1’s medication order list for an Insulin Pen-Injector was ordered 02/05/25 and administered by four different staff members throughout April. S2 stated that S3, who’s a registered nurse, normally administers insulin. Due to lack of information (LIC 602 and training records) from S1, LPA was unable to confirm that any of the staff were professionally trained to administer injections. Based on LPA’s interviews and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies are cited from Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC9099D. Failure to submit proof of corrections by plan of correction due date, and any repeat violations within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted, appeal rights and a copy of this report provided to Tamika Hill, Manager. ...continued from LIC9099 UNSUBSTANTIATED Licensee did not provide planned activities for residents. On 04/02/25, LPA arrived unannounced and upon arrival LPA observed three (3) – four (4) residents engaged in morning exercises and during departure the residents were present for Music and Memory activities. S2 provided LPA with an activities calendar for April with 1-5 various activities each day of the month. In addition to being the facility’s Manager, S2 was also an activities director and still oversees what is scheduled on the monthly calendar. Staff spoke to residents in an inappropriate manner. R4 was in his/her room and did not respond when asked about the treatment at the facility and if he/she felt everything was okay. R7 is deceased. R5 and R6 have some physical limitations, both have home health aide assistance, are neither stated that the were spoken to inappropriately or heard staff speak to other residents in an inappropriate manner. LPA confirmed that Home Health Aides who are mandated reporters (W1, W2 & W3) never heard or witnessed staff speaking to residents in an inappropriate manner. Licensee retained resident(s) requiring a higher level of care. LPA reviewed Resident (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6) records. On 03/26/25 and 03/28/25, R2’s care notes recorded a swallow assessment and dysphasia management. On 03/12/25, R4’s progress notes states there was wound care (not staged), good and no concerns; on 03/14/25 R4 denied pain and discomfort. On 04/14/25 Hydrofera Blue dressings applied to R6’s leg wound (not staged), and on 04/11/25 the wound was healing without infections. The records reviewed did not reveal that R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, and R6 required a higher level of care. Based on LPA’s interviews, observations, and records reviewed, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. The finding that the complaint is unsubstantiated means that the allegations are not valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has not been met. Exit interview conducted, and a copy of this report provided to Tamika Hill, Manager.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 14, 2025 · control 15-AS-20250327095632
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 87211(a) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 21, 2025
Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require...(1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days...resident's name, age,... sex and date of admission; date and nature of event; attending physician's name, findings, and treatment, if any; and disposition of the case. -This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Licensee/ADM did not provide the required written reports for residents to CCLD.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 14, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee/ADM to review regulations by POC, provide in-service training for care staff and ensure that all required written reports are provided to CCLD.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 87629(b)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 21, 2025
87629 Injections (b) In addition to Section 87611, General Requirements for Allowable Health Conditions... residents who require injections shall be responsible for the following: (1) Ensuring that injections are administered by an appropriately skilled professional should the resident require assistance.-This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Licensee/ADM did not ensure that injections were administered by an appropriately skilled professionals.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 14, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee/ADM to review regulations, provide in-service training, and update staff’s training records by POC.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 87506(a) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 21, 2025
87506 Resident Records (a) The licensee shall ensure that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for each resident in the facility or in a central administrative location readily available to facility staff and to licensing agency staff. -This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Licensee/ADM did not ensure that all resident records were maintained.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 14, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee/ADM to review regulations by POC, provide in-service training for care staff and ensure that all resident records are maintained to CCLD.
Jul 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 07/22/2025 around 10:00 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Greg Clark and Andrew Christy arrived unannounced for a required Annual Inspection. LPAs met with Patrick Blanc, Administrator, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPAs toured the facility, including but not limited to, the facility's common areas, bathroom, kitchen, dining room, front area and courtyard. All outdoor and indoor passageways were free of obstruction. No bodies of water were present. A comfortable temperature was maintained at 71 degrees Fahrenheit. LPAs observed lighting in all areas to be adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. The hot water temperature was measured at 119.7 degrees Fahrenheit. All shared restrooms, hand washing, and bathing areas were safe, sanitary and in operating condition. There was a sufficient supply of 2-day perishables and 7-day supply of non-perishable foods. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was observed full and serviced 01/15/2025. Safety drills were last conducted 05/09/2025. LPAs reviewed three (5) staff records and five (5) residents records were reviewed and are complete. Updated copies of the following documents were requested for facility file and are to be submitted to CCL by 8/01/25: LIC 610E Emergency Disaster Plan (9 page version) No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided to RCFE Manager.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 22, 2025
The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Oct 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Due to a lack of supervision, residents with dementia and at risk of falling wander around Staff did not provide comfortable accommodations for residents Staff did not provide a safe and comfortable environment for residents
This report was amended on 10/28/2024 to make report public. On 10/24/2024 at 9:30am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), L. Hall arrived unannounced to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. LPA met with Patrick Blanc, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation the LPA interviewed staff, three (3) residents, obtained and reviewed staff and resident roster. Allegation: Due to a lack of supervision, residents with dementia and at risk of falling wander around. During the investigation visit LPA observed four (4) staff between the 1st and 2nd Continued on LIC9099. Unsubstantiated Continued LIC9099C. floor. During 2nd floor tour LPA observed a camera at the end of the hallway that was placed in the upper corner across from the stairwell that leads to the 1st floor. At the bottom of the stairwell there is a door that leads to the outside of the facility; however, the door that leads outside has an alarm. LPA also observed that both windows on the 2nd floor had screens that was not in disrepair. S3 stated the offices that are located on the 2nd floor also has staff but there was meeting today that staff had to attend. During record review LPA observed only one (1) resident had the diagnosis of dementia. Based on the investigation the above allegations are unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff did not provide comfortable accommodations for residents. Upon arrival LPA observed the residents were having lunch in the dining room. The temperature was at 75 degrees inside the facility. LPA also observed a couple of the residents sitting outside the facility with family. The housekeeper was on the 2nd floor cleaning the rooms. LPA interviewed three (3) residents and all residents stated they are very comfortable. The staff stated if residents need anything they let them know and the family will speak to the staff if necessary. Allegation: Staff did not provide a safe and comfortable environment for residents. Based on interviews with staff and residents. All feel the facility is a safe place to live. The residents interviewed stated the staff treats them nice. R1 stated this is the second time around and if it wasn't safe she would not have returned. Continued on LIC9099C. Continued from LIC9099C. Based on observation during tour LPA observed bells sitting on the night stands of residents to ring for assistance. LPA also observed a long string located at the side of the residents’ bed that can be pulled and the string then notifies staff that help is needed. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 24, 2024 · control 15-AS-20240807135801
Jul 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 07/08/24 around 12:30 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Holmes arrived unannounced for a required Annual Inspection. LPA met with Patrick Blanc, Administrator (ADM) and explained the purpose of the visit. ADM currently holds a standard certificate (#6065998740) that expires on 06/26/25. The facility’s fire clearance was approved for thirty-eight (38), nine (9) non-ambulatory residents; tens (10) may be hospice. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted by ADM. LPA observed several groups of residents dining. LPA and ADM toured the facility, including but not limited to the facility's common areas, bathroom, kitchen, dining room, front area and courtyard(s). All outdoor and indoor passageways were free of obstruction. No bodies of water were present. A comfortable temperature was maintained at 71 degrees Fahrenheit (F). LPA observed lighting in all areas to be adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. The hot water temperature was measured at 115.5 degrees (F). All shared restrooms, hand washing, and bathing areas were safe, sanitary and in operating condition. Hand washing signs, paper towels, and soap observed at all hand washing stations. Linen and hygiene products were available for all residents. PPE, sanitizer, and paper goods remain sufficient. ...continued on LIC809C. ...continued from LIC809 There was a sufficient supply of 2-day perishables and 7-day supply of non-perishable foods. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was observed full and serviced 03/13/24. Emergency Disaster Plan is updated. Safety drills are conducted every month and are rotational between AM and PM schedules. LPA reviewed three (3) staff records and five (5) residents records were reviewed and are complete. The following forms are to be updated and submitted to CCLD: -LIC500 Personnel Report (Reviewed) -LIC308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility -LIC610E Emergency Disaster Plan (Reviewed) -An updated copy of Administrator Certificate(s) (Reviewed) No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided to ADM.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 8, 2024
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Contra Costa County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Hailey's Care Home
El Sobrante · Small home · 0.5 mi away
$4,650 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Carter Place
El Sobrante · Small home · 0.8 mi away
$5,050 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Valley View Care Home II
Richmond · Small home · 0.9 mi away
$4,350 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Hm Love & Care Home
El Sobrante · Small home · 0.9 mi away
$4,400 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Bina's Adult Care
El Sobrante · Small home · 1.2 mi away
$5,550 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Supra Homes
San Pablo · Small home · 1.2 mi away
$5,450 a month to start · Covelight estimate