Summerfield Senior Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Yuba City, Sutter County, California — state license #515002613, licensed for 99 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 11 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated June 2, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

4 homes in view

Summerfield Senior Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 99 residents · Yuba City, CA · Sutter County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #515002613, held since 2017 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1224 Plumas Street · Yuba City, Sutter County
Phone
(530) 755-3850
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 99 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 10 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 99 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10. APPROVED FOR SECURED PERIMETER.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 11 times and filed 11 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 2, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 2, 2026
Occupancy at the October 15, 2025 visit
69 of 99 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 3 documents with transcribed findings, dated May 30, 2024 to October 15, 2025. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 3 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 9 of 11 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jun 2, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20254 state visits · 4 documents
Oct 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff do not have appropriate emergency response training.

Licensing Program Analyst Hiratsuka, conducted this unannounced complaint visit to deliver the results of the allegation above. LPA interved staff. All interviews state the caregivers and other staff are to get a med tech to assess the residents in an emergency and then one will call 911, get any paperwork to send with the resident, and the caregiver or facility staff who found the resident will stay with the resident until emergency services arrive. If there is an immediate danger any staff person who finds a resident will call 911 directly and then call for a med tech if the staff person has a phone readily available. Based on information above, the department concluded that the allegations are Unfounded. A finding that an allegation is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. nothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 15, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250815134452
Oct 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained multiple injuries while in care due to falls Staff did not properly address resident's multiple falls at facility Staff left resident soiled in urine for a period of time

LPA Hiratsuka conducted the investigation into the allegations above. LPA Hiratsuka conducted interviews and reviewed resident file. Title 22 regulations do not require staff to physically be with residents 24 hours a day. The regulations requires care plans that indicate how much supervision that should be updated on a regular basis. There were two occasions the resident was found with a wound on their head: one occasion the resident was found standing and the second the resident was found walking around. There was a third incident the resident was found next to the bed and this was during normal sleeping hours. Staff interviews stated they check on all residents are in a regular basis. Care plan stated the resident was on frequent checks. LPA cannot determine how the injuries occurred. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 1, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250212101448
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent resident from inappropriately touching another resident.

LPA Hiratsuka conducted this unannounced complaint visit. LPA interviewed staff and the resident in question. Interviews indicate the resident who did the inappropriate touch had no previous incidents prior and has not since. The resident's doctor and responsible party were notified and there has been adjustments made to the resident. The resident who was touched stated staff would not have been able to prevent it and feels satisfied with how the facility staff has handled the incident. The resident who was touched stated they stay clear of the other one and feels safe at this facility. Even though the incident occurred, the interviews indicate staff were not at fault. The facility staff followed facility protocol for protecting the resident and reporting requirements. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 30, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240529130731
May 1, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Sep 20, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints0typical 2
Total complaints3typical 7
State visits on file11typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2017.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025440202433020232202022110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$4,000$8,000 /mo
our estimate — broad statewide California range, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (530) 755-3850

Is Summerfield Senior Living licensed?

Yes — Summerfield Senior Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Yuba City (Sutter County): California license #515002613, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 99 residents. State records list 11 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 2, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Summerfield Senior Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Summerfield Senior Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 99 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10. APPROVED FOR SECURED PERIMETER.

How much does Summerfield Senior Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Summerfield Senior Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sutter County typically runs $4,000–$8,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$7,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Summerfield Senior Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Summerfield Senior Living is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

69 of 99 beds occupied (70%) when the state visited on October 15, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Summerfield Senior Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 11 state visits and 11 dated documents since 2022 for Summerfield Senior Living; 3 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 15, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unfounded. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

3 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not have appropriate emergency response training.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst Hiratsuka, conducted this unannounced complaint visit to deliver the results of the allegation above. LPA interved staff. All interviews state the caregivers and other staff are to get a med tech to assess the residents in an emergency and then one will call 911, get any paperwork to send with the resident, and the caregiver or facility staff who found the resident will stay with the resident until emergency services arrive. If there is an immediate danger any staff person who finds a resident will call 911 directly and then call for a med tech if the staff person has a phone readily available. Based on information above, the department concluded that the allegations are Unfounded. A finding that an allegation is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. noCDSS inspection report, October 15, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250815134452
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained multiple injuries while in care due to falls Staff did not properly address resident's multiple falls at facility Staff left resident soiled in urine for a period of time
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
LPA Hiratsuka conducted the investigation into the allegations above. LPA Hiratsuka conducted interviews and reviewed resident file. Title 22 regulations do not require staff to physically be with residents 24 hours a day. The regulations requires care plans that indicate how much supervision that should be updated on a regular basis. There were two occasions the resident was found with a wound on their head: one occasion the resident was found standing and the second the resident was found walking around. There was a third incident the resident was found next to the bed and this was during normal sleeping hours. Staff interviews stated they check on all residents are in a regular basis. Care plan stated the resident was on frequent checks. LPA cannot determine how the injuries occurred. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 1, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250212101448

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent resident from inappropriately touching another resident.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
LPA Hiratsuka conducted this unannounced complaint visit. LPA interviewed staff and the resident in question. Interviews indicate the resident who did the inappropriate touch had no previous incidents prior and has not since. The resident's doctor and responsible party were notified and there has been adjustments made to the resident. The resident who was touched stated staff would not have been able to prevent it and feels satisfied with how the facility staff has handled the incident. The resident who was touched stated they stay clear of the other one and feels safe at this facility. Even though the incident occurred, the interviews indicate staff were not at fault. The facility staff followed facility protocol for protecting the resident and reporting requirements. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, May 30, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240529130731

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 11 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
0
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
3
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
11
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(530) 755-3850
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Summerfield Senior Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.