Ivy Park At Sabre Springs is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego, San Diego County, California — state license #374604747, licensed for 100 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 14 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2024, the most recent dated May 31, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Ivy Park At Sabre Springs

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 100 residents · San Diego, CA · San Diego County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374604747, held since 2024 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
12515 Springhurst Drive · San Diego, San Diego County
Phone
(858) 391-9160
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 100 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careApproved for 8 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 100 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 8 MAY BE BEDRIDDENALL FLOORS APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN. 3RD AND 4TH FLOOR APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 20.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2024, the state has visited this home 17 times and filed 14 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on May 31, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
May 31, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
100 of 100 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 7 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 27, 2025 to May 31, 2026. 7 of the 7 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (5). 7 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 7 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 14 of 14 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20264 state visits · 4 documents
May 31, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not assess residents according to their level of care. Licensee did not ensure resident records were complete and current.

The following determination of findings have been made by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson regarding the above allegations. This report was mailed to the Licensee. On 03/11/2025 it was alleged that Licensee did not assess residents according to their level of care, and Licensee did not ensure resident records were complete and current. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, resident, outside sources, and records review. Staff interviews were consistent regarding the facility's assessment procedures for residents. Staff informed that the only resident with an assessment adjustment during the timeframe of complaint was Resident 1 (R1). The assessment procedures outlined by staff were consistent with R1's onboarding and assessment documents. Staff informed that while R1 was appropriately assessed to be placed in the Assisted Living section of the facility, R1 experienced a change of condition shortly after athe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 31, 2026 · control 08-AS-20250311114348
May 26, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 24, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not allow resident to receive phone calls.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Rob Daynes. On 11/12/2026 it was alleged that Licensee did not allow Resident 1 (R1) to receive a phone call. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. Staff interviews revealed that initially, an instruction existed for staff not to inform a specific outside source that R1 lived at the facility due to safety concerns. Interviews further revealed that the facility later changed this instruction, informing staff that if the outside person called, they must inform R1 and allow them to accept or deny the phone call. Staff stated that during a recent All-Staff meeting, training was provided regarding residents' personal rights to receive or reject phone cathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 28, 2026 · control 08-AS-20251112131132
20256 state visits · 9 documents
Nov 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not treat resident(s) with dignity. Staff did not respond to residents' call buttons in a timely manner. Staff did not provide adequate supervision to residents(s).

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Rob Daynes. On 05/08/2025 it was alleged that staff did not treat resident(s) with dignity, staff did not respond to residents' call buttons in a timely manner, and staff did not provide adequate supervision to residents(s). The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and LPA direct observations. Regarding the allegation, "Staff did not treat resident(s) with dignity", it was alleged that specific staff members were observed yelling at residents and handling them roughly. (Continued on LIC9099 p.2) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 1, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250508132716
Jul 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not treat resident with dignity and respect.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Rob Daynes. On 10/14/2024 it was alleged that Staff did not treat resident with dignity and respect. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, records review, and LPA observations. Staff interviews did not corroborate the allegation, as staff consistently informed not hearing of or witnessing another staff treating a resident without dignity. Staff informed that the resident in question, R1, had become more reclusive and resistant to care due to a change in condition. An outside medical professional familiar with R1's care at the facility informed not observing any dignity issues between staff and R1. (Continued on LIC9099 p.2) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 22, 2025 · control 08-AS-20241014144500
May 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not distribute residents' medications as prescribed. Staff did not ensure that residents' medications were stored in their original container.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Rob Daynes. On 12/16/2024 it was alleged that staff did not distribute residents' medication as prescribed, and staff did not ensure that residents' medications were stored in their original container. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. Seven (7) staff were interviewed regarding medication administration, six (6) of whom were Med Techs or trained to pass medications. All staff provided consistent information regarding the process for passing medications. No staff had observed or were aware of medication errors that had occurred. (Continued on LIC9099 p.2) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 22, 2025 · control 08-AS-20241216101746
May 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility door(s) were in disrepair. Resident(s) were not afforded privacy while care was being provided.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Rob Daynes. On 12/16/2024 it was alleged that facility doors were in disrepair and residents were not afforded privacy while care was being provided. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. It was claimed that resident doors at the facility were being propped open and that doors did not close properly. Staff members interviewed consistently informed that no resident doors had been kept open by staff without the resident's consent or outside of their preference. Staff informed that two residents prefered their doors to remain open, and staff checked on them regularly. No staff had knowledge of any resident door being in disrepair. (Continued on LIC90the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 22, 2025 · control 08-AS-20241216162250
Mar 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident fall due to neglect.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Rob Daynes. On 07/02/2024 it was alleged that staff neglect led to Resident 1 (R1)'s fall, resulting in R1 lying on the floor throughout the night. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. Staff interviews did not corroborate the allegation, as staff consistently denied that Resident 1 (R1) suffered a fall that resulted in them being unattended for hours without staff help. Staff informed that R1 lived in the Assisted Living section of the building and was mostly independent, not requiring assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) or checks throughout the night. Staff interviews revealed that R1 began to experience a change in cognition duringthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2025 · control 08-AS-20240702125951
Mar 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20241 state visit · 1 document
Feb 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations4typical 1
Substantiated complaints4typical 2
Total complaints7typical 7
State visits on file17typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2024.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202644120256912024110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (858) 391-9160

Is Ivy Park At Sabre Springs licensed?

Yes — Ivy Park At Sabre Springs is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego (San Diego County): California license #374604747, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 100 residents. State records list 14 inspection and complaint documents since 2024; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 31, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Ivy Park At Sabre Springs care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Ivy Park At Sabre Springs with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 100 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 8 MAY BE BEDRIDDENALL FLOORS APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN. 3RD AND 4TH FLOOR APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 20.

How much does Ivy Park At Sabre Springs cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Ivy Park At Sabre Springs's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Ivy Park At Sabre Springs accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Ivy Park At Sabre Springs is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

100 of 100 beds occupied (100%) when the state visited on May 31, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Ivy Park At Sabre Springs?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 17 state visits and 14 dated documents since 2024 for Ivy Park At Sabre Springs; 7 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 31, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

7 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not assess residents according to their level of care. Licensee did not ensure resident records were complete and current.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
The following determination of findings have been made by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson regarding the above allegations. This report was mailed to the Licensee. On 03/11/2025 it was alleged that Licensee did not assess residents according to their level of care, and Licensee did not ensure resident records were complete and current. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, resident, outside sources, and records review. Staff interviews were consistent regarding the facility's assessment procedures for residents. Staff informed that the only resident with an assessment adjustment during the timeframe of complaint was Resident 1 (R1). The assessment procedures outlined by staff were consistent with R1's onboarding and assessment documents. Staff informed that while R1 was appropriately assessed to be placed in the Assisted Living section of the facility, R1 experienced a change of condition shortly after aCDSS inspection report, May 31, 2026 · control 08-AS-20250311114348
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not allow resident to receive phone calls.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Rob Daynes. On 11/12/2026 it was alleged that Licensee did not allow Resident 1 (R1) to receive a phone call. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. Staff interviews revealed that initially, an instruction existed for staff not to inform a specific outside source that R1 lived at the facility due to safety concerns. Interviews further revealed that the facility later changed this instruction, informing staff that if the outside person called, they must inform R1 and allow them to accept or deny the phone call. Staff stated that during a recent All-Staff meeting, training was provided regarding residents' personal rights to receive or reject phone caCDSS inspection report, January 28, 2026 · control 08-AS-20251112131132

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not treat resident(s) with dignity. Staff did not respond to residents' call buttons in a timely manner. Staff did not provide adequate supervision to residents(s).
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Rob Daynes. On 05/08/2025 it was alleged that staff did not treat resident(s) with dignity, staff did not respond to residents' call buttons in a timely manner, and staff did not provide adequate supervision to residents(s). The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and LPA direct observations. Regarding the allegation, "Staff did not treat resident(s) with dignity", it was alleged that specific staff members were observed yelling at residents and handling them roughly. (Continued on LIC9099 p.2) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 1, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250508132716
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not treat resident with dignity and respect.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Rob Daynes. On 10/14/2024 it was alleged that Staff did not treat resident with dignity and respect. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, records review, and LPA observations. Staff interviews did not corroborate the allegation, as staff consistently informed not hearing of or witnessing another staff treating a resident without dignity. Staff informed that the resident in question, R1, had become more reclusive and resistant to care due to a change in condition. An outside medical professional familiar with R1's care at the facility informed not observing any dignity issues between staff and R1. (Continued on LIC9099 p.2) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 22, 2025 · control 08-AS-20241014144500
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not distribute residents' medications as prescribed. Staff did not ensure that residents' medications were stored in their original container.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Rob Daynes. On 12/16/2024 it was alleged that staff did not distribute residents' medication as prescribed, and staff did not ensure that residents' medications were stored in their original container. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. Seven (7) staff were interviewed regarding medication administration, six (6) of whom were Med Techs or trained to pass medications. All staff provided consistent information regarding the process for passing medications. No staff had observed or were aware of medication errors that had occurred. (Continued on LIC9099 p.2) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 22, 2025 · control 08-AS-20241216101746
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility door(s) were in disrepair. Resident(s) were not afforded privacy while care was being provided.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Rob Daynes. On 12/16/2024 it was alleged that facility doors were in disrepair and residents were not afforded privacy while care was being provided. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. It was claimed that resident doors at the facility were being propped open and that doors did not close properly. Staff members interviewed consistently informed that no resident doors had been kept open by staff without the resident's consent or outside of their preference. Staff informed that two residents prefered their doors to remain open, and staff checked on them regularly. No staff had knowledge of any resident door being in disrepair. (Continued on LIC90CDSS inspection report, May 22, 2025 · control 08-AS-20241216162250
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident fall due to neglect.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Rob Daynes. On 07/02/2024 it was alleged that staff neglect led to Resident 1 (R1)'s fall, resulting in R1 lying on the floor throughout the night. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. Staff interviews did not corroborate the allegation, as staff consistently denied that Resident 1 (R1) suffered a fall that resulted in them being unattended for hours without staff help. Staff informed that R1 lived in the Assisted Living section of the building and was mostly independent, not requiring assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) or checks throughout the night. Staff interviews revealed that R1 began to experience a change in cognition duringCDSS inspection report, March 27, 2025 · control 08-AS-20240702125951

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 17 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
4
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
4
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
7
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
17
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Ivy Park At Sabre Springs?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Transformer Opco Llc;oakmont Management Group Llc, who operates 18 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(858) 391-9160
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Ivy Park At Sabre Springs? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.