Ivy Park At Huntington Beach

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not meeting residents’ care needs due to lack of staff. Facility is billing for services not rendered.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above allegations received on February 3, 2026. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Executive Director (ED) Bryan Reamer-Yu. LPA explained the reason for the visit. This Department has investigated the complaint alleging that facility staff are not meeting residents’ care needs due to lack of staff. Regarding the allegation the following was revealed: During the investigation LPA reviewed the Ivy Park at Huntington Beach Evergreen staff schedule dated January 2026. Per staff schedule, on average there are three caregivers for the morning shift from 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., three caregivers for the evening shift from 2:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and two caregiver for the night shift from 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. for 20 resident in care. Per May 2026 Evergreen staff schedule, on average there are three caregiver for the morning and evening shifts and two carthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 6, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260203124016

Allegation investigated: Facility failed to get resident medical assistance in a timely manner

This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of investigating the above-mentioned complaint allegation. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Bryan Reamer-Yu, discussed the purpose of the inspection, and explained the allegation. The investigation into the allegation that the facility failed to get resident medical assistance in a timely manner revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed (AD), Health Services Director (HSD) Rebecca Casella, residents, and witnesses, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster, staff roster, Resident #1’s (R1) Physician’s Report dated February 2, 2026, R1’s Individualized Service Plan dated December 11, 2025, R1’s Facility Care Notes, and R1’s Hospital Medical Records dated April 24, 2026. CONTINUED Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260424164805

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not issue refund to representative Licensee not responding to responsible party

On March 20, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brandon Lopez made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by staff after explaining the purpose for the visit. Executive Director (ED) Bryan Reamer-Yu was present and assisted on today's visit. During the course of the investigation, the Department interviewed staff, interviewed residents, interviewed witnesses, reviewed and obtained pertinent documents for this complaint. Regarding the allegation, Licensee did not issue refund to representative, the following has been concluded: It was alleged that the Licensee did not issue a refund to Person #1 (P1) representative. The Department conducted an interview with P1's representative, Witness #1 (W1). W1 stated that a cashier's check in the amount of $6,000.00 was provided to the facility by a different family member, who was not an authorized representative of P1. W1 said that the cashiers check was madethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2026 · control 22-AS-20250401131844

Allegation investigated: Neglect/lack of care and supervision resulting in resident sustaining a head injury

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, the Department interviewed staff as well as reviewed and obtained documentation such as UCI Hospital medical records. Regarding the allegation that Neglect/lack of care and supervision resulting in resident sustaining a head injury, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) was admitted into the facility on August 04, 2025, and was hospitalized twice for unwitnessed falls on September 09, 2025, and September 12, 2025. Facility assessments of R1 were conducted on August 03, 2025, and again on August 28, 2025, showing resident was a fall risk due to impaired vision but able to ambulate on their own. Individualized Service Plan dated August 08, 2025, lists R1 as a fall risk and advised staff to CONTINUED ON LIC 9the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 16, 2026 · control 22-AS-20250909171225

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Allegation investigated: The signal system did not produce an auditory signal for staff causing a delay Staff did not provide care to residents in a timely manner

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the investigation, LPA toured the facility, activated emergency pull cords and interviewed staff. Regarding the allegations that the signal system did not produce an auditory signal for staff causing a delay and staff did not provide care to residents in a timely manner, the investigation revealed the following: LPA observed the signal system during the investigation. The system has a central base and emits to pagers on the caregivers. Pager goes off approximately every 5 minutes if not reset with an escalation to all management after 15 minutes. LPA pulled the emergency cord two different times and staff responded within 1 minute. Six out of six staff state they are provided with pagers and walkie talkies. Sometimes the pagers are in need of batteries andthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 1, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250909100744

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent residents from sustaining falls while in care Facility did not ensure that there is adequate staffing to meet the needs of residents in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff. Regarding the allegations that staff did not prevent residents from sustaining falls while in care and facility did not ensure that there is adequate staffing to meet the needs of residents in care, the investigation revealed the following: Facility staffing runs 3 caregivers and a med tech for 1st and 2nd shift and 2 caregivers on NOC shift for each memory care area. LPA observed adequate staffing on two different occasions. Nine out of ten staff interviewed state resident needs are being met including all activities of daily living. Staff state showers are being given along with meal assistance in the dining room. LPA observed an order for liquid thickener for Resident 1 (R1).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 1, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250728145508

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.