Ridgeview Assisted Living Community is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego, San Diego County, California — state license #374604426, licensed for 68 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 20 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated May 22, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

1 home in view

Ridgeview Assisted Living Community

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 68 residents · San Diego, CA · San Diego County
LicensedHospiceBedriddenWheelchair not on fileMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374604426, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
9825 Glen Center Drive · San Diego, San Diego County
Phone
(858) 293-3905
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file — ask the home
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careVerified in record

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
FACILITY SERVES SIXTY-EIGHT (68) ELDERLY RESIDENTS; SIXTY-EIGHT OF WHOM MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR TWELVE (12) RESIDENTS.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 20 times and filed 20 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on May 22, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
July 17, 2026
Occupancy at the May 22, 2026 visit
60 of 68 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 3 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 23, 2023 to May 22, 2026. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (3). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 3 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 9 of 20 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
May 22, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not following infectious control protocols

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted a telephone visit to conclude a complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA discussed the investigation with Executive Director, Meegan Kline. During the investigation, the facility was toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff. It was alleged that staff are not following infectious control protocols. It was reported Resident #1 (R1) was not quarantined and/or kept away from the other residents, while Covid positive. The Executive Director (ED) explained R1 was in their secured memory care unit. R1 had wandering behaviors and liked to walk. R1 would walk from their room directly to the outside patio, wearing a mask. When R1 was outdoors they were accompanied by staff, both wearing masks.ED stated they followed infection control protocols, by assigning specific staff to positive residents, residents and staff wore masks, and PPE was in place when necessary. Staff confirmed that R1 wothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 22, 2026 · control 08-AS-20220106084229
20254 state visits · 5 documents
Oct 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 3 documents
May 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints0typical 2
Total complaints3typical 7
State visits on file20typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020254502024230202333020224402021440
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?
How are care plans reviewed when a resident’s needs change?

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (858) 293-3905

Is Ridgeview Assisted Living Community licensed?

Yes — Ridgeview Assisted Living Community is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego (San Diego County): California license #374604426, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 68 residents. State records list 20 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 22, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Ridgeview Assisted Living Community care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Ridgeview Assisted Living Community with clearances for hospice care and bedridden; it does not list wheelchair / non-ambulatory and dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordFACILITY SERVES SIXTY-EIGHT (68) ELDERLY RESIDENTS; SIXTY-EIGHT OF WHOM MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR TWELVE (12) RESIDENTS.

How much does Ridgeview Assisted Living Community cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Ridgeview Assisted Living Community's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Ridgeview Assisted Living Community accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Ridgeview Assisted Living Community is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

60 of 68 beds occupied (88%) when the state visited on May 22, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Ridgeview Assisted Living Community?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 20 state visits and 20 dated documents since 2021 for Ridgeview Assisted Living Community; 3 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 22, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

3 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not following infectious control protocols
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted a telephone visit to conclude a complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA discussed the investigation with Executive Director, Meegan Kline. During the investigation, the facility was toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff. It was alleged that staff are not following infectious control protocols. It was reported Resident #1 (R1) was not quarantined and/or kept away from the other residents, while Covid positive. The Executive Director (ED) explained R1 was in their secured memory care unit. R1 had wandering behaviors and liked to walk. R1 would walk from their room directly to the outside patio, wearing a mask. When R1 was outdoors they were accompanied by staff, both wearing masks.ED stated they followed infection control protocols, by assigning specific staff to positive residents, residents and staff wore masks, and PPE was in place when necessary. Staff confirmed that R1 woCDSS inspection report, May 22, 2026 · control 08-AS-20220106084229

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not administer medications as prescribed.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Meegan Kline, Executive Director. On 3/13/2023 it was alleged that facility staff did not administer medication as prescribed to R1 (See LIC811 List of Confidential Names). The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility tours, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff, residents, and outside sources, and LPA direct observations. The Department found insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Staff interview revealed that medications were administered to R1 according to the amount, types, and dates as prescribed by the physician. Staff interview revealed that R1 was upset that staff would not administer their PRN medication at the closest allowable time. A decision was made for R1 to self-administer certain medications, evenCDSS inspection report, July 27, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230313140209
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was not treated with dignity
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Ruiz conducted an unannounced complaint visit to conduct follow-up and deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself to, was greeted by, and explained the purpose of the visit to Administrator Robert Daynes. During today's visit, LPA conducted interviews with staff and residents. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources, review of records, and a tour of the facility. It was alleged that a resident was not treated with dignity. Interviews and records review revealed that in November 2022, Resident 1 (R1) stated that R1 was uncomfortable around a male staff and had woken up without clothing on several occasions. When asked for additional information, R1 could not recall any instances where any staff member had removed R1’s clothing and R1 did not report any soreness, redness, or discharge that would indicate any sexual trauma. Continued on LIC9099-C page...CDSS inspection report, March 23, 2023 · control 08-AS-20221122144158

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 20 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
0
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
3
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
20
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(858) 293-3905
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Ridgeview Assisted Living Community? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.