Ivy Park At West Hills is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in West Hills, Los Angeles County, California — state license #197610501, licensed for 90 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 10 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2024, the most recent dated April 29, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2024, the state has visited this home 10 times and filed 10 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on April 29, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”
The state's published file for this home includes 6 documents with transcribed findings, dated December 26, 2024 to April 29, 2026. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 6 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
Apr 29, 2026Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff’s medication administration error led to a resident’s hospitalization.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tihesha Smith conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit. LPA Smith met with the regional operations specialist and executive director trainees and disclosed the reason for the visit. Staff’s medication administration error led to a resident’s hospitalization It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) experienced symptoms of an overdose requiring hospitalization due to R1 being administered the wrong medication and/or dosage. To investigate the allegation LPA Smith interviewed three (3) staff from 11:00am - at 12:20 pm, requested documents relevant to the investigation during interviews and reviewed facility records at 12:35 pm. Interviews with three (3) of three (3) staff reveal the following: R1 was sent to Kaiser on 04/12/26 due to receiving improper medication, was observed to be drowsy and not at baseline. Review of Kaiser discharge records reveal Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260420122935
Apr 29, 2026Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff’s medication administration error led to a resident’s hospitalization.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tihesha Smith conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit. LPA Smith met with the regional operations specialist and executive director trainees and disclosed the reason for the visit. Staff’s medication administration error led to a resident’s hospitalization It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) experienced symptoms of an overdose requiring hospitalization due to R1 being administered the wrong medication and/or dosage. To investigate the allegation LPA Smith interviewed three (3) staff from 11:00am - at 12:20 pm, requested documents relevant to the investigation during interviews and reviewed facility records at 12:35 pm. Interviews with three (3) of three (3) staff reveal the following: R1 was sent to Kaiser on 04/12/26 due to receiving improper medication, was observed to be drowsy and not at baseline. Review of Kaiser discharge records reveal Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260420122935
Apr 16, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 11, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff locked residents in their rooms. Staff did not change residents in care.
At 9:00am Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Perchui Milena Khurshudyan and Angela Panushkina conducted a subsequent visit to deliver final findings. Upon arrival, LPAs met with the Executive Director (ED) Lidia Cauchi and explained the reason for the visit. During the initial visit conducted on 04/18/2025, at 09:05am, LPAs requested residents and staff rosters. LPAs also requested copies of pertinent information which include, but not limited to Mandated Reporting policy, Staff training log, Incontinent Plan of Operation, Staff work schedule for one week, Staff work daily log for one month. At approximately 09:25am, LPAs conducted a physical plant tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected. Between 9:30am – 11:10am, LPAs conducted interviews with the Executive Director, Memory Care Director, three (3) out of six (6) staff/caregivers, nine (9) out of ten (10) residents who were able to communicate and one (1) witness. Also, while interviewing a sample of ten (10) rthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 11, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250411152240
Sep 8, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 5, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 1, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure that hazardous items are inaccessible to residents in care.
On 5/1/2025 at approximately 1:00pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Perchui Milena Khurshudyan made an unannounced subsequent visit to this facility to deliver final findings. LPA met with the Executive Director Lidia Cauchi and explained the reason for the visit. Initial visit was conducted by LPAs Perchui Milena Khurshudyan and Angela Panushkina on 4/9/2025, and during the initial course of investigation, LPAs requested client and staff rosters. At 10:25am, LPAs requested pertinent documentation which include, but not limited to Admission Agreement, Appraisal Needs and Services, Physician Report, Unusual Incident Reports, copy of R1's Assesment report, copy of facility Plan of Operation, copy of staff training, copy of staff shift schedules, copy of staff files, copy of facility internal investigation summary, copy of staff suspension summary, etc. relevant to the investigation. At approximately 10:45am, LPAs conducted a physical plant tour, to ensure health and safety of the residethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 1, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250407131128
Dec 26, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff does not allow residents to possess personal belongings. Staff does not ensure that residents' incontinence needs are met. Staff confines residents to bedrooms. Staff does not answer residents' call buttons in a timely manner. Staff does not ensure that resident is afforded a comfortable accommodation. Staff speaks inappropriately to residents.
At 09:30am, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Perchui Milena Khurshudyan and Angela Panushkina conducted an initial visit to investigate the above allegations. LPAs met with the Memory Care Director (MCD) and explained the reason for the visit. During course of the investigation, interviews and record review were made. At 9:35am, LPAs requested resident and staff roster. At 09:40am, LPAs requested copies of pertinent information which include, but not limited to Policy and Procedures for an Emergency Response System, Emergency Call Log, etc., relevant to the investigation. At approximately 9:50am, LPA conducted a physical plant tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected. Between 10:00am – 1:00pm, LPAs conducted interviews with the Memory Care Director (MCD), four (4) staff members, one (1) MedTech, six (6) residents and one (1) witness. Also, while interviewing a sample of six (6) residents, LPAs randomly tested resident’s emergency pull cords in rooms and bathroothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 26, 2024 · control 31-AS-20241220102450
Dec 26, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not utilize universal precautions to care for residents affected with scabies.
This is an Amendment to the original report issued on 12/26/2024. Additional information was added to clarify the investigation. On 11/25/2024, during the initial ten-day complaint visit conducted by LPA Khurshudyan, LPA obtained copies of the staff and resident rosters and requested ten (10) resident files. At 11:45am, LPA conducted a physical plant tour including the Memory Care Unit to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected. In addition, between 12:30pm and 3:30pm LPA reviewed files and interviewed eight (8) out of seventy-one (71) residents who were able to communicate; four (4) from the Assisted Living, four (4) from Memory Care Unit, and total of five (5) staff members including Executive Director, and four (4) caregivers/Med-Techs. Interviews with the Executive Director (ED) and staff revealed that residents at Memory Care unit had some type of rash and itching on their skin for the past few months. Continue on LIC9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 26, 2024 · control 31-AS-20241119092225
Dec 26, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jun 18, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Ivy Park At West Hills licensed?
Yes — Ivy Park At West Hills is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in West Hills (Los Angeles County): California license #197610501, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 90 residents. State records list 10 inspection and complaint documents since 2024; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated April 29, 2026, was marked “Substantiated” by the state.
Can Ivy Park At West Hills care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Ivy Park At West Hills with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 90 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 8 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN.BEDRIDDEN CLIENTS MAY BE HOUSED IN ANY BEDROOMS ON GROUND FLOOR. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR (15).
How much does Ivy Park At West Hills cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Ivy Park At West Hills's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Ivy Park At West Hills accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Ivy Park At West Hills is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.
Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
68 of 90 beds occupied (76%) when the state visited on April 29, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Ivy Park At West Hills?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 10 state visits and 10 dated documents since 2024 for Ivy Park At West Hills; 6 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 29, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2026
2025
2024
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 10 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Who runs Ivy Park At West Hills?
From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.
Licensed to Transformer Opco Llc;oakmont Management Group Llc, who operates 18 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- Ivy Park At TustinSanta Ana, CA
- Ivy Park At Wood RanchSimi Valley, CA
- Ivy Park At San MarinoSan Gabriel, CA
- Ivy Park At Alta LomaRancho Cucamonga, CA
- Ivy Park At Palos VerdesTorrance, CA
- Ivy Park At La JollaSan Diego, CA
- Ivy Park At La PalmaLa Palma, CA
- Ivy Park At Walnut CreekWalnut Creek, CA
- Ivy Park At Studio CityStudio City, CA
- Ivy Park At Sabre SpringsSan Diego, CA
- Ivy Park At Woodland HillsWoodland Hills, CA
- Ivy Park At Huntington BeachHuntington Beach, CA
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(818) 701-9550Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Ivy Park At West Hills? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.