Ivy Park At Alta Loma is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California — state license #365530195, licensed for 77 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 4 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2024, the most recent dated March 16, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

19 homes in view

Ivy Park At Alta Loma

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 77 residents · Rancho Cucamonga, CA · San Bernardino County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #365530195, held since 2024 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
9519 Baseline Road · Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County
Phone
(909) 941-3001
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 77 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careApproved for 4 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 77 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 4 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER GRANTED FOR 20. DELAYED EGRESS APPROVED.State service designation945 - ADULTS / ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2024, the state has visited this home 4 times and filed 4 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on March 16, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
March 16, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
66 of 77 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 2 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 11, 2025 to March 16, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 2 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 4 of 4 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Mar 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not answer residents calls for assistance timely Staff do not ensure residents bathroom is cleaned timely

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Prieto met with Executive Director Ramirez and explained the elements of the complaint. Allegations #1 - LPA Prieto spoke with Executive Director Ramirez (S1) who states the they reviewed call records and no calls were made from resident #1 (R1) in question. S1 adds that staff is called 5 minutes after a call is made for a response. R1 was interviewed who stated that her calls are being responded to when made. Allegation #2 - Health Services Director (S2) states that R1 is on medication management and is visited at least four times a day. S2 adds that R1 has not made any concerns related the cleanliness of her bathroom. R1 was interviewed by LPA and she states there is no concerns with her bathroom not being cleaned. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 16, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260312161551
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure that staff follow hand hygiene protocol

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived at the facility to investigate the above-mentioned complaint. LPA Prieto met with Executive Director Sanchez and explained the details of the complaint. Allegation #1 - LPA Prieto interviewed facility nurse (S1) regarding the staff hand hygiene protocol. S1 described the facility's hand hygiene measures, stating that hand sanitizing stations are located throughout the facility. S1 added that staff are required to wear gloves when dispensing medication, addressing resident care needs, bathing, and changing residents' incontinence needs. Hand sanitizing gels are used throughout the day while working at the facility. Executive Director Sanchez confirmed the hygiene protocols followed by the staff and added that the facility adheres to procedures outlined in the Mitigation Plan to prevent the spread of COVID-19 and other infectious diseases. LPA Prieto toured the facility as part of a Health and Safety inspection and found no immediatethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 11, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250306142349
20241 state visit · 1 document
Sep 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints0typical 2
Total complaints2typical 7
State visits on file4typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2024.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020252202024110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — San Bernardino County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?
How are care plans reviewed when a resident’s needs change?

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (909) 941-3001

Is Ivy Park At Alta Loma licensed?

Yes — Ivy Park At Alta Loma is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Rancho Cucamonga (San Bernardino County): California license #365530195, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 77 residents. State records list 4 inspection and complaint documents since 2024; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated March 16, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Ivy Park At Alta Loma care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Ivy Park At Alta Loma with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 77 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 4 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER GRANTED FOR 20. DELAYED EGRESS APPROVED.

How much does Ivy Park At Alta Loma cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Ivy Park At Alta Loma's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Bernardino County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Ivy Park At Alta Loma accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Ivy Park At Alta Loma is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

66 of 77 beds occupied (86%) when the state visited on March 16, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Ivy Park At Alta Loma?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 4 state visits and 4 dated documents since 2024 for Ivy Park At Alta Loma; 2 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated March 16, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

2 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not answer residents calls for assistance timely Staff do not ensure residents bathroom is cleaned timely
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Prieto met with Executive Director Ramirez and explained the elements of the complaint. Allegations #1 - LPA Prieto spoke with Executive Director Ramirez (S1) who states the they reviewed call records and no calls were made from resident #1 (R1) in question. S1 adds that staff is called 5 minutes after a call is made for a response. R1 was interviewed who stated that her calls are being responded to when made. Allegation #2 - Health Services Director (S2) states that R1 is on medication management and is visited at least four times a day. S2 adds that R1 has not made any concerns related the cleanliness of her bathroom. R1 was interviewed by LPA and she states there is no concerns with her bathroom not being cleaned. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 16, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260312161551

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure that staff follow hand hygiene protocol
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived at the facility to investigate the above-mentioned complaint. LPA Prieto met with Executive Director Sanchez and explained the details of the complaint. Allegation #1 - LPA Prieto interviewed facility nurse (S1) regarding the staff hand hygiene protocol. S1 described the facility's hand hygiene measures, stating that hand sanitizing stations are located throughout the facility. S1 added that staff are required to wear gloves when dispensing medication, addressing resident care needs, bathing, and changing residents' incontinence needs. Hand sanitizing gels are used throughout the day while working at the facility. Executive Director Sanchez confirmed the hygiene protocols followed by the staff and added that the facility adheres to procedures outlined in the Mitigation Plan to prevent the spread of COVID-19 and other infectious diseases. LPA Prieto toured the facility as part of a Health and Safety inspection and found no immediateCDSS inspection report, March 11, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250306142349

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 4 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
0
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
2
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
4
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Ivy Park At Alta Loma?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Transformer Opco Llc;oakmont Management Group Llc, who operates 18 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(909) 941-3001
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Ivy Park At Alta Loma? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.