Anaya Elder Care Llc is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Los Banos, Merced County, California — state license #247209204, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 11 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated December 22, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

4 homes in view

Anaya Elder Care Llc

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Los Banos, CA · Merced County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #247209204, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
2058 Dante Ct · Los Banos, Merced County
Phone
(951) 772-9113
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR SIX (6).State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 12 times and filed 11 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated December 22, 2025.

Most recent state visit
December 22, 2025
Occupancy at the September 9, 2024 visit
3 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 3 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 9, 2024. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 3 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 6 of 11 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20251 state visit · 1 document
Dec 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff left resident in a soiled diaper for an extended time. Staff did not ensure resident had privacy.

On 9/9/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) B. Miranda arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver the findings for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Doderlein Anaya Fernandez. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff left resident in a soiled diaper for an extended time. LPA conducted multiple interviews. During the interviews LPA was informed R1 was found on 4/10/24 with soiled brief and clothes, R1 also had bowel movement (BM) and was double briefed. On 4/11/24 R1 was found with dried BM & double briefed. LPA observed pictures provided which showed R1 with bowel movement going through the first brief to the second brief and with BM stuck to the buttocks of R1. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 9, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240412085152
Sep 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that resident's hygiene needs were met while in care.

On 9/9/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) B. Miranda arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver the findings for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Doderlein Anaya Fernandez. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff did not ensure that resident's hygiene needs were met while in care. During the interviews LPA was informed and pictures were provided showing R1 to have bowel movement (BM) dried to the buttock area. Interviewees stated when they saw R1 they smelt of BM and urine. Based on LPAs observations, interviews, which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 & Chapter number 8, are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report LIC9099, LIC9099D, and appeal rights wethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 9, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240415120719
Sep 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent resident from harming themself while in care. Staff did not safeguard resident's personal possessions.

On 9/9/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) B. Miranda arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver the findings for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Doderlein Anaya Fernandez. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff did not prevent resident from harming themself while in care. Multiple interviews were conducted. LPA was not able to verify facility did not prevent resident from harming themself. LPA observed bedrooms with double beds have the beds against one side of the wall. 2. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff did not safeguard resident's personal possessions. LPA conducted interviews and reviewed records. LPA observed a signed and dated "Discharge" form by R1's family indicating R1's personal possessions were returned when R1 left the facility. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged vthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 9, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240415120719
20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 15, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations3typical 0
Substantiated complaints3typical 0
Total complaints2typical 0
State visits on file12typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20251102024242202322020221102021330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,000$5,000 /mo
our estimate — Merced County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (951) 772-9113

Is Anaya Elder Care Llc licensed?

Yes — Anaya Elder Care Llc is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Los Banos (Merced County): California license #247209204, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 11 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated December 22, 2025, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Anaya Elder Care Llc care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Anaya Elder Care Llc with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR SIX (6).

How much does Anaya Elder Care Llc cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Anaya Elder Care Llc's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Merced County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Anaya Elder Care Llc accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Anaya Elder Care Llc is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

3 of 6 beds occupied (50%) when the state visited on September 9, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Anaya Elder Care Llc?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 12 state visits and 11 dated documents since 2021 for Anaya Elder Care Llc; 3 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated September 9, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

3 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff left resident in a soiled diaper for an extended time. Staff did not ensure resident had privacy.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 9/9/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) B. Miranda arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver the findings for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Doderlein Anaya Fernandez. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff left resident in a soiled diaper for an extended time. LPA conducted multiple interviews. During the interviews LPA was informed R1 was found on 4/10/24 with soiled brief and clothes, R1 also had bowel movement (BM) and was double briefed. On 4/11/24 R1 was found with dried BM & double briefed. LPA observed pictures provided which showed R1 with bowel movement going through the first brief to the second brief and with BM stuck to the buttocks of R1. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 9, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240412085152
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure that resident's hygiene needs were met while in care.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 9/9/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) B. Miranda arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver the findings for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Doderlein Anaya Fernandez. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff did not ensure that resident's hygiene needs were met while in care. During the interviews LPA was informed and pictures were provided showing R1 to have bowel movement (BM) dried to the buttock area. Interviewees stated when they saw R1 they smelt of BM and urine. Based on LPAs observations, interviews, which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 & Chapter number 8, are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report LIC9099, LIC9099D, and appeal rights weCDSS inspection report, September 9, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240415120719
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent resident from harming themself while in care. Staff did not safeguard resident's personal possessions.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 9/9/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) B. Miranda arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver the findings for the allegations listed above. LPA introduced herself and explained the reason for the visit. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Doderlein Anaya Fernandez. 1. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff did not prevent resident from harming themself while in care. Multiple interviews were conducted. LPA was not able to verify facility did not prevent resident from harming themself. LPA observed bedrooms with double beds have the beds against one side of the wall. 2. The Department investigated the allegation: Staff did not safeguard resident's personal possessions. LPA conducted interviews and reviewed records. LPA observed a signed and dated "Discharge" form by R1's family indicating R1's personal possessions were returned when R1 left the facility. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged vCDSS inspection report, September 9, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240415120719

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 12 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
3
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
2
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
12
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(951) 772-9113
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Anaya Elder Care Llc? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.