Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Atwater Residential Care Facility
Small home·Licensed for 5·Atwater, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$4,450 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,450
- Home sizeLicensed for 5Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit5 of 5 beds occupiedDecember 12, 2024 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitMay 11, 2026CDSS inspection record
Atwater Residential Care Facility is a small care home in Atwater — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 5 residents since 2022. Bedridden care is not on file.
Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Atwater Residential Care Facility
Is Atwater Residential Care Facility licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
How many residents is Atwater Residential Care Facility licensed for?
5 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Has Atwater Residential Care Facility been cited?
8 Type A and 13 Type B citations since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 35 state visits over the same years.
Is Atwater Residential Care Facility still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Atwater Residential Care Facility cost?
$4,450 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,650–$5,450. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes and similar homes within 37 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Atwater Residential Care Facility take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Abundant Residential Living Services, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Can Atwater Residential Care Facility keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Atwater Residential Care Facility license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “ATWATER RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #247209209. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed for 5 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed to Abundant Residential Living Services, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- First licensed in 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 35 state inspection visits since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 8 Type A and 13 Type B citations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 35 state visits in that period.
- 11 complaints and 23 substantiated allegations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is May 11, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 2 residents
- Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
- Hospice careApproved by the state
- BedriddenNot on file · ask the home
State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR THREE (3) AMBULATORY AND TWO (2) NON-AMBULATORY IN ROOM #3 ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR FIVE(5).
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 13, 2026
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”
State licensing record · September 13, 2026
3 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,450a month to start
Likely $3,650–$5,450
From 15 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$4,450a month
Likely $3,650–$5,650
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Starting monthly rate$4,450likely $3,650–$5,450
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes and similar homes within 37 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,650–$5,650
- $4,450
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,250–$8,800
- $6,450
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes and similar homes within 37 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
15 homes like this within 37 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,850–$5,000.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 15 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Integrated Health CareMerced · 5.8 mi · Small home$3,700Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Kazlin Infinite CareMerced · 6.1 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Trinity Valley CareTurlock · 18 mi · Mid-size home$3,650Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Lifespring Senior Campus, A Wellness CommunityTurlock · 19 mi · Mid-size home$1,900Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Anaya Elder CareLos Banos · 21 mi · Small home$3,900Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Malonzo EldercareModesto · 31 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Patterson CarehomePatterson · 32 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- St. Stephen's HomeModesto · 33 mi · Small home$2,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Safe Haven Central ValleyModesto · 33 mi · Small home$4,900Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sisters Assisted LivingModesto · 34 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Crossroads ManorRiverbank · 34 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Graceful Living at RiverbankRiverbank · 34 mi · Small home$3,300Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Astoria at OakdaleOakdale · 35 mi · Mid-size home$2,150Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Dutchollow Suites IModesto · 36 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Graceful Living at ModestoModesto · 37 mi · Small home$3,300Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 1691 Joe Silva Avenue, Atwater, CA 95301Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2022, the state has filed 32 documents for this home, and its records count 35 visits since 2022. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 11, 2026.
- On file since
- 2022
- State visits
- 35
- Most recent visit
- May 11, 2026
- Occupied · December 12, 2024 visit
- 5 of 5 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 11 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated September 21, 2022 to December 12, 2024. 11 of the 11 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (10), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 11 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 11 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations8typical 0
- Type B citations13typical 0
- Substantiated allegations23typical 0
- Total complaints11typical 0
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2022.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 13 of 32 documents
May 11, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Sarah Hurt and Brianna Miranda conducted an unannounced visit today for the facility’s annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Ahluwalia Surinder, Continual Administrator's Certification expires 01/13/2027. There are currently 3 residents who reside at this home and there is 0 residents on hospice at this time. LPA inspected the interior and the exterior of the facility including the common living spaces, resident bedrooms and bathrooms, activity rooms, medication storage, kitchen, garage and outdoor areas. Bedrooms were clean and in good repair. There is a locked storage for medications. Food supply is adequate for 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable. Fire extinguisher is within the safety regulation period. Smoke alarms were tested and are operational. The home has a carbon monoxide detector. First Aid kit is on site and complete. LPA's observed one facility window screen with small tear. LPA's observed Resident 1's Centrally stored medication record is not accurate. Water temperature in facility hallway bathroom was tested at 110 degrees. Water temperature in Resident 2's bedroom measured to be 126 degrees. Resident 1 and Resident 3's Appraisal/ Needs and services plan is not updated annually. LPA's observed the exit in Resident 2's bedroom is locked and leads to a staff room. The staff room is not listed on the facility sketch. LPA's observed over the counter medications above in a cabinet unlocked above the facility refrigerator. LPA's observed all purpose cleaner unlocked and accessible under facility kitchen sink. Facilities Infection Control Plan, and Emergency Disaster Plan are not signed as reviewed annually. The following deficiencies observed or cited during today's inspection per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. LPA's requested the following documents: LIC 500 Personnel Report, LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility, LIC 610-E the Emergency Disaster Plan and copy of current Administrator’s Certificate to update the facility file. Listed documents shall be sent to Licensing. Exit interview conducted with Administrator, Ahluwalia Surinder, and copy of report left at facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 11, 2026
The state marks this report as 11 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Apr 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Sarah Hurt and Vadim Gorbam conducted an unannounced visit today for the facility’s annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Surinder Ahluwalia, Continual Administrator's Certification expires 01/13/2027. There are currently 5 residents who reside at this home and there is 0 residents on hospice at this time. LPA inspected the interior and the exterior of the facility including the common living spaces, resident bedrooms and bathrooms, activity rooms, medication storage, kitchen, garage and outdoor areas. Bedrooms were clean and in good repair. There is a locked storage for medications. Food supply is adequate for 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable. Fire extinguisher is within the safety regulation period. Smoke alarms were tested and are operational. The home has a carbon monoxide detector. Water temperature was tested at 113 degrees. First Aid kit is on site and complete. The facilities Infection Control Plan has not been reviewed annually. The facilities Emergency and Disaster Plan LIC610E has not been reviewed annually. LPA's observed cleaner disinfectant in Resident 1's bathroom, and bleach cleaning products in hallway bathroom accessible to residents. Resident 2's bedroom is missing desk lamp. Staff 1 does not have CPR/First aid training. Staff 2 does not have LIC503 Health Screening Report. LPA's observed back patio furniture without cushions, backyard grass is dry and overgrown. LPA's observed two backyard window screens with holes. Resident 3's medication was not properly logged on the Centrally Stored Medication record. The facility is not using designated bedrooms on original facility sketch as listed (office is being used as a resident bedroom.) The facility does not have proof of required disaster drills. The following deficiencies observed or cited during today's inspection per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. LPA's requested the following documents: LIC 500 Personnel Report, LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility, LIC 610-E the Emergency Disaster Plan and copy of current Administrator’s Certificate to update the facility file. Listed documents shall be sent to Licensing. Exit interview conducted with Administrator, Surinder Ahluwalia, and copy of report left at facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2025
Dec 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are denying the residents from going outside due to loose animals
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced facility visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with facility Facility staff Arlene Ferguson and explained the purpose of today's visit. Licensee Jessica Johnson was not present at the facility during this visit, but did contact LPA Hurt via phone. Regarding the allegation Staff are denying the residents from going outside due to loose animals. LPA's interviewed facility staff 1 on 03/13/2024 who stated the residents do not normally go in the facility backyard because the goats are loose in the area. LPA's observed several goats along with some goat feces, in the backyard loose on the patio near the back facility door. Based on LPA's interviews conducted, and observation the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. The following Deficiencies are being cited Per Title 22 Regulations, Exit interview conducted with facility staff Arlene Ferguson, a copy of this report along with appeals rights provided. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240311224521
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 26, 2024
87303 Maintenance and Operation (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. The following requirement has not been met as evidenced by: LPA's observed several goats along with some goat feces in the facility backyard, staff 1 stated the facility residents do not go in the backyard as there is several goats, which poses a potential, health, safety, or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2024
Plan of correction: Administrator will provide written plan on keeping facility patio clean, and submit to LPA by POC date of 12/26/2024
Mar 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Sarah Hurt and Brianna Miranda conducted an unannounced visit today for the facility’s annual inspection. LPA met with facility staff Pamela Pinnock, Continual Administrator's Certification for Administrator Lacy Vincent is 04/25/2024. There are currently 4 residents who reside at this home and there is 0 residents on hospice at this time. LPA inspected the interior and the exterior of the facility including the common living spaces, resident bedrooms and bathrooms, activity rooms, medication storage, kitchen, garage and outdoor areas. Bedrooms were clean and in good repair. There is a locked storage for medications. Food supply is adequate for 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable. Smoke alarms were tested and are operational. The home has a carbon monoxide detectors. Water temperature was tested at 129 degrees. First Aid kit is on site and is not complete. LPA's were not provided access to facility staff or client records. LPA's were not able to determine any resident diagnosis or resident needs as client records are not available. LPA's are not able to review staff training as Personnel records are not able for review. Staff 1 present was not able to provide proof of required First Aid training. Resident 1's Centrally Stored Medication log is not properly maintained, and medications are not being given due to being out. LPA's observed multiple facility window screens with tears and not in good repair. LPA's observed several expired food items in facility pantry. LPA's observed facility Resident 1 outside and needing constant supervision along with 2 other residents present. LPA's observed a sliding lock more than 6 feet high on the inside front door out of resident reach which is a potential fire clearance hazard. LPA's were not able to review facility Disaster Plan 610E or log of quarterly disaster drills. The following deficiencies observed or cited during today's inspection per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. LPA's requested the following documents: LIC 500 Personnel Report, LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility, LIC 610-E the Emergency Disaster Plan and copy of current Administrator’s Certificate to update the facility file. Listed documents shall be sent to Licensing. Exit interview conducted with Facility Staff Pamela Pinnock and copy of report left at facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2024
The state marks this report as 11 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 6. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Mar 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA's) Sarah Hurt and Brianna Miranda conducted a Case Management visit. LPA met with facility Facility staff Lacy Vincent, and explained the purpose of today's visit. Licensee Jessica Johnson was not present at the facility during this visit, but did contact LPA Hurt via phone. LPA's requested a current facility resident roster. LPA's requested the current Needs and Services Plan, and Physician's Report (LIC602) for all current facility residents. Staff 1 has not been associated to the current facility. Staff 2 is not background/fingerprint cleared. Exit interview conducted with facility staff Lacy Vincent, and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 13, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 14, 2024
87355 Criminal Record Clearance (a) The Department shall conduct a criminal record review of all individuals specified in Health and Safety Code section 1569.17 and shall have the authority to approve or deny a facility license, or employment, residence, or presence in the facility, based upon the (e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (2) Request a transfer of a criminal record clearance as specified in Section 87355(c) or The following requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Staff 1 is not associated to this facility in LIS or guardian, which poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 13, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee will submit LIC 9182 form to associate Staff 1 to the facility, and send proof to LPA by POC date of 03/14/2024.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87355(b) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 14, 2024
87355 Criminal Record Clearance (a) The Department shall conduct a criminal record review of all individuals specified in Health and Safety Code section 1569.17 and shall have the authority to approve or deny a facility license, or employment, residence, or presence in the facility, based upon the results of such review. (b) Prior to the Department issuing a license, the applicant, administrator and any adults other than a client, residing in the facility shall have a criminal record clearance or exemption. The following requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Staff 2 is not background cleared and has been providing care to residents for one month, which poses an immediate, health, safety, or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 13, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee will remove staff 2 from the facility, and staff will no longer provide care to facility residents until cleared and associated to the facility.
Jan 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility is not adequately staffed resulting in the facility calling the fire department for assistance. Facility staff engaged in a verbal altercation with a resident. Facility staff left resident in urine soaked clothing for an extended period of time.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA's) Sarah Hurt and Brianna Miranda conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver investigation findings. LPA’s met with Assistant Administrator, Airen Miro and explained the purpose of today’s visit. Regarding the allegation the facility is not adequately staffed resulting in the facility calling the fire department for assistance. Emergency Medical Personnel provided a log with more than 21 dates listed where they have been asked to assist Residents in the facility that have fallen, and residents who need assistance getting up from being seated in a recliner to different areas of the facility. Based on interviews conducted during this investigation, and call logs reviewed the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Continued... Substantiated Regarding the allegation Facility staff engaged in a verbal altercation with a resident. Witness 1 stated they were called to assist at the facility, when they arrived they spoke with a facility caretaker who requested they take the resident’s phone. Witness 1 stated they spoke with the resident, who seemed to be coherent and was just saying they didn’t want to be at the facility because they weren’t being treated right and they wanted to go to the hospital. Witness 1 stated they witnessed the caregiver trying to rip the phone from the resident’s hand. Witness 1 stated caregiver then made a phone call and then the caregiver stated the Resident’s daughter told the caregiver to take the phone away from the resident. Witness 1 again stated they weren’t going to take the phone away as it was the residents’ only line of communication. Witness 1 stated they then witnessed the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) staff take the phone away from the resident and the caregiver then came and picked it up where EMS staff set it down. Based on interviews conducted during this investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation Facility staff left resident in urine-soaked clothing for an extended period of time. LPA Hurt conducted interviews with several witnesses who stated they observed residents in clothing that appeared to be soaked in urine for extended periods of time. Based on interviews conducted during this investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED at this time. The following deficiencies are being cited Per Title 22 Regulations. Exit interview conducted with Assistant Administrator, Airen Miro, and a copy of this report along with appeals rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 10, 2024 · control 24-AS-20230612142552
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 25, 2024
87411 Personnel Requirements - General (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. In facilities licensed for sixteen or more, sufficient support staff shall be employed to ensure provision of personal assistance and care as required in Section 87608, Postural Supports. Additional staff shall be employed as necessary to perform office work, cooking, house cleaning, laundering, and maintenance of buildings, equipment and grounds. The licensing agency may require any facility to provide additional staff whenever it determines through documentation that the needs of the particular residents, the extent of services provided, or the physical arrangements of the facility require such additional staff for the provision of adequate services. The following requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Facility staff frequently called local fire staff to assist with lifitng, and moving facility residents, which poses a potential, health, safety, or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 10, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee will put a plan place to be in compliance with regulation 87411(a), and copy will be sent to LPA by POC due date of 01/25/24.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 25, 2024
87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:(1) To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. The following requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Facility staff engaged in a verbal altercation with facility resident which poses a potential, health, safety, or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 10, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee will put a plan place to be in compliance with regulation 87468.1(a), and copy will be sent to LPA by POC due date of 01/25/24.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87265(b)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 11, 2024
87265 Managed Incontinence (b) In addition to Section 87611, General Requirements for Allowable Health Conditions, the licensee shall be responsible for the following:87265 Managed Incontinence (b) In addition to Section 87611, General Requirements for Allowable Health Conditions, the licensee shall be responsible for the following: (3) Ensuring that incontinent residents are kept clean and dry and that the facility remains free of odors from incontinence.. The following requirement has not been as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted facility residents are being left in urine soaked clothing for extended periods of time, which poses an immediate, health, safety, or personal rights risk to reisdents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 10, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee shall provide documentation and training on how staff will evaluate residents regularly to ensure skin breakdown is not occurring and submit proof to LPA Hurt by POC date 01/11/2024.
Jan 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Illegal Eviction Residents conservator not provided Admission Agreement within seven days
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA's) Sarah Hurt and Brianna Miranda conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver investigation findings. LPA’s met with Assistant Administrator, Airen Miro and explained the purpose of today’s visit. Regarding the allegation Illegal Eviction. Resident 1 was taken to the hospital on 12/17/23 and was denied admission back to the facility upon release. Based on LPA's interviews which were conducted and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Regarding the allegation Residents’ conservator not provided Admission Agreement within seven days. Resident 1’s conservator was not provided an Admission Agreement within seven days of admission to the facility. Based on LPA’s interviews which were conducted and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. The following deficiencies are being cited Per Title 22 Regulations. Exit interview conducted with Assistant Administrator, Airen Miro, and a copy of this report along with appeals rights provided. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 10, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231219084413
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87224(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 11, 2024
87224Eviction Procedures (a) The licensee may evict a resident for one or more of the reasons listed in Section 87224(a)(1) through (5). Thirty (30) days written notice to the resident is required except as otherwise specified in paragraph. The following requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Resident 1 was not accepted back into the facility after a visit to the hospital on 12/17/23, which poses an immediate, health, safety, or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 10, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee will put a procedure in place to prevent future unlawful evictions, and copy will be sent to LPA by POC due date of 01/11/24.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87507(a)(c) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 24, 2024
87507 Admission Agreements (a) The licensee shall complete an individual written admission agreement, as defined in Section 87101(a), with each resident or the resident's representative, if any. (c) Admission agreements shall be signed and dated, acknowledging the contents of the document, by the resident or the resident’s representative, if any, and the licensee or the licensee’s designated representative no later than seven days following admission. The following requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Resident 1's Conservator was not provided Admission Agreement within 7 days of living at the facility which poses a potential, health, safety, or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 10, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee will put a procedure in place to be in compliance with regulation 87505(a)(c), and copy will be sent to LPA by POC due date of 01/24/24.
Dec 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: POC
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced POC visit with facility Assistant Administrator Airen Miro to verify correction of citations issued during the visit conducted on 12/01/2023. Deficiency cited on 12/01/2023, Deficiency Section 87507(g)(3)(C) Any fee that is charged prior to or after admission, shall be clearly specified has not yet been cleared. Licensee has not complied with the terms of the POC by POC due date of 12/15/2023. Civil Penalty for failure correct will be assessed during this visit. Exit interview conducted with Assistant Administrator, Airen Miro and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 28, 2023
Dec 8, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff refused to allow resident to return to facility after hospital stay
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced facility visit to open a complaint on the allegations listed above. LPA met with facility staff Andrene Lowe and explained the purpose of today's visit. Licensee Jessica Johnson was not present at the facility during this visit, but did contact LPA Hurt via phone. Regarding the allegation Staff refused to allow resident to return to facility after hospital stay. Licensee stated Resident 1 did not sign an Admission Agreement and no money was collected therefore was never a resident at this facility.LPA Hurt observed Resident 1 not to be present at the facility during visit on 12/08/2023. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. No deficincies cited Per Title 22 Regulations. Exit interview conducted with Administrator Jessica Johnson vis phone, and a copy of this report provided. Report signed by staff Present Andrene Lowe. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 8, 2023 · control 24-AS-20231204154208
Dec 1, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not issue a refund
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA's) Sarah Hurt and Brianna Miranda arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegatuons on 12/01/23 at 10:00 a.m.. LPA's met with facility Assistant Administrator Airen Miro and stated the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation Staff did not issue a refund. Resident 1 provided proof of two paid fees to Licensee totaling $1,855.00 in two separate payments dated on 08/01/2022 (Admission fee $500), and on 08/16/2022 (holding fee $1,355.00.) Resident 1 never moved into the facility. Licensee refunded Resident 1 $500 of the fees paid. The Admission Agreement does not speak to any non refundable "holding" fees. Based on records reviewed during this investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED at this time. The following deficincies are being cited Per Title 22 Regulations. Exit interview conducted with Assistant Administrator Airen Miro, and a copy of this report provided. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 1, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230511143721
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87507(g)(3)(C) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 15, 2023
Section 87507(g)(3)(C) Any fee that is charged prior to or after admission, shall be clearly specified. **This requirement was not met as evidenced by review of the admission agreement provided to RP, that did not specify a $1,355.00 holding fee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 1, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee will submit proof of refund of the $1,355.00 holding fee to the RP by 12/15/23 POC date.
Nov 6, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst's (LPA) Sarah Hurt and Darius Williams conducted an unannounced Case Management visit. LPA's met with facility Assistant Administrator, Airen Miro and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA's toured the facility including facility including kitchen, indoor, and outdoor areas. The facility has sufficient food supply, and is clean in good repair. LPA's observed two facility staff present assisting residents. LPA's observed one facility care staff cleaning the facility, and doing residents laundry. LPA's discussed a plan with facility Assistant Administrator for the backyard seating arrangement. No Deficiencies cited today Per Title 22 Regulations. Exit interview conducted with facility Assistant Administrator, Airen Miro and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 6, 2023
Oct 25, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not meet a resident's incontinence needs while in care Staff did not prevent a resident from causing harm to other residents Staff did not properly reports incidents involving a resident Staff are not providing adequate care and supervision to a resident Staff mishandled a resident's medication while in care Staff is not following the admission agreement
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA's) Sarah Hurt and Darius Williams conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver investigation findings. LPA’s met with Licensee Jessica Johnson over the phone and explained the purpose of today’s visit. Regarding the allegation, Staff did not meet a resident's incontinence needs while in care. LPA Hurt observed several photos documenting Resident 1’s buttocks area to be extremely red and irritated. Medical records document Resident 1 had erythema and pain in the buttocks area. Based on records reviewed during this investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Continued.... Substantiated Regarding the allegation Staff did not prevent a resident from causing harm to other residents. Incident Report dated 03/13/2023 documents Resident 1 assaulted two other facility residents. LPA Hurt reviewed several text and email exchanges between facility Administrator and Resident 1’s Responsible Party documenting incidents of Resident 1 hitting other facility residents. Based on records reviewed the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation Staff did not properly report incidents involving a resident. LPA Hurt reviewed medical records documenting Resident 1 was taken to the hospital on 02/06/2023, this incident was not reported to State Licensing. LPA Hurt observed text messages dated March 4, 2023 documenting Resident 1 assaulted another facility resident. This incident was not reported to State Licensing. This incident from March 4, 2023 was not reported to State Licensing. Based on records reviewed during this investigation the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation Staff are not providing adequate care and supervision to a resident. LPA Hurt reviewed Incident Report dated 03/13/2023 documents Resident 1 assaulted two other facility residents. Staff 1 stated at times working alone with 4 residents providing all care and supervision, meals, and incontinent needs made it difficult to provide supervision. Based on records reviewed during this investigation the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation Staff mishandled a resident's medication while in care. LPA reviewed Centrally Stored Medication log for Resident 1 documenting a medication with a start date of 01/01/2023 with no quantity, date filled, expiration date, or Pharmacy name. The medication is not documented on any Medication Administration Record. It is unclear if this medication was given to Resident 1 at the facility. Based on LPA observation, and records reviewed during this investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation Staff is not following the admission agreement. Admission agreement documents under section “Notice of Rate Changes." If the facility rate for basic services changes because the resident’s needed/desired services changes as determined by an appraisal (see resident appraisals / evaluation of your needs), the rate change will occur when the change in service occurs, as long as at least thirty days have passed since the signing of the admission agreement. We shall provide the resident or the representative a written itemized notice of a rate increase after the change in services which will include a detailed itemized explanation of the additional services to be provided. Responsible Party for Resident 1 was not given a detailed itemized explanation of the additional services provided. The invoice provided is not dated. Based on Records reviewed during this investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED at this time. The following Deficiencies are being Cited Per Title 22 Regulations. Exit interview conducted with Licensee Jessica Johnson, and a copy of this report provided. Continued.. Regarding the allegation Resident sustained multiple injuries while in care. Resident 1 did have documented bruising during a visit to his Physician on 02/13/2023. Resident 1 also had documented un-witnessed falls. Facility staff documented Resident 1 was refusing to use his wheelchair, and walker. Based on the interviews conducted, documentation obtained and reviewed, and the information received during this investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding the allegation Staff disclosed confidential information. Licensee did text Responsible Party for Resident 1 asking if their contact information can be given to the Responsible Parties of other residents. Resident 1’s Responsible party was not contacted by any other residents Responsible Parties. Based on the interviews conducted, documentation obtained and reviewed, and the information received during this investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding the allegation Staff are falsifying a resident's medical records. Facility staff documented Resident 1’s medication given three times daily once at 4 p.m. despite Resident 1 leaving for the hospital at approximately 3 p.m. Facility staff did give Resident 1 his medication as listed on the prescription despite it not being the exact time. Based on the interviews conducted, documentation obtained and reviewed, and the information received during this investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding the allegation Staff did not provide an authorized representative access to resident records. LPA reviewed text messages between Resident 1's Responsible Party, and Licensee Jessica Johnson discussing Resident 1's records. Based on these messages it is unclear when the documents were originally requested, and who requested the records. A written request was not given to Licensee requesting Resident 1's records. Based on the interviews conducted, documentation obtained and reviewed, and the information received during this investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be unsubstantiated at this time. No Deficiencies Cited Per Title 22 Regulations. Exit interview conducted with Licensee Jessica Johnson, and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 25, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230320135406
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 1569.2 · Plan of correction due date: Oct 26, 2023
(c) “Care and supervision” means the facility assumes responsibility for, or provides or promises to provide in the future, ongoing assistance with activities of daily living without which the resident’s physical health, mental health, safety, or welfare would be endangered. Assistance includes assistance with taking medications, money management, or personal care. The following requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Resident 1 attacked several other facility residents which poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 25, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee will provide training to all facility staff on Care and Supervision of residents, and provide proof to LPA by POC date of 10/26/2023.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 26, 2023
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care(a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care, by compliance with the following: (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. The following requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Resident 1's Centrally Stored Medication Log lists medications with no quantity which poses an immediate, health, safety, or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 25, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee will submit a plan documenting how she is going to ensure residents medications will be refilled, dispersed and provided to residents per physician’s orders by POC date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.657(a) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 9, 2023
§1569.657 Rate increase due to change in level of resident care; notice (a) For any rate increase due to a change in the level of care of the resident, the licensee shall provide the resident and the resident’s represent ative, if any, written notice of the rate increase within two business days after initially providing services at the new level of care. The notice shall include a detailed explanation of the additional services to be provided at the new level of care and an accompanying itemization of the charges. The following requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Licensee did not provide Resident 1's responsible party a detailed written breakdown of services provided , and it is not clear when invoice was given, which poses a potential, health, safety, or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 25, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee will re submit invoice #100 to include a detailed explanation of additional services to provided at the new level of care and accompanying itemization of the charges to CCL by POC date of 10/24/2023.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87265(b)(7) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 26, 2023
87265 Managed Incontinence (b) In addition to Section 87611, General Requirements for Allowable Health Conditions, the licensee shall be responsible for the following: (7) Ensuring that the condition of the skin exposed to urine and stool is evaluated regularly to ensure that skin breakdown is not occurring. The following requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Records, and photos document Resident 1's buttocks area was extremely red and irritated over a period of weeks, which poses an immediate, health, safety or personal rights risk to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 25, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee shall provide documentation and training on how staff will evaluate residents regularly to ensure skin breakdown is not occurring and submit proof to LPA Hurt by POC date 10/26/2023.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(1)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 2, 2023
87211Reporting Requirements e shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following:(1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified in (A) through (D) below. This report shall include the resident's name, age, sex and date of admission; date and nature of event; attending physician's name, findings, and treatment, if any; and disposition of the case. The following requirement has not been met as evidenced by: LPA reviewed records of incidents on 03/09/2023 that was not reported to State Licensing which poses a potential, health, safety, or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 25, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee will submit proof of regulation understanding to LPA Hurt by POC date of 11/02/2023.
Oct 10, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA's) Sarah Hurt and Vadim Gorban conducted an unannounced Case Management visit. LPA’s met with facility Licensee Jessica Johnson and explained the purpose of today’s visit. LPA's walked around and toured the facility resident bedrooms, backyard area, kitchen, and common areas. LPA Hurt provided Licensee with Licensing form 311F LPA Hurt provided Licensee with Community Care Licensing / Medications Guide No Deficiencies Cited today Per Title 22 Regulations. Exit interview conducted with Licensee Jessica Johnson, and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2023
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Merced County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
LLC Retirement Homes II
Atwater · Small home · 2.6 mi away
$4,500 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Royalty Care Homes
Atwater · Small home · 3.6 mi away
$5,150 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Guardian Angel Home Care II
Atwater · Small home · 3.8 mi away
$4,050 a month to start · Covelight estimate
St. Anthony's Senior Care
Merced · Small home · 5.8 mi away
$4,600 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Integrated Health Care
Merced · Small home · 5.8 mi away
$3,700 a month to start · Listed by the home
Kazlin Infinite Care
Merced · Small home · 6.1 mi away
$3,000 a month to start · Listed by the home