Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

LLC Retirement Homes II

Small home·Licensed for 6·Atwater, California

Licensed since 2020Licence #247209026
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,500 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,500
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedMay 9, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJune 5, 2026CDSS inspection record

LLC Retirement Homes II is a small care home in Atwater — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2020. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about LLC Retirement Homes II

Is LLC Retirement Homes II licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is LLC Retirement Homes II licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has LLC Retirement Homes II been cited?

0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 11 state visits over the same years.

Is LLC Retirement Homes II still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does LLC Retirement Homes II cost?

$4,500 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,650–$5,500. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes and similar homes within 37 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does LLC Retirement Homes II take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by LLC Retirement Homes II, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Can LLC Retirement Homes II keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

LLC Retirement Homes II license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “LLC RETIREMENT HOMES II”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #247209026. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to LLC Retirement Homes II, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 11 state inspection visits since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 11 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is June 5, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 3 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 4 residents

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. SIX (6) NONAMBULATORY OF WHICH FOUR (4) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ANY ROOM. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR THREE (3).

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,500a month to start

Likely $3,650–$5,500

From 15 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,500a month

Likely $3,650–$5,700

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,500likely $3,650–$5,500

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes and similar homes within 37 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,650–$5,700
$4,500
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,300–$8,850
$6,500
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes and similar homes within 37 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

15 homes like this within 37 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,850–$5,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 15 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 1944 Faxon Dr, Atwater, CA 95301Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 11 visits since 2020. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 5, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
11
Most recent visit
June 5, 2026
Occupied · May 9, 2026 visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated February 7, 2022 to May 9, 2026. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints4typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2020.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202634120251102024110202311020222202021110

The last 36 months — 6 of 10 documents

20263 state visits · 4 documents
Jun 5, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced visit on June 5, 2026 to conduct a Case Management visit. LPA met with Licensee Lindsey Lamerson over the phone and explained the purpose of today's visit. LPA returned file/ records for former facility Resident 1. No deficiencies cited or observed during visit. Exit interview conducted with Licensee, Lindsey Lamerson, and copy of report left at facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2026
May 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained bruises and fractures due to physical abuse Staff do not report injuries to resident's responsible party Staff do not provide responsible party with resident's records Staff do not ensure that resident is hydrated Staff are not distributing resident's medications as prescribed Staff are not adhering to resident's dietary plan Staff do not communicate with responsible party regarding resident's care Staff did not assist resident with obtaining care Staff did not provide a safe environment for resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced facility visit to open a complaint investigation. LPA met with Licensee, Lindsey Lamerson and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation that resident sustained bruises and fractures due to physical abuse, interviews and records reviewed did not reveal evidence that facility staff physically abused the resident. Medical records documented the resident had multiple chronic medical conditions, mobility impairment, chronic knee and hip pain, edema, fall risk, use of blood thinners, and a history of bruising easily. Records further documented prior falls, fractures, weakness, and the resident’s need for assistance with ambulation and transfers. Home health documentation reflected bruising concerns were evaluated and monitored, including recommendations to pad bedrails and wheelchair components to reduce accidental bruising. During interviews, the reporting party acknowledged they never witnessed staff physically abuse the resident and stated they were unsure whether bruising was intentional or related to incompetence or accidental causes. Ombudsman documentation reviewed by LPA reflected no concerns of abuse at the facility and noted the bruising was believed related to blood thinner use and the resident’s medical condition. The Investigations Bureau reviewed the complaint and declined further investigation after determining records and statements obtained did not show evidence of physical abuse. Based on interviews and records reviewed, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation that staff did not report injuries to the resident’s responsible party, records and interviews indicated the responsible party was notified regarding falls, medical concerns, appointments, bruising observations, and hospitalization's. The reporting party acknowledged receiving calls, texts, photographs, and updates from facility staff regarding incidents and changes in the resident’s condition. Although the reporting party expressed dissatisfaction regarding the timeliness or adequacy of certain communications, evidence obtained did not demonstrate staff failed to notify the responsible party of injuries or medical concerns. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation that staff did not provide the responsible party with resident records, LPA reviewed the written request for records submitted by the reporting party through legal counsel. The request sought extensive facility and medical documentation and additionally requested information regarding the cost associated with reproduction of records. Facility records reviewed by LPA included copies of the requested records assembled by facility staff, mailing documentation, certified mail receipts, and postage records demonstrating the records were mailed to the reporting party. Although the licensee generated an invoice reflecting copying and preparation costs, interviews confirmed no payment was requested prior to release and the records were nevertheless provided. Based on documentation reviewed, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation that staff did not ensure the resident was hydrated, LPA reviewed medical records, resident interviews, and observations made during facility visits. Medical records documented the resident received ongoing medical monitoring, physician follow-up appointments, home health services, and hospital care when needed. Resident interviews conducted by LPA revealed residents stated staff routinely provide beverages, meals, and assistance as needed. During facility visits, LPA observed beverages and water accessible to residents throughout the facility. No evidence was obtained showing facility staff intentionally withheld fluids or failed to provide hydration. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation that staff were not distributing medications as prescribed, LPA reviewed available records and conducted interviews. Records reviewed reflected the resident routinely attended medical appointments and received ongoing physician oversight. No evidence was obtained establishing staff intentionally withheld medications or failed to administer medications as ordered. Interviews conducted during the investigation further indicated residents receive medications routinely and timely. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation that staff were not adhering to the resident’s dietary plan, records reviewed reflected the resident was recommended a low sodium diet; however, records and interviews further demonstrated the resident remained under ongoing physician monitoring and continued attending routine medical appointments throughout residency. Interviews indicated the resident was verbal and capable of expressing food preferences and participating in decisions regarding activities and meals. Facility staff did offer salads, healthy choices, and rarely used salt in day to day cooking. No evidence was obtained demonstrating the resident suffered injury or harm due to meals provided by the facility. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation that staff did not communicate with the responsible party regarding the resident’s care, interviews indicated the concern partially related to the resident attending a Mother’s Day brunch outing without prior notification to the responsible party. Interviews and records reviewed reflected the resident was verbal, capable of expressing preferences, and elected to attend the outing. Evidence obtained during the investigation demonstrated ongoing communication occurred between facility staff and the responsible party through calls, text messages, photographs, appointment coordination, and medical discussions. While disagreements existed regarding decision-making and care preferences, evidence did not support that facility staff failed to communicate regarding the resident’s care. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation that staff did not assist the resident with obtaining care, records reviewed demonstrated the resident routinely attended physician appointments, hospital visits, home health services, hospice services, therapy services, and follow-up care throughout residency. Interviews further indicated facility staff assisted with transportation coordination, medical follow-up, and implementation of physician recommendations. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation that staff did not provide a safe environment for residents in care, LPA conducted resident interviews and facility observations. Residents interviewed stated they felt safe residing at the facility and denied witnessing abuse or mistreatment. Residents further stated staff responded when assistance was needed and treated them appropriately. LPA observed residents to appear appropriately dressed, clean, and comfortable within the facility environment. Although records documented the resident experienced falls and bruising, evidence obtained did not establish the facility intentionally created or maintained an unsafe environment. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted with Licensee, Lindsey Lamerson and copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 9, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260116102232
May 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaged residents medication records

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced facility visit to deliver findings on the allegations lsited above. LPA met with Licensee, Lindsey Lamerson and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation that staff mismanaged resident’s medication records, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted interviews and reviewed facility records including physician orders, over the counter PRN medication administration records, medication logs, and additional documentation maintained by facility staff regarding physician notification for over the counter PRN medication administration. LPA reviewed multiple over the counter PRN medication administration records maintained by the facility for the resident. Records reviewed documented over the counter PRN medications administered for symptoms including pain, anxiety, and other symptoms. LPA reviewed handwritten documentation maintained by the facility reflecting staff communication with the house manager and/or physician regarding over the counter PRN medication administration. Documentation reviewed reflected the facility maintained an internal process in which staff notified the house manager and/or physician when over the counter PRN medications were needed for the resident.. LPA identified documentation deficiencies within the PRN medication records. LPA observed several entries on the over the counter PRN medication administration records which contained incomplete documentation including missing times, incomplete results documentation, missing follow-up entries regarding effectiveness of medication administration, and inconsistent documentation regarding symptom resolution following administration of over the counter PRN medications. LPA did not observe evidence indicating the resident suffered harm related to the medication administration practices reviewed. However, the facility failed to ensure over the counter PRN medication records were consistently and accurately completed as required. . Based on interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. The following deficincies are being cited Per title 22 regulations. Exit interview conducted with Licensee, Lindsey Lamerson and copy of report provided along with appeals rights provided. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 9, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260501091427

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(d) · Plan of correction due date: May 23, 2026

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (d) If the resident is unable to determine his/her own need for a prescription or nonprescription PRN medication, and is unable to communicate his/her symptoms clearly, facility staff designated by the licensee, shall be permitted to assist the resident with self-administration provided all of the following requirements are met: (1) Facility staff shall contact the resident's physician prior to each dose, describe the resident's symptoms, and receive direction to assist the resident in self-administration of that dose of medication. (2) The date and time of each contact with the physician, and the physician's directions, shall be documented and maintained in the resident's facility record. (3) The date and time the PRN medication was taken, the dosage taken, and the resident's response shall be documented and maintained in the resident's facility record. The following requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Resident 1's PRN tracking log was not accurate and did not include all times PRN given, and results, which poses a potential, health, safety, or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 9, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to complete the following: Review and audit all resident PRN medication records to ensure documentation includes:date and time administered,medication administered, reason for administration,staff initials/signature,resident response/results following administration, and follow-up documentation when required, and submit proof to LPA by POC date of 05/23/2026.

Jan 28, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced visit today for the facility’s annual inspection. LPA met with Licensee, Lindsey Lamerson, Continual Administrator's Certification expires 02/05/2027. There are currently 6 residents who reside at this home and there is 1 residents on hospice at this time. LPA inspected the interior and the exterior of the facility including the common living spaces, resident bedrooms and bathrooms, activity rooms, medication storage, kitchen, garage and outdoor areas. Bedrooms were clean and in good repair. There is a locked storage for medications. Food supply is adequate for 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable. Fire extinguisher is within the safety regulation period. Smoke alarms were tested and are operational. The home has a carbon monoxide detector and performs disaster drills as required. Water temperature was tested at degrees. First Aid kit is on site and complete. Toxins and cleaning supplies are locked and inaccessible. Required hospice training is not inside Resident 1's hospice binder. There were no deficiencies observed or cited during today's inspection per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. LPA requested the following documents: LIC 500 Personnel Report, LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility, LIC 610-E the Emergency Disaster Plan and copy of current Administrator’s Certificate to update the facility file. Listed documents shall be sent to Licensing. Exit interview conducted with Licensee, Lindsey Lamerson, and copy of report left at facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 28, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Jan 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced visit today for the facility’s annual inspection. LPA met with facility Licensee Lindsay Lamerson, Continual Administrator's Certification for Licensee Lindsay Lamerson expires 02/05/2025. There are currently 6 residents who reside at this home and there is 1 resident on hospice at this time. LPA inspected the interior and the exterior of the facility including the common living spaces, resident bedrooms and bathrooms, activity rooms, medication storage, kitchen, garage and outdoor areas. Bedrooms were clean and in good repair. There is a locked storage for medications. Food supply is adequate for 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable. Fire extinguisher is within the safety regulation period. Smoke alarms were tested and are operational. The home has a carbon monoxide detector and performs disaster drills as required. Water temperature was tested at 110 degrees. First Aid kit is on site and complete. Toxins and cleaning supplies are locked and inaccessible. LPA reviewed 3 facility staff files, and 3 facility resident files. LPA reviewed your Infection Control Plan, and Emergency Disaster Plan. Resident 1 is missing Pre Admission assessment. There were no deficiencies observed or cited during today's inspection per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. LPA requested the following documents: LIC 500 Personnel Report, LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility, LIC 610-E the Emergency Disaster Plan and copy of current Administrator’s Certificate to update the facility file. Listed documents shall be sent to Licensing. Exit interview conducted with facility Licensee Lindsay Lamerson, and copy of report left at facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 17, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Jan 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced visit today for the facility’s annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Lindsey Lamerson, Continual Administrator's for Administrator, Lindsey Lamerson 02/05/2025. There are currently 5 residents who reside at this home and there is 3 residents on hospice at this time. LPA inspected the interior and the exterior of the facility including the common living spaces, resident bedrooms and bathrooms, activity rooms, medication storage, kitchen, garage and outdoor areas. Bedrooms were clean and in good repair. There is a locked storage for medications. Food supply is adequate for 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable. Fire extinguisher is within the safety regulation period. Smoke alarms were tested and are operational. The home has a carbon monoxide detector and performs disaster drills as required. Water temperature was tested at 111 degrees. First Aid kit is on site and complete. Toxins and cleaning supplies are locked and inaccessible. LPA Hurt confirmed all staff present is background cleared. The facility has an updated Emergency Disaster Plan. There were no deficiencies observed or cited during today's inspection per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. LPA's requested the following documents: LIC 500 Personnel Report, LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility, LIC 610-E the Emergency Disaster Plan and copy of current Administrator’s Certificate to update the facility file. Listed documents shall be sent to Licensing. Exit interview conducted with Administrator, Lindsey Lamerson and copy of report left at facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 22, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Merced County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Merced County