Large community · Licensed for 360 · Claremont
Claremont Manor
650 W. Harrison Ave., Claremont, CA 91711Licensed since 2013
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Languages spoken: EnglishReported on Caring.com · September 9, 2026
- Licensed for 360: a large care communityThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 5 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 25 residents
- Bedriddenup to 18 residents
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
LICENSED TO SERVE 252 AMBULATORY RESIDENTS AND 108 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 18 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. MAY RETAIN 25 HOSPICE RESIDENTS. SUMMER HOUSE DEMENTIA II APPROVED FOR 5 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS WITH SECURED PERIMETER. APPROVED FOR LOCKED GATE AND LOCKED DOORS.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
Care services
These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.
Works with hospice
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Pharmacy services on site
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Nurse coverageNurse on Staff (Part time)
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
As needs change
Medicines
Level of medication service: reminders only
Caring.com · September 9, 2026
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 25 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Claremont Manor: two-person transfers or a lift and who is awake overnight. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,600a month to start
Likely $3,550–$5,850
From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Costs & moving in
Term of the admission agreementMonth to month
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Monthly cost breakdownWith a studio and basic help · room, care and fees$4,600likely a month
Starting monthly rate$4,600likely $3,550–$5,850
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,550–$6,000
- $4,600
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,350–$9,150
- $7,100
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes8 nearby homes publish starting rates of $1,500 to $7,630
8 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $1,800–$7,500.
- Mount San Antonio GardensPomona · 0.5 mi · Large community$7,630Listed on its own website · assisted living monthly care and service fees, as low as · seen October 5, 2026
- Claremont PlaceClaremont · 1.2 mi · Large community$5,140Listed on its own website · shared · seen October 5, 2026
- Ivy Park at ClaremontClaremont · 1.8 mi · Large community$4,395Listed on its own website · private studio & companion suites available floor plans · seen October 27, 2026
- La Verne ManorLa Verne · 2.0 mi · Large community$2,100Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Aqua Ridge of MontclairMontclair · 2.0 mi · Large community$3,800Listed on its own website · studio · seen October 5, 2026
- Montclair Royale Senior LivingMontclair · 2.1 mi · Large community$1,500Listed on its own website · shared room · seen October 5, 2026
- Brookdale North EuclidOntario · 4.5 mi · Large community$3,205Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Meridian at ChinoChino · 4.6 mi · Large community$3,495Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.
Rooms & the spaces they will use (10)Shared / companion rooms · Outdoor space · Wifi in resident rooms
Shared / companion rooms
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Outdoor spaceGarden · Tennis courts
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Wifi in resident rooms
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
LaundryDone by staff
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Cable or satellite TV
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Visitor parking
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Kitchenette in the unit
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
AmenitiesSwimming Pool · Library · Fitness room/Gym · W/D in residence
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Housekeeping
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Salon or barber
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Meals, preferences & familiar food (3)Meals are cooked in the home's own kitchen · Meals served in the room · Family may eat with the resident
Meals are cooked in the home's own kitchen
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Meals served in the room
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Family may eat with the resident
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Activities & the rhythm of a day (4)The shape of an ordinary day, as the home describes it · Exercise or fitness program · Trips outside the home
The shape of an ordinary day, as the home describes itComputer class
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Exercise or fitness programTai chi · Yoga/stretching
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Trips outside the home
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Religious services at the home
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Faith, culture & language (1)Languages spoken by caregivers
Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Pets, routines & independence (2)Residents may bring a pet · Overnight guests
Residents may bring a pet
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Overnight guests
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Visiting & staying involved (2)Transport for group outings · Contact form
Transport for group outings
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
- Open on the website
Contact form
Reported on frontporch.net · source dated October 4, 2026.
About the home (2)Brand or trade name · For-profit or nonprofit
Brand or trade nameFront Porch
Reported on frontporch.net · source dated October 4, 2026.
For-profit or nonprofitNonprofit
Reported on frontporch.net · source dated October 4, 2026.
Where it is
650 W. Harrison Ave., Claremont, CA 91711Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Casa Colina HospitalHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.1 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #198601672 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 14 of 23 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 6 “Unsubstantiated”.
20264 state visits · 4 documents
Jun 30, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst Gabriela Castro conducted an annual inspection on 06/30/2025. LPA met with Minerva Naranjo,Director of Health Services and Tanya Madrid, Director of Resident Services and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. The community is licensed to serve (252) ambulatory residents and (108) non-ambulatory of which (18) may be bedridden. There was (1) bedridden residents receiving care during annual inspection. May retain 25 hospice residents. There are fifteen (15) residents under hospice care, during annual inspection. Summer House Dementia Unit II is approved for (5) non-ambulatory residents with secured perimeter, locked gate and locked doors. There are currently twenty-two (22) residents in Summer House Memory Care. Personal Rights postings (LIC 613C and Ombudsman), Complaint Poster (PUB 475), and nondiscrimination notice were observed in a common area. Required “Oxygen in Use” signage was posted in visible locations throughout the facility in accordance with safety requirements. LPA utilized the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) tools for the visit today and observed the following: Physical Plant and Environment safety: The community is composed of several residential buildings that provide independent living, assisted living, and memory care services. Summer House Memory Care consists of three homes, each containing resident restrooms that were observed to be following applicable licensing requirements. The Lodge building was also observed to contain resident restrooms that met licensing regulations, as well as an activities room and a dining hall available for residents' use. During the facility tour, LPA observed a variety of sensory items and activity areas designed to promote resident engagement, including a dedicated sensory room that provides residents with varying sensory experiences and scenery. LPA also observed that the community swimming pool was enclosed by a secured gate, making it inaccessible to residents and in compliance with applicable licensing requirements. (continued on 809C) LPA inspected a total of ten (10) resident bedrooms, including five (5) rooms located in the Summer House Memory Care building and five (5) rooms located in The Lodge building. All resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings, clean linens, adequate lighting, and sufficient storage space for residents' personal belongings. Water temperatures in all resident grooming and bathing areas were measured and found to be within the required range of 105°F to 120°F. LPA observed postings in resident restrooms promoting proper hand-washing practices. Grab bars were installed adjacent to toilets and inside resident showers to promote resident safety. LPA tested the emergency call system in Room #224 at 10:25 a.m., and staff responded at 10:27 a.m. . Evacuation chairs were positioned in the facility stairwells for emergency evacuation purposes. Disinfectants, cleaning solutions, poisons, and other hazardous items were observed to be stored in a manner that made them inaccessible to residents. During record review, LPA obtained and reviewed the community's Annual Fire Alarm Inspection and Testing Report dated 05/20/2026, documenting that a comprehensive inspection and testing of the fire alarm system had been completed throughout the entire community. LPA also observed smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors installed throughout the hallways. Food Service LPA’s observed sufficient supply of nonperishables for one week and perishable foods for a minimum of two days in the facility kitchen area. Soaps, detergents, and cleaning compounds were observed to be stored away from food supplies. Freezers and refrigerators were observed to be clean and within temperatures of 0 degree F (-17.7 degree C), and refrigerators with a maximum temperature of 40-degree F. (4 degree C). LPA’s observed facility weekly and daily menu, which is approved by the facility certified dietary manager. LPA’s observed kitchen staff preparing for lunch while wearing hair nets and gloves LPA observed a newly remodeled dining area that created a spacious and welcoming environment for residents. LPA observed several dining room servers disinfecting tables and counters while wearing gloves and hair nets. The dining area appeared clean, well-maintained, and organized. Planned Activities: LPA’s observed a calendar for June of 2026 with various activities and outings for residents. LPA’s observed sufficient outdoor space in both assisted living and memory care. Disaster Preparedness: Last documented emergency drills were conducted on June 15, 2026, for Summer House and Lodge staff. LPA observed facility sketches with exits and emergency exits routes throughout various locations of the facility. LPA observed emergency food supply. Resident Records: Ten (10) residents files were reviewed and contained current required documents Admissions Agreements, Pre-Placement Appraisals, Consents, Needs/Service Plans, Physician’s Reports with TB/ambulatory status and Rights acknowledgments. Health Related Services: Medications were reviewed and observed to be centrally stored in a designated medication room. The medication cabinets were secured and locked, making medications inaccessible to residents. Medication Administration Records (MARs) were reviewed and found to be current and accurately maintained. Personnel Records & Training: Seven (7) staff files were reviewed and included criminal record clearances, CPR/First Aid, required training and TB screenings. Administrator Certificate for Robert Barton was valid through November 2, 2027. An exit interview was conducted with Robert Barton, Executiver Director and Minerva Naranjo, Director of Health Services. During the inspection, the facility was observed to be following Title 22, Division 6 regulations. No deficiencies were cited at this time. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 30, 2026
Feb 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not meet a resident's incontinence needs
***This report supersedes the report dated 02/03/26. The superseded report was created to update staff, residents and witness identifiers. The findings remain unchanged*** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gabriela Castro conducted an unannounced complaint visit on 02/03/2026 to deliver findings related to the above allegation. LPA met with Tanya Madrid, Director of Resident Services and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation included a review of the resident roster, staff roster, resident face sheet, R1 Physician’s Report, R1 hospice care plans, copies of signage posted in R1’s room, R1 incontinence schedules, R1’s call pendant logs, and R1’s caregiver notes. Additionally, LPA conducted interviews with five (5) staff members (S1–S5), two (2) witness (W1-W2) and eight (8) residents (R1–R8). (Continued on 9099C) Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff do not meet a resident's incontinence needs It is alleged that the facility does not change R1’s diapers frequently enough, which is causing R1 to get urinary tract infections. During staff interviews, staff consistently stated that they assist R1 with ADLs, including grooming, showers, and incontinence care, and that residents requiring increased incontinence care are checked regularly. Staff stated that care provided is documented, including toileting and brief changes, and that staff respond to R1’s requests for assistance as promptly as possible. Staff stated that care plans and hospice plans are available and followed, and that care is individualized based on R1’s preferences and needs. Staff denied concerns of neglect and stated that R1 has not complained about incontinent care. During the resident interview, R1 stated that the facility provides her with everything she needs and that staff treat her well. R1 expressed satisfaction with her living environment and stated that her overall health is good. R1 stated she does not like hospice services and would prefer to return to her prior routine. R1 acknowledged the history of UTIs and reported she is currently taking antibiotics. During resident interviews, residents R2–R8 stated they are satisfied with the care being provided and reported no concerns regarding incontinence care. During W1 interview, W1 stated that R1 has resided at the facility for over eight years and expressed no concerns regarding the services provided. W1 reported regular communication with the hospice nurse and stated that a new incontinence care plan was developed to help reduce recurrent UTIs, noting that UTIs can be common with aging. W1 stated they will continue to communicate with hospice and facility staff and reported no additional concerns. During W2 interview, W2 stated their duties include assessing the resident, conducting regular check-ins, and coordinating care to support the resident’s comfort and well-being. W1 stated that R1 prefers care to be provided in a specific manner and that a care plan was developed between W2, R1 and W1. W2 stated that R1 has a history of recurring UTIs and that R1 reports feeling hot and experiencing burning sensations in the mornings. W2 stated that reminder signages are posted in R1’s room for caregivers to see and that care is adjusted to meet R1’s preferences. W2 described R1 as articulate, active in facility activities, and having vision impairment that causes occasional frustration. W2 stated their role is oversight and care coordination, with caregivers providing direct incontinence care per the care plan. W2 stated that they do not believe the facility neglects residents and would feel comfortable having their own family reside at the facility. Based on the investigation conducted, including interviews with staff, witnesses and residents and review of relevant records, there was insufficient evidence to support the reported allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview was held, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 9, 2026 · control 28-AS-20260130100706
Feb 3, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not meet a resident's incontinence needs
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gabriela Castro conducted an unannounced complaint visit on 02/03/2026 to deliver findings related to the above allegation. LPA met with Tanya Madrid, Director of Resident Services and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation included a review of the resident roster, staff roster, resident face sheet, R1 Physician’s Report, R1 hospice care plans, copies of signage posted in R1’s room, R1 incontinence schedules, call pendant logs, and caregiver notes. Additionally, LPA conducted interviews with six (6) staff members (S1–S6), one (2) witness (W2) and seven (7) residents (R1–R7). (Continued on 9099C) Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff do not meet a resident's incontinence needs It is alleged that the facility does not change R1’s diapers frequently enough, which is causing R1 to get urinary tract infections. During staff interviews, staff consistently stated that they assist R1 with ADLs, including grooming, showers, and incontinence care, and that residents requiring increased incontinence care are checked regularly. Staff stated that care provided is documented, including toileting and brief changes, and that staff respond to R1’s requests for assistance as promptly as possible. Staff stated that care plans and hospice plans are available and followed, and that care is individualized based on R1’s preferences and needs. Staff denied concerns of neglect and stated that R1 has not complained about incontinent care. During the resident interview, R1 stated that the facility provides her with everything she needs and that staff treat her well. R1 expressed satisfaction with her living environment and stated that her overall health is good. R1 stated she does not like hospice services and would prefer to return to her prior routine. R1 acknowledged the history of UTIs and reported she is currently taking antibiotics. During resident interviews, residents R2–R7 stated they are satisfied with the care being provided and reported no concerns regarding incontinence care. During W1 interview, W1 stated that R1 has resided at the facility for over eight years and expressed no concerns regarding the services provided. W1 reported regular communication with the hospice nurse and stated that a new incontinence care plan was developed to help reduce recurrent UTIs, noting that UTIs can be common with aging. W1 stated they will continue to communicate with hospice and facility staff and reported no additional concerns. Based on the investigation conducted, including interviews with staff, witness and residents and review of relevant records, there was insufficient evidence to support the reported allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview was held, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 3, 2026 · control 28-AS-20260130100706
Jan 12, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gabriela Castro conducted an unannounced Case Management visit as a follow-up to a reported gas leak at the facility. The LPA met with Tanya Madrid, Director of Resident Services, and discussed the purpose of the visit. During the visit, the following documents and information were obtained and reviewed staff/resident roster, a map of the campus identifying the affected areas, plumbing work orders, a DigAlert invoice from the contractor to verify that planned drillings are being conducted safely, photos of drilling areas and the facility’s Emergency/Disaster Plan. During a case management visit, Steve Megyes, Director of Environmental Services and Tanya Madrid , Director of Resident Services provided the Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) with a tour of the affected areas related to the gas leak, including the Garden Apartments and East Way units. During the visit, the LPA observed that drilling activities had commenced, and the facility reported having a timeline for repairs to be completed by Friday, January 16, 2026. The LPA conducted interviews with two residents residing in the affected areas. Both residents appeared in good spirits and reported being minimally impacted by the gas leak. Residents stated that their units are equipped with heat pumps that allow for continued heating, and the units also have electric stoves, which remain functional. Residents reported being aware of the accommodation available to them, including temporary relocation options. One resident chose to temporarily relocate to another unit, though that resident also had access to a built-in pump for heating. The facility reported that it continues to monitor the repair process, conducts regular check-ins with affected residents, and address any additional concerns as they arise. The facility further stated that it will remain in contact with Community Care Licensing and provide ongoing updates regarding the status of repairs. There are no deficiencies observed during today’s visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 12, 2026
20256 state visits · 6 documents
Dec 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff neglected to report concern regarding resident.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gabriela Castro conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Tanya Madrid and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted on the following on 12/30/2025, LPA obtained copies of the client roster and staff roster, resident face sheet, and Physician’s Report. LPA also reviewed Unusual Incident Reports (LIC 602), SOC 341, and written staff statements. Additionally, LPA conducted interviews with three staff members (S1–S3), one witness (W1), and one resident (R1). (continued on 9099C) Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff neglected to report concern regarding resident The investigation revealed the following: It is alleged that facility staff failed to report a concern regarding R1. The complaint alleges that staff were aware of statements made by R1 indicating emotional distress and possible self-harm and did not take appropriate action to report. During staff interviews, staff reported that concerns regarding R1’s emotional well-being were first communicated by a private caregiver and were addressed once received. Staff stated the alleged self-harm statements were said to have occurred approximately two weeks earlier but were not reported by the private caregiver at that time. Staff reported that upon notification, supervisory and administrative staff were informed, R1’s safety was assessed, additional supervision was implemented, and R1 was referred for a mental health evaluation. Staff denied failing to report concerns and stated appropriate action was taken once the information was brought to the facility’s attention. During the resident interview, R1 stated she was feeling okay, expressed remorse for prior statements, denied any self-harm intent or behavior, and indicated she wished for the matter to be resolved. During the witness interview, the witness stated they have no concerns regarding the facility or the care provided to R1 and believed the facility responded appropriately to ensure R1’s safety. Community Care Licensing office received the self-harm report, and the facility submitted a detailed Special Incident Report (SIR) on 11/14/2025. Based on the investigation conducted, including interviews with staff, witness and resident and review of relevant records, there was insufficient evidence to support the reported allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview was held, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 30, 2025 · control 28-AS-20251222090239
Oct 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that resident received medical treatment in a timely manner.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elizabeth Irra conducted an investigation to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Tanya Madrid and discussed the purpose of today's visit. During today's visit, LPA obtained copies of the staff and resident rosters, interviewed Staff #1 (S-1) through Staff #3 (S-3), interviewed Resident #1 (R-1) through Resident #4 (R-4), interviewed R-1's Physical Therapist, reviewed R-1's file and obtained relevant documentation. LPA also called R-1's Power of Attorney (POA) and left a message for a return call. All interviewed residents are residing in the memory care unit (where allegation allegedly occurred) and the census for the memory care unit is (21). LPA was unable to interview additional residents from this unit. Refer to LIC 9099C for the continuation of this report. Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff did not ensure that resident received medical treatment in a timely manner. It has been alleged that R-1 has not received physical therapy since sustaining an injury a few months ago. Staff interviews revealed that R-1 sustained an injury on 07/01/25 which resulted in R-1 requiring physical therapy services. Interviewed staff indicated that R-1 was sent to the hospital on 07/01/25 for treatment and was discharged on 07/05/25 to the on-site Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) for rehabilitation. Per interviews (including interview with R-1’s Physical Therapist), R-1 received therapy during their stay at the SNF. Per interviews, R-1 was discharged back to this facility on 07/31/25 under hospice care. Per interviews, due to hospice care being in place, there was a delay with obtaining billing authorization for R-1 to receive physical therapy services. Per interviews, R-1’s POA was aware of the pending authorization for therapy services (meeting was held with R-1’s POA on 08/07/25). Per R-1’s Physical Therapist interview, R-1 began receiving therapy on 08/27/25 at this facility (once the authorization request was approved). Per interviews, the delay for physical therapy services for R-1 was due to the pending authorization approval and not due to staff not ensuring R-1 received medical treatment in a timely manner. Resident interviews revealed that they receive medical treatment in a timely manner and that they do not have any concerns. Interviews and documentation reviewed do not corroborate this allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, a copy of the report and appeal rights were provided to Minerva Naranjothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250930085547
Aug 1, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez conducted subsequent annual inspection on 8/01/2025. LPA Ramirez identified herself and was greeted by Director of Health Services- Minerva Naranjo and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA utilized the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) tools for the visit today and observed the following: Operational Requirements: The fire clearance is approved for (252) ambulatory residents and (108) non-ambulatory of which (18) may be bedridden. This facility may retain no more than twenty (20) hospice residents. There were seventeen (17) residents under hospice care during time of inspection. LPA Ramirez reviewed facility liability insurance and auto registration for three (3) facility vehicles. Infection Control: There are using appropriate hand hygiene and wearing gloves while assisting clients. Staff are cleaning and disinfecting often for high touched surfaces. Facility has an Infection Control Plan in place. Personnel Records Training: Staff files are maintained at the facility. LPA Ramirez observed the required annual training for staff and staff working with dementia residents. LPA Ramirez reviewed food handler certificates for kitchen staff. Staffing: Administrator Certificate for Robert Barton (7033961740) expires 11/02/2025. See 809-C for continuation. Health Related Services/Incidental Medical Services: The medications are centrally stored in the medication rooms and in bubble packs and/or original containers. The facility uses the Medication Administration Record (MAR) electronic log to document medications given. The facility provides incidental medical services. Resident Records/Incident Reports: LPA Ramirez reviewed Resident files for Resident #1 (R-1) through Resident #6 (R-6). Resident files are maintained at the facility. Admission Agreement, Physician's Report (including T.B and Ambulatory Status), Consent for Medical Treatment, Preplacement Appraisal Information, Resident Pre-Appraisal, Care Plan/Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan, Resident Rights were observed. No violations were cited during this inspection visit. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 1, 2025
Jul 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst’s (LPAs) Kimberly Ramirez, Blanca Gonzalez, and Sakinah Madyun conducted an annual inspection on 07/08/2025. LPAs met with Minerva Naranjo (Director of Health Services) and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. This facility is licensed to serve (252) ambulatory residents and (108) non-ambulatory of which (18) may be bedridden. There were two (2) bedridden residents receiving care during annual inspection. This facility may retain no more than twenty (20) hospice residents. There are fourteen (14) residents under hospice care, during annual inspection. Summer House Dementia Unit II is approved for (5) non-ambulatory residents with secured perimeter, locked gate and locked doors. There are currently twenty-two (22) residents in the Summer House Memory Care. The total number of residents at this facility is two-hundred and thirty-nine (239). See 809-C for continued report. LPA utilized the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) tools for the visit today and observed the following: Physical Plant and Environment safety: Disinfectants, cleaning solutions, poisons and other items that could pose a danger if readily available to residents, were observed to be inaccessible to residents. LPA’s observed carbon monoxide detectors and smoke alarms in hallways. Smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and observed to be operational. LPA’s inspected ten (10) rooms; of which five (5) in Summer House Memory Care and five (5) in The Lodge building of the facility. During inspection of Summer House Memory Care, LPA’s observed, combination locks on kitchenette refrigerators. Per Director of Health Services- Minerva Naranjo, resident#1 (R1) has a behavior of removing food or snacks from the refrigerator and placing the food item in random locations. LPA Ramirez will issue one (1) Technical Violation based on this observation. Director of Health Services- Minerva Naranjo instructed staff to remove all combination locks from Summer House Memory Care refrigerators. All resident bedrooms contained the required furniture, linens and lighting. Water temperatures in all grooming and bathing areas were measured to be with 105 – 120 degrees F. Facility maintains a monthly waterlog to record water temperature throughout the facility. LPA Ramirez observed postings encouraging proper hand washing etiquette in restrooms. LPA Ramirez observed grab bars near toilets and inside showers. LPA Ramirez tested emergency pull cord in room#103 at 10:59am, and staff arrived at 11:01am. LPA’s observed evacuation chairs in stairways. Food Service: LPA’s observed sufficient supply of nonperishables for one week and perishable foods for a minimum of two days in the facility kitchen area. Soaps, detergents, and cleaning compounds were observed to be stored away from food supplies. Freezers and refrigerators were observed to be clean and within temperatures of 0 degree F (-17.7 degree C), and refrigerators with a maximum temperature of 40-degree F. (4 degree C). LPA’s observed facility weekly and daily menu, which is approved by the facility certified dietary manager. LPA’s observed kitchen staff preparing for lunch while wearing hair nets and gloves. LPA’s observed several dining room servers disinfecting tables and counters while wearing gloves and hair nets. SEE 809-C for continued report. Planned Activities: LPA’s observed a calendar for July of 2025 with various activities and outings for residents. LPA’s observed sufficient outdoor space in both assisted living section and in memory care. Residents Rights-Information: LPA’s observed the following postings in common areas throughout the facility: Complaint Poster (PUB 475), personal rights, and nondiscrimination notice. LPA Ramirez observed facility computers with internet access and a facility land line. Disaster Preparedness: The facility has the Emergency Disaster Plan (LIC610D/9 pages) in place. LPA Ramirez observed evacuation chair in stairway. Last documented emergency drills were conducted on 7/01/25 during the AM, PM and NOC shifts. LPA Ramirez observed facility sketches with exits and emergency exits routes throughout various locations of the facility. LPA Ramirez emergency food supply. Residents with Special Needs: Facility pool was observed to be inaccessible to residents with physical and mental disabilities. LPA’s observed signs posted indicating “No smoking - Oxygen in Use” in various locations of the facility. LPA’s observed several oxygen tanks in resident rooms secured in stands. Knives, sharps or other items that could pose a danger to residents with dementia, were observed to be inaccessible. Auditory devices and delay egress perimeters were observed to be in working order. Due to time constraints, LPA Ramirez will return at a later time to complete record review and interviews; required for annual inspection. No deficiencies were cited at this time. The Exit interview was conducted with Minerva Naranjo (Director of Health Services) and Administrator Robert Barton. A copy of this report was provided via email.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 8, 2025
The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
May 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez and LPA Gabriela Castro conducted an unannounced Case Management Visit-Incident on 05/20/2025, stemming from incident report received on 05/02/2025. LPAs were greeted by Director of Health Services-Minerva Naranjo and explained the purpose of the visit. Case Management findings: On 05/02/2025, LPA Ramirez received an Unusual Incident/Injury Report (LIC 624) regarding medication error that occurred on 05/01/2025. Per Unusual Incident/Injury Report (LIC 624) dated 05/01/2025, staff#1 (S1) erroneously dispensed another resident’s scheduled medication to resident#1 (R1). Staff immediately notified R1’s responsible party and R1’s primary care physician of the medication error. R1’s primary physician ordered facility staff to monitor R1’s blood pressure, report any abnormal results and skip AM medications till 05/02/2025. Facility staff later reported R1’s blood pressure to R1’s primary care physician and R1’s primary care physician deemed those results were normal. Facility staff reported R1 did not have any adverse reactions throughout 05/01/2025. According to Unusual Incident/Injury Report (LIC 624), S1 would be receiving in-service re-training on medication administration. On 05/20/2025, LPAs requested to review S1’s in-service training on medication administration completed after 05/01/2025. LPA’s reviewed completed in-service re-training for S1 with a final completion date of 05/07/2025. No deficiencies were cited today. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was provided via email.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2025
Mar 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez conducted a Case Management Visit-Incident on 03/18/2025, stemming from incident report received on 2/11/2025. LPA was greeted by Administrator Robert Barton, Director of Health Services-Minerva Naranjo, Director of Resident Services-Tanya Madrid and explained the purpose of the visit. Case Management-Incident findings: On 2/11/25, LPA Ramirez received an Unusual Incident Report (LIC 624) indicating the immediate closure of the facility kitchen by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health (DPH) on 2/11/2025. The facility kitchen was closed due to cockroach infestation. Facility kitchen remained closed from 2/11/25 through 2/15/25, for repairs and extermination of roaches. Facility staff provided meals to residents that came from a local facility. All meals were individually boxed and in disposable containers. On 2/15/2025, the DPH returned and conducted another re-inspection. The DPH found the facility eliminated the cockroach infestation and the facility public health permit was reinstated. On 3/18/25, LPA Ramirez conducted a tour of facility kitchen and observed repairs made to kitchen walls. Interview with Administrator Barton revealed the facility changed pest control company and has an updated pest elimination service contract. LPA Ramirez obtained copies of ECOLAB pest elimination services agreement, DPH official inspection reports, and facility kitchen staff re-training. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted, LPA Ramirez will issue one (1) type A deficiency for violation of Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, Article 10. Food Services- 87555(b)(27) General Food Service Requirements- (b) The following food service requirements shall apply: (27) All kitchen areas shall be kept clean and free of litter, rodents, vermin and insects. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report, 809-D and appeals rights was provided via email.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(27) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 19, 2025
General Food Service Requirements- (b) The following food service requirements shall apply: (27) All kitchen areas shall be kept clean and free of litter, rodents, vermin and insects.This requirement was not met as evidenced by: On 2/11/25, facility kitchen was closed down for 5 days due to roach infestation.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee made kitchen repairs, conducted kitchen staff retraining and updated their pest control services. *NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED*
20244 state visits · 4 documents
Jun 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez conducted subsequent annual inspection on 6/15/2024. LPA Ramirez was greeted by Rafael Constantini (Sales and Marketing Manager) and LPA explained purpose of today’s visit. Tanya Madrid (Director of Human Services) arrived within the hour to assist with inspection. LPA utilized the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) tools for the visit today and observed the following: Operational Requirements: The fire clearance is approved for (252) ambulatory residents and (108) non-ambulatory of which (18) may be bedridden. This facility may retain no more than (15) hospice residents. There are (11) residents under hospice care. LPA Ramirez reviewed facility liability insurance and auto registration for three (3) facility vehicles. Infection Control: There are using appropriate hand hygiene and wearing gloves while assisting clients. Staff are cleaning and disinfecting often for high touched surfaces. Facility has an Infection Control Plan in place. Personnel Records Training: Staff files are maintained at the facility. LPA Ramirez and staff present during inspection were unable to gain access to staff files. LPA Ramirez observed required annual training only for eight (8) out of the ten (10) staff files requested. LPA Ramirez reviewed required annual training for staff working with dementia residents. LPA Ramirez was unable to review the following: CPR and First Aid, TB testing results, Health screening, fingerprint clearance, and job application. LPA Ramirez reviewed food handler certificates for kitchen staff. LPA Ramirez will issue Type B deficiency for not gaining access to staff files. Staffing: Administrator Certificate for Robert Barton (7033961740) expires 11/02/2025. Health Related Services/Incidental Medical Services: The medications are centrally stored in the medication rooms and in bubble packs and/or original containers. The facility uses the Medication Administration Record (MAR) electronic log to document medications given. The facility provides incidental medical services. See 809-C for continuation. Resident Records/Incident Reports: LPA Ramirez reviewed Resident files for Resident #1 (R-1) through Resident #10 (R-10). Resident files are maintained at the facility. Admission Agreement, Physician's Report (including T.B and Ambulatory Status), Consent for Medical Treatment, Preplacement Appraisal Information, Resident Pre-Appraisal, Care Plan/Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan, Resident Rights were observed. One deficiency was observed during this inspection. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report, 809-D and appeals rights was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 15, 2024
Jun 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez conducted required annual inspection. LPA met with Minerva Naranjo (Director of Health Services), Tanya Madrid (Director of Resident Services) and Susan DeGange (Q&A Coordinator) and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. This facility is licensed to serve (252) ambulatory residents and (108) non-ambulatory of which (18) may be bedridden. There are eighty-two (82) residents under Assisted Living. There are zero (0) bedridden residents at this time. This facility may retain no more than fifteen (15) hospice residents. There are eleven (11) residents under hospice care. Summer House Dementia Unit II is approved for (5) non-ambulatory residents with secured perimeter, locked gate and locked doors. There are currently twenty-two (22) residents in the Summer House Dementia Unit. The total number of residents at this facility is 212. LPA utilized the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) tools for the visit today and observed the following: Physical Plant and Environment safety: Disinfectants, cleaning solutions, poisons and other items that could pose a danger if readily available to residents, were observed to be inaccessible to residents. LPA Ramirez observed carbon monoxide detectors and smoke alarms in hallways. LPA Ramirez inspected ten (10) rooms; of which five (5) in Summer House Memory Care and five (5) in The Lodge building of the facility. All resident bedrooms contained required furniture, linens and lighting. Water temperatures in all grooming and bathing areas were measured to be with 105 – 120 degrees F. Facility maintains a monthly waterlog to record water temperature throughout the facility. LPA Ramirez observe postings encouraging proper hand washing etiquette in restrooms. LPA Ramirez observed grab bars near toilets and inside showers. LPA Ramirez tested emergency pull cord in room#119. Staff responded 2 minutes later to assist. LPA Ramirez observed evacuation chairs in stairways. See 809-C for continuation. Food Service: LPA Ramirez observed sufficient supply of nonperishables for one week and perishable foods for a minimum of two days in the facility kitchen area. Soaps, detergents, and cleaning compounds were observed to be stored away from food supplies. Freezers and refrigerators were observed to be clean and within temperatures of 0 degree F (-17.7 degree C), and refrigerators with maximum temperature of 40 degree F. (4 degree C). LPA Ramirez observed facility weekly and daily menu, which is approved by the facility certified dietary manager. LPA Ramirez observed kitchen staff preparing for lunch while wearing hair nets and gloves. LPA Ramirez observed several dinning room servers disinfecting tables and counters while wearing gloves and hair nets. Planned Activities: LPA Ramirez observed twelve (12) residents participating in a staff led seated exercise class in the Lodge Lounge room of the facility. LPA Ramirez observed a calendar for June of 2024 with various activities and outings for residents. LPA Ramirez observed sufficient outdoor space in both assisted living section and in memory care. Residents Rights-Information: LPA Ramirez observed the following postings in common areas throughout the facility: Complaint Poster (PUB 475), personal rights, and nondiscrimination notice. LPA Ramirez observed facility computers with internet access and a facility land line. Disaster Preparedness: The facility has the Emergency Disaster Plan (LIC610D/9 pages) in place. LPA Ramirez observed evacuation chair in stairway. Last documented emergency drills were conducted on 5/3/24, 3/12,24, and on 02/27/24 during the AM, PM and NOC shifts. LPA Ramirez observed facility sketches with exits and emergency exits routes throughout various locations of the facility. LPA Ramirez emergency food supply. Residents with Special Needs: Facility pool was observed to be inaccessible to residents with physical and mental disabilities. LPA Ramirez observed signs posted indicating “No smoking - Oxygen in Use” in various locations of the facility. LPA Ramirez observed several oxygen tanks in resident rooms secured in stands. Knives, sharps or other items that could pose a danger to residents with dementia, were observed to be inaccessible. Auditory devices and delay egress perimeters were observed to be in working order. Due to time constraints, LPA Ramirez will return at a later time to complete annual inspection. No deficiencies were cited at this time. Exit interview was conducted with Minerva Naranjo (Director of Health Services), Tanya Madrid (Director of Resident Services) and Susan DeGange (Q&A Coordinator). A copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 6, 2024
Feb 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not provide a safe environment for residents
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nune Margaryan conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. LPA met with Director of Resident Services, Tanya Madrid who assist with the visit. Reason for the visit was explained. The investigation consisted of the following: Interviews were conducted with 5 staff members and 10 residents from Residential Living Unit. LPA conducted the tour of the Residential Unit which included the administrative building with the main dining room. LPA obtained residents roster and staff roster. Continue 9099C Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following: Staff do not provide a safe environment for residents. It was alleged that residents leave their walkers in the aisles and between tables in the dining room, thus creating safety hazards for other residents and servers. Interviewed nine (9) residents (R2 - R10) denied the allegation and stated that not seeing any residents leave their walkers in the aisles and between tables in the dining room. There are always staff in the dining room to monitor and ensure that residents walkers not blocking residents or servers way and they can navigate in the aisles and between tables. They stated that they didn't hear any complaints from the residents or staff about this matter. One (1) resident (R1) stated that they do not use the walker, just cane and in the dining room they put cane near the entrance wall. R1 stated they worry about others. R1 stated that staff made some arrangements in the dining room. They rearranged the tables in the dining room and now there are more empty spaces for residents to park their walkers. R1 will bring on Administrator's attention again if there will be any issues about this matter. Interviewed staff stated that there are always enough staff in the dining room to monitor residents. They stated they will ask residents and will move / rearrange walkers ensuring the walkways remain clear. During today's visit, LPA toured the dining room while residents were having lunch and observed the following: Residents walkers were observed parked outside of the dining room, next to the wall (near the dining area). Walkers were observed parked inside the dining area near the entrance wall and near the window wall, away from traffic. Multiple residents were observed having lunch while sitting in their wheelchairs, but this did not present a concern of blocking the walkways as there was ample space for the staff and residents to walk around. There was plenty of space for residents with walkers to navigate through. During today's visit, LPA did not observe walkers or wheelchairs obstructing the walkways inside the dining room and creating safety hazards for the staff and residents. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to the Executive Director.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 2, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240123162718
Jan 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff handled resident in a rough manner causing injury Staff speaks inappropriately to residents Staff put resident's mattress on the floor
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez made an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit on 01/18/2024 to deliver findings and on 12/29/23, LPA Ramirez conducted unannounced subsequent complaint investigation, and on 12/26/2023, unannounced Health and Safety check conducted by LPA Maldonado. LPA met with Executive Director, Robert Barton, and explained the purpose for the visit. LPA Ramirez requested and obatined copies of Staff# 1-9 (S1-S9): Application for Employment, eight (8) documented interviews conducted facility staff, copies of recent Physician's Report for Residents# 1-3 (R1-R3), Unusual Incident/Injury Report for R1 dated 11/06/23, 12/21/23, Hopsice Physician Order dated 12/11/23 for R1, nursing clinical note for R1 dated 12/17/23, and physical plant tour of memory care. LPA Ramirez interviewed staff and residents. See 9099-C Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following. Regarding Allegation(s): Staff handled resident in a rough manner causing injury- It is alleged staff handled resident#1 (R1) in a rough manner causing injury. Five (5) out of the six (6) staff interviewed denied this allegation. Three (3) out of the three (3) residents interviewed denied this allegation. LPA Ramirez reviewed facility staff notes that indicated on 12/10/2023, R1 sustained an injury to R1’s hands and the injury was treated by staff. LPA Ramirez did observe other SIRs indicating R1 having injuries due to unwitnessed falls. LPA Ramirez reviewed nine (9) staff records. LPA Ramirez did observe facility policy on “Adult Abuse” for all staff in staff records. On 12/29/2023, LPA Ramirez received a letter from the facility stating an internal investigation conducted by the facility management did not substantiate this allegation. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Staff speaks inappropriately to residents- It is alleged staff speak inappropriately to residents. Five (5) out of the six (6) staff interviewed denied this allegation. Three (3) out of the three (3) residents interviewed denied this allegation. Facility tour conducted by LPA Ramirez on 12/29/2023, did not reveal staff speaking inappropriately to residents. On 12/29/2023, LPA Ramirez received a letter from the facility stating an internal investigation conducted by the facility management did not substantiate this allegation. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Staff put resident's mattress on the floor- It is alleged staff put R1’s mattress on the floor. Five (5) out of the six (6) staff interviewed denied this allegation. Three (3) out of the three (3) residents interviewed denied this allegation. On 12/29/2023, LPA Ramirez conducted a tour of R1’s room and upon entry observed R1 sleeping in hospital grade bed. LPA Ramirez observed a large blue fall pad on floor near R1’s bed. LPA Ramirez was told by staff that R1 has that fall pad placed on the floor due to R1 being a fall risk. Fall pad is being used to prevent further injury should R1 have another fall. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 18, 2024 · control 28-AS-20231222125803
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 9 documents
20233 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 13, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff threatened resident with eviction.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tao conducted an unannounced 10 day complaint visit to this facility. Upon arriving at the facility, LPA met with Robert. LPA explained the purpose of today’s visit and discussed the above-mentioned allegation. The investigation consisted of resident interviews, staff interviews, facility tours, and review of facility records. LPA obtained resident roster, staff roster, and residents’ facility files. The investigation revealed the following: In regard to the allegation, “staff threatened resident with eviction," it was alleged that a resident was given a letter threatening to evict for writing articles about residents and published the articles. Per resident interviews, seven (7) out of ten (10) residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Two (2) out of ten (10) residents were attempted but failed to be interviewed. One (1) out of ten (10) stated resident was threatened with eviction warning after writing about other residents. (-continued in LIC 9099C-) Unsubstantiated Resident interviews revealed that staff did not threaten residents for eviction. All seven (7) staff interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Staff interviews revealed that staff did not threaten resident. File review revealed staff had policy that staff was not allowed to threaten residents. LPA reviewed resident’s letter dated 09/22/23 which resident claimed that letter was threatening to evict resident. The letter stated resident had violated facility policy about disclosing resident privacy in articles and published those in the newspaper without having residents' consent. Administrator attempted to stop resident from publishing articles of other residents without getting their permissions. The consequences of violating residents rights could be eviction per facility policy and resident's agreements. Therefore, staff did not threaten resident with eviction. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with the Administrator. A hard copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 13, 2023 · control 28-AS-20231006162147
Aug 18, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elizabeth Irra conducted a subsequent visit to complete the required annual inspection. The initial visit was conducted on 07/27/23. LPA met with Robert Barton (Executive Director) and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. LPA utilized the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) tools for the visit today and completed the following domains: Staffing: There is sufficient staffing at the facility. Administrator Certificate for Robert Barton expires 01/31/25. Staff employed are over the age of 18 and are fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. Personnel Records Training: Staff files are maintained at the facility. LPA reviewed staff files for Staff #1 (S-1) through Staff #7 (S-7). Pertinent staff have current First Aid/CPR certification. Staff have their Health Screening and Tuberculosis Screening on file. Staff are also trained on Abuse Reporting and Resident Rights. Staff have on-going training. Resident Rights-Information: Resident rights are posted and included in Resident files. Let-Us-No poster posted. LTCO poster posted. Resident Rights-Incident Reports: LPA reviewed Resident files for Resident #1 (R-1) through Resident #8 (R-8). Resident files are maintained at the facility. Admission Agreement, Physician's Report (including T.B and Ambulatory Status), Consent For Medical Treatment, Preplacement Appraisal Information, Resident Pre-Appraisal, Care Plan/Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan, Resident Rights were observed. Refer to LIC 809C for the continuation of this report. Physical Plant & Environment Safety: The kitchen, dining area, Summer House (Dementia) and The Lodge (Assisted Living) locations were amongst the toured locations. Smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors were observed throughout the tour. Fire extinguishers are located throughout the premises (service date of 04/22/23). Knives, cleaning solutions, and disinfectants are locked and inaccessible to clients. Bathrooms had non-skid surfaces and grab bars. The swimming pool is gated and locked. Planned Activities: Staff provide a variety of activities for the residents. Activity calendar posted. There is a full-time Life Enrichment Director and Life Enrichment Assistants focusing on planned activities only. Food Service: There are sufficient food supplies of 2-day perishable and (1) week of non-perishable items. The food is properly stored in the refrigerator. Pesticides and cleaning supplies are kept away from the food preparation areas. Kitchen is kept clean and free from rodents and other vermin. Plates, cups and utensils are kept cleaned and stored properly. Dining room has adequate seating. Posted menu observed. Emergency water supply observed. Health Related Services/Incidental Medical Services: The medications are centrally stored in the medication rooms and in bubble packs and/or original containers. The facility uses the Medication Administration Record (MAR) electronic log to document medications given. Medications are administered as prescribed by the Physician. The facility provides incidental medical services. No deficiencies. Exit interview conducted, copy of appeal rights and a copy of this report was provided to Robert Barton.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 18, 2023
Jul 27, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elizabeth Irra conducted the required annual inspection. LPA met with Robert Barton (Executive Director) and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. This facility is licensed to serve (252) ambulatory residents and (108) non-ambulatory of which (18) may be bedridden. There are (56) residents under Assisted Living. There are no bedridden residents at this time. This facility may retain no more than (10) hospice residents. There are (7) residents under hospice care. Summer House Dementia Unit II is approved for (5) non-ambulatory residents with secured perimeter, locked gate and locked doors. There are currently 21 residents in the Dementia Unit. The total number of residents at this facility is 278. LPA utilized the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) tools for the visit today and observed the following: Infection Control: There are using appropriate hand hygiene and wearing gloves while assisting clients. Staff are cleaning and disinfecting often for high touched surfaces. Facility has an Infection Control Plan in place. Operational Requirements: The fire clearance is approved for (252) ambulatory residents and (108) non-ambulatory of which (18) may be bedridden. There are no bedridden residents at this time. This facility may retain no more than (10) hospice residents. There are (7) residents under hospice care. Summer House Dementia Unit II is approved for (5) non-ambulatory residents with secured perimeter, locked gate and locked doors. There are currently 21 residents in the Dementia Unit. Disaster Preparedness: The facility has the Emergency Disaster Plan (LIC610D/9 pages) in place. Refer to LIC 809C for the continuation of this report. The following domains remain pending: · Staffing · Personnel Records Training · Resident Rights- Information · Resident Rights-Incident Reports · Physical Plant & Environment Safety · Planned Activities · Food Service · Incidental Medical Services Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided to Robert Barton.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 27, 2023
20224 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 9, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
LPA Kimberly Ramirez made an unannounced Case Management visit. LPA met with Administrator Greg Hirst and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA obtained copies of Resident Face Sheet, Facility Self-Assessment of Resident,Preplacement Appraisal Information, Management Medication, Progress Notes, Health and Wellness Review, Resident Appraisal, SIRs. Resident was not available to interview. LPA will return to facility to conduct interviews with staff and resident. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez made an unannounced Case Management visit. LPA met with Administrator Greg Hirst and Director of Residential Services Tanya Madrid and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA was later met by the Director of Health Services Minerva Naranjo. The visit consisted of interviews with the Director of Health Services, two Staff (S1) and (S2), two (2) residents (R1) and (R2). LPA obtained copies of Physician’s Report for Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly, Resident Face Sheet, Facility Self-Assessment of Resident, Preplacement Appraisal Information, Management Medication, Progress Notes, Health and Wellness Review, Resident Appraisal, Resident Roster, Staff Roster, and SIRs. LPA will review all documents provided and information provided from today’s visit. LPA may return and request additional information. LPA conducted exit interview.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 9, 2022
Oct 5, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensed Program Analysts (LPAs) Alberto Lopez and Kimberly Ramirez made an unannounced Case Management visit. LPAs met with Administrator Greg Hirst and Director of Resident Services Tanya Madrid and discussed the purpose of the visit. The visit consisted of interviews with Administrator, Director of Residential services, Manager of Memory care, one resident R1 and 1 staff, S1. LPA asked for and obtained facility personnel roster, staff roster, R1 face sheet and R1 Physicians report for residential care facilities for the Elderly, and wrtten statements of 3 staff. S1-S3. Manager of memory care and Administrator assisted with tour of entire memory care units and LPAs did not observed any health or safety issues while touring memory care unit. It was reported and confirmed by internal investigation and written statements from staff S1-S3 that R1 was left on the floor for approximately 30-40 minutes. 2/3 staff stated resident was left in wet clothing for approximately 30-40 minutes. Based upon the information obtained, deficiency cited on LIC 809D. Appeal Rights explained and exit interview conducted with Greg Hirst.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 5, 2022
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 6, 2022
87468.1(a)(1) To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: According to statements from staff, resident was left on the floor for 30 to 40 minutes in soil clothing which posed a health a safety isuue.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 5, 2022
Plan of correction: Administrator will provide traning in personal rights to all staff in memory care units as welll as other staff at facility and provide LPA with signed roster by POC date.
Jul 28, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vasallo conducted an annual visit to the facility. LPA met with Administrator, Greg Hirst and explained the reason for the visit. LPA used the infection control tool to evaluate the facility. LPA observed the physical plant, COVID-19 procedures, residents' medications and records, food supply, and staff records. The facility cares for elderly residents and is approved for 10 hospice residents. There are currently 7 residents on hospice. Administrator and maintenance staff assisted with the tour of the facility. The facility is a large campus that includes independent living, assisted living, memory care and skilled nursing. The assisted living and memory care buildings were toured. The Lodge is a two story building for assisted living residents. The building consist of resident bedrooms, kitchenette, dining room, activity room, and beauty salon. The furniture in the dining room and activity room is adequate. The hallways and stairways are clear and free of any obstructions. The second-floor stairways have the required evacuation chairs. Resident rooms were randomly chosen for inspection on the first and second floor. The rooms are properly furnished with bedframes, dressers, lamps and chairs. The beds have adequate linen. The bathrooms have the required grab bars near the toilet and in the shower. The hot water was tested and was between 106.3 - 114.2 degrees, which is within the required 105 - 120 degrees. Elevators were operating at the time of the visit. The Summer House is a separate building for memory care residents. The memory care unit requires a code to enter. The building was toured and was observed to contain all required items. The main kitchen was toured. The appliances were working properly. The refrigerators and freezers are set at appropriate temperatures. There was sufficient perishable and non-perishable food and the food is stored properly. There are smoke detectors, carbon monoxide detectors and fire extinguishers located throughout each building. The grounds are properly maintained and there were no hazards observed. The pool has a gate around the entire perimeter and has self-latching doors. Continued on 809C. There is a screening station at the entrance of the facility to screen visitors. Staff document temperatures daily and require visitors to sign in. Facility currently has at least a 60-day supply of PPEs. Five resident records were reviewed to confirm emergency contacts are updated. Staff also document resident temperatures and any COVID-19 symptoms daily. Five staff records were reviewed to confirm health screenings, training, fingerprint clearances, and vaccination status. All records were complete. LPA reviewed three residents' medications. Medications are documented properly and given as prescribed. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, there were no deficiencies observed during the visit. Exit interview held. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 28, 2022
Feb 3, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staffing levels COVID guidelines not being followed Administration of Medication not properly supervised Resident not receiving proper care Denied access to visiting resident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vasallo conducted a subsequent complaint visit. The initial complaint visit was conducted by LPA Nina Galarza on 1/14/22. LPA Vasallo conducted a subsequent complaint visit on 1/26/22. The investigation consisted of the following: Interviews were conducted with 7 staff members and 2 residents. There are currently 15 residents in memory care. LPA obtained contact information for 5 family members and was able to interview 2 of the families. Resident #1's (R1) file was reviewed. The facility was toured including the Summer House (memory care unit). The incidents allegedly occurred at the Summer House. LPA also randomly chose 5 residents' medications to review. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation of low staffing levels, LPA interviewed staff, residents, and residents' families. LPA also reviewed the staff roster. Staff interviewed indicated there is sufficient staff for the amount of residents in memory care. Continued on 9099C. Unsubstantiated Residents interviewed indicated there is sufficient staff and described the staff as "great". Families interviewed did not have any concerns regarding staffing levels. At the time of the visit, LPA observed 3 caregivers, an activity person, and an additional staff member administering medication. The previous visit was conducted in the afternoon and LPA observed 3 caregivers. LPA observed food being served, staff passing medication and assisting residents with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). Based on the information obtained, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Allegation: COVID guidelines not being followed. Allegedly staff were observed not wearing their masks properly. Staff interviewed denied the allegation. Residents interviewed indicated staff always wear masks. During LPA's visits, staff were always observed wearing the appropriate masks. Based on the information obtained, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Allegation: Administration of medication not properly supervised. Allegedly there was confusion about R1's medications, however there were no other details provided. R1 is no longer a resident of the facility and therefore the medication cannot be reviewed. LPA reviewed 5 other residents' medications. The medications are documented properly and appeared to be given as prescribed. Staff and residents interviewed did not corroborate the allegation. Families interviewed did not have any concerns regarding the medications. Based on the information obtained, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Allegation: Resident not receiving proper care. Allegedly R1's briefs were not being changed often enough. This allegedly lead to redness. Staff interviewed denied the allegation and indicated R1 was capable of toileting many days on his/her own. The most recent physician's report dated 9/23/20 indicates R1 is ambulatory and is able to care for own toileting needs. Residents interviewed did not corroborate the allegation. Residents described the staff as "great". Families interviewed did not have any concerns about this allegation. Based on the information obtained, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Allegation: Denied access to visiting resident. Allegedly a visitor was denied a visit with R1. The facility requires visitors to schedule visits through a website. Allegedly the visitor scheduled the visit and was denied a visit. Staff indicated that at the last minute another visitor cancelled their visit and the visitor for R1 was able to schedule a visit for that same time slot. However, the visiting list was already printing out for the day and staff were unaware that R1's visitor had scheduled the visit and did not allow the visitor in because that time slot was already filled. Due to COVID restrictions, the facility is only allowing 1 visitor at a time. Continued on 9099C. Some of the caregivers interviewed remember the incident with R1's visitor and confirmed they did not allow the visitor in because they were not on the visiting list and someone else was scheduled to visit at the same time. Families interviewed indicated they have never been denied a visit. This incident seems to be a scheduling conflict and not a denial of visitation. Based on the information obtained, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. Exit interview held. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 3, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220107141402
20212 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 27, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Christine Wong, Cynthia Chan and Alma Gonzalez conducted an annual required visit. LPA's met with Director of Residential Services, Minerva Naranjo and explained the reason for the visit. LPA's used the infection control tool to evaluate the facility. LPA's observed the facility plant, COVID-19 procedures, reviewed residents' medications, observed food supply, and reviewed resident and staff files. Facility has submitted a mitigation plan and approved on 04/10/21. The facility is located in a large campus that includes independent living, assisted living, memory care and skilled nursing. The assisted living and memory care buildings were toured. The assisted living building has 2 floors. The first floor consist of resident bedrooms, kitchen, dining room and activity room. The furniture in the dining room was adequate and the kitchen was clean. The appliances were working properly. The refrigerators and freezers are set at appropriate temperatures. There was sufficient perishable and non-perishable food and the food is stored properly. There are smoke detectors and fire extinguishers located throughout the building and they are operational. The hallways and stairways are clear and free of any obstructions. LPA inspected Room#102, #104, #107, #116, #209, #214. The rooms are properly furnished with bedframes, dressers, lamps and chairs. The beds have adequate linen. The bathrooms have the required grab bars near the toilet and in the shower. The hot water was tested and was between 115.7 and 118.9 degrees, which is within the required 105 - 120 degrees. The memory care unit was also toured. The memory care unit is a cottage that is separate from the assisted living building. Memory care unit has three different houses with separate key pad entrance. It consists of dining area, kitchen and laundry room. LPA inspected Room#1, #5, #7, #10, #12, 13. Bedrooms have the required furniture and bathrooms have the required grab bars. The hot water was tested and it was between 109 and 116 degrees F, which required 105-120 degrees F. LPA's reviewed ten (10) resident files to confirm emergency contact is updated. LPA's also reviewed staff files to confirm health screenings and fingerprint clearances. LPA's reviewed 10 residents' medications included four (4) residents in memory care unit and six (6) residents in assisted living. Seven (7) Residents have no PRN medication located in the facility. Facility is currently following COVID 19 recommendations regarding COVID 19 signs throughout the facility, disinfecting products are available in each room and facility is disinfected all day long, restrooms have sufficient soap, paper towels, and signs, facility has an isolation room and a cart with PPE supplies, and PPE supplies are sufficient for more than 30 days. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, the deficiencies observed are documented on 809D. Exit interview held. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 27, 2021
Oct 25, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff does not accord privacy to resident.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kruz Long conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. Upon arrival, LPA met with Minerva Naranjo (Director of Residential Health Services) and explained the purpose of the visit. During today's visit, LPA obtained a copy of the Resident and Staff roster, Security report and Facility investigation statement. LPA interviewed Staff #1 in the Chaplain room at 11:15 am, interviewed Resident #1 in the cottage at 12:35 pm, interviewed Residents #2 through #10 in the Chaplain room between 12:40 pm to 1:35 pm and interviewed Staff #2 via telephone in the Chaplain room at 2:02 pm. In regards to the allegation: Facility staff does not accord privacy to resident. LPA's interview with Resident #1 indicate that at time of the incident, Resident #1 did not recall who was at the door or who delivered the mail. Interview with Staff #2 indicate that prior to entering any Resident's cottage or room, the door is knocked and acknowledgment has to be provided. Interviews with 9 out of 9 Residents indicate that Staff has never not accorded them privacy and Staff does not enter their rooms without first knocking. Continue to LIC9099C... Unsubstantiated Based on LPA's record review and interviews, the investigation revealed: Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted with Minerva Naranjo and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 25, 2021 · control 28-AS-20211018162619
264 of 360 beds were occupied at the February 9, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Front Porch Communities and Services, licensed since 2013.
Operates 15 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- St. Paul's Towers · Oakland
- Villa Gardens · Pasadena
- Kingsley Manor · Los Angeles
- Canterbury Woods · Pacific Grove
- Walnut Village · Anaheim
- Carlsbad by the Sea · Carlsbad
- Wesley Palms · San Diego
- Fredericka Manor · Chula Vista
- Casa De Manana · La Jolla
- San Francisco Towers · San Francisco
- Sunny View Retirement Community · Cupertino
- Webster House · Palo Alto
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2013, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 23
- Total complaints
- 8
- Substantiated allegations
- 0
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2013, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 1 |
| Substantiated allegations | 0 | 2 |
| Total complaints | 8 | 6 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Claremont Manor
Is Claremont Manor licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Claremont Manor licensed for?
360 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Claremont Manor been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2013, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 23 state visits over the same years.
Is Claremont Manor still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Claremont Manor cost?
$4,600 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,550–$5,850. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 133 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,306 to $5,961 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 133 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Claremont Manor take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Front Porch Communities and Services, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. See the homes licensed to Front Porch Communities and Services — at least 15 on the state roster.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Casa Colina Hospital is 1.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Claremont Manor keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 25 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Claremont Manor license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “CLAREMONT MANOR”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #198601672. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 360 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Front Porch Communities and Services, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2013, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 23 state inspection visits since 2013, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2013, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 23 state visits in that period.
- 8 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2013, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is June 30, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$1,900 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$7,630 a month to start
Listed by the home on its own website · October 5, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$4,800 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,200 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,250–$5,350On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,100–$6,150On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,800 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,950–$5,900On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Los Angeles County