Claremont Manor is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Claremont, Los Angeles County, California — state license #198601672, licensed for 360 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 22 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 30, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2021, the state has visited this home 23 times and filed 22 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 30, 2026.
The state's published file for this home includes 9 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 25, 2021 to February 9, 2026. 9 of the 9 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (9). 9 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 9 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
Jun 30, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 9, 2026Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not meet a resident's incontinence needs
***This report supersedes the report dated 02/03/26. The superseded report was created to update staff, residents and witness identifiers. The findings remain unchanged*** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gabriela Castro conducted an unannounced complaint visit on 02/03/2026 to deliver findings related to the above allegation. LPA met with Tanya Madrid, Director of Resident Services and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation included a review of the resident roster, staff roster, resident face sheet, R1 Physician’s Report, R1 hospice care plans, copies of signage posted in R1’s room, R1 incontinence schedules, R1’s call pendant logs, and R1’s caregiver notes. Additionally, LPA conducted interviews with five (5) staff members (S1–S5), two (2) witness (W1-W2) and eight (8) residents (R1–R8). (Continued on 9099C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 9, 2026 · control 28-AS-20260130100706
Feb 3, 2026Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not meet a resident's incontinence needs
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gabriela Castro conducted an unannounced complaint visit on 02/03/2026 to deliver findings related to the above allegation. LPA met with Tanya Madrid, Director of Resident Services and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation included a review of the resident roster, staff roster, resident face sheet, R1 Physician’s Report, R1 hospice care plans, copies of signage posted in R1’s room, R1 incontinence schedules, call pendant logs, and caregiver notes. Additionally, LPA conducted interviews with six (6) staff members (S1–S6), one (2) witness (W2) and seven (7) residents (R1–R7). (Continued on 9099C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 3, 2026 · control 28-AS-20260130100706
Jan 12, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 30, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff neglected to report concern regarding resident.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gabriela Castro conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Tanya Madrid and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted on the following on 12/30/2025, LPA obtained copies of the client roster and staff roster, resident face sheet, and Physician’s Report. LPA also reviewed Unusual Incident Reports (LIC 602), SOC 341, and written staff statements. Additionally, LPA conducted interviews with three staff members (S1–S3), one witness (W1), and one resident (R1). (continued on 9099C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 30, 2025 · control 28-AS-20251222090239
Oct 7, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that resident received medical treatment in a timely manner.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elizabeth Irra conducted an investigation to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Tanya Madrid and discussed the purpose of today's visit. During today's visit, LPA obtained copies of the staff and resident rosters, interviewed Staff #1 (S-1) through Staff #3 (S-3), interviewed Resident #1 (R-1) through Resident #4 (R-4), interviewed R-1's Physical Therapist, reviewed R-1's file and obtained relevant documentation. LPA also called R-1's Power of Attorney (POA) and left a message for a return call. All interviewed residents are residing in the memory care unit (where allegation allegedly occurred) and the census for the memory care unit is (21). LPA was unable to interview additional residents from this unit. Refer to LIC 9099C for the continuation of this report. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250930085547
Aug 1, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jul 8, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 20, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Mar 18, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jun 15, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jun 6, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 2, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not provide a safe environment for residents
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nune Margaryan conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. LPA met with Director of Resident Services, Tanya Madrid who assist with the visit. Reason for the visit was explained. The investigation consisted of the following: Interviews were conducted with 5 staff members and 10 residents from Residential Living Unit. LPA conducted the tour of the Residential Unit which included the administrative building with the main dining room. LPA obtained residents roster and staff roster. Continue 9099C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 2, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240123162718
Jan 18, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff handled resident in a rough manner causing injury Staff speaks inappropriately to residents Staff put resident's mattress on the floor
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez made an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit on 01/18/2024 to deliver findings and on 12/29/23, LPA Ramirez conducted unannounced subsequent complaint investigation, and on 12/26/2023, unannounced Health and Safety check conducted by LPA Maldonado. LPA met with Executive Director, Robert Barton, and explained the purpose for the visit. LPA Ramirez requested and obatined copies of Staff# 1-9 (S1-S9): Application for Employment, eight (8) documented interviews conducted facility staff, copies of recent Physician's Report for Residents# 1-3 (R1-R3), Unusual Incident/Injury Report for R1 dated 11/06/23, 12/21/23, Hopsice Physician Order dated 12/11/23 for R1, nursing clinical note for R1 dated 12/17/23, and physical plant tour of memory care. LPA Ramirez interviewed staff and residents. See 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 18, 2024 · control 28-AS-20231222125803
Oct 13, 2023Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff threatened resident with eviction.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tao conducted an unannounced 10 day complaint visit to this facility. Upon arriving at the facility, LPA met with Robert. LPA explained the purpose of today’s visit and discussed the above-mentioned allegation. The investigation consisted of resident interviews, staff interviews, facility tours, and review of facility records. LPA obtained resident roster, staff roster, and residents’ facility files. The investigation revealed the following: In regard to the allegation, “staff threatened resident with eviction," it was alleged that a resident was given a letter threatening to evict for writing articles about residents and published the articles. Per resident interviews, seven (7) out of ten (10) residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Two (2) out of ten (10) residents were attempted but failed to be interviewed. One (1) out of ten (10) stated resident was threatened with eviction warning after writing about other residents. (-continuethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 13, 2023 · control 28-AS-20231006162147
Aug 18, 2023Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Claremont Manor licensed?
Yes — Claremont Manor is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Claremont (Los Angeles County): California license #198601672, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 360 residents. State records list 22 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 30, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.
Can Claremont Manor care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Claremont Manor with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordLICENSED TO SERVE 252 AMBULATORY RESIDENTS AND 108 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 18 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. MAY RETAIN 25 HOSPICE RESIDENTS. SUMMER HOUSE DEMENTIA II APPROVED FOR 5 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS WITH SECURED PERIMETER. APPROVED FOR LOCKED GATE AND LOCKED DOORS.
How much does Claremont Manor cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Claremont Manor's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Claremont Manor accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Claremont Manor is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.
Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
264 of 360 beds occupied (73%) when the state visited on February 9, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Claremont Manor?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 23 state visits and 22 dated documents since 2021 for Claremont Manor; 9 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated February 9, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2026
2025
2024
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 23 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.
Who runs Claremont Manor?
From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.
Licensed to Front Porch Communities And Services, who operates 15 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- Casa De MananaLa Jolla, CA
- Sunny View Retirement CommunityCupertino, CA
- Fredericka ManorChula Vista, CA
- St. Paul's TowersOakland, CA
- Carlsbad By The SeaCarlsbad, CA
- Canterbury WoodsPacific Grove, CA
- Wesley PalmsSan Diego, CA
- Webster HousePalo Alto, CA
- San Francisco TowersSan Francisco, CA
- Spring Lake VillageSanta Rosa, CA
- Walnut VillageAnaheim, CA
- Villa GardensPasadena, CA
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(909) 626-1227Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Claremont Manor? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.