Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Fil-Am Home for Seniors: Lansing's
Small home·Licensed for 6·Claremont, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$4,800 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,900–$5,900
- Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedJanuary 28, 2025 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitJanuary 16, 2026CDSS inspection record
- Licence holderStateside Medical LLCSince 2021 · 3 licensed homes
Fil-Am Home for Seniors: Lansing's is a small care home in Claremont — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2021. Bedridden care is not on file.
Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Fil-Am Home for Seniors: Lansing's
Is Fil-Am Home for Seniors: Lansing's licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
How many residents is Fil-Am Home for Seniors: Lansing's licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Has Fil-Am Home for Seniors: Lansing's been cited?
0 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 11 state visits over the same years.
Is Fil-Am Home for Seniors: Lansing's still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Fil-Am Home for Seniors: Lansing's cost?
$4,800 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,900–$5,900. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 5 other homes of a similar licensed size in Claremont that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $2,388 to $4,800 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 5 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Fil-Am Home for Seniors: Lansing's take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Stateside Medical LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Stateside Medical LLC — at least 3 on the state roster.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Casa Colina Hospital is 1.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Fil-Am Home for Seniors: Lansing's keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Fil-Am Home for Seniors: Lansing's license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “FIL-AM HOME FOR SENIORS: LANSING'S”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #198603406. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed to Stateside Medical LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 11 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 11 state visits in that period.
- 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is January 16, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
- Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 4 residents
- BedriddenNot on file · ask the home
State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 4.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 13, 2026
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”
State licensing record · September 13, 2026
3 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,800a month to start
Likely $3,900–$5,900
From 14 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$4,800a month
Likely $3,900–$6,100
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Starting monthly rate$4,800likely $3,900–$5,900
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,900–$6,100
- $4,800
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,600–$9,200
- $6,800
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
14 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,750–$4,800.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 14 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Alta Loma Gardens Residential Care #2Claremont · 0.2 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Gold Medal EstatesClaremont · 0.7 mi · Small home$4,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Gold Medal Senior Living GardensClaremont · 1.1 mi · Small home$4,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Western Assemblies HomeClaremont · 1.3 mi · Mid-size home$1,900Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Genesis Manor IVLa Verne · 2.1 mi · Small home$4,100Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Mountain View CenterClaremont · 2.1 mi · Mid-size home$2,550Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Ira CareUpland · 3.4 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Oasis Senior CareUpland · 3.7 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- M.A.M. Family Home 1Upland · 3.9 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- San Dimas Adventist Home CareSan Dimas · 4.0 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Golden Ages Senior CareUpland · 4.5 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Bentits Retirement VillaSan Dimas · 4.7 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- North San Antonio Senior Care IIUpland · 4.7 mi · Small home$4,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Jace Guest HomeChino · 4.9 mi · Mid-size home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 1120 W. Briarcroft Rd., Claremont, CA 91711Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2022, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 11 visits since 2021. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated January 16, 2026.
- On file since
- 2022
- State visits
- 11
- Most recent visit
- January 16, 2026
- Occupied · January 28, 2025 visit
- 6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated April 9, 2024 to January 28, 2025. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (4). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations2typical 0
- Substantiated allegations0typical 0
- Total complaints2typical 0
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2021.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 8 of 10 documents
Jan 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gabriela Castro conducted an unannounced required annual visit using the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) Tool. LPA was greeted by Joann Hernandez, Caregiver and explained the reason for the visit. Max Raharuhi, Administrator Assistant arrived shortly thereafter. The facility is licensed to serve residents ages sixty (60) and older. The approved capacity is six (6) non-ambulatory residents. The facility is approved to retain no more than four (4) residents receiving hospice care. There were four (4) residents under hospice care during inspection and two (2) residents receiving home health. Facility Tour & Observations Personal Rights postings (LIC 613C and Ombudsman), Complaint Poster (PUB 475), and nondiscrimination notice were observed in a common area. Oxygen was observed in use in the facility. Required “Oxygen in Use / No Smoking” signs were posted throughout the facility in visible locations. Residents had access to personal space, privacy, and adequate storage. No firearms/weapons were present. Physical Plant The facility is in a residential area and is a one-story home consisting of six (6) resident bedrooms, two (2) restrooms with one being a private restroom, living room/dining area, kitchen, laundry room, garage, front yard, and backyard w/a gated pool. LPA observed six (6) resident bedrooms, and all contained the required furniture (bed, mattress, linens, dresser, chair, and lighting). (continued 809C) Cleaning supplies and toxic substances were accessible to residents in a kitchen cabinet under sink. Bathrooms were clean and equipped with required grab bars in showers and near toilets, as well as non-skid mats; hot water measured in bathroom (1) 105.2°F and bathroom (2)105.3 which is within the required 105–120°F. Extra linens and towels were available in a hallway cabinet. Smoke/carbon monoxide detectors were functional; fire extinguisher available by front entrance and dining room area. Backyard provided shaded seating. Passageways and exits were observed to be clear and unobstructed. Food Service Refrigerators/freezers were maintained at proper temperatures (refrigerators maximum of 40 degrees °F and freezer 0-degree °C) with sufficient supply of 2-day perishable and 7 days non-perishable food. Fresh produce, proteins, and dry goods were stocked. Knives and were observed in a locked kitchen drawer. Health-Related Services & Records Six (6) resident files (R1–R6) were reviewed. All six (6) files were missing Annual Appraisals. Five (5) residents had current Admission Agreements; however, R5 did not have an Admission Agreement on file. Pre-Placement Appraisals were complete for four (4) residents; R5 and R6 had incomplete or missing Pre-Placement Appraisals. Consents, Needs/Service Plans, and Physician’s Reports documenting TB clearance and ambulatory status were present for three (3) residents. Residents R3, R5, and R6 did not have TB test results on file; additionally, R5 did not have a Physician’s Report. Resident Rights acknowledgments were present for all residents. Three (3) residents’ medications were reviewed and observed to be centrally stored in a locked kitchen cabinet. Medication Administration Records (MARs) were current. Disaster Preparedness Last fire/earthquake drill was conducted on November 26, 2025, with logs available. LIC 610D Emergency Disaster Plan was posted on kitchen bulletin board. Emergency supplies (water, food, flashlights, batteries, first aid) were observed in the garage. Infection Control Plan was updated. Personnel Records & Training Four (4) staff files were reviewed and included criminal record clearances. CPR/First Aid certificates were missing for two (2) staff members (S1 and S3). TB screenings were missing for three (3) staff members (S2, S3, and S4). Required training documentation was reviewed and present. Insurance Liability insurance was in compliance with an expiration date of April 5, 2026. An exit interview was conducted with Toby Miclat, Administrator. During the inspection, deficiencies were observed and cited on the attached LIC 809D/809C in accordance with Title 22, Division 6 regulations. A copy of this report, LIC 809D/809C and Appeal Rights was provided via email.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 16, 2026
The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 5. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Feb 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez conducted an unannounced required annual inspection visit and was greeted by Administrator Lea Loaiza. Administrator Toby Miclat arrived shortly after. LPA Ramirez explained the purpose of the visit. The facility is located on a residential and is a single store dwelling. LPA utilized the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) tools for the visit today and observed the following: Physical Plant and Environment safety: Disinfectants, cleaning solutions, poisons and other items that could pose a danger if readily available to residents, were observed to be inaccessible to residents. Carbon monoxide detectors and smoke alarms in hallways were tested and operational. LPA Ramirez inspected six (6) resident rooms. All resident bedrooms contained required furniture, linens, and lighting. Water temperatures in all grooming and bathing areas were measured to be with 105 – 120 degrees F. LPA Ramirez observed grab bars near toilets and inside showers. LPA Ramirez observed no-slip mat in showers. Bathroom#1 has a wheelchair accessible shower. Food Service: LPA Ramirez observed sufficient supply of nonperishables for one week and perishable foods for a minimum of two days in the facility kitchen area. Soaps, detergents, and cleaning compounds were observed to be stored away from food supplies. Freezers and refrigerators were observed to be clean and within temperatures of 0-degree F (-17.7 degree C), and refrigerators with maximum temperature of 40-degree F. (4 degree C). Planned Activities: LPA Ramirez observed board games, magazines, and other activities for residents. Residents Rights-Information: LPA Ramirez observed the following postings in common areas throughout the facility: Complaint Poster (PUB 475), personal rights, and nondiscrimination notice. LPA Ramirez observed facility land line. Disaster Preparedness: The facility has the Emergency Disaster Plan (LIC610D/9 pages) in place. Last documented emergency drills were conducted on 01/02/2025. LPA Ramirez observed facility sketches with exits and emergency exits routes throughout various locations of the facility. LPA Ramirez observed emergency food supply located in pantry. See 809-C Residents with Special Needs: Pool was observed to contain locked gate around perimeter. LPA Ramirez observed signs posted indicating “No smoking - Oxygen in Use” in various locations of the facility. LPA Ramirez observed several oxygen tanks in resident rooms secured in stands. Knives, sharps or other items that could pose a danger to residents with dementia, were observed to be inaccessible. Auditory devices were observed to be in working order. Health Related Services/Incidental Medical Services: Medications are centrally stored in locked kitchen cabinet and in bubble packs and/or original containers. The facility uses electronic charting to document medications administered and other charting notes on residents. The facility provides incidental medical services. Staffing: Administrator Certificate for Toby Miclat expires 10/12/2025. Staff employed are over the age of 18 and are fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. Personnel Records Training: Staff files are maintained at the facility. LPA Ramirez observed required annual training, CPR and First Aid for two (2) out of the two (2) personnel records reviewed. LPA Ramirez observed TB testing results, Health screening, fingerprint clearance and job application for two (2) out of the two (2) personnel records reviewed. Infection Control: Staff is using appropriate hand hygiene and wearing gloves while assisting clients. Staff are cleaning and disinfecting often for high touched surfaces. Facility has an Infection Control Plan in place. LPA Ramirez observed staff wearing gloves while proving care to a resident. Operational Requirements: The fire clearance is approved for six (6) non-ambulatory. This facility may retain no more than four (4) hospice residents. There were four (four) residents under hospice care during inspection. Resident Records/Incident Reports: LPA reviewed Resident files for six (6) residents in care. Resident files are maintained at the facility. Admission Agreement, Physician's Report (including T.B and Ambulatory Status), Consent for Medical Treatment, Preplacement Appraisal Information, Resident Pre-Appraisal, Care Plan/Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan, Resident Rights were observed. No deficiencies were observed during this visit. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided via email.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 20, 2025
Jan 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident developed pressure injuries in care. Facility staff are not repositioning the resident as needed. Facility staff are not meeting incontinence care needs of resident. Facility staff speak inappropriately to resident.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit on 01/28/2025, to deliver findings. Initial complaint investigation visit was conducted by LPA Ramirez on 12/24/2024 and needs further investigation was documented. LPA Ramirez was met by Back-up Administrator Lea Loaiza and explained the purpose of today’s visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Ramirez requested and obtained copies of Personnel Report (LIC 500), Resident Roster, Staff#1-2 interviews (S1-S2), Resident interviews#1- 4 interviews (R1 – R4), Interview of R1’s responsible party, Resident#1- (R1): Emergency Contact Form, Physician Report, Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Record (LIC 622), Resident Appraisal (LIC 603A), and physical plant tour. See 9099-C for continued report. Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following. Regarding Allegation(s): Resident developed pressure injuries in care - It is alleged R1 developed pressure injuries while receiving care at the facility. Two (2) out of the two (2) staff interviewed denied this allegation. Three (3) out of the four (4) residents interviewed denied this allegation. Interview with R1’s responsible party denied this allegation. Physicians report (LIC 602A) dated 1/15/2025, revealed R1’s physician observed R1’s skin integrity to be normal and clear. R1’s physician did not observe bedsores or abrasions. Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Facility staff are not repositioning the resident as needed - It is alleged that staff are not repositioning R1 as needed. Two (2) out of the two (2) staff interviewed denied this allegation. Three (3) out of the four (4) residents interviewed denied this allegation. Interview with R1’s responsible party denied this allegation. LPA Ramirez reviewed R1’s resident records including R1’s physician orders. LPA Ramirez did not observe a physician’s order indicating staff shall reposition R1. Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Facility staff are not meeting incontinence care needs of resident- It is alleged staff leave R1 soiled. Two (2) out of the two (2) staff interviewed denied this allegation. Three (3) out of the four (4) residents interviewed denied this allegation. Interview with R1’s responsible party denied this allegation. During facility tour, LPA Ramirez observed six (6) out of the six (6) residents to be well groomed and residents’ rooms were not observed to be malodorous. LPA Ramirez observed all resident beds to contain disposable incontinence pads and required linens. LPA Ramirez observed the facility to have sufficient supply of incontinence care products. Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Facility staff speak inappropriately to resident – It is alleged staff spoke inappropriately to R1. Two (2) out of the two (2) staff interviewed denied this allegation. Three (3) out of the four (4) residents interviewed denied this allegation. Interview with R1’s responsible party denied this allegation. During tour of facility, LPA Ramirez observed staff providing care and supervision. LPA Ramirez observed staff to be professional and did not observe staff speaking inappropriately to residents. Staff interviewed were knowledgeable on residents’ rights and on specific needs of the residents’ they serve. Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies were cited during this investigation. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 28, 2025 · control 28-AS-20241218160327
May 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility failed to provide a safe environment for a resident in care
This report supersedes the previous complaint reports dated 04/09/24 and 05/02/24. The reason it’s being superseded is to provide additional information not included on the original LIC9099 dated 04/09/24 and 05/02/24, and to remove the LIC 9099D for the citation which was issued erroneously.The findings will remain the same. On today's visit Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sanjay Vaid and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Fernando Fierros conducted a tour of the physical plant along with caregiver Joanne Hernandez, and obtained staff and resident roster. All passages are clear of debris, facility is clean and in good repair. On 05/02/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sanjay Vaid conducted a subsequent visit and met with staff Joanne Hernandez and staff Mark Reyes, staff notified the Administrator of Licensing's visit. 30 minutes later, Administrator, Lea Loaiza and Licensee,Toby Miclat arrived at the facility and the purpose of the visit was discussed. LPA and staff Hernandez toured the physical plant and observed the facility to be clean, in good condition, and free of obstacles throughout. LPA Vaid conducted interviews with residents. Unsubstantiated On 04/09/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sanjay Vaid and Tyler Reyes conducted a subsequent complaint visit regarding the allegation listed above to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA Vaid and Reyes met with licensee-Toby Miclat and administrator- Lea Loaiza and discussed the purpose of the visit, which was to deliver complaint investigation findings. On 04/13/2023, LPA Kruz Long, conducted the initial visit, during visit, LPA Long took a photo of the Staff/Resident rosters, attempted to obtain a copy of R#2's records (Physician's Report, Appraisal Needs and Services Plan). LPA interviewed Staff #1, #2 #3 and interviewed Resident #1 (R#1). Resident #2 (R#2) was not present in the facility. Regarding allegation: Facility failed to provide a safe environment for a resident in care. It is alleged, that staff are not providing a safe environment for residents, as a resident was assaulted in the facility. Interviews with 6 out of 6 residents revealed, residents residing at the facility feel safe and secure, and residents have not witnessed any assaultive behavior from other residents or staff. During the investigation, Resident #1 (R1) and Resident #2 (R2) were not interviewed, as R1 & R2 are deceased. Interviews with 5 out of 5 staff revealed, the staff treats residents with respect and kindness. Staff reported the only incident witnessed by staff regarding assaultive behavior occurred on 03/28/23 between R1 and R2. Staff separated the residents and reported no visible injuries were noted. Therefore the investigation revealed, on 03/28/2023, R1 was assaulted by R2, and R1 did not sustain any injury. Staff who were present during the incident, separated R1 and R2, and staff performed assessed R1 for injury. Therefore, the investigation did not reveal any evidence to support that staff are not providing a safe environment for residents in care. Based upon records review and interviews conducted, the findings indicate that, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted with Staff in Charge - Caregiver Joanne Hernandez. A copy of the licensing report was provided at time of visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2024 · control 28-AS-20230406145142
May 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sanjay Vaid and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Fernando Fierros conducted a case management visit regarding deficiencies noted during visits conducted on 04/09/24 and 05/02/24. LPA Vaid met with lead staff, Joanne Hernandez, and spoke with Licensee Toby Miclat via telephone and discussed the purpose of the visit. During 04/09/2024 visit, LPA Vaid interviewed Administrator and reviewed Resident #2 (R2) facility file. LPA obtained a copy of R2’s admission agreement, and any incident reports regarding R2. Administrator reported R2 went on an outing with family for the period 04/13/23 through 04/16/2023 and R2 was expected to return to the facility on 04/16/2023. However, R2 did not return to the facility after the outing with family. On 04/15/2023, R2 was sent to the hospital for observation, while R2 was hospitalized, R2 passed away on 04/16/23 due to a medical issues. However, the facility failed to provide licensing with an incident report regarding R2s hospitalization and death. Per Administrator, R2 was never discharged from the facility. R2 was a resident of the facility when hospitalized on 04/15/2023 and on R2’s date of death. Deficiencies cited per Title 22 Chapter 6 Division 8, Refer to attached LIC 809D. Exit interview was conducted with caregiver, Joanne Hernandez. Licensing report and appeals rights were given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(A) · Plan of correction due date: May 17, 2024
Reporting Requirements a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports...(1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence...(A)Death of any resident from any cause regardless of where the death occurred, including but not limite... to visiting away from the facility. The requirement was not met as evidence by R2 was hospitalized on 04/15/23 and passed away on 04/16/23, however, facility failed to report R2 hospitalization and death to licensing per Title 22 regulations.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2024
Plan of correction: Administrator to send an incident report (LIC624A) for R2 by POC Due date 05/17/2024. On 04/09/24, Administrator provided a copy of R2’s death certificate to LPA Vaid.
May 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility failed to provide a safe environment for a resident in care.
At 8:49 am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sanjay Vaid was met by staff- Joanne Hernandez and Mark Reyes, explained the purpose of the visit, the administrator was notified. LPA and staff Hernandez toured the facility and conducted brief interviews with residents. Administrator- Lea Loaiza and Licensee -Toby Miclat arrived 30 minutes later and the purpose of the visit was discussed. ***This report supersedes the previous complaint report dated 04/09/24. The reason it’s being superseded is to provide additional information not included on the original LIC9099 dated 04/09/24, and to remove the LIC 9099D deficiency cited. The Unsubstantiated Finding will remain the same** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sanjay Vaid and Tyler Reyes conducted a subsequent complaint visit on 04/09/24 regarding the allegation listed above to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA Vaid and Reyes met with licensee-Toby Miclat and administrator- Lea Loaiza and discussed the purpose of the visit, which was to deliver complaint investigation findings. . Unsubstantiated On 04/13/2023, LPA Kruz Long, conducted the initial visit, during visit, LPA Long took a photo of the Staff/Resident rosters, attempted to obtain a copy of R#2's records (Physician's Report, Appraisal Needs and Services Plan). LPA interviewed Staff #1, #2 #3 and interviewed Resident #1 (R#1). Resident #2 (R#2) was not present in the facility. On todays visit, LPA Vaid interviewed residents, owner, administrator, and staff, and toured the physical plant and observed the facility to be clean, in good condition and free of obstacles throughout. Regarding allegation: Facility failed to provide a safe environment for a resident in care. It is alleged, that staff are not providing a safe environment for residents, as a resident was assaulted in the facility. Interviews with 6 out of 6 residents revealed, residents are feeling safe and secure residing at the facility, and residents have not witnessed any assaultive behavior from other residents or staff. During the investigation, Resident #1 (R1) and Resident #2 (R2) were not interviewed, as R1 & R2 are deceased. Interviews with 5 out of 5 staff revealed, the staff treats residents in care with respect and kindness. Except for the incident in year 2023, no other assaultive behavior has been witnessed by the staff. The investigation revealed, on 03/28/2023, R1 was assaulted by R2, and R1 did not sustain any injury. Staff who were present during the incident, separated R1 and R2, and staff performed assessed R1 for injury. Therefore, the investigation did not reveal any evidence to support that staff are not providing a safe environment for residents in care. Based upon records review and interviews conducted, the findings indicate that, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted with Lea Loaiza, Administrator. A copy of the licensing report was provided at time of visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 2, 2024 · control 28-AS-20230406145142
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(A) · Plan of correction due date: May 2, 2024
87211 (a)(1)(A) a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports...(1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence...(A)Death of any resident from any cause regardless of where the death occurred, including but not limite... to visiting away from the facility. This requirement wasn't met as evidenced by: R2 was hospitalized on ?? and passed away on 04/16/23, however, facility failed to report R2 hospitalization and death to licensing per Title 22 regulations.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 2, 2024
Plan of correction: Plan of Correction: On 04/09/24, Administrator provided a copy of R2’s death certificate to LPA Vaid. Administrator to send an incident report (LIC624A) for R1 and R2 by POC Due date 05/06/2024.
Apr 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility failed to provide a safe environment for a resident in care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sanjay Vaid and Tyler Reyes conducted a subsequent complaint visit regarding the allegation listed above to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA Vaid and Reyes met with Toby Miclat-owner and Lea Loaiza- administrator and discussed the purpose of the visit, which was to deliver complaint investigation findings. On 04/13/2023, LPA Kruz Long, conducted the initial visit, during visit, LPA Long took a photo of the Staff/Resident rosters, attempted to obtain a copy of R#2's records (Physician's Report, Appraisal Needs and Services Plan). LPA interviewed Staff #1, #2 #3 and interviewed Resident #1 (R#1). Resident #2 (R#2) was not present in the facility. On todays visit, LPA Vaid interviewed residents, owner, administrator, and staff, and toured the physical plant with Lea Loaiza -Administrator and observed the facility to be clean, in good condition and free of obstacles throughout. Regarding allegation: Facility failed to provide a safe environment for a resident in care. It is alleged, that staff are not providing a safe environment for residents, as a resident was assaulted in the facility. Unsubstantiated Interviews with 6 out of 6 residents revealed, they are feeling safe and secure living at the facility and have not witnessed any assaultive behavior from other residents. Interviews with 5 out of 5 staff revealed, the staff treats residents in care with respect and kindness. Except for the incident in year 2023, no other assaultive behavior has been witnessed by the staff. On 03/28/2023 a resident #1 (R1) was assaulted by resident #2 (R2) and did not sustain any injury. Staff were present and separated R1 and R2. There is no evidence to support that staff are not providing a safe environment for residents in care. Based upon records review and interviews conducted, the findings indicate that, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. Two deficiencies were noted today, failure by facility to provide death report within 7 days of the occurrence for each resident. Exit interview conducted with Lea Loaiza, Administrator. A copy of the licensing report was provided at time of visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 9, 2024 · control 28-AS-20230406145142
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(A) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 9, 2024
(a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports...(1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence...(A)Death of any resident from any cause regardless of where the death occurred, including but not limited to a day program, a hospital, en route to or from a hospital, or visiting away from the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 9, 2024
Plan of correction: Faciility will submit copy of death certificates for R2 and death report for R1 and R2 by 4/16/2024.
Jan 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Wong conducted an unannounced Required- 1 year visit using the full Care Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) Tools. The purpose of the visit was explained to caregiver Adora Capa and the facility administrator Lea Chavez arrived shortly after. The facility is licensed for 6 residents with age range 60 and over. 6 Non-ambulatory and hospice waiver for 4. Currently, the facility has four hospice waiver residents, no home health, one on oxygen and no bedridden residents. The following 12 (CARE) tool domains were utilized during the inspection: Infection Control, Operational Requirements, Physical Plant/Environment Safety, Staffing, Personnel Records/Staff Training, Resident Records/Incident Reports, Planned Activities, Food Service, Incident Medical and Dental, Disaster Preparedness, and Residents with Special Health Needs. Infection Control: Infection Control Practices and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) supplies were observed. Facility Staff still practice hand washing and wear mask in the facility. The facility has submitted a COVID-19 Mitigation Plan and Infection Control Plan. Operational Requirement: The facility has a Dementia Waiver in place. A Hospice Waiver for 4 residents is approved. All resident in the facility is non-ambulatory which is under the fire clearance approval. The facility does not have the actual liability insurance policy and they only have the quote for the liability insurance. Physical Plant and Environmental Safety: The facility is a single story house and located in a residential neighborhood area. The facility includes: kitchen, living room, dining area, 6 residents bedroom, 4 bathrooms, laundry room, pantry room and an attached garage. LPA inspected the resident room and each resident room has one bed, one chair, night stand, required furniture and beddings and sufficient lighting and closet space. LPA inspected the bathrooms, each bathroom is clean, sanitary and in a good working condition. Each bathroom has the required grab bar and non-skid mat. The hot water in all resident bathroom are tested between 110.8 and 114 degrees F. which is within the Title 22 regulation. The appliances in the kitchen and living room are working well. The sharp knives are stored and locked in the kitchen cabinet. All the cleaning supplies and chemicals are stored and locked in the garage. The extra linen and towels are stored in the cabinet near the residents room. LPA inspected the carbon monoxide detectors and smoke detectors and they are located in each bedroom and common area and they are all working well. The facility has a pool with water in the backyard. The pool water was clean and pool is surrounded by a locked gated. The passageway, walkway and patio are free of obstruction. Staffing: The facility has sufficient staffing in the facility. The facility has at least one person to have updated First Aid and CPR training certificate. Personnel Records-Training Information: All the staff work in the facility are over 18 yeas old and background checked and associated with the facility. All the staff file has the required documents include: health screening, TB test result, updated First Aid Certificate and required training hours. The administrator is Toby Miclat and her administrator certificate was expired on 10/12/2023 and currently the certificate is pending with CCL system since 11/28/23. Resident's right/Information: The complaint poster from LTCO and CCL are placed on the wall near the entrance door which included the resident personal right and theft and loss policy. The facility also has internet service which provide at least one internet access device such as computer or smart phone..etc for video conferencing with resident's family. Planned Activities: The facility has a sufficient space to accommodate both indoor and outdoor activities. Food Service: The facility has sufficient food supply for two days perishable and seven days non-perishable food in the facility. Currently there's no resident is on a modified diet that prescribed by the doctor. All the food in the facility are stored properly. Incidental Medical and Dental: LPA reviewed six residents' medication. R1's daily medication for Vitamin D3 and Omerprazole was not listed on the MARs and not sure if resident was taking the medication. The medication in the facility is centrally stored and locked in the kitchen cabinet. LPA also inspected the First Aid Kit in the facility and they have all the required supplies and updated Manual and stored and locked in the kitchen cabinet. Resident's Record-Incident Reports: A total of six (6) resident files were reviewed. They contained admission agreements, Physician's Reports, Appraisal, TB clearance, medical consent, and medication records. ***A total of 1 Dementia resident (R1) had Physician Report's older than 12 months. All the residents admission agreement is print double side of the paper. Disaster Preparedness: The updated Emergency and Disaster Plan LIC 610E is in place and posted on the wall. The facility did not conduct any emergency disaster drill last year. Resident's appraisal and Needs services plans are part of Emergency training. Residents with Special Health Needs: Four (4) residents receive hospice care. Half and Full bed rails for mobility assistance were observed in residents' rooms. LPA observed one resident (R2) has no doctor order for the half bed rail. Individual Service Plans and appraisals are on file. No Residents have prohibited health condition. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, deficiencies were cited. Exit interview was conducted with Lea Chavez. A copy of the report and appeal rights were issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 12, 2024
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Who holds the licence
Stateside Medical LLC, licensed since 2021, operates 3 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- Fil-Am Home for Seniors III · Claremont
- Fil-Am Home for Seniors IV · Upland
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Ivy Park at Claremont
Claremont · Large community · 0.1 mi away
$4,395 a month to start · Listed by the home
The Leisure Living Homes
Claremont · Small home · 0.2 mi away
$4,800 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Alta Loma Gardens Residential Care #2
Claremont · Small home · 0.2 mi away
$4,500 a month to start · Listed by the home
At Open Arms
Claremont · Small home · 0.2 mi away
$4,750 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Claremont Care Homes
Claremont · Small home · 0.3 mi away
$5,600 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Harper's Care Home
Claremont · Small home · 0.4 mi away
$4,850 a month to start · Covelight estimate