Large community · Licensed for 70 · Los Angeles
Alta Vista Gardens
829 N Alta Vista Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90046Licensed since 2015
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 25, 2026
- Languages spoken: EnglishReported on Caring.com · September 9, 2026
- Licensed for 70: a large care communityThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 50 residents
- Hospiceup to 6 residents
- Bedriddenup to 6 residents
Not on file: dementia approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 25, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
50 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 6 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 25, 2026
Care services
These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.
Incontinence care
Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 25, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Alta Vista Gardens: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$5,200a month to start
Likely $4,050–$6,650
From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Costs & moving in
How care costs are added to the rentAll inclusive
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Payment methodsCheck · Credit card
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Monthly cost breakdownWith a studio and basic help · room, care and fees$5,200likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$5,200likely $4,050–$6,650
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 communities with 50 or more beds within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Help with daily careIncludedper the home
The home lists its rent as all-inclusive on Caring.com, seen September 9, 2026. Ask which care needs would change the monthly rate.
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,050–$6,650
- $5,200
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,900–$9,800
- $7,700
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes8 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,500 to $8,795
8 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,300–$8,450.
- City View LaLos Angeles · 0.4 mi · Large community$6,000Listed on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026
- Hayworth TerraceLos Angeles · 1.1 mi · Large community$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- The Leonard on Beverly A Clearwater CommunityLos Angeles · 1.2 mi · Large community$8,240Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Belmont Village HollywoodLos Angeles · 1.6 mi · Large community$4,900Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The Pinnacles at BurtonLos Angeles · 2.2 mi · Large community$4,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Oakmont of Beverly HillsBeverly Hills · 2.4 mi · Large community$8,795Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Kingsley ManorLos Angeles · 2.6 mi · Large community$3,594Listed on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunny Hills Assisted Living (Memory Care)Los Angeles · 2.7 mi · Large community$2,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 communities with 50 or more beds within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.
Rooms & the spaces they will use (2)Room types · Common areas
Room typesCapacity
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Common areasIndoor Common Areas
Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Meals, preferences & familiar food (1)Meals provided
Meals provided
Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Activities & the rhythm of a day (2)Activity types offered · Religious services off site
Activity types offeredActivities On-site
Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Religious services off site
Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Faith, culture & language (1)Languages spoken by caregivers
Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Where it is
829 N Alta Vista Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90046Address from the public record · October 25, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Southern California Hospital at HollywoodHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.5 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 25, 2026 · License #197608200 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 8 of 19 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Substantiated” and 3 “Unsubstantiated”.
20262 state visits · 3 documents
Apr 20, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaged resident's funds.
On 4/20/26, at 10:00 am, Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Naira Margaryan and Licensing Program Analyst, Raymond Comer, arrived to conduct an intial 10-day visit regarding the allegations listed above. LPM/LPA met with the Assistant Administrator, presented official CDSS badge identification, and reason for the visit was disclosed. To investigate this allegation, LPM/LPA received resident and staff roster. At 10:00 am, LPM and LPA spoke with the Administrator over the phone. At 10:20 am, LPM/LPA spoke with the Assistant administrator, and Staff1 (S1). At 10:50 am, LPM/LPA interviewed four (4) out of twenty (20) residents recieving Person and Incidental (P&I) funds. Between 11:00 am, and 11:40 am, LPA's recieved and reviewed Resident#1's (R1's) Physician's report, Admission agreement, and Client personal property and valuables inventory log. [LIC 9099C]-Continued Substantiated Allegation: It was alleged that there were unknown transactions made on R1's EBT card. The Administrator verified using only #500.00 for R1's additional expenses. LPM/LPA interview with Administrator, and Staff#1 (S1) revealed the following: In March 2026, using R1's EBT card, staff made three (3) ATM withdrawals totaling 500.00 for the purchase of cigarette and soft drinks for R1's use. LPM/LPA interviews with four (4) out of twenty (20) residents receiving P&I funds stated the following: All four (4) residents interviewed stated that they receive P&I funds on a monthly basis and have no issues regarding financial assistance by staff. LPM/LPA review of documents revealed the following: R1's client/resident property and valuables inventory log omits receipt of R1's EBT card and record of withdrawal transactions made by staff on R1's behalf. Based on records review and interviews with Administrator, Staff, and Residents, facility staff failed to document withdrawals made from R1's EBT card, the allegation is substantiated. issued. No health and safety issues noted at the time of this visit. Exit interview conducted, deficiency issued, and copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 20, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260410145838
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87217(by) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 30, 2026
87217(b) Safeguard of resident cash, personal property and valuables: Every facility shall take appropriate measures to safeguard residents' cash resources, person property and valuables...entrusted to the licensee...This requirement was not met as evidenced by. Based on overall investigation, the licensee mismanaged R1's fiances by failure to appropriately handle the EBT card while in facility's possession. This posses a potential health, safety and personal risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 20, 2026
Plan of correction: The administrator shall provide written plan of action explaining the steps they are going to take to ensure that residents' finances and/or personal belongings are safeguarded and documented as required. Documents made by submitted by POC date
Feb 14, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure that client's hygiene needs are met. Staff do not ensure resident's medications are taken as prescribed.
On 2/14/26, at 8:00 am, Licensing Program Analyst, (LPA) Raymond Comer, arrived to conduct a subsequent visit regarding the allegations listed above. LPA met with the Assistant Administrator, presented official CDSS badge identification, and reason for the visit was disclosed. At 8:15 am, A physical plant tour of the facility was conducted by LPA; No health or safety issues observed. All residents observed during facility inspection appeared to be clean, groomed, with acceptable hygiene. To investigate this allegation, on 06/19/25, at 9:45 am, LPA Comer conducted initial visit, at which time a physical plant tour was conducted; no health and safety issues were observed. Between 10:10 am, and 11:15 am, LPA received resident and staff roster, and reviewed files relevant to the investigation which included, but were not limited to, Resident#1's (R1) Physician's report, Appraisal, MARs, and Admission's Agreement. Between 11:30 am and 1:45 pm, LPA interviewed Administrator, staff and residents. [LIC 9099C]-Continued Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff do not ensure that client's hygiene needs are met. It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) appears to have not showered/bathed for several days. LPA interviews with Administrator, and two (02) care staff, refute the allegation, stating to LPA that R1 frequently leaves the facility on early mornings, and does not return until late at night. Administrator and staff provide R1 constant encouragement, reminders, and offered assistance to help the resident in case they need help. However, R1 ignores reminders and refuses staff assistance. LPA interviewed six (6) out of a total census of sixty-nine (69) residents, which revealed that staff do provide satisfactory assistance regarding bathing, changing, and medications. LPA conducted a records review, which revealed that R1 requires reminders from staff to shower, change clothes, and keep up good hygiene. Records also reveal that R1 has a case worker that is aware that R1 perpetually resists staff's offers of hygiene assistance, and frequently leaves the facility in an unhygienic condition. Based on information gathered during the visit, these allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation: Staff do not ensure resident's medications are taken as prescribed. It was alleged that Resident#1's (R1)has not taken their medication for several months. LPA interviews with Administrator, and two (02) care staff refute the allegation, stating to LPA that although R1 leaves the facility early mornings, and does not return until late at night, staff attempts to dispense medication to R1 in the morning, and later at night. They constantly remind R1 to take their medication before leaving the facility. However, R1 refuses staff assistance. LPA interviewed six (6) out of a total census of sixty-nine (69) residents, which revealed that staff do provide satisfactory medication assistance. LPA conducted a records review, which revealed the following: Monthly Medication Administration Records (MAR's) verified that staff attempted to dispense medication to R1 and they refused to take their medications when provided by staff. Based on the information gathered during this visit, these allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 14, 2026 · control 31-AS-20250613113042
Feb 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 2/14/26, at 8:00 am, Licensing Program Analyst, (LPA) Raymond Comer, arrived to conduct an unannounced annual inspection of the Facility. LPA met with the Administrative Assistant, and reason for the visit was disclosed. Facility is licensed as a two-story building. Fire clearance issued for fifty (50) non-ambulatory, and twenty (20) ambulatory, for total capacity of seventy (70) residents. Bedridden cleared six (6) residents. Hospice waiver approved for six (6) residents. At 8:15 am, LPA conducted a tour of the physical plant and observed the following: Physical plant was inspected for cleanliness and condition. Facility’s main door is the primary entry/exit access. Screening area is located immediately upon entrance. Visitor Sign-in sheet, hand sanitizer, gloves and masks are available. Hand washing, coughing etiquette, and other necessary signage are posted throughout the facility. Wall thermostat displays a setting of 71.0°F, within the required range. Facility maintains an approved Mitigation and Infection Plan. Required postings are prominently displayed and observed to be current. Disaster drills were last conducted in January, 2026. [LIC809C-Continued] Fire Detection/Protection system is present in the facility. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors are hardwired, interconnected and tested as "passed" inspection by Los Angeles Fire Department on 05/07/2025. Fire Extinguishers are located throughout the facility. (service date: October 13, 2025) Evacuation routes are clearly posted throughout the facility. Fire drills conducted January , 2026. Evacuation chairs were observed in stairwell leading out to street access. Roof access is inaccessible to residents. Evacuation routes are clearly labelled and posted throughout the facility. Kitchen: At 9:15 am, kitchen was observed to be clean, with an adequate supply of perishables and non-perishable food located in multiple commercial refrigerators, freezer, and pantry. Food was properly labeled and stored. Emergency food is stored in a sub-floor area adjacent to the laundry room. Trash cans observed with lids. Knives and Sharps are secured and inaccessible to residents. No pesticides, nor poisons, were observed near any food areas. Medications: Medication room is located on first floor, near the building entrance. Medication room was observed to be inaccessible to residents. Medication documentation and implementation appeared to be complete. First aid kit, and manual stored in the medication office. Laundry: At 9:45 am, LPA observed laundry room, located on the sub-base level floor, to be clean and clear from obstruction. Laundry machines were observed functioning properly. Soap, toxins, and poisons observed to be locked and stored in basement area supply cabinet. Laundry is inaccessible to residents. Commons: LPA observed activities room, and dining room, located on the first floor. Outside patio area and surrounding area of the facility observed to be clean and clear from debris and obstruction. All common areas observed to have sufficient tables and chairs for seating. Furnishings are in fair condition. Bedrooms: At 10:25 am, LPA observed multiple resident bedrooms on all floors for safety, privacy, and comfort. (Bedroom#’s #21, #22, #23, #29, #31, #32, #33, #35) Bedrooms were inspected and observed to maintain required furnishing and sufficient lighting, bed linens, and blankets. All bedrooms were observed to be clean and clear of obstructions. Bathrooms: LPA observed appropriate grab bars and non-slip flooring. Hot water temperature measured in range from 106.0°F through 111.0°F; within the required range. Bathrooms observed to be clean; hand towels are not shared. Due to time constraints, LPA was unable to complete the required Annual inspection visit. LPA will complete at a later date. Exit interview conducted/Copy of report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 14, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Jul 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek medical attention for resident in care. Staff did not prevent resident from harming another resident in care.
On 7/26/2025 at approximately 9:40 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angelica Segovia conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to the facility. LPA was greeted by staff and stated the reason for their visit was to conduct interviews, review documentation and deliver the findings of the complaint. The Administrator, Staci Marmershteyn was unavailable to attend today’s visit and designated lead staff, Debra Dapson as the facility’s designee. At 09:45 AM, LPA requested census, resident and staff roster. At approximately 10:00 AM, LPA conducted a physical plant tour, to ensure the health and safety of the residents. At 11:00 AM, LPA requested pertinent documentation pertaining to the investigation such as but not limited to: Physicians Report, Admission Agreement and the Centrally Stored/Destruction Medication (CSDMR). In between 11:15 AM – 1:00 PM, LPA attempted interviews with eight (8) residents (R1-R8), two (2) staff members (S1-S2) and conducted record review. (Continue to LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation: Staff did not seek medical attention for resident in care. It was alleged that R1 was not provided with medical attention. To investigate the allegation, LPA interviewed two (2) staff members and attempted to interview seven (7) residents. LPA’s interview with both staff members revealed that when they were made aware of R1 seeking treatment, they attempted to assist them but R1 declined. S2 stated that when they asked R1 if they required, “…medical attention…” R1 stated they did not want any. LPA attempted to interview R1 but R1 was not present during the visit and could not be reached. LPA’s interview with six (6) out of the seven (7) residents confirmed that if they needed medical attention the facility would provide such services. Based on interviews, there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation: Staff did not prevent resident from harming another resident in care. It was alleged that R1 was physically assaulted by R2 and staff did not prevent the altercation from occurring. To investigate the allegation, LPA interviewed two (2) staff members and attempted to interview eight (8) residents. LPA’s interview with both staff members revealed that R2 did not have a history of aggressive behaviors towards other residents, however R1 has had a history of aggressive behavior towards other residents. Interview with S1 revealed that when they became aware of a possible incident occurring between R1 and R2, they self-reported the incident on an Unusual Incident/Injury Report (SIR). LPA’s interview with S2 revealed that they removed R2 from their shared living space to help mediate the situation. Both staff members stated that R2 denied that they had physically assaulted R1. LPA’s interview with two (2) out of the eight (8) residents confirmed that they have had prior incidents involving R1’s aggressive behavior. Interview with R3 revealed that R1 would become upset with them and had even once restricted their access into shared spaces within the facility. Interview with R4 confirmed that they too had prior incidents regarding R1’s behavior. R4 stated that R1 always wanted to fight them and would, “threaten” them all the time. Interview with R3 and R4 confirmed that the facility did ensure to minimize said incidents by removing them away from R1 to ensure all could coexist safely. LPA’s interview with R5 revealed that their interactions with R2 were always amicable. LPA attempted to interview R2 but R2 no longer resides at the facility and could not be contacted. LPA attempted to interview R1, but they were not present during the visit and could not be contacted. LPA’s interview with R6, R7 and R8 revealed that they have not had any interactions with R1 and R2. LPA’s record review confirmed that the facility did report the incident to Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD). (Continue to LIC 9099-C) Further record review revealed that R1 has various medical diagnosis with some resulting in possible side effects including agitation. Based on interviews and record review, there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No immediate health and safety issues observed during the day of the visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the lead staff designee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 26, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250127093808
20244 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 12/05/24, 8:30 am, Licensing Program Analyst, (LPA) Raymond Comer, arrived to conduct an unannounced annual inspection of the Facility. LPA met with Facility Administrator, Staci Mamershteyn, and reason for the visit was disclosed. Facility is licensed as a two story building. Fire clearance issued for fifty (50) non-ambulatory, and twenty (20) ambulatory, for total capacity of seventy (70) residents. Bedridden cleared six (6) residents. Hospice waiver approved for six (6) residents. At 9:05 am, LPA conducted a tour of the physical plant with the Administrator and observed the following: Physical plant was inspected for cleanliness and condition. Facility’s main door is the primary entry/exit access. Screening area is located immediately upon entrance. Facility provides dementia care; LPA observed delayed egress system working properly throughout all access points of the facility. Visitor Sign-in sheet, hand sanitizer, gloves and masks are available. Hand washing, coughing etiquette, and other necessary signage are posted throughout the facility. Wall thermostat displays a setting of 71.0°F, within the required range. Facility maintains an approved Mitigation and Infection Plan. Required postings are prominently displayed and observed to be current. Disaster drills were last conducted September, 2024. Fire Detection/Protection system is present in the facility. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors are hardwired, interconnected and tested as "passed" inspection by Los Angeles Fire Department on 03/22/2024. Fire Extinguishers are located throughout the facility. (service date: October 31, 2024) Evacuation routes are clearly posted throughout the facility. Fire drill conducted September 09, 2024. [LIC809C-Continued] Kitchen: At 9:50 am, kitchen was observed to be clean and an adequate supply of perishables and non-perishable food located in multiple commercial refrigerators, freezer, and pantry. Food was properly labeled and stored. Emergency food is stored in sub floor area adjacent to the laundry room. Trash cans observed with lids. Sharps are stored in the kitchen and inaccessible to residents. No pesticides, nor poisons, were observed near any food areas. Medications: Medication room is located on first floor, near the building entrance. Medication room observed to be locked when unattended by staff. Medications are stored in separate compartments,by resident name. PPE, first aid kit, and manual stored in the medication office. LPA observed medications as prepared and dispensed to residents by medical technician staff. Laundry: At 10:20 am, LPA observed laundry room, located on the sub-base level floor, to be clean and clear from obstruction. Commercial laundry machines were observed to be in operating condition and inaccessible to residents. Laundry soap, toxins, and poisons observed to be locked and stored in basement area supply cabinet. Commons: At 10:35 am, LPA observed activities room, and dining room, located on the first floor. Outside patio area and surrounding area of the facility observed to be clean and clear from debris and obstruction. All common areas observed to have sufficient tables and chairs for seating. Bedrooms At 11:15 am, LPA observed random bedrooms, with bathrooms, located on the first and second floor to be appropriately furnished with sufficient lighting, bed linen and comforters on all beds. Bedrooms contain single and double occupancy. All bedrooms observed to be clean and clear from obstruction. Bathrooms: At 11:15 am, LPA observed random bathrooms, located in the bedrooms on the first and second floor. LPA observed appropriate grab bars and non-slip skid flooring in the bathtub. Hot water temperature measured in range from 109.2°F through 115.5°F; within the required range. Bathrooms observed to be clean and have sufficient soap and hand towels are not shared. Resident records: At 12:05 pm, Facility records room observed as locked and inaccessible to residents. A total of six (6) resident files were reviewed for current IPP and/or Needs and Services plans, physician report, and admission agreements. LPA review of record revealed residents (R1) through (R6) reappraisal/needs and services plans were not updated within twelve (12) month period, as required. [LIC809C-Continued] Staff records: Facility records room was observed as locked and inaccessible to residents. A total of four (4) Staff files were reviewed. Criminal record clearances were present, and Staff are associated to this facility. Staff records appear to be complete and current. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D). Exit Interview Conducted, appeal rights discussed, and copy of the report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 5, 2024
Jul 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency pages: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced case management visit at this as a result of the Licensee's failure to inform the Department about the Bankruptcy filed on 03/07/24. LPA met with Administrator Staci Mermerhteyn and inform of the reason for the visit. LPA's record review today revealed that the facility filed a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy on 03/07/24 and informed Long Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) on 03/25/24 but no record of informing Community Care Licensing (CCL). Per California Health and Safety Code section 1569.686, you are hereby notified that a $100 civil penalty is being assessed per day. The total civil penalty for a continuous violation shall not exceed $2000. You will receive an invoice in the mail. Payment is due when billed. Payments must be made by a personal business or cashier's check or money order made payable to the "California Department Of Social Services". Please write the facility number and invoice number on your check and include copy of your invoice with the payment. You will find the invoice number on your invoice. DO NOT SEND CASH. The licensee was notified that a civil penalty is being assessed for failure to comply with this section and/or failure to report specified events, in writing, within 2 business days to the Department, the state long term ombudsman, all residents, and their representatives. Deficiency cited under Health and Safety code 1569.686. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code, the following deficiency was cited (refer to LIC 809-D). Exit interview conducted/ Citations issued/ Civil Penalty assessed/ Appeal Rights discussed/ A copy of report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 25, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 1569.686(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 26, 2024
A licensee shall notify the department, the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, all residents... in writing, within two business days, of any of the following events, or knowledge of the event: (3) The licensee files for bankruptcy. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the licensee failed to notify the department when they filed for bankruptcy, this poses an immediate health and safety and personal rights risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 25, 2024
Plan of correction: The Licensee agreed to review the Health & Safety Code pertaining to this specific section and will submit a statement of understanding
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC1569.686(c) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 26, 2024
A licensee who fails to comply with this section may be liable for civil penalties in an amount not to exceed one hundred dollars ($100) for each day of the failure to provide notification required in this section. The total civil penalty shall not exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000). If a resident is relocated without the notification required by this section, and suffers transfer trauma or other harm to his or her health or safety, the department may also suspend or revoke the licensee's license and issue a permanent revocation of the licensee's ability to operate or act as an administrator of a facility anywhere in the state. Suspension or revocation proceedings pursuant to this subdivision shall be conducted in compliance with Section 1569.51. Based on record review, the licensee failed to notify the residents and the department of bankruptcy filing, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 25, 2024
Plan of correction: A civil penalty of $2000 is assessed today. The Licensee agreed to review the Health & Safety Code pertaining to this specific section and will submit a statement of understanding.
May 28, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide proper care to resident in care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosaura Valenzuela conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility to render the findings of the above noted allegation. LPA met with blank and explained the reason for the visit. It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1)'s overall health condition was changed, and facility staff did not provide required assistance to meet R1's needs. The complaint investigation was initiated by LPA Evelyn Rios on 07/26/23 and completed by the investigatior Philippe Miles from the Community Care Licensing Investigation Branch. During the investigation on 09/09/2023, Investigator Miles reviewed R1's facility file and hospital records previously requested and received on 08/29/2023. On 10/05/23, Investigator Miles conducted interviews with three (03) facility staff who were assisting R1 and a witness who was involved in R1's care. Staff revealed that due to changes in R1's health condition, R1 was transferred from assisted living to the memory care unit. Staff assisting R1 in the memory care unit noted significant changes in R1's conditon. Continue on 9099-C Substantiated Based on interviews and record review there is not sufficient information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No health and safety issues noted at the time of this visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was provided. R1 looked pale, was not eating well and had decrease in physical functions. However, staff was unable to explain when they started to notice changes in R1's condition and what additional services they were providing to R1 to meet resident's unmet needs. On 08/07/23, R1 was sent to the hospital after R1's family member visited the facility and requested to call 911. Prior to this visit on 05/17/24 at 11:00am, R1's facility files were reviewed. A physician report dated 07/23/23 did not disclose any information about changes in R1's condition observed by the facility staff. A completed needs and services plan for R1 was dated on 12/19/19 and not updated care and service plan was available for review. Hospital records revealed that at the time of admission to ED, R1 presented with an altered mental status, hypertension, and possible sepsis. Based on interviews and record review, there is sufficient information to support the allegation. Hence, the allegation is SUBSTANTIATED at this time. No health and safety issues noted at the time of this visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230725132639
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87464(d) · Plan of correction due date: May 29, 2024
87464 Basic Services-(d) A facility need not accept a particular resident for care. However, if a facility chooses to accept a particular resident for care, the facility shall be responsible for meeting the resident's needs as identified and providing...other basic servies...either directly or through outside resources. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Resident #1 (R1) had a change in condition and it was not documented and additional services were provided. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2024
Plan of correction: The Licensee shall submit to Licesning in writing how they will ensure that the needs of all residents in care are met by close of business day on 5/29/24.
Mar 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident sustained an unexplained fracture while in care Resident became malnourished while in care Facility retains a resident with a higher level of care needs
On 03/20/24, at 8:50am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gina Saucedo arrived at the facility to conduct an unannounced, subsequent complaint visit and was greeted by Medical Technician, Deborah Dapson. LPA disclosed the purpose of the visit. LPA explained the purpose of this visit was to gather additional information, conduct more interviews, and deliver findings for this complaint. On 12/12/2023, LPA Gina Saucedo initiated the complaint investigation. The complaint was referred to Investigations Branch (IB) on 12/12/23 and accepted one (1) out of the three (3) allegations mentioned above. The investigator was John Canto. On 03/20/24, at 8:50AM, LPA asked for census, staff, and resident roster. At 9:20AM, LPA conducted the physical tour with facility Administrator, Staci Marmershteyn. LIC 9099C-continued Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation: Resident sustained an unexplained fracture while in care. It is being alleged that resident had facial edema, slight bruising to left eye and has a nasal fracture. On 12/13/23, IB Investigator, John Canto requested medical records from Norwalk Community Hospital. Resident #1 (R1) was transported there on 12/08/23 for hypertension and concerns with areas of the face, eyes, nose, and mouth. R1’s nasal deviation was noted as chronic. Upon admission to the hospital, R1 also had an altered mental status, hypertension, seizure disorder and dementia. On 12/11/23, it was noted on the CT Head Scan (without IV contrast) that there was no skull fracture; therefore, paranasal sinuses are normal as shown which confirms that R1 did not have any skull fractures. On 12/13/23, it was noted that R1 was sent to the emergency room due to edema of bilateral lower extremities. R1 had a history of bumping their head on the toilet and scooting on their knees. On 01/16/24, IB Investigator attempted to interview R1’s social worker but was unable to obtain an interview. On 02/06/24, IB Investigator Canto interviewed three (3) staff and one (1) out of three (3) residents. Two (2) residents were unable to participate due to their cognitive abilities. The three (3) staff were able to confirm that R1 was housed in the memory care unit, would scoot on their knees, would argue, steal from residents, and would overeat. The medical records from 12/12/23 for R1, shows no facial swelling and/or rashes and was normal. The nose also shows no mass or deformity. Based on the observation of the IB Investigator, interviews conducted, and record review, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding the allegation: Resident became malnourished while in care. It is being alleged that the resident is very confused, malnourished, and thin. LPA was able to obtain the Physician’s report of 2023 which shows Resident #1 (R1) weighed 121lbs, the physician’s report of 2020 showed a weight of 115lbs which showed that R1 gained weight. In addition, the weight at the time of hospital admittance on 12/08/23 shows that R1 weight at 80 kilograms (176 lbs.). LPA interviewed seven (7) out of eight (8) that confirmed R1 would eat their own food and ask others for their food or sometimes even steal other resident’s food. LPA interviewed seven (7) residents out of eight (8) that also confirmed that they can receive extra food from the kitchen if they are still hungry. LPA was also able to interview four (4) out of four (4) staff that confirmed that R1 would steal food and request extra food from staff and other residents. Therefore, based on the LPA's interviews, observations, and record review, the above allegation(s) UNSUBSTANTIATED. LIC 9099C-continued Regarding the allegation: Facility retains a resident with a higher level of care needs. It is being alleged that the resident needs a higher level of care due to their severe dementia. The facility Administrator was able to provide the LPA with the referral name and number to the Department of Health Services (DHS) in which the facility Administrator has made several attempts to help Resident #1 (R1) get a higher level of care. The facility Administrator confirmed that R1’s mental status has deteriorated since R1 has arrived at the facility. LPA was able to interview the DHS-Lisa Speights that oversees R1’s referral from the facility. DHS was able to confirm that the facility has made several attempts to try to get R1 more care and help but DHS stated it is not that easy. DHS stated there is several steps to this process and it will still take a while to get R1 to be moved from the above facility. LPA was able to interview four (4) staff that were able to state how each resident’s level of care differentiates between each other and how they provide that level of care. Four (4) out of four (4) staff also confirmed that R1’s level of care had deteriorated. LPA was also able to interview seven (7) out of eight (8) residents regarding their level of care. Seven (7) out of eight (8) residents confirmed that their level of care needs is met by the staff, case managers and social workers. Therefore, based on the LPA's interviews and record review the above allegation(s) is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted, no citations were issued for the above allegation(s), and a copy of this report was given to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2024 · control 31-AS-20231211162011
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 11 documents
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not providing a comfortable environment for resident Staff did not prevent resident from threatening another resident
At 12:00 p.m. on 10/26/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA met with the administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. To investigate the allegations above, LPA toured the facility at 12:15 p.m., reviewed pertinent records at 12:30 p.m. including but not limited to medical assessments, functional capabilities assessments, preplacement appraisals, reappraisals, face sheets, admission agreements, government identifications, and needs and service plans, and interviewed three (03) facility staff members, two (02) case managers, and ten percent (10%) of residents, which equated to seven (07) out of seventy (70) residents, between 12:00 p.m. and 2:30 p.m. Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation “Staff are not providing a comfortable environment for resident” it was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was unsafe at the facility. Staff interviews revealed that residents often yell at one another but typically resolve their issues peacefully. No staff recalled recent or notable instances of yelling resulting in physical violence. Staff #1 (S1) stated at 12:00 p.m. today that R1 often bothered other residents when R1 ran out of money or cigarettes. Resident #2 (R2), who is R1’s current roommate, stated at 12:40 p.m. today that they respect and get along with R1. Resident #3 (R3), who was R1’s previous roommate, confirmed at 1:25 p.m. today that R1 annoyed them, so the facility changed their living arrangements to accommodate both R1’s and R3’s comfort. Interview with R1 at 1:30 p.m. today revealed that R1 felt safe and comfortable at the facility. Based on interviews, there is insufficient evidence to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation “Staff did not prevent resident from threatening another resident” it was alleged R2 threatened to hurt R1. Interview with S1 at 12:00 p.m. today revealed the facility was not aware of any threats, and staff had not reported any threats. Interview with R2 at 12:40 p.m. today revealed they occasionally yell with R1, though the two get along overall. R2 stated they have never threatened R1. Interview with R3 at 1:25 p.m. today revealed they R3 never threatened R1. Interview with R1 at 1:30 p.m. today revealed that R1 got on R2’s nerves and R2 got on R1’s nerves. R1 stated that although they felt they engaged in verbal altercations with R2, R3, and other residents in the past, R1 stated that is how residents spoke to one another at the facility. Interview with Staff #2 (S2) at 1:15 p.m. today confirmed that the facility is aware of the manner in which residents yell at one another, but staff intervene when necessary. Interview with R1’s neighbor, Resident #4 (R4) at 1:45 p.m. today revealed R1 and R2 yell but are friendly and peaceful overall. Based on interviews, there is insufficient evidence to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No immediate health or safety hazards were noted during the time of this visit. Exit interview conducted. Appeal rights discussed. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 26, 2023 · control 31-AS-20231017140458
20224 state visits · 5 documents
Nov 30, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abeye Duguma met with the administrator, Staci Marmer, for a One (1) Year Required - Infection Control visit. LPA explained the reason for the visit. A tour of the physical plant was conducted at 1:35pm and the following was noted: There is one entrance being utilized at the facility, there are required posters at the main door. Screening area is located immediately upon entrance. Sign in sheet, infrared thermometer, hand sanitizer, gloves and masks are available. LPA was screened upon entry. All staff were observed to be wearing masks upon entrance and during the visit. Hand washing, coughing etiquette, physical distancing and other necessary signs are posted in the bathroom and throughout the facility. The facility has enough PPE supplies. The facility has a total of thirty-five (35) bedrooms and thirty-six (36) bathrooms. The facility is fire cleared for fifty (50) non-ambulatory of which six (06) may be bedridden and a hospice waiver for six (06). The facility is currently occupying sixty-nine (69) residents. The facility has outdoor furniture with a covered shaded area for residents and visitors. The facility does not have a swimming pool/body of water. The garage is currently being used for parking and storage. Laundry detergents, cleaning agents and other toxins are locked away. Kitchen is sufficiently stocked with at least two (2) days perishable and seven (7) days non-perishable food. Frozen foods are wrapped and stored appropriately. Food storage and preparation areas are clean and inaccessible to pests. Knives and sharps are observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. Living and dining room furniture were also checked. The living and dining room are neat and clean. The facility maintains an average comfortable temperature at 73°F. The smoke and carbon monoxide detectors are hardwired, interconnected and observed to be operational. Fire extinguishers are located throughout the building, observed to be full and last inspected on 11/23/2022. (continued on LIC 809-C) The residents' rooms are adequately furnished with appropriate lighting system. Hallways are well lit. Residents have enough personal hygiene product provided by the licensee. The bathroom was checked for cleanliness and proper operations. The hot water temperature was measured at 106.3°F. Towels and washcloths are not shared. There was enough clean linen available in the cabinets. LPA observed medication and first aid kit to be locked and inaccessible to residents. No health and safety hazards noted during the visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 30, 2022
Oct 7, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility has bed bugs. Facility Food is not healthy. Facility did not provide incidental medical care to resident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) LaQueena Lacy conducted a subsequent visit on 10/07/2022 at 10:48am to deliver investigative findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Staci Mermar and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted a physical plant tour at 10:52am It is alleged that a resident had bed bugs bites on them. To investigate the above allegation, LPA Lacy conducted interviews with staff and residents on 11/23/2021 between 11:19 – 11:35am and 07/25/2022 between 11:42am - 2:46pm. Five (05) out of seven (07) residents interviewed have not seen or heard of any bedbugs at the facility. During the investigation LPA inspected nine (09) random rooms on the first and second floor, instructed and observed staff to remove bed linens, comforters off beds, and unzipped mattress coverings. LPA inspected mattress seams, bed frames and did not observe any bed bugs or pests during the inspection. Continued on 9099C. Unsubstantiated Upon record review of Dewey Pest Control Co. Quality Assurance Report the facility receives a monthly service to control general pest inside and around the perimeter of the building and other pest as identified. Based on LPAs interviews, observation, and record review, there is not enough evidence to support the allegation, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. #2. Facility Food is not healthy. It is alleged that the food is horrible and not healthy. To investigate the above allegation LPA interviewed seven (07) residents on 11/23/2021 between 11:19 – 11:35am and 07/25/2022 between 11:42am - 2:46pm. Five (05) out of (07) residents had lunch at the facility the day of the investigation, and stated “the food was good”, had no complaints regarding the food, and that the food provided was healthy. LPA observed lunch served the day of the investigation to be of quantity, quality, and observed no complaints during lunch. Upon record review of the Monthly Food Service Inspection Report conducted by a dietician, confirmed the food is well accepted by residents, portion control followed, and substitutions or replacements are offered and appropriate. Based on LPAs interviews, observation, and record review, there is not enough evidence to support the allegation, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. #3. Facility did not provide incidental medical care to resident. It is alleged that a resident had bites on them. To investigate the above allegation interviews with six (06) out of seven (07) residents revealed they have not been bitten by any bugs or pest. Interviews with staff confirmed no one has complained about any bites or bugs in their room or on their persons. During the investigation LPA inspected nine (09) random rooms on the first and second floor and did not observe any bugs or pest. Based on LPAs interviews, observation, there is not enough evidence to support the allegation, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies cited, Exit interview conducted, Copy of report and appeal rights issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2022 · control 31-AS-20211119123050
Oct 7, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff shoved resident. Staff not assisting resident to the bathroom. Staff not allowing resident to be interviewed.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) LaQueena Lacy conducted a subsequent visit on 10/07/2022 at 10:48am to deliver investigative findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Staci Marmer and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted a physical plant tour at 10:52am It is alleged that that resident #1 (R1) was shoved by escorts during a mobile clinic at the facility. To investigate the above allegation, LPA interviewed staff and residents on 07/25/2022 between 11:42am - 2:10pm. During the investigation R1 revealed that staff did not shove or tell R1 to stop talking. Interviews with six (06) out of (06) residents confirmed that no staff have shoved, or told any residents to stop talking. They have not witnessed or heard of any staff mistreating any resident. Interviews with staff confirmed that that no residents complained of any staff shoving them. Based on LPAs interviews, observation, there is not enough evidence to support the allegation, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Continued on LIC9099C. Unsubstantiated #2. Staff not assisting resident to the bathroom. It is alleged that that resident #1 (R1) cited example of not being assisted to the bathroom. To investigate the above allegation, LPA interviewed staff and residents on 07/25/2022 between 11:42am - 2:10pm. During the investigation five (05) out of six (06) residents confirmed they are assisted with ADLs and have no issues when needing assistance. Upon record review R1 is able to care for own toileting needs, and is able to communicate needs. Based on LPAs interviews, observation, and record review, there is not enough evidence to support the allegation, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. #3. Staff not allowing resident to be interviewed. It is alleged that staff told resident #1 (R1) to stop talking when complaining about the facility. During the investigation R1 revealed that staff had not yelled or told R1 to stop talking during the mobile clinic at the facility. Interviews with six (06) out of (06) residents on 07/25/2022 between 11:42am - 2:10pm confirmed that no staff had yelled or told any resident to stop talking. Based on LPAs interviews, observation, there is not enough evidence to support the allegation, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies cited, Exit interview conducted, Copy of report and appeal rights issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220715173601
May 27, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Resident sustained severe pressure injury while in care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Wendell Smith conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to finish investigation into the allegation above. Initial visit was conducted by LPA Lacy on 10/18/2021. This complaint was investigated by Investigation Branch (IB) Investigator Edward Hector. It is alleged that resident # 1 (R1) was admitted to Kaiser Los Angeles Medical Center on 10/08/21 with a stage four pressure injury on their tailbone from Brier Oaks Skilled Nursing facility. R1 allegedly arrived at Brier Oak Skilled Nursing facility two weeks before being admitted to the hospital already having pressure injuries. On 10/20/2021 interviews were conducted with facility staff and it was confirmed that R1 left the facility on 8/30/21 to go to Cedar Sinai hospital due to having a hard time breathing and never returned to the facility. On 10/20/21 interviews and medical documentation was obtained and reviewed from Brier Oaks Skilled Nursing facility. Interviews and a review of medical documentation revealed that R1 was admitted to Brier Oaks from the hospital on 9/12/21. When R1 came on 9/12/21, an assessment was done and R1 was diagnosed with stage three pressure injury on their sacral area. Unfounded Information obtained through interviews and medical documentation it is found that the last time R1 was at the facility was 8/30/21. R1 was admitted to Kaiser Hospital on 10/8/21 with a stage four pressure injury after being at Brier Oaks Skilled Nursing facility since 9/12/21. Based on all the information obtained this allegation is deemed Unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit Interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 27, 2022 · control 31-AS-20211015115643
May 10, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident caused injuries to another resident while in care Staff did not address a resident's change in medical condition
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a subsequent visit to the facility to conclude the investigation regarding the above allegations. The 10-day visit was made by LPA Elizabeth Arambulo. Complaint was then referred to Investigations Branch (IB). It was accepted and assigned to investigator Jose Santana as a full assignment. IB’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff and residents, and a review of Resident 1 (R1) medical records. Resident caused injuries to another resident while in care: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that on or around 11/26/19, R1 was assaulted by Resident 2 (R2). The investigation reveals that it was known R2 disliked sharing rooms with R1. Prior to the assault, on or around 11/23/19, staff had observed R2 punching R1 several times because he disliked sharing rooms. Facility had documented the incident with the resolution for room reassignment. The reassignment did not occur. Furthermore, the incident was not reported to the Department of Health Services (DHS). Had this conflict been known, DHS would have taken steps to address the issue, and Substantiated possibly preventing the incident to occur on 11/26/19. Based on the information obtained, there is enough information to corroborate with the allegation of resident causing injury to another resident while in care. Therefore, the allegation is Substantiated. Citation(s) issued on the 9099D. Staff did not address a resident’s change in medical condition: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that on or around 10/30/20, R1 was treated for an edema. R1 received instructions to follow up with their primary doctor in one to two days, or to return to the emergency room if symptoms worsened. The investigation revealed that there was no follow up appointment with R1’s primary doctor. R1 wasn’t seen until 2/3/21. Between 10/30/20 to 11/26/20, there was documentation that R1 experienced swelling and redness on six different days, but no record of a hospital visit or attempts to treat R1’s condition. Additional documentation also noted that on 11/24/20, R1 had a “little open hole” to their ankle, but no notation that it was being treated. Based on the information obtained, there is enough information to corroborate with the allegation of staff not addressing R1’s change in condition. Therefore, the allegation is Substantiated. Citation(s) issued on the 9099D.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 10, 2022 · control 31-AS-20210114093851
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: May 10, 2022
Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities: (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This requirement has not been met as evidenced by Prior to R2 assaulting R1 on 11/26/19, R2 was also involved in another assault with R1 on or around 11/23/19. Licensee failed to notify DHS of R2’s behavior, which could have helped in taking steps to prevent another assault from happening.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 10, 2022
Plan of correction: As POC, the licensee will review this section of the regulation and self certify that they have read and understood the section. POC due to the licensing agency by 5/17/22.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: May 10, 2022
Incidental Medical and Dental Care: A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care, by compliance with the following: The licensee shall arrange, or assist in arranging, for medical and dental care appropriate to the conditions and needs of residents. This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: The licensee failed to make a follow up appointment with R1’s primary doctor who instructed them to do so after being treated for an edema. Cont.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 10, 2022
Plan of correction: Furthermore, licensee failed to take R1 to the emergency room as instructed when R1 was experiencing swelling and redness for six days. As POC, the licensee will review this section of the regulation and self certify that they have read and understood the section. POC due to the licensing agency by 5/17/22.
20215 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 30, 2021Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide required medical care to resident.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) LaQueena Lacy conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to investigate the allegation above. LPA meet with staff Deborah Dopson and explained the purpose of this visit. It is alleged that resident #1 (R1) oxygen levels were low, due to not receiving prescribed Oxygen treatment. To investigate the allegation, LPA conducted a physical plant tour at 10:45am and observed no immediate health and safety concerns. At 11:01am LPA requested and reviewed copies of relevant documents pertinent to the investigation. Based on document review R1 received the prescribed oxygen machine delivered on 12/08/2021 at 6:20pm to the facility. Upon review of discharge documents from the hospital dated 12/24/2021, although, the Oxygen Therapy listed as a Home Treatment, it has not been documented by the facility as a part of R1s Needs and Service Plan. During the investigation, at approximately 11:10am LPA began interviews with facility staff. Interviews revealed that the staff had knowledge about the oxygen concentrator delivered to the facility. However, they did not follow up with the order to clarify who is was prescribed to and how they were supposed to assist the resident. Substantiated At 11:36am, LPA spoke with seven (7) out of seventy (70) residents they all did not address any concerns about their medical care. Overall investigation revealed that, although R1’s oxygen concentrator was delivered to the facility, staff did not ensure to assist R1 Oxygen administration as needed. Based on the information obtained through observations, document review and interviews, there is a sufficient information to support the allegation. Therefore, allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. Citation issued, appeal rights discussed and given. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 30, 2021 · control 31-AS-20211228144047
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 31, 2021
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility… provide for assistance in obtaining such care, by compliance with the following: (1) The licensee shall arrange, or assist in arranging, for medical …care appropriate to the conditions and needs of residents. This requirement is not met as evidenced by; The licensee did not develop an incidental medical care for C1. C1 was not receiving O2 treatment as prescribed. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 30, 2021
Plan of correction: Licensee will contact R1 Medical Physician to obtain a plan of care to ensure that residents incidental medical needs are provided. Licensee will submit to LPA the written plan of care from the physician.
Nov 18, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff hit resident in care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pitz conducted an unannounced visit on this day in response to the above allegation. As part of this investigation LPA conducted a virtual visit on 7/28/2020 and interviewed the facilty administrator, Resident 1's (R1's) roommate and caseworker; conducted a visit on 11/18/2021 and interviewed the administrator, two staff members, and 7 residents at 12:45pm. Allegation #1, that "Facility staff hit resident in care," has been unsubstantiated based on the interviews conducted. LPA did not receive any supporting evidence from the complainant to support the allegation, and none of the 3/3 staff, 1/1 witness, or 8/8 residents interviewed between 7/28/2020 and 11/18/2021 corroborated the allegation. Report reviewed, signed and delivered. Exit interview conducted, no deficienices cited. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 18, 2021 · control 31-AS-20200721135243
The state marks this report as 2 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Oct 18, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) LaQueena Lacy arrived at the facility at 9:30am to conduct a One (1) year Required Infection Control visit. LPA meet with the Administrator Staci Marmer and explained the purpose of this visit. A tour of the physical plant was conducted at 9:38am and the following was observed: The facility has one main entrance being used, there are required Covid-19 prevention signage (hand washing, coughing etiquette and physical distancing) posted throughout the facility. The PPE screening station is located inside the medication room located at the entrance of the facility. PPE is readily accessible a thermometer, gloves, mask, and sign in sheet at the time of visit. Hand sanitizer is located on the wall at the entrance near the medication room and throughout the facility posted on the wall. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature of 72 degrees. The facility has an approved mitigation plan on file. Medication: At 9:38am LPA observed the medication room, located at the entrance of the building. The medication room observed to be locked when unattended by staff or management in the office. The medications are stored in open faced cupboards, LPA observed medication and PPE stored in the medication office and a First Aid Kit and manual. Medication is prepared in the medication room and dispensed to residents. Kitchen: At 9:47am LPA observed the kitchen to be clean and clear from obstruction. Food storage and preparation areas are clean and inaccessible to pests. The kitchen has a dining room adjoining the kitchen that was observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed four (4) refrigerator to be storing Perishable food, meats, and vegetables. The kitchen door also has a lock which was observed to be open but is locked when staff is unattended in the kitchen. LPA observed kitchen drawers to be without locks used to store sharps. Toxins observed to be under the kitchen sink, kitchen staff is stationed in the kitchen during shift or the kitchen is closed and locked when unattended by kitchen staff and inaccessible to residents. (Continued on LIC 809C) Bedrooms: LPA at 10:06am observed bedrooms to have sufficient lighting and are properly furnished and observed to be clean and have appropriate bedding and linens. Bathrooms: At 10:06am LPA observed the bathrooms located in the bedrooms to half baths and the rooms that have a full bath showers are not being used all showers are conducted in the shower room located near the kitchen. LPA observed appropriate grab bars and non-slip skid mats in the bathtub. The hot water temperature measured in range from 105.6 through 110.3 degrees Fahrenheit. Bathrooms observed to be clean and have sufficient soap and paper towels hand towels are not shared. The second shower room is in the memory care unit. Living, dining room and common areas: At 10:22am observed living room to have television, chairs seating with sufficient lighting. LPA observed to be clean and in good repair and free from obstruction. The dining room observed to have sufficient lighting, chairs, and tables for seating. LPA observed activity supplies to be stored in a cabinet in the office/medication room. Basement/Laundry Room/ Storage Rooms: At 10:33am LPA observed the laundry room to be clean and clear from obstruction. Laundry soap, toxins, and poisons observed to be locked and stored in the housekeeping supply cabinet located in the in the basement. LPA observed first storage room located in the basement to be stocked with PPE, toiletries, and incontinent supplies. The second storage has extra personal care items (shampoo, body wash lotion etc.). On the second-floor patio area, has a shed that is storing mop buckets and other cleaning equipment observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. The emergency food is also stored in the basement in a locked storage room supplied with enough water, canned food, and non-perishables items Backyard: At 10:54am LPA observed the back yard and area around the facility observed to be clean and clear of debris. The facility has multiple seating areas for lounging on the second-floor patio area with an owing with table and chairs for seating. The facility has a shaded front area with tables and chair for seating. At 11:15am the fire alarm system was tested and observed to be working, it is hard wired and inter-connected. The facility has Fire Extinguishers located throughout the facility all have a service tag dated November 06, 2020. No bodies of water observed on the property. There are no deficiencies to report during this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 18, 2021
Sep 14, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not meet resident's hygiene needs Resident had lost a lot of weight due to neglect Staff leaves resident in soaking wet clothing for extended period of time Staff failed to seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Staci Marmeshteyn and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:15 AM. LPA requested and reviewed facility documents relevant to the investigation from 9:45 AM to 11:30 AM. LPA conducted interview with staff, residents and administrator between 11:30 AM to 1:30 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff do not meet resident's hygiene needs, LPA's record review between 9:45 AM and 11:30 AM, revealed that Resident #1 (R1) almost always refused to take showers and assistance to clean self. LPA's interview with Resident #2 (R2) also revealed that staff always attend to R1's need but R1 refused and wanted to sleep naked. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) Regarding the allegation that Resident had lost a lot of weight due to neglect, LPA record review revealed that R1 had a terminal illness and continuously declining and unable to eat properly due to the illness. LPA's interview with the administrator and staff at 12:20 PM also revealed that R1's food are pureed due to R1's illness but sometimes refused the facility food. The facility however, was able to obtain for R1 to have a liquid supplement (Ensure) that R1 took regularly. Regarding the allegation that Staff leaves resident in soaking wet clothing for extended period of time, LPA's interview with R2 revealed that R1's diaper was being changed regularly by the staff. LPA's interview with the care staff however, revealed that R1 always removed and sometime refused to wear R1's pull up diaper as R1 would like to be naked all day. Regarding the allegation that Staff failed to seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner, LPA record review revealed that R1's case manager was the one arranging for medical transportation for R1 to continue medical treatment but R1 refused to go multiple times. Further record review also revealed that the facility agreed to plan and arrange R1's medical and dental transportation and record shows that the facility did, but whenever R1 was about to be taken to the medical appointment, R1 refused. Moreover, dental appointment was not recommended by R1's doctor to be done as it might not able to heal due to R1's medical condition and additionally, LPA's interview with the administrator also revealed that R1 refused to have the dental procedure be done to R1. Based on the information gathered during this and prior visit, the allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 14, 2021 · control 31-AS-20201112132618
Jul 19, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident 1 (R1) sustained severe injuries resulting in hospitalization.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Martha Guzman Chavez conducted a subsequent complaint investigation to the above facility. The purpose of the visit is to deliver findings for the above allegation. Initial visit was conducted on 12/03/2019 by LPA Brian Balisi. LPA met with MedTech Deborah Dapson who oversees facility while Administrator is on vacation. Entrance interview conducted. On 12/02/2019 the Department received a complaint in which it was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) sustained severe injuries resulting in hospitalization. The complaint was referred to Community Care Licensing Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to Investigator Laura Garcia. Continuation on LIC 9099c Unsubstantiated Continuation from LIC 9099 On 12/03/2019 at 1:28 p.m. LPA Brian Balisi conducted the initial complaint visit, interviewed the Administrator Staci Marmershteyn, and obtained copies of pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. Investigator Garcia conducted interviews with R1’s relative on 01/25/2020 at approximately 1000 hours, the Administrator on 01/15/2020 at approximately 1130 hours, caregivers on 04/13/2020 at approximately 1828 hours and on 04/14/2020 at approximately 1320 hours, and R1’s case manager on 04/13/2020. Medical records were also obtained and reviewed. Information contained in the records revealed that R1 was diagnosed with bone cancer and initially misdiagnosed at the hospital with a hip and rib fracture. After further evaluation during a pre-operative procedure for the alleged hip fracture, blood work detected metastasized cancer cells in the bones. A hip fracture was noted however, per the report, the fracture was highly suggestive of metastatic disease leading to brittle bones. Caregivers interviewed denied R1 falling or injuring self while under their care and supervision. Prior to R1 complaining of leg pain, R1 slept through the night without any pain, complaints or incidents. On 11/28/19 at approximately 0800 hours the resident began to complain of pain in the leg area and was immediately transported to the hospital for medical evaluation. Tests conducted at the hospital revealed findings highly suggestive of cancer. Based on the information and documentation obtained and review, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to support the above allegation. Therefore, the above allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted and a copy of report given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 19, 2021 · control 31-AS-20191202150048
70 of 70 beds were occupied at the April 20, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Alta Vista Gardens, Inc., licensed since 2015.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2015, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 19
- Total complaints
- 11
- Substantiated allegations
- 5
- Type A citations
- 3
- Type B citations
- 2
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2015, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 3 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 2 | 1 |
| Substantiated allegations | 5 | 2 |
| Total complaints | 11 | 6 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Alta Vista Gardens
Is Alta Vista Gardens licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
How many residents is Alta Vista Gardens licensed for?
70 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
Has Alta Vista Gardens been cited?
3 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026. Those records count 19 state visits over the same years.
Is Alta Vista Gardens still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 12, 2026.
What does Alta Vista Gardens cost?
$5,200 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,050–$6,650. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 communities with 50 or more beds within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 17 other homes of a similar licensed size in Los Angeles that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,000 to $6,311 a month, and the middle figure is $3,594 (n = 17 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Alta Vista Gardens take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Alta Vista Gardens, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Southern California Hospital at Hollywood is 1.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Alta Vista Gardens keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
Alta Vista Gardens license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “ALTA VISTA GARDENS”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #197608200. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
- Licensed for 70 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
- Licensed to Alta Vista Gardens, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
- First licensed in 2015, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
- 19 state inspection visits since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
- 3 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026. The same records count 19 state visits in that period.
- 11 complaints and 5 substantiated allegations on file since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is April 20, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,400 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,400–$5,550On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,300 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,350–$5,500On the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,900 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,850–$6,450On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,250 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,300–$6,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,350 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,400–$6,600On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,500 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,350–$7,200On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Los Angeles County