Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Melrose Gardens

Mid-size home·Licensed for 31·Los Angeles, California

Licensed since 2023Licence #197610367Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,950 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,900–$6,500
  • Home sizeLicensed for 31Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit55 of 31 beds occupiedMarch 27, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · September 23, 2026
  • Last state visitMarch 27, 2026CDSS inspection record

Melrose Gardens is a mid-size care home in Los Angeles — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 31 residents since 2023. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Melrose Gardens

Is Melrose Gardens licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Melrose Gardens licensed for?

31 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Melrose Gardens been cited?

1 Type A and 0 Type B citation since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 7 state visits over the same years.

Is Melrose Gardens still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Melrose Gardens cost?

$4,950 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,900–$6,500. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 9 other homes of a similar licensed size in Los Angeles that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,375 to $8,250 a month, and the middle figure is $7,000 (n = 9 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Melrose Gardens take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, September 23, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Danmar Villas, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Danmar Villas LLC — at least 2 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Southern California Hospital at Hollywood is 1.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Melrose Gardens keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 31 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Melrose Gardens license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “MELROSE GARDENS”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197610367. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 31 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Danmar Villas, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 7 state inspection visits since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 0 Type B citation on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 7 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is March 27, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 31 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 31 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 31 residents

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 31 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 31 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR 31.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 31 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,950a month to start

Likely $3,900–$6,500

From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,950a month

Likely $3,900–$6,650

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,950likely $3,900–$6,500

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,900–$6,650
$4,950
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,650–$9,600
$6,950
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, September 23, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

24 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$8,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 1007-1013 N. Martel Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90046Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2023, the state has filed 7 documents for this home, and its records count 7 visits since 2023. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on March 27, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2023
State visits
7
Most recent visit
March 27, 2026
Occupied at that visit
55 of 31 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated May 23, 2025 to March 27, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 2
  • Total complaints2typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2023.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026110202523120241102023220

The last 36 months — 6 of 7 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Mar 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff neglected to provide proper care and supervision to resident resulting in injury- Resident’s pressure wound worsened due to staff neglect- Staff were distracted by their personal phones and not meeting the needs of residents-

This is an addendum the the previous report issued on 5/23/2025. On 3/27/26, Licensing Program Analyst, (LPA) Raymond Comer, arrived at the facility to conduct a subsequent visit regarding the allegation(s) listed above. LPA conducted the initial complaint visit on 05/22/25, at which time LPA spoke with the facility Administrator, Staff, and Witnesses having knowledge of the above noted allegations. In addition, between 12:10 pm and 1:30 pm, LPA received facility resident and staff roster, Resident #1 (R1’s) facility records, included but not limited to, physician report, assessment, need and service plan, functional capability assessment, hospital discharge records and other pertinent documents. Between 1:35 pm and 2:15 pm, LPA interviewed facility staff and R1’s responsible family member. During subsequent visits, LPA discussed R1’s overall health conditions to clarify what kind of services R1 was receiving from staff and 3rd party home health care providers. On 09/19/2025, during subsequent visit between 10:15 am and 12:30 pm, LPA Comer requested and reviewed Resident #2 (R2s) records, interviewed Staff, and five (05) out of a total of thirty-one (31) residents. [LIC 9099C] Continued- Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff neglected to provide proper care and supervision to residents,resulting in injury. It was alleged that on 5/11/25 at 1:00 PM in the dining area, R1 was observed with bruising around their eyes. R1 was questioned by the their responsible family member (F1) and R1 stated that the facility is awful, that someone probably punched R1, but refused to provide additional details. Staff revealed that they provide wellness checks to R1 a minimum of every two hours. R1 is under staff observation in the common areas and is being assessed and supervised as frequently as necessary. Staff explained that on 05/05/2025 during lunch time R1 got too close to the Resident#2 (R2), and accidentally touched R2. By the time staff went to redirect R1, R2 grabbed the plate from the table and threw it at R1; Staff immediately separated R1 and R2. Staff revealed that R1 had a health condition triggering behaviors that could disturb other residents. Therefore, they were always monitoring R1. Staff stated that R1 did not have fall incidents that could cause bruise around their eyes. LPA was unable to communicate with R1 due to R1’s inability to respond to questions. Other residents interviewed during investigation did not address any concerns regarding the assistance provided by facility staff. A review of facility records verified the information received from staff. Based on the information obtained through observation, records review, and interviews, it was concluded that although R1 may have been involved in the incident, causing injuries, there is not sufficient information to conclude that staff neglected to provide required care and supervision to R1. Hence, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Allegation: Resident’s pressure wound worsened due to staff neglect- Concerns were addressed that a prior bed soar, above R1’s buttock had worsened and appeared to be 6 inches long by 3 inches wide. Four months ago, the wound was much smaller. Staff revealed that R1 had a wound on their buttock and was receiving home health care services for wound care. As per Staff’ observation, and the information received from home health nurses, the wound was healing. A review of R1’s home health care records verified that R1 wound was responding to treatment and healing. During investigation, LPA Comer was able to observe R1’s wound, finding the skin to be dry and wound healing well. [LIC 9099C] Continued- Based on interviews, observation, and record review, there is not sufficient information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Allegation: Staff were distracted by their personal phones and not meeting the needs of residents- Complainant alleges that staff neglected to assist R1 with toileting assistance as they [staff] were instead distracted using their cell phones during working hours. During initial and subsequent visits, LPA conducted multiple tours of the facility in the morning and afternoon shifts and observed the following: Staff were witnessed providing consistent care and assistance to residents; no residents were witnessed by LPA as neglected by staff. During LPA interviews with Administrator and staff, they refuted this allegation, stating that staff provide assistance to residents in care on a consistent basis. Staff stated that if they need to make a phone call while working their shift, they will ask co-staff to provide temporary coverage until they return to their work duties. Residents’ interviews revealed that staff provide resident care and supervision on a consistent basis and that resident assistance was not neglected due to staff's personal issues. Based on the information LPA obtained through observation, and interviews with staff and residents, It cannot be proven that staff neglect to meet residents needs, nor are distracted by personal matters. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2026 · control 31-AS-20250516141919
20252 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 30, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 09/30/25, 8:30 am, Licensing Program Analyst, (LPA) Raymond Comer, arrived to conduct an unannounced annual inspection of the Facility. LPA met with Facility Administrator, Yossi "Joseph" Wieder, and reason for the visit was disclosed. Facility is licensed as a single-story building. Fire clearance approved for thirty-one (31) non-ambulatory residents. Bedridden cleared for thirty-one residents. Hospice waiver approved for thirty-one (31). Currently, there are two (2) residents receiving hospice care services; none bedridden. At 10:15 am, LPA conducted a tour of the physical plant with the Administrator and observed the following: Physical plant was inspected for cleanliness and condition. Facility’s main door is the primary entry/exit access. Screening area is located immediately upon entrance. Facility provides dementia care; LPA observed delayed egress system working properly. Visitor Sign-in sheet, hand sanitizer, gloves and masks are available. Hand washing, coughing etiquette, and other necessary signage are posted throughout the facility. Room temperature is comfortable; wall thermostat displays a setting of 74.0°F; within the required range. Facility maintains an approved Mitigation and Infection Control Plan. Required postings are displayed and observed to be current. Disaster drills last conducted on September,2025 Commons: Activity room and dining room observed to be clean. Furnishings observed to be in good condition. No obstructions, nor tripping hazards observed. [LIC 809C]-continued Fire Detection/Protection: System is present in the facility. Multiple dual smoke/carbon monoxide alarms are installed, hardwired, and interconnected throughout the Facility. Fire alarm system was tested and worked properly. Two (2) fire extinguishers are located at opposite ends of the facility; extinguishers last serviced on December 24, 2024. Evacuation routes are clearly labelled and posted. Kitchen: At 11:15 am, LPA observed kitchen as clean, commercial refrigerators and freezers observed to maintain required temperatures, appliances and fixtures functional. LPA observed a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food which was properly stored and labeled. Residents do not have access to the kitchen; knives and sharps are inaccessible to residents. Facility menu appears to meet the daily dietary needs of the residents. No pesticides, nor poisons, were observed near food areas. Medications: Medication room is located next to the facility entrance; LPA observed room as locked and inaccessible to residents. Medications are properly labeled and stored in secured medication carts. Medication documentation and distribution records appear to be complete. First aid kits were observed on carts stored in the medication room. Laundry: LPA observed the laundry room, located in outdoor storage compartment. Laundry room, detergents, cleaning supplies, and other toxins, are secured and inaccessible to residents. Bedrooms: At 11:50 am, LPA observed resident bedrooms and bathrooms for safety, privacy, and comfort. Random bedrooms (#109, #110, #113, #118) were inspected and observed to maintain required furnishings, sufficient lighting, bed linens, and blankets. All bedrooms were observed to be clean and clear of obstruction. Bathrooms were observed to be clean and sanitary with necessary supplies and required safety fixtures (grab bars, anti-slip floor stripping). Hot water temperature measured at 114.0°F. Within the required range. Outdoor (rear courtyard) area observed to have a shaded patio, with table and sufficient seating for residents. Outdoor furniture observed to be in good condition. All trash cans were observed to be covered. There are no bodies of water in the facility. [LIC 809C]-continued Resident records: Records are stored in locked cabinets within the Administrator's office and inaccessible to residents. A total of four (4) Resident files were reviewed for current IPP and/or Needs and Services plans, physician report, admission agreements, and all relevant documentation. Resident records appeared to be complete and current. Staff records: Records are stored in locked cabinets within the Administrator's office and inaccessible to residents. A total of six (6) Staff files were reviewed. Criminal record clearances, Health Screening, CPR/First Aid, and all relevant documentation were review by LPA. Staff records appear complete and current. There were no immediate health and safety hazards observed at the time of this inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 30, 2025
May 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not properly safeguarding medications-

At 8:45 am, Friday, 5/23/25, Licensing Program Analyst, (LPA) Raymond Comer, arrived to conduct a subsequent visit regarding the allegation listed above. LPA conducted the initial complaint visit on 05/14/25. LPA met with facility Administrator, Marco Villegas, presented official CDSS badge identification, and reason for the visit was disclosed. At 9:05 am, LPA conducted a physical plant tour; no health and safety issues were observed. To investigate the allegation(s), LPA received Facility resident roster, and staff roster. LPA interviewed the Administrator, staff, and residents. [LIC 9099C]- Continued Substantiated Allegation: Facility staff are not properly safeguarding medications - The Reporting Party (RP) alleges that a staff member left their child in the medications room unattended during their scheduled work shift. LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator, which revealed the following: Per the Administrator, he allowed the staff member (S1) in question to let their child sit in the medications room. "It was a Sunday, and S1 did not have anyone to watch over the child that day. He [the child] was sitting in S1's vehicle and it was a very hot day, so I allowed S1 to bring her child in the medications room." Per the Administrator, "All medications are securely locked in medication carts and overhead cabinets, so there was no way for unauthorized persons to access any medications." LPA conducted an observation of the medications room which revealed the following: Door to medications room was locked and inaccessible to residents. Inside the room, all medications were witnessed as securely locked in medication carts and overhead cabinets. However, the Administrator admits that non-authorized persons were allowed access in the medications room. Based on the information LPA obtained through observation, interviews with the Administrator, staff, residents, the allegation that facility's medications were not properly safeguarded is Substantiated. Deficiency is cited on the LIC 9099-D page. Exit interview conducted. Appeal rights discussed. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250505152734

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(2) · Plan of correction due date: May 23, 2025

87465(h)(2) Incidental Medical and Dental Care- Centrally stored medicines shall be kept in a safe and locked place that is not accessible to persons other than employees responsible for the supervision of the centrally stored medication. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA interviews with the Administrator and Staff, the licensee failed to ensure that the facility's medication room was inaccessible to persons other than athorized personnel which posed an immediate health risk to residents in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2025

Plan of correction: All staff will complete in-service training regarding access policy to medications room within ten days of this citation. Licensee will provide statement that moving forward, medication room access policy will comply with regulations. Evidence of completion to be submitted to LPA as POC.

May 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

On 05/23/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raymond Comer, conducted an unannounced case management visit. LPA met with the administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. This case management visit was conducted in conjunction with complaint investigation #31-AS-20250516141919 to address deficiencies related to the complaint. During the initial complaint investigation, LPA conducted a facility records review and interviews with Administrator and Staff which revealed the following: On 5/05/25, an incident occurred in which Resident#2 (R2) committed an aggressive act upon Resident#1 (R1). Staff contacted the Primary Care Physician for both R1, and R2. Additionally, staff informed responsible family members of R1, and R2 concerning the incident. However, staff did not report to issue to the the Administrator, and as a result, the facility did not submit an incident reports or other required reports to the Licensing Division. At the time of this visit, the Administrator was informed that staff are not following reporting requirements and failed to follow Tittle 22 reporting requirements. Deficiencies are cited on the corresponding 809-D page. No immediate health or safety hazards were observed during today's visit. Exit interview conducted. Appeal rights discussed. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: May 23, 2025

87211(a)(1) Reporting Requirements- A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency...and person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified...This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA records review and interviews with Administrator and Staff, Licensee failed to submit an Incident Report to licensing agency within seven days of the incident's occurance, which poses a potential health risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee has agreed to conduct an in-service training for all staff about the section cited. Licensee shall submit proof of training by the POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87211(c) · Plan of correction due date: May 23, 2025

87211(c) Reporting Requirements-Any suspected physical abuse that does not result in serious bodily injury...shall be reported to local ombudsman...and local law enforcement agency within twenty-four (24) hours...This requirment was not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA records review and interviews with Administrator and Staff, Licensee failed to report to ombudsman and local authorities as required, which poses a potential health risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2025

Plan of correction: The licensee has agreed to conduct an in-service training for all staff about the section cited. The licensee will submit proof of training by the POC due date.

20241 state visit · 1 document
Dec 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 12/12/24, 9:45 am, Licensing Program Analyst, (LPA) Raymond Comer, arrived to conduct an unannounced annual inspection of the Facility. LPA met with Facility Administrator, Marcos Villegas, and reason for the visit was disclosed. Facility is licensed as a single-story building. Fire clearance approved for thirty-one (31) non-ambulatory residents. Bedridden cleared in thirty-one residents. Hospice waiver approved for thirty-one (31). Currently, there are two (2) residents receiving hospice care services; no bedridden at time of visit. At 10:15 am, LPA conducted a tour of the physical plant with the Administrator and observed the following: Physical plant was inspected for cleanliness and condition. Facility’s main door is the primary entry/exit access. Screening area is located immediately upon entrance. Facility provides dementia care; LPA observed delayed egress system working properly throughout all access points of the facility. Visitor Sign-in sheet, hand sanitizer, gloves and masks are available. Hand washing, coughing etiquette, and other necessary signage are posted throughout the facility. Room temperature is comfortable; wall thermostat displays a setting of 75.0°F; within the required range. Facility maintains an approved Mitigation and Infection Plan. Required postings are prominently displayed and observed to be current. Disaster drills were last conducted on September 25, 2024 Fire Detection/Protection system is present in the facility. Multiple dual smoke/carbon monoxide alarms are installed, hardwired, and interconnected throughout the Facility. Fire alarm system was tested and works properly. Two (2) fire extinguishers were observed on opposite ends of the hallway; extinguishers last serviced on December 24, 2023. Evacuation routes are clearly labelled and posted throughout the facility. Fire drill last conducted September 25, 2024. [LIC 809-C] Continued- Kitchen: At 10:45 am, LPA observed kitchen as clean, commercial refrigerators and freezers observed to maintain required temperatures, appliances and fixtures functional, and a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food observed as properly stored and labeled. Residents do not have access to the kitchen;knives and sharps are inaccessible to residents. Facility menu appears to meet the daily dietary needs of the residents. No pesticides, nor poisons, were observed near any food areas. Medications: Medication room is located next to the facility entrance; LPA observed room as locked and inaccessible to residents. Medications are properly labeled, and stored in secured medication carts. Medication documentation and distribution records appear to be complete. First aid kits were observed on carts stored in the medication room. Laundry: At 11:12 am, LPA observed the laundry room, located in outdoor storage compartment. Laundry room, detergents, cleaning supplies, and other toxins, are secured in locked compartment area and inaccessible to residents. Laundry area is clean and clear from obstruction. Commons: Activity room, and dining room, observed to be clean. Furnishings observed to be in good condition. No obstructions, nor tripping hazards observed. Bedrooms: At 11:35 am, LPA observed random resident bedrooms and bathrooms for safety, privacy, and comfort. Resident rooms were inspected and observed to maintain required furnishing and sufficient lighting, bed linens, and blankets. All bedrooms were observed to be clean and clear from obstruction. Bathrooms were observed to be clean and sanitary with necessary supplies and required safety fixtures (grab bars, anti-slip floor stripping). Hot water temperature measured at 113.5°F; Within the required range. Outdoor (rear courtyard) area observed to have a shaded patio, with table with sufficient seating for the residents. Outdoor furniture observed to be in good condition. All trash cans were observed to be covered. There are no bodies of water in the facility. Resident records: At 12:15 pm, LPA observed records room, located in Administrator's office, as secured and inaccessible to residents. A total of three (3) Resident files were reviewed for current IPP and/or Needs and Services plans, physician report, and admission agreements. Resident records appeared to be complete and current. [Continued on LIC 809-C] Staff records: At 12:40 pm, LPA observed records room, located in Administrator's office, as secured and inaccessible to residents. A total of three (3) Staff files were reviewed. Criminal record clearances were present and Staff are associated to this facility. Staff records appear to be complete and current. There were no immediate health and safety hazards observed at the time of this inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was given to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 25, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Evelin Rios and Michael Cava arrived at the facility on 10/25/2023 at 10:30 a.m. to conduct an announced Pre-Licensing visit and met with Administrator Marcos Villegas. Entrance interview conducted with the administrator and explained the purpose of today’s visit. Today's site visit consisted of the LPAs and administrator touring the physical plant at 10:30 a.m. inside and outside the following was observed: The facility has one main entrance being used, there are appropriate Covid-19 signs and required postings and a sign-in log in the entry lobby. The facility is a one floor building with a laundry area accessible through the outside of the building. The facility fire clearance is granted for a total capacity of thirty-one (31) bedridden residents. The facility temperature observed to be in range of 71 to 73 degrees Fahrenheit. The telephone on premises is operational and functioning. The emergency exit plan/sketch is posted on the walls throughout the building. Kitchenette: At approximately 10:20 a.m. LPAs observed the kitchenette by the dining area to be clean. Appliances observed; sink, refrigerator and microwave appeared to be in good repair and functional. According to the administrator the facility prepares the food at their other licensed facility located across the street. The food is placed in large serving trays and transported in a large sealed cart then individually served to residents at this facility. Bedrooms: At approximately 10:30 a.m. LPAs inspected six (6) random bedrooms all were observed to be clean and appropriately furnished and equipped with adequate lighting, bedroom furniture and linens. Extra linens, toiletries and incontinent care items sufficient for the facility capacity was observed in a hallway closet. Pull cords and intercoms systems were tested and observed to be operational and functioning. Exit doors observed to have auditory alarms and building equipped with delayed egress doors, both were tested and observed to be operational and functioning. LPA observed the call light system to be on the wall by the dining area and television area. Screen doors and window coverings observed during the time of inspection. Continued on LIC809C Bathroom: LPA observed bathrooms located inside resident bedrooms to have non-skid shower flooring and appropriate grab bars installed in shower and around the toilet. At 11:50 a.m. hot water was tested in bathrooms and measured at 115*F. Medications: At approximately 11:15 a.m. the medication room was observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. Medications were kept locked in a medication cart. The same pharmacy is used for most residents except for two (2) that use a different pharmacy. Medication records are kept electronically. LPA observed the First Aid Kit and Manual stored in the medication room. Resident and Staff Records: Records are kept stored and locked in the other licensed facility 197610370 across the street. LPAs selected at random resident and staff records to review. Records were reviewed for completeness and updates. Common areas: LPAs observed television areas to be clean and clear of clutter. LPAs observed a wheelchair elevator with last serviced date 07/12/2023 by one of the television area. LPAs observed five (5) fire extinguishers through out the facility with last serviced date 12/13/22. Administrator provided a copy of last Fire Protection Equipment Performance Report dated 07/25/2023. LPAs observed smoke/carbon monoxide detectors to be interconnected through out the facility. Dining Area was observed clean and have enough tables and chairs to sit the capacity of the facility. Surroundings: LPAs observed the outside and surrounding area of the facility to be clean and clear from debris and obstruction. The front and back of the facility has table and chair with umbrellas and canopies for shade and is enclosed with a gated fence. LPAs observed a water fountain with water level not exceeding regulation. Component III was conducted with the licensee and administrator on 05/12/2023. "Pre-Licensing is complete and this facility has no deficiencies." Exit interview was conducted with Administrator Marcos Villegas and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 25, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County