Our Sweet Home Inc #2 is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Northridge, Los Angeles County, California — state license #197608083, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 13 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 15, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

11 homes in view

Our Sweet Home Inc #2

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Northridge, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairBedriddenMemory care not on fileHospice not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #197608083, held since 2011 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
10150 Melvin Ave · Northridge, Los Angeles County
Phone
(818) 970-9586
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 5 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careVerified in record

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
FACILITY LICENSED TO SERVE ELDERLY RESIDENTS AGE 60 AND ABOVE. FIRE CLEARED FOR FIVE(5)NON-AMBULATORY AND ONE(1)BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED TO ACCEPT OR RETAIN TWO(2) RESIDENTS ON HOSPICE. 87705 COMPLIANT.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 14 times and filed 13 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 15, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 15, 2026
Occupancy at the April 9, 2024 visit
4 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 5 documents with transcribed findings, dated April 26, 2022 to April 9, 2024. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 5 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 7 of 13 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Jun 15, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20251 state visit · 1 document
May 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20244 state visits · 4 documents
May 31, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not administer medication to resident while in care.

This is report is to amend the LIC9099 report issued 03/18/2024. Additional information was added to clarify the investigation pertaining to allegation mentioned above and based on new information obtained the determination for the above allegation is changed from Unsubstantiated to Substantiated. On 04/09/2024 Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Evelin Rios arrived at the facility to conduct an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to obtain additional information. Upon arrival LPA met with staff, Hermon Ledesma. Hermon contacted the Administrator, Tina Arutyunyan by telephone and LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Tina met LPA shortly after. An entrance interview was conducted. Tina provided medication administration record (MAR) for resident #2 (R2) for December 2021. Tina was unable to provide documentation showing medication for December 2021 was filled by a pharmacy or documentation resident #1 (R1) was seen by a doctor to prescribe medication after Hospice discharge date 10/1the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 9, 2024 · control 31-AS-20220509135641
Mar 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide medical assistance to resident while in care. Staff did not administer medication to resident while in care.

On 03/18/2024 Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Evelin Rios arrived at the facility to conduct an unannounced subsequent complaint visit. Upon arrival LPA met with staff Hermon Ledesma. Hermon contacted the Administrator, Tina Arutyunyan by telephone and LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Tina could not meet LPA on todays visit and designated Hermon to sign todays report. LPA informed Tina to be available by telephone if LPA called requesting more information. At approximately 10:25 a.m. LPA conducted a physical plant tour of the facility and interviewed Hermon. At approximately 11:17 a.m. LPA conducted interviews with four (4) out of four (4) residents in the home. At approximately 11:43 a.m. LPA reviewed and obtained resident's #1 (R1's) admission agreement, physician's reports, appraisal needs and services plan, identification and emergency information, and Hopsice records on file. LPA also reviewed facility program in reference to medication procedure and medication documentatithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2024 · control 31-AS-20220509135641
Feb 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not assist resident in a timely manner Staff threatened resident in care

This is an amended report of the prior investigation report delivered on 02/02/24. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mariana Agban conducted an unannounced visit to this facility. LPA met with Administrator Designee Hermon Ledesma and explained the reason for the visit. Based on the information LPA gathered LPA determined that the allegations are unfounded. R1 doesn’t live at the address stated on the complaint report. A finding of unfounded means that the allegation is either false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging (Staff did not assist resident in a timely manner and Staff threatened resident in care). We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report issued Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 2, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240126125534
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 0
Type B citations6typical 0
Substantiated complaints2typical 0
Total complaints4typical 0
State visits on file14typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2011.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202622020251102024441202311020224512021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
If end-of-life care were ever needed, could they stay here? What’s the plan?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (818) 970-9586

Is Our Sweet Home Inc #2 licensed?

Yes — Our Sweet Home Inc #2 is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Northridge (Los Angeles County): California license #197608083, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 13 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 15, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Our Sweet Home Inc #2 care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Our Sweet Home Inc #2 with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care and hospice care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordFACILITY LICENSED TO SERVE ELDERLY RESIDENTS AGE 60 AND ABOVE. FIRE CLEARED FOR FIVE(5)NON-AMBULATORY AND ONE(1)BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED TO ACCEPT OR RETAIN TWO(2) RESIDENTS ON HOSPICE. 87705 COMPLIANT.

How much does Our Sweet Home Inc #2 cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Our Sweet Home Inc #2's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Our Sweet Home Inc #2 accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Our Sweet Home Inc #2 is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

4 of 6 beds occupied (67%) when the state visited on April 9, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Our Sweet Home Inc #2?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 14 state visits and 13 dated documents since 2021 for Our Sweet Home Inc #2; 5 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 9, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

5 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not administer medication to resident while in care.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
This is report is to amend the LIC9099 report issued 03/18/2024. Additional information was added to clarify the investigation pertaining to allegation mentioned above and based on new information obtained the determination for the above allegation is changed from Unsubstantiated to Substantiated. On 04/09/2024 Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Evelin Rios arrived at the facility to conduct an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to obtain additional information. Upon arrival LPA met with staff, Hermon Ledesma. Hermon contacted the Administrator, Tina Arutyunyan by telephone and LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Tina met LPA shortly after. An entrance interview was conducted. Tina provided medication administration record (MAR) for resident #2 (R2) for December 2021. Tina was unable to provide documentation showing medication for December 2021 was filled by a pharmacy or documentation resident #1 (R1) was seen by a doctor to prescribe medication after Hospice discharge date 10/1CDSS inspection report, April 9, 2024 · control 31-AS-20220509135641
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide medical assistance to resident while in care. Staff did not administer medication to resident while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 03/18/2024 Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Evelin Rios arrived at the facility to conduct an unannounced subsequent complaint visit. Upon arrival LPA met with staff Hermon Ledesma. Hermon contacted the Administrator, Tina Arutyunyan by telephone and LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Tina could not meet LPA on todays visit and designated Hermon to sign todays report. LPA informed Tina to be available by telephone if LPA called requesting more information. At approximately 10:25 a.m. LPA conducted a physical plant tour of the facility and interviewed Hermon. At approximately 11:17 a.m. LPA conducted interviews with four (4) out of four (4) residents in the home. At approximately 11:43 a.m. LPA reviewed and obtained resident's #1 (R1's) admission agreement, physician's reports, appraisal needs and services plan, identification and emergency information, and Hopsice records on file. LPA also reviewed facility program in reference to medication procedure and medication documentatiCDSS inspection report, March 18, 2024 · control 31-AS-20220509135641
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not assist resident in a timely manner Staff threatened resident in care
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
This is an amended report of the prior investigation report delivered on 02/02/24. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mariana Agban conducted an unannounced visit to this facility. LPA met with Administrator Designee Hermon Ledesma and explained the reason for the visit. Based on the information LPA gathered LPA determined that the allegations are unfounded. R1 doesn’t live at the address stated on the complaint report. A finding of unfounded means that the allegation is either false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging (Staff did not assist resident in a timely manner and Staff threatened resident in care). We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report issued UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, February 2, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240126125534

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are mishandling resident's finances
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately, 12:30pm Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs), Angela Panushkina and Joscelyn Martinez arrived at the facility in response to the above mentioned allegations. LPAs met with Tina Arutyunyan, Administrator, and explained the reason for the visit. LPAs conducted a physical plant walk through to ensure that the facility is in compliance with rules and regulations under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6. LPA did not observe any immediate health and safety issues during the visit. To investigate the above allegation, LPAs interviewed the Administrator, one (1) out of one (1) staff member, three (3) out of three (3) residents and reviewed the records. A review of records received revealed that licensee was insured and bonded to handle residents P&I funds. In lieu of P&I logs, the Licensee/Administrator provided hand-written receipts (LIC405) with R1’s signature. Licensee/Administrator UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 16, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220609132619
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is financially abusing resident
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
An in-person office meeting was conducted at the Monterey Park Adult and Senior Care Regional Office (MP ASCRO). A Regional Manager (RM) Araceli Ramirez, Manager of Audit Department Jacqueline Juarez, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Tuesday Cabiness, Rosaura Valenzuela, Yelena Avetisyan, and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Naira Margaryan from the Woodland Hills South Adult and Senior Care Regional Office (WHS ASCRO), LPAs Mary Flores and Noemi Galarza, LPMs Lisa Hicks, Stefanie Coronel from Monterey Park ASCO and Licensee/Administrator Tina Arutyunyan, with Administrator Akop Ekimyan were present at the time of this meeting; and was informed the reason of the meeting. On August 23, 2021, the Woodland Hills Adult and Senior Care office received a complaint alleging facility was financially abusing resident #1 (R1), by retaining R1’s personal and SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 26, 2022 · control 31-AS-20210823141159

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 14 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
6
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
4
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
14
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Our Sweet Home Inc #2?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Our Sweet Home Inc, who operates 3 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(818) 970-9586
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Our Sweet Home Inc #2? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.