Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Our Sweet Home

Small home·Licensed for 6·Granada Hills, California

Licensed since 2009Licence #197607711
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,250 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,250
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedAugust 28, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJune 12, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderOur Sweet Home Inc.Since 2009 · 3 licensed homes

Our Sweet Home is a small care home in Granada Hills — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2009. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Our Sweet Home

Is Our Sweet Home licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Our Sweet Home licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Our Sweet Home been cited?

1 Type A and 6 Type B citations since 2009, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 11 state visits over the same years.

Is Our Sweet Home still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Our Sweet Home cost?

$4,250 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,500–$5,250. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 228 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,300 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 228 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Our Sweet Home take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Our Sweet Home Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Our Sweet Home Inc. — at least 3 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Providence Holy Cross Medical Center is 2.3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Our Sweet Home keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Our Sweet Home license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “OUR SWEET HOME INC”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197607711. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Our Sweet Home Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2009, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 11 state inspection visits since 2009, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 6 Type B citations on file since 2009, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 11 state visits in that period.
  • 3 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2009, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is June 12, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 5 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 4 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
LICENSED TO SERVE ELDERLY RESIDENTS AGE 60 AND ABOVE. FIRE CLEARED FOR FIVE NON-AMBULATORY AND ONE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM ONE (1). APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR FOUR (4). FACILITY 87705 COMPLIANT.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,250a month to start

Likely $3,500–$5,250

From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,250a month

Likely $3,500–$5,450

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,250likely $3,500–$5,250

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,500–$5,450
$4,250
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,100–$8,600
$6,250
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

8 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$5,850.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 8 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 16518 Devonshire St, Granada Hills, CA 91344Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 13 documents for this home, and its records count 11 visits since 2009. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated September 9, 2025.

On file since
2021
State visits
11
Most recent visit
June 12, 2026
Occupied · August 28, 2024 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated July 23, 2021 to August 28, 2024. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations6typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints3typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2009.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20251102024340202322020223412021220

The last 36 months — 6 of 13 documents

20251 state visit · 1 document
Sep 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted an Annual Required visit and inspection of the facility. LPA met with staff, Norma Alfeche and Manuel Soriano, and explained the reason for the visit. At approximately 10:30am, with the assistance of staff, LPA took a tour of the physical plant. Required postings were observed in the entry area. The smoke alarms are battery operated. The carbon monoxide detector, that is installed in the dining room, functions properly. The fire extinguisher is located in the kitchen. It was purchased on September 24, 2024. Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. LPA found a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; properly stored. Knives were stored in a locked drawer in the kitchen. Cleaning supplies were all locked underneath the kitchen sink during the day of the visit. Bedrooms: There are six (6) bedrooms, of which five (5) bedrooms are designated for residents' use. Room #5 is a shared room. Rooms #1, #2, #3 and #4 are private. The sixth bedroom is reserved for staff. LPA observed resident rooms to be properly furnished with appropriate beddings and linens with sufficient closet space and lighting. Bathrooms: There are three (3) bathrooms designated for residents' use. Bathrooms were properly supplied with grab bars non-skid mats and had functional fixtures. Hot water temperature was measured between 117 and 119 degrees Fahrenheit. Common Areas: These included the living room, family room and dining area. The living room, located at the front entrance, is furnished with a couch, recliner, television and table with four additional chairs. The fireplace in the living room is non-functional. There is a screen and a glass door in place. No fireplace tools were present. The family room has three couches, a table and a television. The dining room table was large enough to seat up to six (6) residents. Floors were mopped and clean. Furniture is in good repair. Passageways and hallways were clear of obstruction. The auditory alarms on all exit doors were tested and functional at the time of the visit. Surrounding Grounds: Entry/exits were free of obstruction. There was furniture appropriate for outdoor use. There is no swimming pool or any other bodies of water. Back gate was checked to insure no improper locks are in place. Laundry Area: The laundry area is located by the living room. Detergents and cleaning supplies were kept locked in a cabinet. Garage: Facility has no garage. Only a car port. Resident Files: Resident files are kept secured in the medication cabinet, located at the kitchen. LPA conducted a file review of resident records to insure compliance of licensing forms. Staff Files: Staff files are also kept secured in the medication cabinet. LPA also conducted a file review of staff records to insure forms and training are up to date and compliance with licensing forms. Medications: The medication cabinet is located in the kitchen. It was observed locked during the visit. Medication and Medication Records were review for storage and documentation. documentation. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, there were no deficiencies observed during the day's visit. Exit Interview Conducted and a Copy of this Report Issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 9, 2025
20243 state visits · 4 documents
Aug 28, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained injuries while in care due to lack of care and supervision Facility did not report incident(s) as required. Staff did not meet resident's hygiene needs. Staff did not properly dispose of soiled incontinence products

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility to conclude the investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA met with the administrator, Tina Arutyunyan, and advised her of the complaint. LPA Cava's investigation consisted of interviews with staff and residents, a physical plant inspection, and record review. Resident sustained injuries while in care due to lack of care and supervision/Facility did not report incident(s) as required: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that Resident 1 (R1) had wandered day and night, while at the facility, and experienced falls due to lack of getting their medicaitons. R1 did not get their medicine until approximately eight days after admission. As a result of these falls, R1 sustained bruising to the arms, legs, hips and head. Moreover, R1's falls and injury was not reported to licensing and their responsible party. Interviews with the administrator and two (2) of two staff deny both allegations. Interviews with administrator Unsubstantiated and staff reveal that R1 only lived in the facility for approximately two months. Within that two months, R1 only had one confirmed fall. Staff and administrator confirmed that the fall happened sometime in July 2023. Staff 1 (S1) was present during R1's fall, which they went to assist R1 immediately after a loud sound coming from R1's room made. S1 assessed R1, and only observed small bruising. Administrator, R1's hospice agency, and family were all notified. Medical attention and first aid was applied. LPA conducted a record review, and observed that an incident report was completed and submitted July 10, 2023. Regarding R1's medications, administrator stated R1 had medication with them at admission, when they were discharged from the skilled nursing where R1 was previously residing. As soon as hospice was initiated, prescriptions refills were made and filled. Administrator assured there were no lapse in medications. LPA also conducted a review of R1's medication records and did not observe any lapse. Based on the information obtained, it could not be proven that R1's injuries were caused due to lack of care and supervision, and facility failed to report an incident as required. Therefore, allegations are deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff did not meet resident's hygiene needs: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that R1 was not given proper nutrition, bathing and showers. R1 was only sprayed with deodorant in perfume. Review of R1's files does indicate assistance with bathing. Interviews with the administrator and two (2) of two staff reveal that R1's hospice nurse would come to the facility twice a week to provide R1 with bathing/shower service. In addition to the bathing and showering, staff would give R1 a bed/sponge bath in between the hospice visits. Interviews made with six (6) of six residents reveal no complaints about their hygiene needs not being met. Review of R1's hospice care plan, and interview with hospice nurse confirm that bathing was part of the care plan, and that it was made twice a week. Based on the information obtained, there wasn't enough evidence to prove that staff did not meet R1's hygiene needs. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff did not properly dispose of soiled incontinence products: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that facility bathrooms and outside patio are never clean. Dirty diapers aren't disposed of properly. Interviews with (2) of two staff both confirm that facility bathrooms are cleaned everyday. Staff state they insure soiled diapers are disposed of, and bathrooms are checked on often in the day to insure it is maintained and clean. Interviews made with six (6) of six residents have no complaints of the bathrooms not being maintained and clean. In conjunction with today's investigation, LPA conducted an annual visit and inspection of the physical plant. The facility has three (3) bathroom, which were observed clean during the day's visit. Based on the information obtained, there wasn't enough evidence to confirm that staff do not properly dispose of soiled incontinent products. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Administrator advised and a copy of this report given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240723091150
Aug 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

In conjunction with a complaint investigation (complaint control #31-AS-20240723091150) Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted an Annual Required visit and inspection of the facility. LPA met with the administrator, Tina Arutyunyan, and explained the reason for the visit. At approximately 11:06am, with the assistance of the administrator, LPA took a tour of the physical plant. Required postings were observed in the entry area. The smoke alarms are battery operated. The carbon monoxide detector, that is installed in the dining room, functions properly. The fire extinguisher is located in the kitchen. It was purchased on September 12, 2023. Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. LPA found a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; properly stored. Knives were stored in a locked drawer in the kitchen. Properly labeled medications were locked in one of the kitchen cabinets. No cleaning supplies were observed present in the kitchen during the day's inspection. Bedrooms: There are six (6) bedrooms, of which five (5) bedrooms are designated for residents' use. Room #5 is a shared room. Rooms 1 to 4 are private. LPA observed rooms that are occupied by the residents to be properly furnished with appropriate beddings and linens and sufficient lighting. There is one room, designated for staff use. Bathrooms: There are three (3) bathrooms designated for residents' use. Bathrooms were properly supplied and had functional fixtures. Hot water temperature was measured between 111 and 115 degrees Fahrenheit. Common Areas: These included the living room, family room and dining area. The living room, located at the front entrance, is furnished with a couch and table with four additional chairs. The fireplace in the living room is non-functional. There is a screen and a glass door in place. No fireplace tools were present. The family room has three couches and a television. The dining room table was large enough to seat up to six (6) residents. Floors were mopped and clean. Passageways and hallways were clear of obstruction. The auditory alarms on all exit doors were tested and functional at the time of the visit. Surrounding Grounds: Entry/exits were free of obstruction. There was furniture appropriate for outdoor use. The outdoor area was free of hazards. Laundry Area: The laundry area is located by the living room. Detergents and cleaning supplies were kept locked. Resident Files: Resident files are kept secured in the medication cabinet, located at the kitchen. LPA conducted a file review of resident records to insure compliance of licensing forms. Staff Files: Staff files are also kept secured in the medication cabinet. LPA also conducted a file review of staff records to insure forms and training are up to date and compliance with licensing forms. Medications: The medication cabinet is located in the kitchen. It was observed locked during the visit. Medication and Medication Records were review for storage and documentation. documentation. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, there were no deficiencies observed during the day's visit. Exit Interview Conducted and a Copy of this Report Issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2024
Feb 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not assist resident in a timely manner Staff threatened resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit at the facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with staff, Norma Alfeche and Manuel Soriano and advised them of the complaint. Staff notified the administrator, Tina Arutyunyan of the complaint over the telephone, and she was advised of the allegations. Today's investigation consisted of interviews with the administrator, staff and residents. LPA also conducted a physical plant inspection of the facility to insure the health and safety of the residents in care, and a record review. Staff did not assist Resident 1 (R1) in a timely manner: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that Resident 1 (R1) slipped, fell, and remained on the floor for over thirty minutes. Interviews with the administrator and staff deny the allegation. According to the administrator, R1 only lived at the facility for approximately a month, but never expressed any complaints or concerns regarding the lack of supervision. Interviews with five (5) of five residents also do not corroborate Unsubstantiated with the allegation as residents expressed no concerns regarding lack of supervision, or ever witnessing R1's fall. LPA conducted a phone interview with R1, who no longer resides at this facility. Phone call was made to the facility where R1 currently resides at. Per R1, staff never mistreated them and staff was able to meet all their needs. No complaints or concerns regarding the care provided at this facility. R1 did confirm of a fall they experienced while at the facility, but denies ever being left on the floor for a long period of time. R1 added that staff assisted right away after the fall. Furthermore, R1 stated they didn't require an immediate medical attention after the fall. Based on the information received, there was insufficient evidence to prove staff did not assist resident in a timely manner. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff threatened resident in care: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that because R1 was having trouble paying facility fees, staff confronted R1 by putting their belongings in trash bags and threatened to place the trash bags out on the street. Interviews with the administrator and staff deny the allegation. The administrator did state that R1 could not afford the monthly rent at this facility, but was able to assist R1 in finding a facility more suitable for R1's needs and finances. Interviews with five (5) of five residents at the facility do not corroborate with the allegation. There were no concerns made by these residents that staff had ever threatened them or mistreated them. LPA conducted a phone interview with R1, who no longer resides at this facility. Phone call was made to the facility where R1 currently resides at. R1 denies ever being threatened or being treated inappropriately by facility staff. R1 confirmed that rent was high at this facility, but was provided assistance to locate another facility suitable to their finances. No further concerns were expressed by R1. Furthermore, LPA made a phone interview with placement agency that was able to assist in R1's placement. They confirmed that the place R1 transferred to satisfied their needs, and was more suitable to their finances. They also expressed no concerns from R1. Based on the information received, there was insufficient evidence to prove that staff threatened a resident in care. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 13, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240205145009
Jan 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted Case Management (CM) visit and inspection of the facility to insure facility compliance. On May 27, 2022, a Non Compliance Conference (NCC) was held at the Woodland Hills Regional office. As a result of that NCC, the facility was placed on a three year compliance plan. LPA met with staff, Norma Alfeche and explained the reason for the visit. LPA spoke with the administrator, Tina Arutyunyan, and advised her of the NCC visit. At approximately 9:15am, with the assistance of staff, LPA took a tour of the physical plant. Required postings were observed in the entry area. The smoke alarms are battery operated. The carbon monoxide detector, is installed in the dining room, functions properly. The fire extinguisher is located in the kitchen. It was purchased on September 12, 2023. Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. LPA found a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; properly stored. Knives and cleaning supplies were stored in a locked drawer. Properly labeled medications were locked in one of the kitchen cabinets. Bedrooms: There were six (6) bedrooms designated for residents' use. Room #5 is a shared room. Rooms 1 to 4 are private. LPAs observed rooms that are occupied by the residents to be properly furnished with appropriate beddings and linens and sufficient lighting. There is one room, designated for staff. Bathrooms: There are three (3) bathrooms designated for residents' use. Bathrooms were properly supplied and had functional fixtures. Hot water temperature was measured between 105 and 110 degrees Fahrenheit. Common Areas: These included both living rooms and dining area. The common areas were properly furnished. The auditory alarms on all exit doors were on and functional at the time of the visit. The living room area at the front entrance has a table with four chairs, a television, sign in desk, and fireplace. The fireplace was observed with a screen and glass covering. There were no tools present. According to staff, the fireplace is never in use. LPA did not observe any keys or turn on switch to operate the fireplace, accessible to residents at the time of the visit. The second living room is located towards the back of the facility. It is observed with a couch and television. The alarm at the exit door from the back living room was tested and operational. The dining room has a dining table capable of seating up to six (6) individuals. Surrounding Grounds: Entry/exits were free of obstruction. There was furniture appropriate for outdoor use. The outdoor area was free of hazards. The laundry area is located by the second living room towards the back of the home. Detergents and cleaning supplies were kept locked. Resident Files: LPA conducted a file review of resident records to insure compliance of licensing forms. Staff Files: LPA also conducted a file review of staff records to insure compliance with licensing forms. Medications: Medications, medication records, staff and resident records are maintained locked in a kitchen cabinet. Medications and medication records were reviewed for storage and proper documentation. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, there were no deficiencies observed during the day's visit. Exit Interview Conducted and a Copy of the Report Issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 9, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Sep 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda and Huma Rahimi and Michael Cava conducted an Annual Required visit and inspection of the facility. LPAs met with the administrator, Tina Arutyunyan, and staff Norma Alfeche and Manual Soriiano and explained the reason for the visit. At approximately 12:46pm, with the assistance of staff, LPAs took a tour of the physical plant. Required postings were observed in the entry area. The smoke alarms are battery operated. The carbon monoxide detector, that is installed in the dining room, functions properly. The fire extinguisher is located in the kitchen. It was purchased on September 12, 2023. Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. LPA found a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; properly stored. Knives were stored in a locked drawer in the kitchen. Properly labeled medications were locked in one of the kitchen cabinets. Bedrooms: There were five (5) bedrooms designated for residents' use. Room #5 is a shared room. Rooms 1 to 4 are private. LPAs observed rooms that are occupied by the residents to be properly furnished with appropriate beddings and linens and sufficient lighting. Room #3 is currently vacant. There is one room, designated for staff use. Bathrooms: There are three (3) bathrooms designated for residents' use. Bathrooms were properly supplied and had functional fixtures. Hot water temperature was measured between 110 and 111 degrees Fahrenheit. Common Areas: These included the living room and dining area. The common areas were properly furnished. The auditory alarms on all exit doors were tested and functional at the time of the visit. Surrounding Grounds: Entry/exits were free of obstruction. There was furniture appropriate for outdoor use. The outdoor area was free of hazards. The laundry area is located by the living room. Detergents and cleaning supplies were kept locked. Resident Files: LPA conducted a file review of resident records to insure compliance of licensing forms. Staff Files: LPA also conducted a file review of staff records to insure forms and training are up to date and compliance with licensing forms. Medications: Medication and Medication Records were review for storage and documentation. documentation. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D). Exit Interview Conducted / Appeal Rights Discussed / A Copy of the Report Issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 28, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Our Sweet Home Inc., licensed since 2009, operates 3 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County