Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Pacific Pines
Mid-size home·14 while this license was open·Redlands, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
- Home size14 while this license was openMid-size care home · the state license record
- Room at the last state visit5 of 14 beds occupiedJanuary 12, 2026 · not a current opening
- Licence holderIntegrated Elder Care Inc.Since 2012 · 2 licensed homes
Pacific Pines in Redlands held a license for a mid-size care home — a residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE). The license covered 14 residents, first issued in 2012. The state lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership.”
Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Pacific Pines
Is Pacific Pines licensed?
The state lists this license as “Closed, Change of Ownership,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
How many residents is Pacific Pines licensed for?
14 residents while this license was open — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Has Pacific Pines been cited?
1 Type A and 5 Type B citations since 2012, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 10 state visits over the same years.
Is Pacific Pines still open?
This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
What does Pacific Pines cost?
This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Among 6 other homes of a similar licensed size in Redlands that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,050 (n = 6 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Pacific Pines take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license was held by Integrated Elder Care Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Can Pacific Pines keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is on this closed license’s record, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Pacific Pines license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “PACIFIC PINES”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #366425568. The state lists this license as “Closed, Change of Ownership,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- This license covered 14 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- This license was held by Integrated Elder Care Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- First licensed in 2012, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 10 state inspection visits since 2012, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 1 Type A and 5 Type B citations on file since 2012, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 10 state visits in that period.
- 3 complaints and 6 substantiated allegations on file since 2012, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is February 5, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 14 residents
- Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
- BedriddenApproved · covers up to 6 residents
State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
14 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 6 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
3 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
What it costs here
Typical starting rate
$4,050a month to start
Likely $2,700–$6,000
From homes this size in San Bernardino County · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$4,050a month
Likely $2,700–$6,100
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Starting monthly rate$4,050likely $2,700–$6,000
Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 8 homes with 7 to 49 beds publish in San Bernardino County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $2,700–$6,100
- $4,050
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,600–$8,950
- $6,050
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhy this is a county figure
Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 8 homes with 7 to 49 beds publish in San Bernardino County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Where it is
- 1438 Pacific St., Redlands, CA 92373Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
A map position is not on file for this address.
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2022, the state has filed 5 documents for this home, and its records count 10 visits since 2012. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on February 5, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”
- On file since
- 2022
- State visits
- 10
- Most recent visit
- February 5, 2026
- Occupied · January 12, 2026 visit
- 5 of 14 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated January 12, 2026 to February 5, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations1typical 0
- Type B citations5typical 0
- Substantiated allegations6typical 0
- Total complaints3typical 1
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 327 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2012.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 4 of 5 documents
Feb 5, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident in care was diagnosed with severe dehydration.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Sarina Ramirez and Andrew Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations mentioned. LPAs met with House Manager Annaliza Lazo and explained the purpose of the visit. The Department's investigation involved interviews and records review. It is alleged a resident in care was diagnosed with severe dehydration. The medical records confirm that Resident #1 (R1) was dehydrated but also show consistent communication among the facility administrator, R1’s family, and hospital staff. Over the span of two years of R1’s stay at the facility, both family members and staff report R1 has consistently received good care, including adequate food and hydration. A family member responsible for overseeing R1’s medical needs stated that relatives visit frequently, often weekly or daily to ensure R1’s well being and affirmed that staff provide attentive care. Medical professionals did not attribute her dehydration to facility neglect. Based on the available information, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that R1’s hospitalization for dehydration resulted from neglect or lack of supervision. The allegation is therefore deemed unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiated Based on lack of evidence, Departments observations, and interviews, the allegation above is Unfounded. A finding that the complaint is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted with House Manager Annaliza Lazo, and a copy of this report was provided at the conclusion of the visit. Based on Departments observations, staff and resident interviews, and relevant documentation, the allegation is determined to be Unsubstantiated. An Unsubstantiated finding means that although the allegations may be valid or could have occurred, there is insufficient evidence to support that the alleged violations did or did not happen. An exit interview was conducted with House Manager Annaliza Lazo, and a copy of this report was provided at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 5, 2026 · control 56-AS-20250313143700
Jan 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not fingerprint or background cleared
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) E. Conchas conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings. During today’s visit LPA met with Administrator, Iren Creighton, and discussed the purpose of today's visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA interviewed facility staff and resident, and gathered pertinent information. Regarding the allegation, Staff are not fingerprint or back background cleared; Interviews and file review reveal staff 10 has worked at the facility and did not have a file available with a fiingerprint/ background at facility. Continue LIC 9099-C, LIC 9099-D. Substantiated Based on the evidence found during the investigation, the allegations Administrator qualifications, Staff mishandled resident, and Insufficient staff available are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. Based on the Department’s investigation, the above allegations are Substantiated. A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and a copy with appeal rights was provided to Administrator, Iren Creighton at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 12, 2026 · control 56-AS-20251013161721
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(g)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 13, 2026
(g) Prior to employment or initial presence in the facility, all employees...:(1)Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by law or Department regulations or:this requirement is not met as evidenced by: The Licensee did not comply with the section cited above by allowing Staff 10 (S10) to work at facility with out clearance , which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 12, 2026
Plan of correction: Administrator stated staff 10 no longer works at facility. Administrator will ensure to have clearance completed and on file prior to working at facility
Mar 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Amanda Santos, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) with a license capacity of (14), a current census of (12). LPA conducted an overall inspection of the facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant/Environment: Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. The facility does not have a swimming pool or similar bodies of water. The facility has sufficient lighting and is maintained at a comfortable temperature. The facility has sufficient indoor and outdoor space for resident activities. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors/carbon monoxide alarms last inspected by RSD alarms on 4/24/24, working laundry equipment, and telephone service. Resident’s showers, toilets, and hand washing areas were operating properly. The hot water temperature in three (3) resident bathrooms measured between 106.2 and 114 degrees F. Eight (8) resident’s bedrooms had beds, bed linen, chairs, dresser, storage space and sufficient lighting. The facility has sufficient linens, towels, and personal hygiene items for residents. The facility has posted in a common area facility sketch, emergency disaster plan and telephone numbers, monthly menu, personal and resident rights, staff schedule, monthly activities, CCLD complaint poster, and Ombudsman poster. Food Service: Facility kitchen and dining area are maintained clean. The facility has sufficient non-perishable and perishable food supply for residents in care. Sharps and chemicals were kept locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Continuation on LIC – 809C: Care & Supervision: Facility has 24-hour/7days a week care staff. Facility staff have current CPR/first aid training. Medical Related Services: Resident’s medications are labeled and centrally stored in a locked cabinet. Record Review: Four (4) Staff files reviewed were observed to be complete. Five (5) Resident files reviewed were observed to be complete. Based on observations and record review no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was discussed and provided to Administrator Amanda Santos.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2025
Apr 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with Facility Administrator Amanda Santos and was granted entry to the facility. At the time of the visit there was four (4) staff present, and twelve (12) residents present. The facility is a eight (8) bedroom, seven (7), bathroom home, with a kitchen/dining area, living room, with open driveway. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for Elderly (RCFE) Licensed capacity is (14) current census (12). LPA was accompanied by Facility Administrator, to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected resident’s bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to residents in care. There was a designated storage space for resident/staff files. Medications are kept inside Med-Room on second floor. inaccessible to residents in care. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for residents in care. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of residents in care. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. All staff members working in the facility have criminal record clearance through the department. Record Review: LPA reviewed four (4) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. LPA also reviewed four (4) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, training, and health screenings. Medications were audited at random and appeared to be dispensed appropriately by staff members. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) was discussed and provided to Facility Administrator Amanda Santos.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 8, 2024
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Who holds the licence
Integrated Elder Care Inc., licensed since 2012, operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- Pacific Pines · Redlands
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes in San Bernardino County. This home has no map location on the state record, so these are not ordered by distance. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
A & A Care and Wellness
Hesperia · Small home
$3,750 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Assisted livingA & H Quality Home Care Services
Upland · Small home
$4,600 a month to start · Covelight estimate
A & K Private Home Care
Loma Linda · Small home
$3,000 a month to start · Listed by the home
A and E Loving Senior Home Care
Fontana · Small home
$4,000 a month to start · Listed by the home
A Berkshire Cottage
Rancho Cucamonga · Small home
$5,350 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Aaspen Villagecare
Yucca Valley · Mid-size home
$4,600 a month to start · Covelight estimate