Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Canyon View Country Home
Small home·Licensed for 6·Redlands, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$4,500 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,700–$5,550
- Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedJuly 14, 2025 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitJanuary 8, 2026CDSS inspection record
Canyon View Country Home is a small care home in Redlands — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2023. Dementia care is not on file.
Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Canyon View Country Home
Is Canyon View Country Home licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
How many residents is Canyon View Country Home licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Has Canyon View Country Home been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.
Is Canyon View Country Home still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Canyon View Country Home cost?
$4,500 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,700–$5,550. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 small homes and similar homes within 4 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 6 other homes of a similar licensed size in Redlands that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,050 (n = 6 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Canyon View Country Home take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Canyon View Country Home, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to Canyon View Country Home Inc. — at least 2 on the state roster.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Redlands Community Hospital is 0.8 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Canyon View Country Home keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Canyon View Country Home license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “CANYON VIEW COUNTRY HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #365530075. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed to Canyon View Country Home, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- First licensed in 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 9 state inspection visits since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
- 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is January 8, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 5 residents
- Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
- BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident
State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR SIX (6) RESIDENTS: ONE AMBULATORY IN ROOM 4 AND FIVE(5) NON-AMBULATORY IN ROOMS 1,2, AND 3, OF WHICH ONE(1) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN EITHER ROOM 2 OR 3. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR SIX (6) HOSPICE RESIDENTS.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
4 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation not on file
Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,500a month to start
Likely $3,700–$5,550
From 19 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$4,500a month
Likely $3,700–$5,750
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$4,500likely $3,700–$5,550
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 small homes and similar homes within 4 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,700–$5,750
- $4,500
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,300–$8,850
- $6,500
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 small homes and similar homes within 4 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
19 homes like this within 4 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,450–$5,750.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 19 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Blessed Garden HomeRedlands · 0.6 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Canyon View Pacific HomeRedlands · 1.5 mi · Mid-size home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Pacific PinesRedlands · 2.1 mi · Mid-size home$5,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Casa BienRedlands · 2.6 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Divine Home CareLoma Linda · 2.6 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Adora CareRedlands · 2.7 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Aspen Grove Home CareRedlands · 3.2 mi · Small home$4,300Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sarah Jane Guest HomeLoma Linda · 3.2 mi · Small home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Kwik Elderly EstateLoma Linda · 3.3 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Kwik Board and CareLoma Linda · 3.5 mi · Small home$4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Birch ResidenceLoma Linda · 3.6 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- A & K Private Home CareLoma Linda · 3.6 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- ExcelcareLoma Linda · 3.6 mi · Mid-size home$4,100Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Ctr Home CareLoma Linda · 3.7 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- L & S LifecareLoma Linda · 3.7 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Silvercare HomesLoma Linda · 3.7 mi · Small home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Golden Guest HomeLoma Linda · 3.7 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Rest Haven Care HomeLoma Linda · 3.9 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Ancheta's PlaceMentone · 4.0 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 418 Hastings St., Redlands, CA 92373Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2022, the state has filed 7 documents for this home, and its records count 9 visits since 2023. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated January 8, 2026.
- On file since
- 2022
- State visits
- 9
- Most recent visit
- January 8, 2026
- Occupied · July 14, 2025 visit
- 6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated July 11, 2025 to July 14, 2025. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations0typical 0
- Substantiated allegations0typical 0
- Total complaints2typical 0
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2023.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 5 of 7 documents
Jan 8, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) E. Conchas conducted an unannounced visit to the facility for an annual inspection. LPA met with administrator Iren Creighton. LPA toured the facility inside and out with the administrator. The facility has no bodies of water. LPA was informed that the facility currently has one (1) resident in hospice. LPA was informed that the facility has a dementia care plan in place. The facility has a charged fire extinguisher, operating smoke alarms, and carbon monoxide detectors. Outdoor and indoor passageways were kept free of obstruction. The outside of the facility did not have a shaded area with seating. A technical was issued. Cleaning supplies, medications, and sharps were kept locked and inaccessible to the residents. Cleaning supplies were stored in the laundry rooms. LPA observed that centrally stored medications were kept in a safe and locked place. Sharps were stored in the kitchen. LPA toured the kitchen. Food was stored in a safe and healthful manner. The facility had a menu available for review. LPA observed that the facility had a two (2) day supply of perishable food items and seven (7) day supply of nonperishable food items. LPA observed a activities calendar not updated. A technical was issued. LPA toured a the resident rooms. The resident bedrooms had the required furniture and functional lighting. LPA observed grab bars and nonskid mats in the bathrooms. LPA measured the hot water temperature throughout the facility and observed it was above 125 degrees F. A warning sign was posted. A technical was issued. The facility had a supply of additional linen and extra hygiene items for the residents. LPA also observed emergency supplies. The facility had a complete first aid kit and the last disaster drill was conducted on August 1, 2025. Continue LIC 809-C. LPA reviewed staff and resident files. Staff files were reviewed. Staff 1 was missing a TB clearance. A deficiency was cited. Administrator did not have current completed training copies on file, a technical was issued. Other required documentation including first aid/CPR certification was completed. Resident files were reviewed. Including an admission's agreement which was not updated a technical was issued. Annual physician's reports was not updated A technical was issued. LPA reviewed medications. Medications appeared to be dispensed appropriately according to the physician's orders. During the visit. LPA requested the following documents and were updated for the facility: Certificate of Liability Insurance, Personnel Report, RCFE Administrator's Certificate. A deficiency and technicalities were cited during this visit. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and provided to the administrator Iren Creighton.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 8, 2026
The state marks this report as 11 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Jul 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff refused to accept resident back to the facility. Staff retaliating against resident.
On 7/14/2025 at 12:10PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eldin Serrano made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings of the above allegations. LPA Serrano met with Administrator Iren Creighton to explain the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of file review, interviews with facility staff and resident as well as facility observation. Allegation #1: Staff refused to accept resident back to the facility. – Based on phone interview with resident #1(R1), R1 stated that R1 was never refused to come back to the facility. In fact, R1 returned to the facility from the hospital. Staff #1 (S1) also denied the allegation. Based on information received, LPA was unable to corroborate the allegation. Allegation #2: Staff retaliating against resident. - Based on phone interview with R1, R1 denied that the facility was retaliating against R1 because of the facility's refusal to take R1 to the hospital right away. R1 stated it is "simply not true". S1 also denied the allegation. Based on information received during the investigation, LPA was unable to corroborate the allegation. *** Continuation in LIC9099C *** Unsubstantiated During the investigation, LPA did not find evidence to corroborate the allegations. Based on the evidence, the allegations mentioned above are UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. An exit interview was conducted where this report, LIC9099 was discussed and provided to Administrator Iren Creighton.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 14, 2025 · control 56-AS-20241125144900
Jul 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff consume liquor while on shift Staff do not have fingerprint clearance Staff lock facility doors to prevent residents from leaving Staff insert suppositories to residents in care Staff did not complete required trainings Staff facility records are falsified Staff did not maintain resident records Residents are not provided proper food service Staff did not ensure resident’s diapering needs were met
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Becky Mann conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate a complaint investigation. LPA met with Iren Creighton, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of LPA pertinent record reviews, observations and interviews with staff and residents. First allegation, staff consume liquor while on shift. LPA conducted a walk through of the facility. LPA inspected kitchen cabinets, and appliances, and liquor was not observed during the inspection. LPA interviewed four (4) residents. Two (2) residents denied witnessing staff consuming liquor while providing care. Two (2) other residents were unable to answer due to cognitive impairment. LPA interviewed three (3) staff, all staff denied consuming or storing liquor at the facility. Staff has not witnessed another staff consume liquor while providing care to residents. Unsubstantiated Second allegation, staff do not have fingerprint clearance. LPA retrieved a facility roster via Guardian Background System and observed that Staff #1 (S1), Staff #2 (S2) and Staff #3 (S3) that are currently working at the facility were eligibly cleared. LPA conducted a file review for Staff 1-3 and discovered that all clearance records were on file. Third allegation, staff lock facility doors to prevent residents from leaving. LPA conducted a walk through of the facility and inspected resident's bedrooms and doorknobs. LPA observed that no latches and/or child proof locks were in place. LPA conducted an inspection on all doors and emergency exits and observed that no latches and/or child proof locks were in place. Two (2) residents interviewed deny being locked or prevented from leaving the facility. Two (2) other residents interviewed were unable to answer due to cognitive impairment. Three (3) staff interviewed denied locking and/or preventing residents from leaving the facility. Fourth allegation, staff insert suppositories to residents in care. Three (3) staff interviewed denied utilizing or inserting suppositories to residents. Two (2) residents interviewed denied staff inserting suppositories for the residents. Two (2) other residents interviewed were unable to answer due to cognitive impairment. Staff #2 (S2) mentioned that Resident #1 (R1) does use suppository. The nurse from Brookside Hospice comes to the facility to assist R1 with the suppository. Fifth allegation, staff did not complete required trainings. LPA conducted staff file reviews and observed that training was completed. LPA observed certificates of completion to be on file for staff. Sixth allegation, staff facility records are falsified. LPA conducted a First Aid & CPR verification through National CPR Foundation and New Life CPR, these agencies are used by the facility to certify staff. Staff 1-3 are certified for First Aid & CPR certification. Seventh allegation, staff did not maintain resident records. LPA conducted a file review for three (3) residents and observed that all required documentation were on file based on Title 22 Residential Care Facility for Elderly (RCFE). Eight allegation, residents are not provided proper food service. LPA conducted an inspection on facilities food supply and observed that the facility has adequate amount of food supply to meet resident needs. LPA observed that all food including canned goods sustained current shelf life. Two (2) residents interviewed stated that the food is good and has no concerns. Two (2) other residents interviewed were unable to answer due to cognitive impairment. Ninth allegation, staff did not ensure resident’s diapering needs were met. Three (3) staff interviewed stated that they do ensure that resident's diapering needs are being met. Resident #2 (R2) stated that they do not use diapers. Resident #3 (R3) stated that staff does ensure that their diapering needs are met. Two (2) other residents interviewed were unable to answer due to cognitive impairment. Based on LPA observations, residents diapering needs are being met, the residents are kept clean and free of odors. Based on evidence obtained during this investigation, the allegations above are Unsubstantiated; meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and a copy of this report was provided to Iren Creighton at the conclusion of the visit. Staff #1 (S1) and Staff #2 (S2) stated that they do provide adequate medication assistance to residents. LPA conducted file reviews of residents Medication Administration Record (MAR) and observed that all medication is being distributed and managed correctly by staff. The allegation that staff refuse to call an ambulance for residents in care. Two (2) residents interviewed stated that staff has not refused to call ambulance for residents. Two (2) other residents interviewed were unable to answer due to cognitive impairment. Three (3) staff interviewed stated denied refusing to call an ambulance for residents in care. The allegation that staff threatened residents in care. Two (2) residents interviewed stated that staff has not threatened residents .Two (2) other residents interviewed were unable to answer due to cognitive impairment. Three (3) staff interviewed stated denied threatening residents in care. The allegation that staff did not ensure sufficient food items were available at the facility for residents in care. LPA conducted an inspection on facility's food supply and observed that there is an adequate amount of food supply to meet resident needs. Two (2) residents interviewed stated that the food provided is fulfilling and have no issues with the food. Two (2) other residents interviewed were unable to answer due to cognitive impairment. The allegation that staff did not prevent residents from engaging in inappropriate interactions. Two (2) residents interviewed stated that they have not engaged in inappropriate interactions and have not witnessed inappropriate interactions at the facility. Two (2) other residents interviewed were unable to answer due to cognitive impairment. Three (3) staff interviewed stated that they do prevent residents from engaging in inappropriate interactions. The allegation that staff yelled at residents in care. Two (2) residents interviewed stated that staff has not yell at residents in care or witnessed it at the facility. Two (2) other residents interviewed were unable to answer due to cognitive impairment. Three (3) staff interviewed stated deny yelling at residents in care and have not witnessed a staff yelling at a resident in care. The allegation that staff did not assist residents that sustained falls. Two (2) residents interviewed stated that staff does assist residents with transfers and are very involved and deny witnessing residents sustain falls and not being assisted by staff. Two (2) other residents interviewed were unable to answer due to cognitive impairment. Three (3) staff interviewed stated that they do assist residents in care. The allegation that centrally stored medications are accessible to residents in care. LPA conducted a walk through of the facility and observed that the medications are locked and secured in the kitchen cabinets. During the inspection, staff opened the cabinets with a magnet and demonstrated that medication cabinets remain locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Based on evidence obtained during this investigation, the allegations above are Unsubstantiated; meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and a copy of this report was provided to Iren Creighton at the conclusion of the visit. The allegation that staff are not following reporting requirements. LPA conducted interviews with staff who informed LPA that Special Incident Reports (SIR) are faxed to Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) when pertaining to any incident involving residents in care. The allegation that staff left residents unattended. Two (2) residents interviewed denied being left alone and/or unattended at the facility. Two (2) other residents interviewed were unable to answer due to cognitive impairment. Three (3) staff interviewed denied leaving residents unattended or unsupervised. Based on evidence obtained during this investigation, the allegations above are Unsubstantiated; meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and a copy of this report was provided to Iren Creighton at the conclusion of the visitthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 11, 2025 · control 56-AS-20241120130951
Jan 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bernadette Allen made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA met with Iren Creighton, Administrator, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) with a license capacity of (6) and a current census of (6) residents in care. The facility has a hospice waiver for (6) residents. LPA conducted an overall inspection of the facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility has sufficient lighting and is maintained at a comfortable temperature. Resident’s bathrooms were operating in safe and sanitary conditions. The hot water temperature in residents' bathrooms measured 105 to 120 degrees F. Resident’s bedrooms have sufficient lighting and furniture appeared to be in good repair. Facility has operating carbon monoxide detectors, and telephone service. The facility has sufficient linen, towels, and personal hygiene items for residents. The facility has posted in a common area, Community Care Licensing complaint poster, Ombudsman poster, resident's personal rights, disaster evacuation plan and emergency telephone numbers. The Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. The facility has no bodies of water accessible to residents in care. Outdoor backyard is sufficient for resident activities and is enclosed with self-latching gates Care & Supervision: Facility has (24) hour/(7) days a week care staff. Staff working have criminal record clearances or exemptions through the Department. Food Service: Facility has sufficient non-perishable and perishable food supply for residents in care. Sharps, pesticides and other cleaning solutions were kept locked and stored away from food areas. Record Review: LPA requested staff files and Irene stated no staff files were available for review during the inspection. Irene stated that the files were at another facility to be copied and would be delivered to Canyon View Country Home during todays. Irene was informed that staff and residents files are required to remain at the facility at all times with all required information/training certificates. A Technical Advisory has been issued due to the unavailability of a complete set of staff files when LPA requested them. Irene had the files delivered to the facility about 30 minutes into the inspection process. The administrator has committed to maintaining comprehensive files for both staff and residents at all times. Irene Creighton was provided with the LIC9242 checklist during the inspection to ensure all required documents are properly filed Medical Related Services: The facility has a complete first aid kit. Resident's medication are centrally stored and kept in a locked cabinet and (2) two residents MARS/files was audited and it appears that their medications are being dispensed as prescribed by their physician. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and provided to Irene Creighton- Administrator at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 15, 2025
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Jan 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA met with Iren Creighton, Administrator, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) with a license capacity of (6) and a current census of (6) residents in care. The facility has a hospice waiver for (6) residents. LPA conducted an overall inspection of the facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. The facility has no bodies of water accessible to residents in care. Outdoor backyard is sufficient for resident activities and is enclosed with self-latching gates. The facility has sufficient lighting and is maintained at a comfortable temperature. Resident’s bathrooms were operating in safe and sanitary conditions. The hot water temperature in residents' bathrooms measured 105 to 106 degrees F. Resident’s bedrooms have sufficient lighting and furniture in good repair. Facility has operating carbon monoxide alarms, signal systems and telephone service. The facility has sufficient linen, towels, and personal hygiene items for residents. The facility has posted in a common area, Community Care Licensing complaint poster, Ombudsman poster, resident's personal rights, disaster evacuation plan and emergency telephone numbers. Care & Supervision: Facility has (24) hour/(7) days a week care staff. Staff working have criminal record clearances or exemptions through the Department. Food Service: Facility has sufficient non-perishable and perishable food supply for residents in care. Sharps, pesticides and other cleaning solutions were kept locked and stored away from food areas. Record Review: Staff files reviewed at random were observed to be complete. Resident files reviewed at random were observed to be complete. Administrator’s certification expires on 10/29/24. Medical Related Services: The facility has a complete first aid kit. Resident's medication is centrally stored and kept in a locked cabinet. Based on observations and record review, no deficiencies were cited during today’s visit. An exit interview was conducted where the Licensing reports were discussed and copies were provided to the Administrator at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 19, 2024
The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in San Bernardino County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Blessed Garden Home
Redlands · Small home · 0.6 mi away
$3,500 a month to start · Listed by the home
Summerfield of Redlands
Redlands · Large community · 0.7 mi away
$4,295 a month to start · Listed by the home
Plymouth Village of Redlands
Redlands · Large community · 1.2 mi away
$3,800 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Canyon View Pacific Home
Redlands · Mid-size home · 1.5 mi away
$6,000 a month to start · Listed by the home
Braswell's Chateau Villa
Redlands · Large community · 1.6 mi away
$2,800 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Palm View Pleasant Living
Redlands · Mid-size home · 1.7 mi away
$4,100 a month to start · Covelight estimate