Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Rose Valley Redlands II

Mid-size home·Licensed for 9·Redlands, California

Licensed since 2018Licence #361880517
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,050 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,650
  • Home sizeLicensed for 9Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 9 beds occupiedDecember 2, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitDecember 12, 2025CDSS inspection record

Rose Valley Redlands II is a mid-size care home in Redlands — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 9 residents since 2018.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Rose Valley Redlands II

Is Rose Valley Redlands II licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Rose Valley Redlands II licensed for?

9 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Rose Valley Redlands II been cited?

1 Type A and 3 Type B citations since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 12 state visits over the same years.

Is Rose Valley Redlands II still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Rose Valley Redlands II cost?

$5,050 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,000–$6,650. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 6 other homes of a similar licensed size in Redlands that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,050 (n = 6 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Rose Valley Redlands II take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Dm Farview LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Redlands Community Hospital is 3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Rose Valley Redlands II keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Rose Valley Redlands II license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ROSE VALLEY REDLANDS II”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #361880517. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 9 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Dm Farview LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 12 state inspection visits since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 3 Type B citations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 12 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 3 substantiated allegations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is December 12, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
3 AMBULATORY 6 NON- AMBULATORY OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN.HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,050a month to start

Likely $4,000–$6,650

From 10 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,050a month

Likely $4,000–$6,800

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,050likely $4,000–$6,650

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,000–$6,800
$5,050
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,750–$9,700
$7,050
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

10 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,800–$6,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 10 nearby homes behind this estimate
  • Pacific PinesRedlands · 0.8 mi · Mid-size home
    $5,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Casa BienRedlands · 0.9 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Aspen Grove Home CareRedlands · 1.5 mi · Small home
    $4,300Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Canyon View Pacific HomeRedlands · 1.7 mi · Mid-size home
    $6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ancheta's PlaceMentone · 2.1 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Adora CareRedlands · 2.1 mi · Small home
    $6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Blessed Garden HomeRedlands · 2.3 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Assisted Living of AmericaYucaipa · 4.6 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Yucaipa Valley Board & CareYucaipa · 4.7 mi · Small home
    $6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Divine Home CareLoma Linda · 4.8 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026

Where it is

  • 1309 Farview Ln, Redlands, CA 92374Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2023, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 12 visits since 2018. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated December 12, 2025.

On file since
2023
State visits
12
Most recent visit
December 12, 2025
Occupied · December 2, 2025 visit
6 of 9 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated February 21, 2025 to December 2, 2025. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations3typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations3typical 0
  • Total complaints4typical 1

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 327 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2018.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202546020241102023230

The last 36 months — 9 of 10 documents

20254 state visits · 6 documents
Dec 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Marsie Marcos, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) with a license capacity of (9), a current census of (6). LPA conducted an overall inspection of the facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant/Environment: Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. The facility does not have a swimming pool or similar bodies of water. The facility has sufficient lighting and is maintained at a comfortable temperature. The facility has sufficient indoor and outdoor space for resident activities. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors/carbon monoxide alarms, working laundry equipment, and telephone service. Resident’s showers, toilets, and hand washing areas were operating properly. The hot water temperature in resident bathrooms measured between 106 and 110 degrees F. Resident bedrooms had beds, bed linen, chairs, dressers, storage space and lighting. The facility has sufficient linens, towels, and personal hygiene items for residents. The facility has posted in a common area, facility license, administrator certificate, activity schedule, personal rights, facility sketch, emergency disaster plan and telephone numbers, menu, CCLD complaint poster, sample of facility's admissions agreement, and Ombudsman poster. During the inspection of the facility, LPA observed a unknown male individual sitting outside near the front side of the facility. LPA asked Administrator who the person was. Administrator stated that they were the spouse of the one of the caregivers. After inquiring for more information, the Administrator disclosed to the LPA that they hired the individual/staff #1 as a caregiver but their criminal record clearance is still pending and is temporarily residing at the facility. Food Service: Facility kitchen and dining area are maintained clean. The facility has sufficient non-perishable and perishable food supply for residents in care. Sharps and chemicals were kept locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Care & Supervision: Facility has 24-hour/7days a week care staff. Facility staff have current CPR/first aid training. Medical Related Services: Resident’s medications are stored locked. LPA's review of resident medication records, reveals that Resident #1(R1) still had three (3) of today's (12/12/25), morning medications in the bubble pack; however, staff initialed that the (3) medications were administered in the morning. Administrator informed LPA that medication may have been missed due to the way the medication was stored and may have been separated from the other AM medications. Record Review: Three (3) resident records were reviewed for admission's agreements, appraisals, and medical assessments. Review of three (3) staff files reveals the Administrator, Staff #2(S2), Staff#3(S3) did not have a health screening which indicates that that they are physically qualified to perform their job duties and signed by examining physician. Deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. Civil penalties have been accessed for have not having a criminal record clearance for S1 prior to them residing and/or working at the facility. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was discussed and provided with appeal rights to Administrator Marsie Marcos.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2025
Dec 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not maintain accurate medication records for residents Staff do not store residents’ medication in original container Staff do not ensure facility is free from odors

On 12/02/2025 at 4:15PM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renese Howell-Small conducted an unannounced visit to the residence in order to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator, Marsie Marcos. The investigation consisted of interviews, record review and observation. In regards to the allegation of staff do not maintain accurate medication records for residents: LPA interviewed three (3) staff. LPA reviewed the Medication Administration Record(s) (MAR) for five (5) residents in care and audited medications. Staff denied the allegation. Based on interviews and record review, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. In regards to the allegation of staff do not store residents’ medication in original container: LPA observed all resident medication(s) to be in their original containers. Staff denied the allegation. Based upon observation and interview, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Unsubstantiated SUBSTANTIATED is defined as the complaint allegation(s) is valid and a violation has occurred based on the preponderance of available evidence. Two deficiencies will be cited. An exit interview was conducted where this report LIC9099A, LIC9099C, LIC9099D and Appeal Rights were discussed, and a copy was provided to Administrator, Marsie Marcos. In regards to the allegation of staff do not ensure facility is free from odors: LPA observed five (5) residents in care and two (2) staff assisting residents. LPA conducted a brief tour of the residence and found it to be sanitary and free from mal odors. Based upon observation, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. UNSUBSTANTIATED is defined as the allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s) occurred. An exit interview was conducted where this report LIC9099 and LIC9099C was discussed and copies were provided to staff.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 2, 2025 · control 56-AS-20240321113158

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(5)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 3, 2025

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (5) Facility staff, except those authorized by law, shall... : (D).. does not include..., hiding or camouflaging medications in other substances... without the resident's knowledge and consent.. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based upon interview and record review, the Administrator did not ensure that the resident exercised their right to refuse medication by hiding Resident 1 (R1's) medication in their food which poses/posed an immediate risk to health and safety of resident(s) in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 2, 2025

Plan of correction: The Administrator will conduct a staff training on medications, review the regulations on Medication and submit proof to LPA by the Plan of Correction (POC) due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(b)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 5, 2025

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (b) If the resident's physician has stated in writing that the resident is able to determine and communicate his/her need...(2) Once ordered by the physician the medication is given according to the physician's directions. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the Administrator did not ensure that the resident(s) in care were given their medications according to the physician's orders which posed/poses a potential risk to the health and safety of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 2, 2025

Plan of correction: The Administrator will conduct a staff training on medication and submit proof to LPA by Plan of Correction (POC) due date.

Mar 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure a fire safety measure is being followed

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation on the above allegation. LPA met with Aministrator Marsie Marcos, and discussed the purpose of the visit. LPA observed a smoke alarm detached from its mount. Although the smoke alarm is detached from its mount, it is functional. LPA proceeded to test another smoke alarm in facility hallway as well as facility’s carbon monoxide detector, both of which were found to be in proper working order. Based on the evidence gathered, the allegation is deemed UNFOUNDED. A finding that the complaint allegation is UNFOUNDED means that the allegation was without a reasonable basis. Therefore, the allegation dismissed. An exit interview was conducted where this report LIC9099 was discussed and provided to Administrator Marsie Marcos. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250313151448

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 22, 2025

87303 Maintenance and Operation (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator has informed LPA a Maintenance technician will be visiting the facility 3/19/25. Administrator has agreed to submit proof to LPA once sink has been repaired.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 22, 2025

87303 Maintenance and Operation (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. Based on observation and interview, the Administrator did not comply with Maintenance and Operation by not repairing resident sink in a timely manner, which poses a potential health, safety, or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator has informed LPA a Maintenance technician will be visiting the facility 3/19/25. Administrator has agreed to submit proof to LPA once sink has been repaired.

Mar 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a Health and Safety check. LPA met with Administrator Marsie Marcos, and discussed the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility. LPA observed a smoke alarm detached from its mount. Although the smoke alarm is detached from its mount, it is functional. The LPA proceeded to test another smoke alarm in facility hallway and facility’s carbon monoxide detector, both of which were found to be in proper working order. LPA observed Administrator and staff attempting to mount smoke alarm back in place, however they were unsuccessful. LPA provided a Technical Violation, Administrator informed LPA a new smoke alarm will be purchased and mounted. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed, and a copy of this safety report along with LIC 9102 was provided to Administrator Marsie Marcos at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2025
Feb 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained serious injury due to staff neglect Facility staff did not provide assistance in meeting resident's medical needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations mentioned above. LPA met with Administrator Marsie Marcos and explained the purpose of the visit. The Department's investigation involved interviews and records review. The allegation alleged that a resident (R1) sustained serious injury due to staff neglect. After a comprehensive review of medical records, interviews with facility staff, outside parties, it was determined that R1 arrived at Rose Valley Redlands II on August 6, 2024, and had two reported falls subsequently. The treating Orthopedic Surgeon estimated the fracture treated on September 23, 2024, was approximately two months old, indicating it occurred before R1 placement at Rose Valley Redlands II. Therefore, it cannot be conclusively demonstrated that the fracture happened at this facility or resulted from staff neglect. Unsubstantiated The allegation alleged Facility staff did not provide assistance in meeting resident's medical needs. Administrator clarified that R1 received care from Innovage PACE, which manages all transportation to medical appointments. It was reported that R1 sustained an elbow skin injury on September 3, 2024, after an overnight home visit. Administrator promptly contacted Innovage for medical treatment. R1 was treated on September 5, 2024. Records show that R1’s elbow fracture was diagnosed by September 9, 2024, and was seen by a Nurse Practitioner on September 19, 2024. Therefore, the alleged allegations have been determined Unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiated; meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report (LIC 9099) was discussed, and a copy was provided to Administrator Marsie Marcos.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 21, 2025 · control 56-AS-20240925161927
Feb 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are financially abusing resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation mentioned above. LPA met with Marsie Marcos and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation Staff are financially abusing resident, LPA interviewed 5 residents. 3 out of 5 residents informed LPA their families handle their finances and no one in the facility has access, 2 out of 5 residents informed LPA they handle their own finances. R1 was not interviewed due to no longer living at the facility. LPA interviewed 3 staff. 3 out of 3 staff informed LPA they do not handle resident’s finances. Administrator informed LPA they never safeguard cash or cards for residents, if residents need anything they notify or call their responsible parties. Administrator stated they never had possession of R1's cards, R1's belongings were never opened. Unsubstantiated Based on LPAs observations, record review, and interviews, the above allegation is Unsubstantiated; meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and a copy was provided to Administrator Marsie Marcos at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 21, 2025 · control 56-AS-20241001084826
20241 state visit · 1 document
Dec 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Marsie Marcos, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) with a license capacity of (9), a current census of (8). LPA conducted an overall inspection of the facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant/Environment: Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. The facility does not have a swimming pool or similar bodies of water. The facility has sufficient lighting and is maintained at a comfortable temperature. The facility has sufficient indoor and outdoor space for resident activities. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors/carbon monoxide alarms, working laundry equipment, and telephone service. Resident’s showers, toilets, and hand washing areas were operating properly. The hot water temperature in two (2) resident bathrooms measured between 114.8 and 116 degrees F. Five (5) resident’s bedrooms had beds, bed linen, chairs, dresser, storage space and sufficient lighting. The facility has sufficient linens, towels, and personal hygiene items for residents. The facility has posted in a common area, facility license, administrator certificate, activity schedule, personal rights, facility sketch, emergency disaster plan and telephone numbers, menu, CCLD complaint poster, and Ombudsman poster. Food Service: Facility kitchen and dining area are maintained clean. The facility has sufficient non-perishable and perishable food supply for residents in care. Sharps and chemicals were kept locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Continuation on LIC – 809C: Care & Supervision: Facility has 24-hour/7days a week care staff. Facility staff have current CPR/first aid training. Medical Related Services: Resident’s medications are labeled and centrally stored in a locked cabinet. Record Review: Three (3) Staff files reviewed were observed to be complete. Four (4) Resident files reviewed were observed to be complete. Based on observations and record review no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was discussed and provided to Administrator Marsie Marcos.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2024
20231 state visit · 2 documents
Nov 13, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA met with Marsie Marcos, Administrator, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE). License capacity of (9) with a current census of (9). LPA conducted an overall inspection of the facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. The facility has no bodies of water accessible to residents in care. The facility is enclosed with self-latching gates. The facility has sufficient lighting and is maintained at a comfortable temperature. Resident’s bathrooms were operating in safe and sanitary conditions. The hot water temperature in residents' bathrooms measured at 105 degrees F. Resident’s bedrooms have sufficient lighting and furniture in good repair. Facility has operating carbon monoxide alarms and telephone service. The facility has sufficient linen, towels, and personal hygiene items for residents. The facility has posted in a common area, Community Care Licensing complaint poster, Ombudsman poster, disaster evacuation plan and emergency telephone numbers. Food Service: Facility has sufficient non-perishable and perishable food supply for residents in care. The refrigerator and freezer are operating in a healthful manner. Pesticides and other cleaning solutions were kept locked and stored away from food areas. Care & Supervision: Facility has 24-hour care staff. Staff working have California criminal record clearances or exemptions. Medical Related Services: All medication is centrally stored and kept locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Record Review: The Administrator's certification expires on 5/22/2024. (3) staff files were reviewed. LPA observed the facility did not maintain verification of job training on file for staff #1 (S1), including verification of S1's Dementia Care training. (3) resident files were reviewed. LPA observed the facility did not maintain a complete appraisal which includes a resident's functional capabilities on file for resident #1 (R1) and resident #2 (R2). Based on observations and record review, deficiencies are being cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6. Licensing reports (LIC809/LIC809-D/LIC9102) were discussed with the Administrator. Copies of the Licensing reports with appeal rights were provided to the Administrator at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 13, 2023

The state marks this report as 9 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 5. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Nov 13, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced case management visit to the facility. LPA met with Marsie Marcos, Administrator and discussed the purpose of the visit. LPA visited the facility to amend report LIC809-D that was previously issued on 11/13/2023. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and a copy of the report was provide to the Administratorthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 13, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Bernardino County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Bernardino County