Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Breeze Hill Care

Small home·Licensed for 6·Vista, California

Licensed since 2015Licence #374603683
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Starting rate$4,800 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedAugust 9, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 9, 2026CDSS inspection record

Breeze Hill Care is a small care home in Vista — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2015.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Breeze Hill Care

Is Breeze Hill Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Breeze Hill Care licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Breeze Hill Care been cited?

2 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2015, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 12 state visits over the same years.

Is Breeze Hill Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Breeze Hill Care cost?

$4,800 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 11 other homes of a similar licensed size in Vista that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,625 to $5,875 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 11 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Breeze Hill Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Breeze Hill Care LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Sharp Tri-City Medical Center is 1.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Breeze Hill Care keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Breeze Hill Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “BREEZE HILL CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #374603683. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Breeze Hill Care LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2015, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 12 state inspection visits since 2015, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 2 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2015, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 12 state visits in that period.
  • 3 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2015, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 9, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 4 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
6 NON-AMBULATORY; OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN TO BE HOUSED IN BEDROOMS #2, 3, 4 OR 5 ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 4.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$4,800a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$4,800a month

Likely $4,800–$5,400

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,800this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,800–$5,400
$4,800
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,800–$8,900
$6,800
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

24 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,350–$7,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 799 Marsopa Drive, Vista, CA 92081Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 11 documents for this home, and its records count 12 visits since 2015. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on August 9, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unfounded.”

On file since
2021
State visits
12
Most recent visit
August 9, 2026
Occupied at that visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated February 23, 2023 to August 9, 2026. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations2typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations2typical 0
  • Total complaints3typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2015.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261202025231202411020233412021110

The last 36 months — 7 of 11 documents

20261 state visit · 2 documents
Aug 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not complete an initial personal property inventory when resident entered the facility.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola conducted an unannounced visit to the facility in order to conduct an investigation into the allegation above. LPA met with the Staff, Evangeline Bartolazo, who was informed of the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted interviews, documented observations and collected documentation for the resident. Regarding allegation " Staff did not complete an initial personal property inventory when resident entered the facility. " It was alleged that the facility staff failed to complete a personal property inventory form for the resident. The LPA reviewed the resident's file and found that the facility did complete this form and obtained a copy of this. When facility staff was interviewed on what belongings the resident came to the facility with, the staff responses were consistent with the personal property form that was filled out. This agency has investigated the complaint and found that the allegation unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted with this report was reviewed and provided to them. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 9, 2026 · control 18-AS-20230217085412
Aug 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola conducted an unannounced Case Management Visit. LPA met with Staff, Evangeline Bartolazo who was informed on the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted the Case Management Visit to deliver an amended report. LPA read the amended report, met with facility staff, and observed the facility common areas during the time of the visit. No immediate health or safety issues were observed during the time of the visit. No deficiencies were cited at the time of the visit. An exit interview was conducted where this report was reviewed and provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 9, 2026
20252 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola conducted an unannounced annual required visit. LPA was granted entry and met with Licensee, Smilja Milosavljevic who was informed of the purpose of the visit. At the time of the visit there was (3) staff and (5) residents present. The facility is a one story home with (5) resident bedrooms, (1) staff room, and (5) bathrooms. No pools or firearms are housed at the facility. The facility is approved for (6) non ambulatory residents, (1) of which may be bedridden. The number of hospice residents during the time of the visit is in compliance with the approved Hospice waiver for (4) residents. Physical plant, floors, windows, and doors were observed to be clean. Fixtures and furniture were in good repair were present. The outdoor area and passage ways were observed to be free of hazards. LPA observed hygiene supplies for residents, PPE, clean linens. There are designated locked areas for sharps, dangerous objects, cleaning supplies, and medications. The smoke detector and carbon monoxide are operational, and the hot water temperature 120F. There are emergency supplies such as emergency lighting, complete first aide kit and emergency food and water. LPA observed facility kitchen had the ability to prepare food in clean environment and possessed equipment in good working condition. LPA observed the facility met the required 2-day supply of perishable and 7-day supply of non-perishable foods. LPA reviewed the facility's emergency and disaster plan and infectious control plan. LPA reviewed documentation showing the facility's last fire drill 10/02/2025, which met the department requirements. Required postings were found in the facility. The listed administrator, possesses a current administrator's certificate. LPA reviewed (3) staff files and training. All staff have criminal clearance and updated training along with CPR/First Aid Certification. (6) resident files were reviewed, and possessed all required paperwork. The facility does not handle finances for residents, per the Licensee. LPA observed resident medications which are locked, filled, and stored in their originally received containers. The medication was accounted for on Centrally Stored Medication logs for residents. No deficiencies were cited at the time of the visit. An exit interview was conducted where this report was reviewed and provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 2, 2025
May 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide proper supervision to resident in care resulting in multiple falls

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola conducted an unannouned visit in order to investigation the allegations listed above. LPA met with Staff, Eva Bartolazo and spoke with Administrator Smilja Milosavljevic over the phone who were informed of the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted interviews, observations and records review. It was alleged "Staff did not provide proper supervision to resident in care resulting in multiple falls", regarding Resident #1 (R1) who experiences falls while at the facility due to lack of supervision at night. LPA attempted to conduct interview with R1, however R1 was not available for interview. Substantiated LPA conducted (3) staff interviews which revealed R1 experienced wandering behaviors and experienced a fall occurring after 3 am when R1 got up at night to go to the restroom. All (3) staff interviewed confirmed staff are on call at night and there is no awake staff. Records review revealed physician's report identifying R1 with Condition #1 (C1). There was no readmission appraisal or plan of care on file for R1. According to California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22, person's identified with C1 in facilities with (16) residents or less require at least (1) awake staff at night. Therefore, based on interviews and records review the allegation is substantiated. The preponderance of the evidence standard has been met and CCR Title 22 regulation is being cited on the attached LIC9099-D. An exit interview was conducted where this and attached reports including appeal rights were reviewed and provided. Records review revealed medication order for R1's physician stating R1 was prescribed M1 with instructions: "Please give extra dose of M1 at night if patient restless or wanders." Therefore based on records review and interviews the allegation that M1 was being used to sedate R1 in bed and was given incorrectly is unfounded. The allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 8, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250501160911

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87705(b)(2) · Plan of correction due date: May 9, 2025

Care of Persons with Dementia(b) Licensees shall be responsible for the following: (2) For facilities with fewer than 16 residents, ensuring there is at least one night staff person awake and on duty if any resident with dementia is determined through...observation, to require awake night supervision. This requirment was not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review R1 had Condition #1 and the facility was not providing night supervision with awake staff. Based on interview staff were aware R1 had wandering behaviors. This poses an immediate health saftey or personal rights risk to residents in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 8, 2025

Plan of correction: The licensee agreed to submit an updated LIC500 showing staff coverage at night by the POC due date.

May 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola conducted an unannounced visit and found the below deficiencies. LPA met with Staff, Eva and spoke with Administrator Smilja Milosavljevic over the phone who were informed of the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted interviews, observations and records review. File review for Resident #1 (R1) revealed R1 did not have a preadmission appraisal or plan of care in their file. Interview with the administrator revealed they did not prepare a plan of care for R1 as they were admitted for two and a half months. The deficiency was cited and an exit interview was conducted where a copy of this report with LIC809-D page and appeal rights were reviewed and provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 8, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87457(c)(1) · Plan of correction due date: May 29, 2025

(c) Prior to admission...(1) The appraisal shall include, at a minimum, an evaluation of the prospective resident's functional capabilities, mental condition...evaluation of social factors as specified in Sections 87459, Functional Capabilities and 87462 Social Factors. Based on interview and record review R1 did not have a preadmission appraisal documented. This poses a potential health saftey or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 8, 2025

Plan of correction: The licensee agreed to attend a training on preadmission appraisals and care plans and submit by the POC due date.

20241 state visit · 1 document
Dec 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of conducting a required annual inspection. The LPA was granted entry by staff to conduct the inspection and met with administrator, Smilja Milosavljevi. The LPA informed the Administrator of the purpose for the visit. The inspection included the following: The facility consists of six (6) resident bedrooms, one staff bedroom, five (5) bathrooms, a kitchen and dinning area, a living room area, a garage and laundry area, a yard with sufficient seating with a table umbrella, and space for activities. There are no bodies of water located on the property. According to Administrator, no weapons are stored in the home. All outdoor and indoor passageways are kept free of obstruction and are free of debris and other trash. There are grab bars for each toilet, bathtub and shower used by residents. Resident showers have non-skid mats present. The home was kept clean and free of any odors. LPA began review of client records. Five (5) records were reviewed. LPA reviewed for identification and emergency information, admission agreement, medical assessment, and TB test results, needs and service plans, placement, functional assessment, centrally stored medication/destruction records, safeguard for personal property/valuables, and personal rights notification. LPA observed client records to be available and complete. LPA began review of employee records- four (4) records were reviewed. LPA reviewed employee records for first aid certification, criminal record clearance or an exemption, health screening and TB test results, employee rights, training verification, and current administrator certification. Administrator provided proof of submitted application and the completion of all the courses and is pending the certificate. LPA observed personnel records to be available and complete. LPA observed facility kitchen had the ability to prepare food in clean environment and possessed equipment in good working condition. Food supply meets the requirement of one (1) week supply of nonperishable and two (2) day supply of perishables. Emergency food and water supply is present. There is a locked location for chemicals in the garage. Sharps and knives are locked in the kitchen. Medications are centrally stored. There is a locked cabinet in the kitchen allocated for medication storage. Centrally stored medication and destruction logs are maintained. Medications reviewed appear to have been dispensed accurately. LPA made observation throughout the inspection process to assess if the facility remains in conformity with the State Fire Marshall regulations. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and found to be operational. Fire extinguishers was observed to be in compliance and valid until 12/31/2025. The facility is conducting emergency disaster/fire drills quarterly; last done on 08/21/2024. Based on the information received during this visit today in the areas reviewed, there are no deficiency that are being cited per Title 22, Division 6 of The California Code of Regulations. This LIC 809 report was reviewed with the facility representative and a copy was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 14, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On December 14, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the required annual inspection and met with the Administrator, Smilja Milosavljevic. The LPA introduced herself and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA Mixson toured the facility along with the Administrator and inspected the facility inside and outside, and there were no obstructions to the indoor or outdoor passageways at the time of this visit. The facility is a single-story home, located at 799 Marsopa Drive, Vista, CA. 92081. Physical Plant: The facility phone number is (760) 631-0267 and is operable. The LPA observed the residents bedrooms, and they are equipped with required furniture as per Title 22. The LPA inspected facility bathrooms, and the hot water temperature was tested and tested within regulations. The bathrooms were clean and appliances were operating appropriately at the time of this visit. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors, carbon monoxide alarms, and fire extinguishers. The LPA observed required postings such as The Ombudsman, "If you See Something, Say Something," and the "Personal Rights" postings were posted in a common area. The cleaning supplies and sharp items were kept locked and inaccessible to the residents in care. There was a designated storage space for the resident and staff files they were locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Medications: were locked and inaccessible to the residents. The overall facility is clean, the furniture is in good condition. The facility air conditioning and other appliances were operable currently at the time of this visit. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient per regulations, and there are a variety of food types available for residents. Dishes and utensils were in sufficient supply and stored properly. Care & Supervision Facility has sufficient staff, three at the time of this visit, and the residents are busy with the noon day meal. Records Review: The LPA reviewed five resident files, two staff files, and interviewed three staff. There were no Title 22, Division 6 Regulation violations observed and/or cited during today’s visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was given to the Administrator, Smilja Milosavljevic.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 14, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Diego County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Diego County