Small home · Licensed for 6 · Carlsbad
Arbor Victoria
3410 Highland Dr, Carlsbad, CA 92008Licensed since 2013
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 3 residents
- Bedriddenup to 1 resident
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
FACILITY SERVES SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY ELDERLY RESIDENTS; AGE 60 AND ABOVE. ONE(1) OF WHOM MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOMS #1 OR #4 ONLY. HOSPICE CARE WAIVER APPROVED FOR THREE (3) ON 4/6/2018.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Arbor Victoria: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
This home’s starting rate
$7,500a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$7,500likely a month
Starting monthly rate$7,500this home
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.
Shared room insteadAsknot on file
This home’s listed starting rate is for assisted living private room. A shared room, if one is offered, may cost less — ask.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $7,500–$8,100
- $7,500
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $7,500–$11,650
- $10,000
Lines marked “Ask” are not in the totals.
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes12 nearby homes publish starting rates of $4,000 to $8,500
12 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,500–$7,000.
- Carlovy Homes in CarlsbadCarlsbad · 0.7 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- The GardensCarlsbad · 1.0 mi · Mid-size home$8,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Carlsbad Elder CareCarlsbad · 1.6 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Julia's CottageOceanside · 1.8 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Julia's Cottage at the HillsOceanside · 2.2 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Senior Beginnings @ Julia's CottageOceanside · 2.5 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Alta Vista ManorVista · 4.0 mi · Mid-size home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Villa AdrianaVista · 4.2 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Breeze Hill CareVista · 4.5 mi · Small home$4,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Our Family Care HomeVista · 4.8 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Serenity VillaVista · 5.0 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Carlsbad Comfort CareCarlsbad · 5.0 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
3410 Highland Dr, Carlsbad, CA 92008Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Sharp Tri-City Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list2.9 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #374603328 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 6 of 8 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Unsubstantiated”.
20261 state visit · 1 document
Mar 19, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramin Hashemi conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by and discussed the purpose of the visit to Administrator Richard Axtell. The facility's license shows a maximum capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents, one (1) of whom may be bedridden in room #1 or #4 only. During today’s inspection there were five (5) residents in care. LPA and Administrator Richard Axtell toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. The facility contained at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food, all safely stored. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present. No toxic chemicals or poisons were accessible to residents. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water exist on the premises. Per Administrator Richard Axtell, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all in working order. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed staff and reviewed facility records. The files reviewed by LPA contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Richard Axtell to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2026
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Mar 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hannah Rodgers conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was greeted by, identified themselves to and discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator Richard Axtell. The facility's license shows a maximum capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents, one (1) of whom may be bedridden in room #1 or #4 only. During today’s inspection there were four (4) residents in care. LPA with Administrator Axtell toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. The facility contained at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food, all safely stored. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present. No toxic chemicals or poisons were accessible to residents. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water exist on the premises. Per Administrator Axtell, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all in working order. Fire extinguisher(s) were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit was complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA reviewed facility records. The files reviewed by LPA contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Axtell to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 6, 2025
Jan 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hannah Rodgers conducted an unannounced Case Management visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator Richard Axtell. Today's visit was in response to a self reported incident that occurred on 12/26/2024 regarding the death of Resident #1 (R1). [See LIC811 Confidential Names List.] During today’s visit LPA conducted a brief facility tour, observed residents in care, and interviewed relevant staff. No deficiencies were cited during today’s visit. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Richard Axtell, to whom a copy of this report, the LIC811 Confidential Names List, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 2, 2025
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Apr 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Ryan Fulton and Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced Case Management visit to amend reports for a visit conducted on 3/19/24. LPAs identified themselves and discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator Richard Axtell. During today’s visit, LPAs obtained signatures on the amended reports. Deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the attached LIC809-D). A Plan of Correction was jointly developed with the Administrator. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Richard Axtell, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 3, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(8) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 3, 2024
87555(b) "The following food service requirements shall apply: (8) All food shall be of good quality..." This requirement was not met, evidenced by: Expired canned goods were found in the pantry during the annual inspection visit on 3/19/24. This posed a potential health and safety risk to 6 of 6 persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 3, 2024
Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to immediagely discard all expired food items and regularly check food for expiration dates and discard or use by the expiration date.
Mar 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst's (LPA) Ryan Fulton and Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPAs were welcomed by and discussed the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Erika Garcia during the visit LPA's spoke to Licensee Richard Axtell over the phone and then in person later during the visit. The facility's license shows a maximum capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents, one (1) of whom may be bedridden in room #1 or #4 only. During today’s inspection there were six (6) residents in care. LPAs and Caregiver Erika Garcia toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. The facility contained at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food, all safely stored. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present. No toxic chemicals or poisons were accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water exist on the premises. Per caregiver Yulissa Colon Ramirez, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all in working order. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Technical assistance and technical violations were provided regarding fire extinguisher checks, infection control, facility records, and required licensing postings. LPAs interviewed staff and clients, and reviewed client facility records. The files reviewed by LPAs contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. Deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the attached LIC809-D). An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Richard Axtell, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided. This is an amended report for facility visit conducted on 3/19/24.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2024
The state marks this report as 2 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Jan 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not ensure that medications were made inaccessible to residents
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mark Mandel conducted an unannounced visit to follow-up on a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified himself to, was granted entry by and met with Administrator, Richard Axtell. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and discussed the elements of the complaint with Administrator Axtell. LPA delivered the findings of the investigation that was initiated on 12/18/2023 to Adminstrator Axtell. On 12/11/2023, the Department received a complaint alledging that facility staff did not ensure that medications were made inaccessible to residents. The Department's investigation consisted of facility visits, record reviews and interviews with residents, staff and outside sources. During the initial visit conducted on 12/18/2023, LPA Mark Mandel and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Simon Jacob toured the facility and interviewed staff. During the tour of the facility, LPA and LPM observed that medications for residents were kept on the second floor in a locked cabinet and the residents all lived on the first floor. Interviews revealed that Staff 1 (S1) never saw Resident 1 (R1) take any pills, but then heard R1 say that they wanted to die. LPA and LPM also observed R1 in their room lying in their bed on 12/18/2023 and their Phsycians Report confirmed that they are nonambulatory. (Cont. on LIC9099) Unsubstantiated (Cont. from LIC9099) A review of the Discharge Summary from Scripps Memorial Hospital Encinitas- where R1 was taken on 12/10/2023 for 5150WI after admitting to the Carlsbad Fire Department Medics that she tried to kill herself by ingesting 2000 mg of Tylenol - states Outside Source 1 (OS1) said R1 stays in bed unless assisted by staff and can walk short distances to her bathroom, or transfer to a wheelchair, which, along with their non ambulatory status, further demonstrates R1's inability to access medication at the facility. The report also states that OS1 alleges that R1 had some Tylenol pills in a small container that was holding R1's rosary either from hoarding pills that facility staff had administered to R1 or possibly from the pills having been placed in the container prior to R1 moving into the facility. Also, the Physian's Report for R1 states they had difficulty walking, muscle weakness and were non ambulatory, which, again, points to R1's inability to access medication at the facility. An interview with Outside Source 1 (OS1) revealed that a female caregiver- whose name they did not remember- at the facility told him by phone on 12/10/2023 that R1 had told the caregiver that they had taken 3-4 Tylenol pills. OS1 said the caregiver also told him that she saw two pills left inside of a small box that she concluded were Tylenol pills, which prompted the caregiver to call 911 in case the Tylenol R1 said they had taken would affect R1 adversely. Two or three days after the incident, OS1 visited R1 at the facility and viewed the small box where the facility caregiver said she had found the Tylenol pills and confirmed he had seen the box previously, but did not think it ever contained any medication and he had never opened it. OS1 said the box was white in color and had a religious picture on it and had a rosary inside of it. He said the box was really for religious items and R1 is "pretty religious". OS1 said he did not bring any medication to R1 at the facility and that R1 has no opportunity to access medication when he takes them to the doctors or from anywhere, but said the Tylenol pills could have been in the box prior to the date R1 moved into the facility and maybe for years, or R1 may have been hoarding pills given to them by staff. OS1 said R1 was living in their own home as recently as August 2023, but then they fell and went to the hospital. Once R1 left the hospital they went to Vista Life Care for two to three weeks and then they were admitted to Arbor Victoria in September 2023. He added that R1's medication is kept in another room at the facility in a drawer or cabinet and it is administered to R1 by staff who put it in R1's hand, while giving R1 a cup of water to drink with their medication. (Cont. on LIC9099) (Cont. from LIC9099) Also, Carlsbad Police Department Report No. 2307923.1 states that the facility administrator told the responding officer that R1 had been hiding a stash of Tylenol in their room, which corroborates a similar statement made by OS1 to the doctor at Scripps Memorial Hospital Encinitas that discharged R1 on 12/12/2023, and one made to LPA Mandel by OS1. LPA also reviewed the House Rules staging it is not appropriate for residents to refuse to store prescribed and over-the-counter medications in a secured locked central location. The form was signed by OS1. During today's visit, LPA toured the facility, reviewed records, observed residents in care and interviewed staff, residents and outside sources. S1 stated he spoke to OS2 on 12/24/2023 and she told him she did give R1 Tylenol pills that OS2 bought at Costco when R1 was her neighbor in Oceanside and also told S1 that R1 kept the Tylenol pills in a pill box designed to hold a rosary. LPA also spoke to OS2 and she confirmed that she gave R1 Tylenol pills when R1 lived in Oceanside that OS2 had bought as Costco. OS2 said R1 kept the Tylennol in a pill box the was round and gold in color and held six pills. OS2 said she never gave any pills to R1 during anytime she visited R1 at the facility, which she said is 3-4 times weekly. OS2 said it is possible that R1 brought the pills OS2 gave her when they both were neighbors in Oceanside to the facility, but she was not aware of it if she did. She added that R1 doesn't have access to medication and can't get up to get in any drawers. LPA confirmed daily medication is locked up in a drawer in the kitchen and that a storage of medication for the month is kept locked in a desk upstairs. Based on the interviews conducted and records obtained and reviewed, the allegation that facility staff did not ensure that medications were made inaccessible to residents is Unsubstantiated, as the preponderance of evidence standard was not met. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Richard Axtell, and a copy of this report was provided to Administrator Axtell.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 29, 2024 · control 08-AS-20231211165614
Earlier years2022 · 2 documents
20222 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 16, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - COVID-19Report on file
Type of visit: Case Management - COVID-19
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Sabel Martinez, and County of San Diego Nurse Contractor, Sandra Brackman, with the HAI Program, conducted an on-site HAI assessment visit. The LPA and team identified themselves and discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator, Richard Axtell, and Caregiver, Ericka Garcia. The Department conducted an on-site visit to provide technical assistance and to evaluate the facility's mitigation plan to include disinfection, testing, vaccination, and screening protocols as well as the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). During today's visit, the team interviewed the Administrator and conducted a walk-though of the facility. A debriefing was conducted at the conclusion of the visit. No deficiencies were cited on this date. An exit interview was conducted with Richard Axtell, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 01/16) were provided via electronic mail. An electronic mail read receipt confirms the documents were received by the administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 16, 2022
Apr 15, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano, conducted an unannounced Required 1 - Year Visit. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA met with Administrator Richard Axtell and discussed the purpose of the visit. All staff present have a current criminal record clearance. LPA conducted a tour of the facility, both inside and outside and observed the residents in care. In accordance with the Department’s Infection Control, LPA provided technical assistance, evaluated, and observed the facility's implementation of their mitigation plan to include disinfection, testing surveillance, and screening protocols as well as the use of personal protective equipment. No deficiencies were cited or observed on this date. The Licensee will be provided a copy of their appeal rights (LIC9058 01/16). An exit interview was conducted with Richard Axtell and a copy of this report will be emailed to the Licensee with an electronic read receipt as confirmation of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2022
6 of 6 beds were occupied at the January 29, 2024 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Coastal Elderhomes, Inc., licensed since 2013.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2013, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 8
- Total complaints
- 1
- Substantiated allegations
- 0
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2013, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 0 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 1 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Arbor Victoria
Is Arbor Victoria licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Arbor Victoria licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Arbor Victoria been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2013, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.
Is Arbor Victoria still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Arbor Victoria cost?
$7,500 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.
Among 12 other homes of a similar licensed size in Carlsbad that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,950 to $6,250 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 12 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Arbor Victoria take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Coastal Elderhomes, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Sharp Tri-City Medical Center is 2.9 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Arbor Victoria keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Arbor Victoria license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “ARBOR VICTORIA”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #374603328. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Coastal Elderhomes, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2013, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 8 state inspection visits since 2013, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2013, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
- 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2013, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is March 19, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in San Diego County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$3,700 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,150 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,550On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$8,500 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,650 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,600–$5,900On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$4,500 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,850 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,000On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore San Diego County