Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Monte Vista Manor

Small home·Licensed for 6·Vista, California

Licensed since 2019Licence #374604144
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Starting rate$5,000 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedFebruary 12, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitApril 3, 2026CDSS inspection record

Monte Vista Manor is a small care home in Vista — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2019.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Monte Vista Manor

Is Monte Vista Manor licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Monte Vista Manor licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Monte Vista Manor been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 6 state visits over the same years.

Is Monte Vista Manor still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Monte Vista Manor cost?

$5,000 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 11 other homes of a similar licensed size in Vista that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,575 to $5,875 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 11 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Monte Vista Manor take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Ilich, Vesna, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - San Marcos is 4.4 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Monte Vista Manor keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Monte Vista Manor license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “MONTE VISTA MANOR”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #374604144. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Ilich, Vesna, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 6 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 6 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is April 3, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 2 residents

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 2 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$5,000a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$5,000a month

Likely $5,000–$5,600

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,000this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Shared room insteadAsknot on file

    This home’s listed starting rate is for assisted living private room. A shared room, if one is offered, may cost less — ask.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $5,000–$5,600
$5,000
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,000–$9,100
$7,000

Lines marked “Ask” are not in the totals.

How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.

21 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,000–$6,650.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 21 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 2331 Monte Vista Dr, Vista, CA 92084Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 6 documents for this home, and its records count 6 visits since 2019. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 3, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
6
Most recent visit
April 3, 2026
Occupied · February 12, 2026 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated February 12, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2019.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026230202511020241102022110

The last 36 months — 5 of 6 documents

20262 state visits · 3 documents
Apr 3, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On April 03, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the Annual Inspection and met with the Licensee, Vesna Ilich. The facility file review was conducted at the Regional Office and additional records were requested and reviewed on site. The facility is licensed for six Elderly Adult residents and is currently operating at the capacity of six Elderly Adult residents. For a 740 facility type. LPA Mixson toured the facility along with the Licensee, Vesna Ilich, and made observations pertaining to the Required Annual visit. LPA inspected the facility inside and outside. There were no obstructions or debris to the indoor or outdoor passageways observed. Additionally, there were no bodies of water seen on the premises at the time of this visit. The facility is a single-story home located at 2331 Monte Vista Dr. Vista Ca. Physical Plant: The facility phone number is(760) 536-3114, and it is operable. LPA Mixson observed the residents’ bedrooms, and each was furnished as per Regulations and Title 22. LPA Mixson inspected the facility bathrooms, and the hot water temperature tested within regulations, and was logged. The bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately currently. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors, carbon monoxide alarms, and fire extinguishers. Administrator informed LPA fire extinguishers were serviced in 2026, by Cintas. LPA Mixson observed required postings such as "If you See Something, Say Something,” the "Personal Rights," and the LTCO poster. The cleaning supplies and sharp items were locked and inaccessible to the residents in care presently. There were designated storage spaces for the residents’ and staff’s files, and it was locked and inaccessible to residents in care at present. Medications: Were locked and inaccessible to residents in care, and there was a sufficient supply of medication for each resident. There were no documented errors observed on the centrally stored medication forms, and medications were stored in their original containers at the present time. The facility has two caregivers present, and the Administrator, and they were interviewed for the annual visit. Food Service& furniture: The non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient per regulations, and there are a variety of food types available for residents currently. Dishes and utensils were in sufficient supply and stored properly, and sharp items are locked. The overall facility is clean; the furniture is in good condition and arranged in a manner which provides space for residents to move safely. The facility cooling system and other appliances were operable at time of this visit. Licensee informed LPA there were safety lights for night throughout the facility. Care & Supervision/Administration: There were adequate staff present for the supervision of residents in care. The floor plans, telephone numbers and personal rights were found posted in the facility. The listed Administrator, Vesna Ilich possess a current administrator’s certificate with an expiration date of 08/20/2027, and it is posted in the facility, near the front door. Records Reviewed and Resident/Staff Files: LPA Mixson reviewed the staff files and the facility's staff schedule. The staff files reviewed contain criminal clearances, updated training's, along with current First Aid certifications. The resident files reviewed possessed the required paperwork as per Regulations including current TB tests. Disaster preparedness: LPA Mixson reviewed the facility's emergency and disaster plan as well as the disaster training binder. LPA observed the last fire drill met the Department standards and was conducted as required per standards. Last drill conducted February 12, 2026 Infection Control: LPA Mixson observed the hand washing stations in the facility restrooms. LPA observed PPE equipment and cleaning supplies to conduct regular cleaning of the facility. LPA reviewed the facility's infection control plan and found required infection control measures met the Department requirements. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was reviewed and given to the Licensee, Ilich Vesna.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 3, 2026
Feb 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not let residents come out of their rooms. Staff yell at residents in care. Staff do not provide proper toileting assistance to residents in care.

On 02/12/2026, the California Department of Social Services/Community Care Licensing (CDSS/CCL) Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted an unannounced follow-up complaint visit. LPA met with staff member Jaqueline, and the purpose of the visit was explained. The Administrator Vesna Ilich later joined the LPA. The investigation consisted of the following: On 03/08/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Venus Mixson conducted an initial, unannounced investigation visit. LPA Mixson met with Administrator Vesna Ilich. On 02/12/2026, the Department interviewed the Administrator (A1), two staff members #1-2 (S1-S2), three residents #1-3 (R1-R3), and one witness #1 (W1). The department reviewed several documents, including the Staff Roster (dated 01/21/26), Resident roster (dated 1/14/26) (R1’s), Physician Report (dated 03/13/24), Admission Agreement, Unusual Incident Report (Dated 03/05/2024), and other pertinent records associated with this complaint. (Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099C) Unsubstantiated Allegation #1: Staff do not let residents come out of their rooms. The complaint alleged that the caregivers instructed them not to leave their rooms until they were called for meals and that staff would come to get them. On 02/12/26, the LPA arrived at this facility and observed three residents seated in the dining room. On the same day, the LPA interviewed the Administrator (A1), who denied the allegation and stated that all residents may leave their rooms if they choose. Additionally, on 02/12/26, the LPA interviewed two staff members, #1-2 (S1-S2), who both denied the allegation and explained that residents in wheelchairs are permitted to leave their rooms with staff assistance if they wish. The LPA also interviewed three residents, #1-3 (R1-R3), all of whom denied the allegation and stated that they leave their rooms at will. At the same time, the LPA spoke with one witness (W1), who also denied the allegation and mentioned that W1 visits the facility often and that R1 was always out of R1’s room. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Allegation #2: Staff yell at residents in care. The complaint alleged that staff raise their voices and yell at the residents. On 02/12/26, LPA interviewed the Administrator (A1), who denied the allegation and stated that staff were trained not to yell at residents, even if residents could not hear staff. Some staff members speak loudly because they believe the residents didn’t hear them, but not in a yelling tone. Report Continued on LIC9099C On 02/12/26, LPA interviewed three residents #1-3 (R1-R3), all of whom denied being yelled at by any staff. On the same day, LPA interviewed the witness (W1), who denied the allegation and stated that W1 visited the facility often. W1 would have noticed the yelling. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation (s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Allegation #3: Staff does not provide proper toileting assistance to residents in care. The complaint alleged that staff failed to assist with toileting when called for help at night and stated, “You should go in my diaper.” On 02/12/26, LPA interviewed the Administrator (A1), who denied the allegation and said that some residents wear diapers and staff check residents at night to ensure they are changed. On 02/12/26, LPA Richard interviewed two staff members, #1-2 (S1-S2). Both denied ever failing to change a resident's diaper at night or assisting them out of bed. They also stated that they routinely check each resident at night and change residents' diapers three times a day, or earlier upon request. On 02/12/26, LPA interviewed three residents, #1-3 (R1-R3), all of whom denied the allegation and said they had been changed out of their diapers at night. R1 also stated that R1 likes how the staff treats R1. On 02/12/26, LPA interviewed one witness, W1, who denied any issue with staff assisting R1 daily. W1 confirmed that the staff provides proper toileting to R1. On 02/12/26, LPA interviewed one witness, W1, who denied any issue with staff assisting R1 daily. W1 confirmed that the staff provides proper toileting to R1. On 02/12/26, LPA reviewed facility notes and Unusual Incident Reports related to this allegation and found no documentation. On 02/12/26, LPA observed staff assisting residents throughout the day. Based on observations, interviews, and records review (s), the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation (s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were cited. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report was provided to the Administrator Vesna ILICHthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2026 · control 18-AS-20230303101603
Feb 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff handled resident in a rough manner. Staff do not treat residents with dignity and respect.

On 02/12/2026, the California Department of Social Services/Community Care Licensing (CDSS/CCL) Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted an unannounced follow-up complaint visit. LPA met with staff member Jaqueline, and the purpose of the visit was explained. The Administrator Vesna Ilich later joined the LPA. The investigation consisted of the following: On 10/26/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Venus Mixson conducted an initial unannounced investigation visit. LPA Mixson met with Administrator Vesna Ilich. On 02/12/2026, the Department interviewed the Administrator (A1), two staff members #1-2 (S1-S2), three residents #1-3 (R1-R3), and one witness #1 (W1). The department reviewed several documents, including the Staff Roster (dated 01/21/26), Resident roster (dated 1/14/26) (R1’s), Physician Report (dated 03/13/24), Admission Agreement, Unusual Incident Report (Dated 03/05/2024), and other pertinent records associated with this complaint. (Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099--C) Unsubstantiated Allegation #1: Staff roughly handled a resident. The complaint alleged that a staff member was rough and impatient while preparing a resident for the morning, pulling on R1's arm and shoulder. On 02/12/2026, between 10:38 am and 11:30 am, the Department interviewed the Administrator (A1) about the allegation. A1 denied the allegation and said that staff are trained to use appropriate techniques to assist residents based on their abilities. A1 mentioned that staff are instructed to contact A1 if a resident appears uncomfortable or in pain and to file a report if a resident reports an injury. A1 stated they were not aware of any caregiver handling a resident roughly to prepare the resident for the morning. On 02/12/2026, between 10:43 am and 11:30 am, the Department interviewed 2 staff members #1-2 (S1-S2) regarding the allegation. Both staff members denied the allegation and stated that they did not handle the residents roughly. On 02/12/2026, between 10:43 am and 11:30 am, the LPA interviewed three residents (R1-R3) regarding the allegation. All three residents denied the allegation and stated that they had never been handled roughly by staff. R1 also mentioned that the staff is very helpful. On 02/12/26, at 11:00 am, the department interviewed a witness (W1), who also denied the allegation that R1 was roughly handled by staff. Report continued on LIC9099C On 02/12/2026, between 10:30 am and 11:30 am, the Department conducted a records review and found no incident reports or resident notes related to this allegation. Based on information gathered through interviews and record reviews, there is not enough evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation (s) did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Allegation #2: Staff do not treat residents with dignity and respect. The complaint alleged that a staff member berated R1 by saying, " Come on, you can get up,” and by pulling R1's paralyzed arm. On 02/12/2026, between 10:30 am and 11:30 am, the Department interviewed the Administrator (A1) about the allegation. A1 denied the allegation and stated that staff are trained to treat all residents with respect. A1 also said that if a staff member mistreats a resident, A1 would retrain the staff member on the resident's rights. Additionally, no residents have ever complained to A1 about not being treated with respect and dignity. On 02/12/2026, between 10:30 am and 11:30 am, the department interviewed two staff members (S1-S2) regarding the allegation. 2 out of the 2 staff members denied the allegation and stated that they treat residents with dignity and respect because the facility is their home. On 02/12/2026, between 10:30 am and 11:30 pm, the Department interviewed three residents (R1-R3) about the allegation. All three residents denied the allegation and said they had never been disrespect or treated without dignity. R1 specifically stated there was no pulling or pushing. On 02/12/2026, the Department also interviewed one witness (W1), who denied the allegation and stated that W1 had never seen staff disrespect R1. On 02/12/2026, between 10:30 am and 11:30 am, the Department conducted a records review and found no incident reports or resident notes regarding this allegation. Based on information gathered through interviews and record reviews, there is not enough evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies were cited. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to Administrator Vesna Ilich.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2026 · control 18-AS-20231017113318
20251 state visit · 1 document
Apr 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On April 11, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the Required Annual Inspection and met with Vesna Ilich, Administrator. The facility file review was conducted at the Regional Office and additional records were requested and reviewed on site. The facility is licensed for six Elderly Adults and is currently operating at capacity of five Elderly Adults (740). LPA Mixson toured the facility along with the Administrator and made observations pertaining to the annual visit. LPA inspected the facility inside and outside there were no obstructions or debris to the indoor or outdoor passageways at the time of this visit. Additionally, there were no bodies of water on the premises. Following is a summary; Physical Plant: The facility phone number is (760) 294-5949 and it is operable. LPA Mixson observed the residents’ bedrooms, and each was equipped with required furniture as per Title 22. LPA Mixson inspected facility bathrooms, and the hot water temperature tested within regulations at. The bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately currently at the time of this visit. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors, carbon monoxide alarms, and fire extinguishers. LPA Mixson observed required postings such as "If you See Something, Say Something,” the "Personal Rights," and the PUB 475. The cleaning supplies and sharp items were kept locked and inaccessible to the residents in care. There was a designated storage space for the residents and staff files, and it was locked and inaccessible to residents in care currently at the time of this visit. Medications: Were locked and inaccessible to residents in care, and there was a sufficient supply of medication for each resident. The overall facility is clean, the furniture is in good condition. The facility cooling system and other appliances were operable currently at the time of this visit. Administrator informed LPA there are safety lights for night throughout the facility. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient per regulations, and there are a variety of food types available for residents. Dishes and utensils were in sufficient supply and stored properly, and sharp items are locked. Care & Supervision/Administration: Adequate staff are present for the supervision of resident in care. Floor plans, telephone numbers and personal rights were found posted in the facility. The listed Administrator possesses a current administrator’s certificate with an expiration date of 08/20/2025. Records Reviewed and Resident/Staff Files: LPA reviewed staff and resident files and reviewed the facility's staff schedule. The staff files reviewed have updated training along with First Aid Certification. Resident files were reviewed and possessed required paperwork. Disaster preparedness: LPA Mixson reviewed the facility's emergency and disaster plan as well as disaster training binder. Infection Control: LPA Mixson observed the hand washing stations in the facility restrooms. LPA observed PPE equipment and cleaning supplies to do regular cleaning of the facility. LPA reviewed the facility's infection control plan and found all required infection control measures. There were no TA deficiencies observed or cited per Title 22, Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations at this time. An exit interview was conducted where a copy of this report was discussed and given to Vesna Ilich, Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 11, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Apr 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On April 15, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the Required Annual Inspection and met with the Administrator, Vesna Ilich. The facility file review was conducted in the Regional Office and additional forms were requested and reviewed on site. The facility is licensed for six Adult Seniors and is currently operating at a capacity of five. LPA Mixson toured the facility along with the Administrator and inspected the facility inside and outside, there were no obstructions or debris to the indoor or outdoor passageways currently at the time of this visit. The facility is a single-story home located at 2331 Monte Vista Dr Vista Ca. 92084. Physical Plant: The facility phone number is (760) 536-3114 and is operable currently. The LPA observed the residents’ bedrooms, each was equipped with required furniture as per Title 22. LPA Mixson inspected facility bathrooms, and the hot water temperature tested within regulations. The bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately currently at the time of this visit. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors, carbon monoxide alarms, and fire extinguishers. The LPA observed required postings such as "If you See Something, Say Something" the "Personal Rights" and the Ombudsman postings. The cleaning supplies and sharp items were kept locked and inaccessible to the residents in care. There was a designated storage space for the residents and staff files, and it was locked and inaccessible to residents in care currently at the time of this visit. Medications: Were locked and inaccessible to residents in care, and there was a sufficient supply of medication for each resident. The overall facility is clean, the furniture is in good condition. The facility heating system and other appliances were operable currently at the time of this visit, and there were safety lights for night through out the facility. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient per regulations, and there are a variety of food types available for residents. Dishes and utensils were in sufficient supply and stored properly, and sharps are locked. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient staff, three staff on site at the time of this visit and were engaging the residents with medication management and meals. Records Review: The LPA reviewed resident and staff files, conducted staff interviews, and observed a resident during transition, the other residents were in the community. Previous Community Care Licensing forms were reviewed. There were no Title 22, Division 6 Regulation violations observed or cited during today’s visit. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was given to the Administrator, Vesna Ilich.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Diego County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Diego County