Quail Park Memory Care Residences is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Visalia, Tulare County, California — state license #547206596, licensed for 44 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 16 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated May 21, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

7 homes in view

Quail Park Memory Care Residences

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 44 residents · Visalia, CA · Tulare County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #547206596, held since 2012 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
5050 Tulare Avenue · Visalia, Tulare County
Phone
(559) 624-3560
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 44 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. ALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE CARE WAIVER GRANTED FOR 13 RESIDENTS. BEDRIDDEN GRANTED FOR 13 RESIDENTS.State service designation981 - RCFE / DELAYEDthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 18 times and filed 16 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 21, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 21, 2026
Occupancy at the December 2, 2024 visit
26 of 44 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 8 documents with transcribed findings, dated December 21, 2022 to December 2, 2024. 8 of the 8 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (5). 8 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 8 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 8 of 16 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
May 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20251 state visit · 1 document
Aug 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20245 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure that there is sufficient staffing to meet the needs of residents in care. Residents are sustaining falls due to lack of staff supervision.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Kaur arrived at the facility unannounced for subsequent complaint inspection. LPA met with Executive Director Lauri Aguilar and discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. LPA delivered the following findings. The Department investigated the allegations listed above. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed the facility had sufficient staffing to provide care although staff needs were changing due to census. Based on records reviewed no major raise in falls was found. Based on these findings, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore these allegations are unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 2, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240805092419
Oct 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Residents are missing medications

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Kaur arrived at the facility to conduct an initial 10-day complaint inspection. LPA met with Executive Director Lauri Aguilar and discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. Health and Wellness Director Kassandra Hernandez joined a short time later. LPA delivered the following findings. The Department investigated the allegations listed above. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed it was discovered (R1) Residents are missing medications. Medication audit revealed residents’ medication was not logged in the MAR(s) or the Medication narcotics Log as given but pill count was short by 3. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. See citations on the attached LIC9099D. Exit interview was conducted with Executive Director, a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2024 · control 24-AS-20241016151014
Aug 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not administer resident’s medications as prescribed

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Kaur arrived at the facility unannounced for subsequent complaint inspection. LPA met with Executive Director Lauri Aguilar and discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. Administrator Lennette arrived a short while later. LPA delivered the following findings. The Department investigated the allegations listed above. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed Staff did not administer resident’s medications as prescribed. Medication audit revealed residents’ medication was not logged in the Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Record (CSMDR). CSMDR was incomplete and missing information. R1’s Medication count revealed extra pills based on records. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. See citations on the attached LIC9099D. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator, a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Substanthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 2, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240312124816
Apr 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Aug 15, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations3typical 1
Type B citations1typical 1
Substantiated complaints3typical 2
Total complaints8typical 7
State visits on file18typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2012.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020251102024552202345020222312021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Tulare County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2024 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (559) 624-3560

Is Quail Park Memory Care Residences licensed?

Yes — Quail Park Memory Care Residences is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Visalia (Tulare County): California license #547206596, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 44 residents. State records list 16 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated May 21, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Quail Park Memory Care Residences care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Quail Park Memory Care Residences with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. ALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE CARE WAIVER GRANTED FOR 13 RESIDENTS. BEDRIDDEN GRANTED FOR 13 RESIDENTS.

How much does Quail Park Memory Care Residences cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Quail Park Memory Care Residences's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Tulare County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Quail Park Memory Care Residences accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Quail Park Memory Care Residences is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

26 of 44 beds occupied (59%) when the state visited on December 2, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Quail Park Memory Care Residences?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 18 state visits and 16 dated documents since 2021 for Quail Park Memory Care Residences; 8 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 2, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

8 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee does not ensure that there is sufficient staffing to meet the needs of residents in care. Residents are sustaining falls due to lack of staff supervision.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Kaur arrived at the facility unannounced for subsequent complaint inspection. LPA met with Executive Director Lauri Aguilar and discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. LPA delivered the following findings. The Department investigated the allegations listed above. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed the facility had sufficient staffing to provide care although staff needs were changing due to census. Based on records reviewed no major raise in falls was found. Based on these findings, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore these allegations are unsubstantiated. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 2, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240805092419
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents are missing medications
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Kaur arrived at the facility to conduct an initial 10-day complaint inspection. LPA met with Executive Director Lauri Aguilar and discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. Health and Wellness Director Kassandra Hernandez joined a short time later. LPA delivered the following findings. The Department investigated the allegations listed above. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed it was discovered (R1) Residents are missing medications. Medication audit revealed residents’ medication was not logged in the MAR(s) or the Medication narcotics Log as given but pill count was short by 3. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. See citations on the attached LIC9099D. Exit interview was conducted with Executive Director, a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 17, 2024 · control 24-AS-20241016151014
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not administer resident’s medications as prescribed
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Kaur arrived at the facility unannounced for subsequent complaint inspection. LPA met with Executive Director Lauri Aguilar and discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. Administrator Lennette arrived a short while later. LPA delivered the following findings. The Department investigated the allegations listed above. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed Staff did not administer resident’s medications as prescribed. Medication audit revealed residents’ medication was not logged in the Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Record (CSMDR). CSMDR was incomplete and missing information. R1’s Medication count revealed extra pills based on records. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. See citations on the attached LIC9099D. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator, a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. SubstanCDSS inspection report, July 2, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240312124816

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not treat resident in care with dignity and respect
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
The Department investigated the allegation listed above. Based on interviews conducted and review of facilities internal investigation the allegation is unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did occur or did not occur. Exit interview conducted with Executive Director. A copy of this report was signed and given to Adminstrator, whose signature confirms receipt of this report. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 17, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230630163629
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident hit another resident while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Kaur arrived at the facility unannounced for an initial 10-day inspection. LPA met with Administrator Lenette Otero-Gross and Health and Wellness Director Megan Mike and explained the purpose of the visit and reviewed the elements of the allegation. LPA delivered the following complaint investigation findings. The Department investigated the allegations listed above. Based on interviews conducted and documents reviewed; an altercation did occur between two residents; however the facility separated the residents immediately and have taken steps to prevent another incident from occurring. Based on the interviews conducted, the allegations listed above are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations did or did not occur; therefore, these allegations are unsubstantiated UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 27, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230323151259
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff do not maintain accurate medication records. Facility staff do not follow physician's orders Facility staff do not properly report unusual incidents Facility is in disrepair
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Kaur conducted a subsequent complaint inspection to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator Lenette Otero-Gross and Health and Wellness Director Megan Mike and explained the purpose of the visit and reviewed the elements of the allegations. LPA delivered the following complaint investigation findings. The Department investigated the allegations listed above. Administrator and staff were interviewed and based on interviews conducted and records reviewed there were no incidents of physician’s orders not being followed. LPA reviewed a sample of resident’s medications with the MARs and Centrally stored log and discovered no discrepancies or issues. Based on interviews conducated all incidents are reported. LPA conducted a tour of the facility and observed the facility to clean with no obstruction or fire clearance issues. Based on observation and interview of staff and residents, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations mayCDSS inspection report, January 26, 2023 · control 24-AS-20221118171548
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff left resident unsupervised causing resident to AWOL.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Kaur conducted a subsequent complaint inspection to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator Lenette Otero-Gross and Health and Wellness Director Megan Mike and explained the purpose of the visit and reviewed the elements of the allegation. LPA delivered the following complaint investigation findings. The Department investigated the allegation listed above. Administrator and staff were interviewed and based on interviews conducted and records reviewed R1 did try to vacate the facility. However the facility staff and nurse were present with the resident at the time of exit and stayed with resident until resident returned indoors. Based on observation and interview of staff and residents, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore these allegations are unsubstantiated. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 26, 2023 · control 24-AS-20221121120449

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained fracture and was hospitalized due to staff’s neglect
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 12/21/22, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), M. Yang arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint finding and stated the purpose of the visit and granted entry. LPA met with Administrator Lenette Otero-Gross and Health and Wellness Director Megan Mike. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews, records were reviewed and based on review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation that Resident 1 (R1) sustained fracture and was hospitalized due to staff neglect is SUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, a deficiency is being cited on the attached Lic 9099D. A violation regarding care and supervision warrants an immediate civil penalty. An immediate civil penalty of $500 is assessed. The issuance of additional civil penalties is pending and currently under review. The details of additional civil penalties will be outlined in a future report to the facility, if any. An exit inCDSS inspection report, December 21, 2022 · control 24-AS-20221007131548

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 18 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
3
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
8
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
18
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(559) 624-3560
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Quail Park Memory Care Residences? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.