Courtyard, The is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Yuba City, Sutter County, California — state license #515000683, licensed for 80 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 15 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated December 17, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

4 homes in view

Courtyard, The

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 80 residents · Yuba City, CA · Sutter County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #515000683, held since 1999 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1240 Williams Way · Yuba City, Sutter County
Phone
(530) 790-3050
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 80 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 15 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 5 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND ABOVE. FIRE CLEARANCE FOR EIGHTY (80) NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH FIVE (5) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR FIFTEEN (15) RESIDENTS.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 18 times and filed 15 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated December 17, 2025.

Most recent state visit
June 4, 2026
Occupancy at the September 4, 2025 visit
56 of 80 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 6 documents with transcribed findings, dated December 16, 2022 to September 4, 2025. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 6 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 8 of 15 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20254 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not provide adequate supervision to resident in care.

LPA Hiratsuka, conducted this unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings into the allegation above. Title 22 regulations requires facilities to assess a resident to determine the level of care and supervision a resident requires and have a separate written plan of care of how the facility staff are going to meet the resident needs. Title 22 regulations do not require staff to be with a resident, in eye sight of a resident, or within hearing distance of a resident at all times. LPA reviewed facility and hospice medical records. LPA also interviewed staff and witnesses. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 4, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250509094217
Aug 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaged residents medication.

Licensing Program Analyst Kerry Hiratsuka conducted this unannounced complaint visit to deliver the results of the allegation above. LPA interviewed Administrator and staff. The med tech assigned to dispense medications was on vacation. Another med tech who normally passes medications at this facility's sister facility and is associated to this facility, came to assist this facility to assist with passing medications. There are two residents with the same first name and the substitute med tech accidentally got them mixed up and one resident received the medication for the other resident. The med tech immediatly reported the incident to managment and management immediately conducted an investigation into the incident, contacted the physician, responsible party, monitoring resident, and later reviewed medication proceedures with staff who are in charge of medications. Resident did not suffer any ill effects from the medication error. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 19, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250813093452
Jan 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 2 documents
Sep 27, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff forced resident to take medication.

LPA Hiratsuka, conducted this unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings of the allegation above. LPA interviewed staff and the resident in question. LPA also reviewed the facility medication administration records. One of the medications is an as needed medication and the resident displayed symptoms of requiring it and the resident is capable of determining the need for it. Staff stated they offered the medication and the resident accepted it for several days. Staff interview stated the resident requested to have two medications mixed together on the last day and the resident stated they did not. The resident stated they didn't know they were taking the medication and felt the staff person mixed it with another one. Staff documented the resident requested both medications and the resident denied it. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 27, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230814173328
Sep 27, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff spoke inappropriately to resident

LPA Hiratsuka, conducted this unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings of the allegation above. LPA interviewed staff and the resident in question. The staff in question denied there was any ill intent when they approached the resident. The resident stated they were started by the way the staff person approached them and felt humiliated. The staff person has a naturally loud voice and can be boisterous at times and there was a discussion between LPA and the staff person about the voice volume. LPA was unable to contact any witnesses to the event. LPA cannot prove or disprove the allegation because each side has their own version of events. Due to the information gathered, LPA cannot determine the Staff spoke inappropriately to resident. LPA finds allegation to be unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 27, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230825101845
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints1typical 2
Total complaints6typical 7
State visits on file18typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 1999.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20254412024220202323020225502021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$4,000$8,000 /mo
our estimate — broad statewide California range, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (530) 790-3050

Is Courtyard, The licensed?

Yes — Courtyard, The is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Yuba City (Sutter County): California license #515000683, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 80 residents. State records list 15 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated December 17, 2025, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Courtyard, The care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Courtyard, The with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND ABOVE. FIRE CLEARANCE FOR EIGHTY (80) NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH FIVE (5) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR FIFTEEN (15) RESIDENTS.

How much does Courtyard, The cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Courtyard, The's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sutter County typically runs $4,000–$8,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$7,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Courtyard, The accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Courtyard, The is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

56 of 80 beds occupied (70%) when the state visited on September 4, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Courtyard, The?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 18 state visits and 15 dated documents since 2021 for Courtyard, The; 6 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated September 4, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

6 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not provide adequate supervision to resident in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
LPA Hiratsuka, conducted this unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings into the allegation above. Title 22 regulations requires facilities to assess a resident to determine the level of care and supervision a resident requires and have a separate written plan of care of how the facility staff are going to meet the resident needs. Title 22 regulations do not require staff to be with a resident, in eye sight of a resident, or within hearing distance of a resident at all times. LPA reviewed facility and hospice medical records. LPA also interviewed staff and witnesses. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 4, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250509094217
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff mismanaged residents medication.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst Kerry Hiratsuka conducted this unannounced complaint visit to deliver the results of the allegation above. LPA interviewed Administrator and staff. The med tech assigned to dispense medications was on vacation. Another med tech who normally passes medications at this facility's sister facility and is associated to this facility, came to assist this facility to assist with passing medications. There are two residents with the same first name and the substitute med tech accidentally got them mixed up and one resident received the medication for the other resident. The med tech immediatly reported the incident to managment and management immediately conducted an investigation into the incident, contacted the physician, responsible party, monitoring resident, and later reviewed medication proceedures with staff who are in charge of medications. Resident did not suffer any ill effects from the medication error. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 19, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250813093452

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff forced resident to take medication.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
LPA Hiratsuka, conducted this unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings of the allegation above. LPA interviewed staff and the resident in question. LPA also reviewed the facility medication administration records. One of the medications is an as needed medication and the resident displayed symptoms of requiring it and the resident is capable of determining the need for it. Staff stated they offered the medication and the resident accepted it for several days. Staff interview stated the resident requested to have two medications mixed together on the last day and the resident stated they did not. The resident stated they didn't know they were taking the medication and felt the staff person mixed it with another one. Staff documented the resident requested both medications and the resident denied it. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 27, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230814173328
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff spoke inappropriately to resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
LPA Hiratsuka, conducted this unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings of the allegation above. LPA interviewed staff and the resident in question. The staff in question denied there was any ill intent when they approached the resident. The resident stated they were started by the way the staff person approached them and felt humiliated. The staff person has a naturally loud voice and can be boisterous at times and there was a discussion between LPA and the staff person about the voice volume. LPA was unable to contact any witnesses to the event. LPA cannot prove or disprove the allegation because each side has their own version of events. Due to the information gathered, LPA cannot determine the Staff spoke inappropriately to resident. LPA finds allegation to be unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 27, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230825101845
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff caused a resident to fall while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
LPA Hiratsuka, conducted this unnanounced complaint visit to deliver the findings of the allegation above. LPA interviewed staff and the resident in question. LPA also reviewed the incident report and resident's file. Resident stated the facility staff put an onxygen tank in the middle of the floor and the resident tripped on it. The staff stated they found the resident in the bathroom on floor with no oxygen tank around. LPA cannot prove or disprove the allegation because each side has their own version of events. Due to the information gathered, LPA cannot determine the Staff caused a resident to fall while in care. LPA finds allegation to be unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 23, 2023 · control 25-AS-20230109160715

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewed. Staff are not properly trained to provide care and supervision 2. Staff leave the residents unattended while in care 3. Staff did not respond timely to the residents alerts 4. Staff are retaining residents who require a higher level of care 5. Resident was not provided comfortable accommodations 6. Staff are forcing the residents to sleep earlier while in care
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
LPA Hiratsuka, conducted this unannounced complaint visit. LPA wore a surgical mask and observed wearing surgical masks. LPA conducted the investigation into the allegations above. LPA interviewed staff and residents. LPA reviewed training records and reviewed records for two residents no longer at this community. 1. LPA reviewed staff training records. The facility provides the training required by Community Care Licensing Division. LPA also observed the facility staff going over topics during all staff meetings and if someone needs extra training the facility provides it. Based on the records, the allegation is unfounded. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, December 16, 2022 · control 25-AS-20220922101057

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 18 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
6
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
18
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(530) 790-3050
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Courtyard, The? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.