Rachelle's Home I is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Freedom, Santa Cruz County, California — state license #445202713, licensed for 12 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 9 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated April 16, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

4 homes in view

Rachelle's Home I

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 12 residents · Freedom, CA · Santa Cruz County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #445202713, held since 2019 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
99 Airport Blvd · Freedom, Santa Cruz County
Phone
(831) 319-4190
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 8 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 7 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 4 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 12 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 8 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY AND 4 MAY BE BEDRIDDENHOSPICE WAVIER FOR 7.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 10 times and filed 9 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on April 16, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”

Most recent state visit
June 24, 2026
Occupancy at the April 16, 2026 visit
5 of 12 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 3 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 19, 2024 to April 16, 2026. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 3 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 7 of 9 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Apr 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility currently has only one operational toilet available for an approved 14 capacity due to overflowing septic. Facility did not report physical plant or maintenance issue at the facility to licensing which threatens resident's welfare, safety or health.

On 10/22/2025, the Department received a complaint with the above allegations. On 10/29/2025, LPA Marrufo conducted an initial complaint investigation visit. On 02/12/2026, LPA Marrufo conducted an additional complaint investigation visit. Allegation: Facility currently has only one operational toilet available for an approved 14 capacity due to overflowing septic. When the department received the complaint, it was alleged that the facility had a damaged septic system. See LIC9099-C pages for more information. Page 1 of 3. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 16, 2026 · control 26-AS-20251022113846
Feb 12, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20251 state visit · 1 document
Dec 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 31, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility not following COVID 19 screening protocols for visitors. Staff spoke to resident inappropriately

Allegation: Facility not following COVID 19 screening protocols for visitors. Based on interviews and observation during the tour of the facility, the department observed COVID 19 screening protocols for visitors and staff. At the time of the complaint the facility was alleged to have not checked temperatures of staff or residents the department was unable to confirm or deny this based on the available infromation today. Allegation: Staff spoke to resident inappropriately. All staff interviewed denied witnessing or speaking to any of the residents inappropriately. Staff interviewed stated that the residents are treated with respect and dignity. The above allegations are unsubstantiated Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 19, 2024 · control 26-AS-20210806153730
Oct 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not administer prescribed medications to resident resulting in resident suffering pain. Facility did not notify hospice agency of resident's change in condition

On 10/19/2024, LPA Johnson arrived unannounced to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Magali and later joined by Alquin Gamab. Based on records review and interviews with current staff the department was unable to determine if R1 suffered as a result of the facility neglecting to notify the hospice agency about a change in condition. The alleged lack of notification could have contributed to R1 having trouble with pain referred to in this complaint. If there was discomfort or pain it could have been addressed by the hospice agency. The department could not confirm that the hospice agency was notified of the R1's change in condition, nor could the department from the review of records identify that R1 had a change of condition that would have warrant a call to the hospice agency. R1's condition on discharge from the skilled nursing facility to this care home on hospice was unmanaged right hip pain. The above allegations are unsubstantiated Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 19, 2024 · control 26-AS-20220404103902
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 0
Type B citations2typical 0
Substantiated complaints3typical 0
Total complaints3typical 1
State visits on file10typical 8
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 307 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2019.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262212025110202434020221102021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — Santa Cruz County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (831) 319-4190

Is Rachelle's Home I licensed?

Yes — Rachelle's Home I is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Freedom (Santa Cruz County): California license #445202713, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 12 residents. State records list 9 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated April 16, 2026, was marked “Substantiated” by the state.

Can Rachelle's Home I care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Rachelle's Home I with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 12 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 8 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY AND 4 MAY BE BEDRIDDENHOSPICE WAVIER FOR 7.

How much does Rachelle's Home I cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Rachelle's Home I's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Santa Cruz County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Rachelle's Home I accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Rachelle's Home I is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

5 of 12 beds occupied (42%) when the state visited on April 16, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Rachelle's Home I?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 10 state visits and 9 dated documents since 2021 for Rachelle's Home I; 3 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 16, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

3 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility currently has only one operational toilet available for an approved 14 capacity due to overflowing septic. Facility did not report physical plant or maintenance issue at the facility to licensing which threatens resident's welfare, safety or health.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 10/22/2025, the Department received a complaint with the above allegations. On 10/29/2025, LPA Marrufo conducted an initial complaint investigation visit. On 02/12/2026, LPA Marrufo conducted an additional complaint investigation visit. Allegation: Facility currently has only one operational toilet available for an approved 14 capacity due to overflowing septic. When the department received the complaint, it was alleged that the facility had a damaged septic system. See LIC9099-C pages for more information. Page 1 of 3. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 16, 2026 · control 26-AS-20251022113846

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility not following COVID 19 screening protocols for visitors. Staff spoke to resident inappropriately
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Allegation: Facility not following COVID 19 screening protocols for visitors. Based on interviews and observation during the tour of the facility, the department observed COVID 19 screening protocols for visitors and staff. At the time of the complaint the facility was alleged to have not checked temperatures of staff or residents the department was unable to confirm or deny this based on the available infromation today. Allegation: Staff spoke to resident inappropriately. All staff interviewed denied witnessing or speaking to any of the residents inappropriately. Staff interviewed stated that the residents are treated with respect and dignity. The above allegations are unsubstantiated UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 19, 2024 · control 26-AS-20210806153730
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not administer prescribed medications to resident resulting in resident suffering pain. Facility did not notify hospice agency of resident's change in condition
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/19/2024, LPA Johnson arrived unannounced to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Magali and later joined by Alquin Gamab. Based on records review and interviews with current staff the department was unable to determine if R1 suffered as a result of the facility neglecting to notify the hospice agency about a change in condition. The alleged lack of notification could have contributed to R1 having trouble with pain referred to in this complaint. If there was discomfort or pain it could have been addressed by the hospice agency. The department could not confirm that the hospice agency was notified of the R1's change in condition, nor could the department from the review of records identify that R1 had a change of condition that would have warrant a call to the hospice agency. R1's condition on discharge from the skilled nursing facility to this care home on hospice was unmanaged right hip pain. The above allegations are unsubstantiated UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 19, 2024 · control 26-AS-20220404103902

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 10 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for mid-size homes (7–15 beds), computed across all 307 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
3
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
3
typical for this size: 1
State visits on file
10
typical for this size: 8
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Rachelle's Home I?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Rachelle's Home, Inc, who operates 2 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(831) 319-4190
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Rachelle's Home I? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.