Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Juliette's Gardens (Rose)

Small home·Licensed for 6·San Jose, California

Licensed since 2016Licence #435202528
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Starting rate$4,100 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedSeptember 25, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitSeptember 17, 2025CDSS inspection record

Juliette's Gardens (Rose) is a small care home in San Jose — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2016. Bedridden care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Juliette's Gardens (Rose)

Is Juliette's Gardens (Rose) licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Juliette's Gardens (Rose) licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Juliette's Gardens (Rose) been cited?

0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2016, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.

Is Juliette's Gardens (Rose) still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Juliette's Gardens (Rose) cost?

$4,100 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 50 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Jose that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,200 (n = 50 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Juliette's Gardens (Rose) take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Jvp Premier Healthcare Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Good Samaritan Hospital is 2.9 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Juliette's Gardens (Rose) keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Juliette's Gardens (Rose) license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “JULIETTE'S GARDENS (ROSE)”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #435202528. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Jvp Premier Healthcare Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2016, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 8 state inspection visits since 2016, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2016, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2016, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is September 17, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 3 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY ONLY. LICENSEE IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE HOSPICE WAIVER FOR THREE (3).

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$4,100a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$4,100a month

Likely $4,100–$4,700

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,100this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,100–$4,700
$4,100
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,100–$8,200
$6,100
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

21 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,200–$5,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 21 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 1511 Ilikai Ave, San Jose, CA 95118Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 6 documents for this home, and its records count 8 visits since 2016. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated September 17, 2025.

On file since
2021
State visits
8
Most recent visit
September 17, 2025
Occupied · September 25, 2024 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated September 25, 2024. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2016.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20251102024120202311020221102021110

The last 36 months — 3 of 6 documents

20251 state visit · 1 document
Sep 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit, and met with Lead Caregiver, Lisa (Noveliza) Manzanilla (S1). During the visit, LPA observed 5 residents and 2 staff. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA contacted facility ADM via phone call at 10:36am, no answer. LPA left voicemail informing ADM of visit. LPA toured the facility inside out with S1 which included the Living room, kitchen, dining room, 2 restrooms and 5 residents bedrooms. The staff area of the facility was also inspected. The front yard and backyard were inspected. There was no obstruction to block the walkways. Two-day perishable food supplies and seven day nonperishable food supplies were observed. LPA observed the medication storage area, knives storage area, and cleaning product storage area as locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Room temperature was at 75 degrees F, and hot water temperature was measured to range from 108-112 degrees F in resident bathrooms. Fire extinguisher was serviced in January 8, 2025. The facility was equipped with smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. Smoke detectors was tested by S1, and were functional. LPA observed facility first aid kit and facility fire/earthquake drill log. The facility's last drill was on August 18, 2025. S1 stated that was the only drill conducted in 2025. Page 1 Out of 2. LPA reviewed facility records for 3 staff and 3 residents. LPA reviewed 3 resident medications and centrally stored medication records. LPA conducted interviews with 1 staff and 1 residents. LPA requested a copy of the following documents be sent to LPA by September 24, 2025 1. LIC500, Personnel Summary 2. LIC308, Designation of Administrative Responsibility 3. LIC400, Affidavit Regarding Client/Resident Cash Resources 4. Liability Insurance 5. Qualifications of Administrator (Certificate) Deficiencies are being cited during today's visit. This report was reviewed with Lead Caregiver, Lisa (Noveliza) Manzanilla and a copy of the signed report was provided. Appeal rights were provided. Page 2 Out of 2. END OF REPORT.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 17, 2025
20241 state visit · 2 documents
Sep 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not ensure residents records are complete and current. Staff does not have 40 hours of required training The facility is not meeting residents Recommended Dietary Allowance. Facility placed cameras in the facility without the residents/ responsible party's consent. Staff assisting residents with self-administration of medication do not have required medication training. Facility not providing activities which foster and maintain independent functioning Facility has rodents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Simi Rai conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation. LPA Rai met with the Administrator and stated the purpose of today’s visit. On 10/31/2023 the Department received a complaint with the above allegations. On 11/6/2023, the Department conducted an initial investigation at the facility. Continuation on LIC 9099-C, Page 1 of 4. Unfounded Page 2 of 4. Licensee did not ensure residents records are complete and current. /Staff does not have 40 hours of required training. / Staff assisting residents with self-administration of medication do not have required medication training. On 11/6/2023, the LPA reviewed 3 staff files and 3 resident files. All files were complete and current, including the required training for staff and medication training. Administrator (ADM) worked on R1 and R3’s physician to update LIC 602A’s Physician’s Order at the time of the visit. This was a plan of correction ADM was working on as a result of a deficiency cited during facility’s annual inspection on 9/21/2023. Facility placed cameras in the facility without the residents/responsible party’s consent. On 9/21/2023, during the facility’s annual inspection, LPA observed cameras in resident’s rooms which were placed without resident’s consent. ADM’s plan of correction was to remove the cameras until written consent was provided by resident and/or resident’s responsible party. On 11/6/2023, the Department interviewed ADM. ADM stated on 9/21/2023, after facility’s annual inspection, ADM removed all cameras in the facility. During visit on 11/6/2023, the LPA did not observe any cameras at the facility. The facility is not meeting residents Recommended Dietary Allowance. On 11/6/2023, the Department interviewed two staff (S1-S2) and ADM. Three out of three staff stated there is an established food menu which accounts for resident’s requests and any special diets the residents require based on the physician’s order. Page 3 of 4. On 11/6/2023, the Department interviewed 3 residents. Three out of three residents stated the food was okay and they did not have any complaints regarding the food served at the facility. During the visit on 11/6/2023, the LPA observed the facility food supply where the facility had a variety of food, including fruits, vegetables, and canned foods. LPA also observed lunch service and residents were served chicken pot pie and a bowl of fruit. Facility not providing activities which foster and maintain independent functioning. On 11/6/2023, the Department interviewed two staff (S1-S2) and ADM. Three out of three staff stated the facility staff provide activities such as walks, playing cards, read books, watch tv or sports. Staff S1 stated the residents have physical therapist visitations at the facility and staff will encourage the residents to exercise their arms and legs. Staff S2 stated the staff will interact and mingle with the residents as well. On 11/6/2023, the Department interviewed 3 residents. Two out of the three residents stated the facility provide activities and they are satisfied with activities provided. One out of the three residents did not answer any questions regarding facility providing activities. During the visit on 11/6/2023, the LPA did observed residents watching tv and later observed staff S1 take resident R1 and R2 for a walk outside of the facility. Facility has rodents. On 11/6/2023, the Department interviewed two staff (S1-S2) and ADM. Three out of three staff stated they have not seen any rodents in the facility and have not heard of the residents complain or mention seeing rodents in the facility. Page 4 of 4. On 11/6/2023, the Department interviewed 3 residents (R1-R3). Three out of three residents stated they have seen or heard any rodents in the facility. During the visit on 11/6/2023, the LPA toured the facility and did not observe rodents or rodent feces/droppings. The Department has completed the investigation of the above allegations. Based on interviews conducted and record reviews, the department has found that the above allegations were UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or are without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies cited from California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit interview conducted with Administrator and a copy of the report was provided. Page 2 of 2. Based on facility file, the facility has an Infection Control plan in place to manage outbreaks and other infections in the facility. During today's visit, LPA Rai interviewed two staff (S1-S2). Two out of two staff were able to provide information regarding facility's infection control policy, cough etiquette and hand washing procedure. During today's visit, LPA Rai observed a third party vendor who was disinfecting the facility, including but not limited to resident bedrooms, bathrooms, living room, kitchen, and outdoor space. Based on the interviews conducted with clients and staff and based on observation and records review, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the above allegations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies cited from California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit interview conducted with Administrator and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2024 · control 26-AS-20231031142449

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 2, 2024

87211 Reporting Requirements (a) (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events... This requiement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, ADM did not ensure to report was submitted to the licensing agency when resident being hospitalized after a fall and when two out of three residents had scabies at the facility which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2024

Plan of correction: Administrator was not present during today's visit. Administrator stated to submit a written plan of action understanding regulation and ensure Incident Reports are submitted to licensng agency by POC due date.

Sep 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Simi Rai conducted an unannounced Required 1 Year visit. LPA Rai met with Lead Caregiver (LC) Lisa (Noveliza) Manzanilla and stated the purpose of today's visit. LPA Rai observed 2 staff and 5 residents at the facility. LPA Rai spoke with Administrator, Jonathan Perez over the phone and obtained verbal authorization for Lead Caregiver to sign the report on his behalf. During visit, LPA Rai toured the inside and outside of the facility. When touring the outside area of the facility, the exits were cleared of obstruction. LPA Rai observed 1 shed which was locked, inaccessible and was used as storage and not habitual space. LPA Rai toured the facility kitchen and observed food supply of at least 2 days of perishable food and at least 7 days of nonperishable food. Sharps and medications were locked in secured areas. LPA observed additional food supply areas and secured areas for cleaning supplies and laundry detergents. LPA Rai toured 5 resident bedrooms and 1 staff room. 6 Out of 6 resident bedrooms had available bedding, drawers, and functioning lights. LPA Rai observed resident R1's room and exit door located in the room. LC removed a pole from the bottom of the screen door which restricted resident from using the exit door. LC stated R1 exhibited exit seeking behaviors. LPA Rai observed a working door alarm on the exit and the door had locking capabilities. The facility bathroom had available soap, paper towels, and trash cans with lids. The water temperature in the bathroom sinks ranged from 105.1 - 105.9 degrees F. The water temperature in the kitchen sink was 105.1 degrees F. Fire extinguisher was observed and inspected on 01/26/2024. The last disaster drills were conducted on 07/30/2024, 07/31/2024, and 8/1/2024. Continuation on LIC 809-C, Page 1 of 2. Page 2 of 2. LPA Rai reviewed facility records for 3 staff and 3 residents. LPA Rai reviewed resident medications and central stored medication records. Deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Technical Assistance was provided. Failure to correct the cited deficiency, on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. This report was reviewed with Lead Caregiver (LC) Lisa (Noveliza) Manzanilla and a copy of the report was provided. Appeal Rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Santa Clara County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Santa Clara County