Large community · Licensed for 59 · San Francisco
San Francisco RCFE
887 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110Licensed since 2014
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: WheelchairState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 59: a large care communityThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 59 residents
Not on file: dementia, hospice and bedridden approvals.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. ALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for San Francisco RCFE: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines, staying through hospice and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$5,050a month to start
Likely $3,900–$6,400
From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a studio and basic help · room, care and fees$5,050likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$5,050likely $3,900–$6,400
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 communities with 50 or more beds within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,900–$6,550
- $5,050
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,750–$9,700
- $7,550
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes9 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,695 to $9,600
9 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $5,150–$8,850.
- Coterie Cathedral HillSan Francisco · 2.0 mi · Large community$9,600Listed on its own website · coterie cathedral hill · seen October 5, 2026
- Victorian ManorSan Francisco · 2.1 mi · Large community$6,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The Sequoias San FranciscoSan Francisco · 2.2 mi · Large community$5,357Listed on its own website · garden courts studio starting fee · seen October 27, 2026
- The Carlisle-Ivy Signature LivingSan Francisco · 2.2 mi · Large community$8,695Listed on its own website · studio apartments · seen October 27, 2026
- Portola GardensSan Francisco · 2.3 mi · Large community$3,695Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Ivy Park at Cathedral HillSan Francisco · 2.3 mi · Large community$7,895Listed on its own website · studio apartments · seen October 27, 2026
- Kokoro Assisted LivingSan Francisco · 2.4 mi · Large community$6,559Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Rhoda Goldman PlazaSan Francisco · 2.5 mi · Large community$7,200Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Sagebrook Senior Living at San FranciscoSan Francisco · 2.9 mi · Large community$7,095Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 communities with 50 or more beds within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
887 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list0.1 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #385600399 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 4 of 12 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Unsubstantiated”.
20261 state visit · 2 documents
Sep 1, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: -Staff did not prevent residents from smoking in the facility.
On 09/01/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian conducted an unnannounced complaint visit. LPA met with administrator, Charisse Li, LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that staff did not prevent residents from smoking inside the facility, the Department conducted investigation, document reviews, interviews with residents and staff consistently indicated that residents smoke outside or in the designated patio area and that indoor smoking was not occurring. Although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove whether the allegations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report is reviewed and a copy of this report is provided to the administrator. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 1, 2026 · control 14-AS-20260601163306
Sep 1, 2026Facility evaluation reportAnnual/RandomReport on file
Type of visit: Annual/Random
On 9/1/2026, LPA Yi Sam jian made an unannounced annual visit to the facility. LPA met with Administrators Charisse Li. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility including sample resident rooms, common areas & laundry rooms, bathrooms, and shower rooms. LPA observed some residents were in a common room engaging in group activity. Courtyard was fenced, secured, and in good condition. All outdoor and indoor passageway were free and clear of obstruction. No accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. Kitchen was inspected, sufficient supply of food observed. Infection control practices reviewed. Medications, toxins and sharps stored appropriately and inaccessible to clients, a comfortable temperature was maintained, hot water temperature inspected to be compliant, furnishing and lighting was sufficient for comfort and safety. Bathrooms and shower rooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid floors. Food is served from the main hospital’s kitchen and brought to the facility in a food warmer cart. Evacuation chair in the process of being mounted in the stairwell. Emergency drills are up to date. Carbon monoxide detector and smoke detector system inspected and met the requirements. Fire extinguisher checked and fully charged. Facility has sprinklers and fire extinguishers are up to date. Licensee has at least one completed first aid kit located in the office. No deficiencies were cited. Technical violation was noted in LIC9102. The work order for the evacuation chair installation was reviewed. The report was reviewed and discussed with administrator. A copy of the report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 1, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Sep 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 9/23/2025, LPA Yi Sam jian made an unannounced annual visit to the facility. LPA met with Administrators Charisse Li. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility including sample resident rooms, common areas & laundry rooms, bathrooms, and shower rooms. LPA observed some residents were in a common room engaging in group activity. Courtyard was fenced, secured, and in good condition. All outdoor and indoor passageway were free and clear of obstruction. No accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. Kitchen was inspected, sufficient supply of food observed. Infection control practices reviewed. Medications, toxins and sharps stored appropriately and inaccessible to clients, a comfortable temperature was maintained, hot water temperature inspected to be compliant, furnishing and lighting was sufficient for comfort and safety. Bathrooms and shower rooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid floors. Food is served from the main hospital’s kitchen and brought to the facility in a food warmer cart. Evacuation chair in the process of being mounted in the stairwell. Emergency drills are up to date. Carbon monoxide detector and smoke detector system inspected and met the requirements. Fire extinguisher checked and fully charged. Facility has sprinklers and fire extinguishers are up to date. Licensee has at least one completed first aid kit located in the office. No deficiencies were cited. Three technical violations were noted: no documented signature for a client with limited English comprehension on the admission and personal rights form, and the evacuation chair installation is still in progress. The report was reviewed and discussed with Annie Jacob. A copy of the report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 23, 2025
The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20241 state visit · 1 document
Sep 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 9/18/2024, LPA Grace Donato & Sam Yi made an unannounced annual visit to the facility. LPA met with Administrators Calvin Latimore & Charisse Li. LPAs explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility including sample resident rooms, common areas & laundry rooms, bathrooms, and shower rooms. The indoor and outdoor passageways were free of obstruction. LPA observed some residents were in a common room watching tv. Facility has sprinklers and fire extinguishers are up to date. Hot water was also tested in the bathrooms and the temperature was 108 deg F. The residents have adequate amount of linens in their bedrooms. All personal belongings are intact. Resident bedrooms and bathrooms were observed to be in good repair. Bathrooms and shower rooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid floors. Food is served from the main hospital’s kitchen and brought to the facility in a food warmer cart. Evacuation chair will be mounted in the stairwell. Emergency drills are up to date. Five resident records and five staff records were reviewed. Resident records are updated, complete and signed. Staff records are complete, with training logs. Medication review was done, and all medications are accounted for, and centrally stored medication records are updated. LPAs received the following documents: LIC500 Personnel Report, Liability insurance. No deficiencies are cited at this time. Report is reviewed and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 18, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 8 documents
20232 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 25, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility did not provide computer to resident
On October 25, 2023 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the investigation findings. LPA met with Interim Administrator, Charisse Ann Li and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding to allegation of - facility did not provide computer to resident. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed resident - in - question (R1) and interim administrator. According to R1, there is no computer access for residents at the facility which made it impossible for R1 and other residents to search the internet and other activities. The interim administrator acknowledged that there is no electronic device for residents and it is vital for residents to have access to an electronic device. Therefore, the facility will be working on obtaining it for the residents. Based on interviews and observations during the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, this allegations were determined to be substantiated. Deficiency is cited on the LIC 9099D under Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report was discussed with Administrator, and Appeal Rights provided. Substantiated LPA interviewed 3 other residents who did their own laundry and all of them stated that they have not had any of their clothes missing from the laundry room. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated as R1 did not report to facility staff when the hats were missing, and R1 was not able to provide additional details of the missing hats. Regarding to allegation of- Staff behavior towards resident was unacceptable, the reporting party reported resident- in - question (R1) experienced unacceptable behavior from staff members. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed R1 and interim administrator. According to R1, he/she did not like the way he/she was being talked to by staff #1 (S1). R1 denied being mistreated by S1 but did not like the tone of voice such as when R1 did not want to take his/her medication, and felt he/she was being questioned by S1. However, R1 was not able to provide additional details and R1 stated that it was not reported to any team leaders and supervisors. LPA interviewed interim administrator who stated that S1 is being monitored on work related tasks but no one has expressed concerned about S1's tone of voice while talking to residents. LPA interviewed a team leader who reported that residents have not reported any concerns of any staff members being rude to them. LPA interviewed 3 residents and they all reported that facility staff members are caring, doing their best to care for them and they are friendly. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated as R1 stated that he/she was not mistreated by S1 and interim administrator will speak to S1 regarding to the tone of voice while speaking to residents. Although the above investigations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. This report is reviewed and discussed with interim administrator; a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 25, 2023 · control 14-AS-20230817121522
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.319(a) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 1, 2023
§1569.319..(a) A licensee of a facility that has internet service shall provide at least one internet access device, such as a computer,.. that can support real-time interactive applications,..and is dedicated for resident use. This requirement is not met as evidenced by facility did not have internal access device such as a computer for residents to access which poses a potential health risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 25, 2023
Plan of correction: The administrator/licensee will develop a plan to ensure compliance and will submit a copy of the plan to CCL by 11/1/2023.
Jul 21, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility is retaining residents with higher level of care needs.
On July 21, 2023, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Grace Donato and Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint visit. LPAs met with Team Leader, Darren Page, and Program Director, Adela Morales joined shortly thereafter. LPAs explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that facility is retaining residents with higher level of care, according to the reporting party, the facility is retaining clients who require a higher-level of care and staff are not equipped to provide care for them. According to the reporting party, Resident 1 (R1) has breathing issues and needs oxygen, however facility can’t take anyone with oxygen, Resident 2 (R2) is obsessed with smoking and will wake residents up at night to ask for cigarettes, and Resident 3 (R3) has bad dementia and needs to be in a memory care facility. During the investigation, LPAs reviewed resident files and interviewed the Program Director and Team Leader. Based on interviews conducted with the Program Director and Team Leader, R1 does not Unsubstantiated require oxygen. Based on R1’s physician report dated 7/13/2023, it was documented that R1 has resolved aspiration pneumonia and does not require oxygen. LPAs reviewed R2’s file and the facility house rules regarding smoking. Based on the facility house rules and interviews conducted, the facility does not allow residents to smoke cigarettes inside the facility, however residents are allowed to smoke cigarettes in the designated smoking areas. In addition, based on the interviews conducted, residents are able to smoke when they like as the facility does not have a smoking schedule. Based on R2’s file, LPAs observed a written agreement between the facility and R2 indicating that R2 will receive a fixed amount of cigarettes per day by facility. Furthermore, LPAs reviewed R3’s file. Based on R3’s file, R3 was admitted to the facility on January 2021. Upon admission, R3 did not have a diagnosis of dementia. The physician’s report documentation dated, April 2023 indicated R3 was diagnosed with dementia. According to the Program Director and Team Leader, the facility has been in contact with SFDPH Placement Team and R3’s case manager, however, has not been successful with finding R3 placement. In addition, according to the Program Director, R3 is currently at the San Francisco General Hospital due to R3’s progressive dementia and the social workers and case managers at the hospital are assisting with trying to find R3 placement. Therefore, based on the interviews conducted, files reviewed, and information collected, the allegation that the facility is retaining residents with higher level of care is UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Report is reviewed with Program Director, Adela Morales and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 21, 2023 · control 14-AS-20230711084418
20214 state visits · 6 documents
Oct 21, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident needs a higher level of care Residents are locked out the front door
On 10/21/2021, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannouced visit to deliver the investigtion findings. LPA Han met with the Administrator, Adela Morales and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA was properly screened by the receptionist at the main entrance. Regarding to allegation of- resident needs a higher level of care- LPA Han observed residents in question and all of them are independent with their Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and ambulation with the exception of one resident who requires some assistance with performing some of the ADLs due to a recent change of condition. According to the Physician's Reports, all of them are able to leave the facility unassisted and they have the capacity for self-care. Furthermore, according to staff, all the residents in question are independent with their ADLs but some of them need a little reminder and encouragement and others need more such as Resident #3 (R3) who needs a lot of convincing and encouragement to perform personal hygiene tasks and overall room cleanliness. Base on observation, record review and interviews during the course of investigation, this allegation is unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiated Regarding to allegation of- residents are locked out the front door, the Reporting Party stated that Resident #1 (R1) and some of other residents are being locked out after leaving the facility from the front door and it is difficult for them to re-enter the facility from the main entrance especially with the residents who require medical device for ambulation as the main entrance is around the block. According to R1, R1 does not use the front door. R1 uses the elevator and the facility's main entrance to exit and to enter the facility. According to Resident #2 (R2), locking the front door is not a problem as R2 uses the main entrance to come back to the facility. According to the Director of the Behavioral Health Service Center, the front door was unlocked up until a few weeks ago as there were too many people congregating by the door and homeless people come in at night so the facility decided to lock the gate as people are leaving to ensure the safety of the residents and staff. In addition, the Director of Behavioral Health Service Center stated that the residents who ambulate with a medical device is being re-directed by the staff who monitors the exit door to take the elevator down to the 1st floor and then exit through the main entrance because it would be unsafe for them to exit from the front door as there are many stairs leading to the door. Base on observation and interviews during the course of investigation, this allegation is unsubstantiated. . Although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. During the course of the investigation, LPA Han observed some documents did not reflect the current status of a resident. This deficiency will be cited on LIC809D. This report is reviewed and discussed the Administrator . A copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 21, 2021 · control 14-AS-20210930110757
Oct 21, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On 10/21/2021, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced inspection and met with the Administrator, Adela Morales. LPA explained the purpose of the visit and delivered this finding. During the course of the investigation of Complaint Control Number 14-AS-20210930110757, LPA Han observed Resident #1 (R1)'s Appraisal/Needs and Service Plan does not indicate R1's recent accident and hospitalization. The facility acknowledged that R1's Appraisal/Needs and Service Plan was not updated after the recent change of condition. Based on records review, and interviews, the preponderance of evidence has been met. Deficiency was cited today under the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6. Please see LIC 809-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. This report was discussed with administrator. A copy of this report and licensee’s Appeal Rights forms given to administrator. Appeals must be directed to Licensing Regional Manager.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 21, 2021
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87506(a) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 4, 2021
RESIDENT RECORDS (a) The licensee shall ensure that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for each resident in the facility or in a central administrative location readily available to facility staff and to licensing agency staff. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on records review and interview, the Administrator did not ensure Resident 1's (R1) appraisal and service plan reflect the current health status and needs as it does not reflect R1's recent change of condition which poses an potential Health and Safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 21, 2021
Plan of correction: The Administrator or the designee to update R1's Appraisal/Needs and Service Plan and submit a copy to the Regional Office. The Administrator or the designee will review the regulation, in-service staff and submit a copy of the lesson plan and the sign-in sheet to Licensing by 11/4/2021.
Sep 29, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 9/29/2021, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Murial Han and LPA Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced annual inspection. LPAs observed COVID-19 signs posted by the entrance. LPAs were greeted by the Director of Behavioral Health Center, Linda SIms and the Administrator, Adela Morales joined shortly thereafter. LPA Han and LPA Charitra explained the purpose of the visit and LPAs were screened at the front entrance. LPA toured facility and grounds. No accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. Infection control practices are reviewed: entry procedures, staff training and policies, resident and staff daily monitoring records, containment strategies (facility has designated 2 private rooms, 1 semi-private room, 1 shower room and 2 bathrooms for the quarantine and isolation purposes when needed), PPE supply and the environmental cleaning supply are adequate (the Director of Behavioral Health Center reviews the PPE inventory on a daily basis and replenishes the supplies when needed), bathrooms are equipped with soap and paper towels, however, there are no hand-washing signs posted; some signs are posted through-out the facility such as social distancing in different languages, cough etiquette, etc; trash cans are observed to have foot operated lids. Medications, toxins and sharps are stored appropriately and inaccessible to resident, and a comfortable temperature is maintained, lighting is sufficient for comfort. There were signs/stickers on the floor in the elevators and thought-out the facility to remind everyone to maintain social distancing. Residents were observed to be maintaining social distancing during mealtime and in the TV room. LPA Han requested for the following documents to be submitted by 10/4/2021 by noon: - Proof Administrator Certification was submitted, - LIC 500 - LIC 402 - LIC 308 - Review LIC 555 LPAs discussed the following recommendations during the inspection: - Post additional COVID-19 signs in the hallways, the common areas/dinning rooms, the staff lounge, the bathrooms, and the shower rooms. - Post hand-washing signs above each sink. - Remove 2 chairs from the table in the staff lounge and mark off one of the seats on the double seated couch to ensure social distancing is maintained. No deficiency cited today. This report is reviewed and discussed with the Administrator and the Director of Behavioral Center and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 29, 2021
Sep 9, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff touched resident in a sexual manner. Staff verbally abused resident.
On 9/9/2021, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han and LPA Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced 10-day initial complaint inspection regarding the above allegations. LPA Han and LPA Charitra met with the Administrator, Adela Morales and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding to the allegations of staff touched resident in a sexual manner and staff verbally abused resident, these were reported to the Department in the past in reference to Complaint # 14-AS-20210310114055. At that time, the Department has addressed and completed the investigation and determined the allegations to be unfounded. Therefore, after review, this allegation is also unfounded. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without reasonable basis. This report is reviewed and discussed with the Administrator. A copy is provided. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 9, 2021 · control 14-AS-20210831111654
The state marks this report as 2 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Aug 25, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff engaging in inappropriate interactions in the presence of resident's. Staff made an inappropriate comment towards resident.
On 8/25/21, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mohamed Filouane conducted a follow-up visit regarding this complaint investigation. LPA Filouane met and spoke Administrator Adela Morales, explained the purpose of the visit, and then delivered the findings. Concerning the allegation of staff engaging in inappropriate interactions in the presence of residents, LPA Filouane interviewed the Administrator, the Director of Behavioral Health Center, Linda Sims, and facility staff members. The Administrator stated the resident in question believes that staff member interacts inappropriately when they sit close to each other or when staff are sitting in an alleged wrong manner at their desks. There is no additional evidence to support the inappropriate interactions allegation in the presence of residents. Concerning the allegation of staff making inappropriate comments to a resident, LPA Filouane interviewed the Administrator, the Director of Behavioral Health Center, Linda Sims, and facility staff members. Unfounded Information gathered reveals that one staff member (S1) allegedly told a resident that other staff members informed S1 that the resident is making up stories and reporting things that are not true. S1 denies this allegation. There were no witnesses present to support the allegation. Under Title 22 regulations, there was no inappropriate comment made towards the resident in question. This agency has investigated the complaint. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted with the Administrator. A copy of this signed report will be emailed to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 25, 2021 · control 14-AS-20210603123136
Aug 25, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Facility staff threatened resident. Facility staff spoke inappropriately to resident. Facility staff retaliated against resident for filing a complaint.
On 8/25/21, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mohamed Filouane conducted a follow-up visit regarding this complaint investigation. LPA Filouane met and spoke Administrator Adela Morales, explained the purpose of the visit, and then delivered the findings. Concerning the allegation of staff threatening the resident in question, LPA Filouane interviewed the Administrator and facility staff members. The Administrator stated staff do not threaten the residents. There was no additional evidence submitted to the Communtiy Care Licensing Division (CLLD). The investigation revealed no witnesses were present during any of the times it was alleged that facility staff spoke inappropiately to the resident in question. After review, this allegation is unfounded. Concerning the allegation of facility staff speaking inappropriately to a resident, LPA Filouane interviewed the Administrator and facility staff. Unfounded There was no additional evidence submitted to CCLD. The investigation revealed no witnesses were present during any of the time(s) it was alleged that facility staff spoke inappropriately to the resident in question. After review, this allegation is unfounded. Concerning the allegation of facility staff retaliating against the resident in question for filing a complaint, LPA Filouane interviewed the Administrator and facility staff. The incident reported to LPA Han and verified with the Administrator revolved around the resident in question and a staff member raising their voices at each other. According to Title 22 regulations, that alone is not a violation. After review, this allegation is unfounded. This agency has investigated the complaint. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted with the Administrator. A copy of this signed report will be emailed to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 25, 2021 · control 14-AS-20210630093333
45 of 59 beds were occupied at the September 1, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
San Francisco Department of Public Health, licensed since 2014.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2014, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 11
- Total complaints
- 4
- Substantiated allegations
- 1
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 1
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2014, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 1 | 1 |
| Substantiated allegations | 1 | 2 |
| Total complaints | 4 | 6 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about San Francisco RCFE
Is San Francisco RCFE licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is San Francisco RCFE licensed for?
59 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has San Francisco RCFE been cited?
0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2014, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 11 state visits over the same years.
Is San Francisco RCFE still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does San Francisco RCFE cost?
$5,050 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,900–$6,400. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 communities with 50 or more beds within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 12 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Francisco that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $5,679 to $8,305 a month, and the middle figure is $7,148 (n = 12 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does San Francisco RCFE take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by San Francisco Department of Public Health, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center is 0.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can San Francisco RCFE keep a resident on hospice?
Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”
San Francisco RCFE license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “SAN FRANCISCO RCFE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #385600399. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 59 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to San Francisco Department of Public Health, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2014, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 11 state inspection visits since 2014, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2014, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 11 state visits in that period.
- 4 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2014, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is September 1, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in San Francisco County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$4,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$4,500 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,300 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,400–$5,700On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,550 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,600–$6,000- Assisted living: Licensed by California as a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly — the assisted-living license category.
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,900 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,850–$6,450On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,750 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,750–$6,200On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore San Francisco County