San Francisco Rcfe is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Francisco, San Francisco County, California — state license #385600399, licensed for 59 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 10 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated September 23, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

6 homes in view

San Francisco Rcfe

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 59 residents · San Francisco, CA · San Francisco County
LicensedWheelchairMemory care not on fileHospice not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #385600399, held since 2014 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
887 Potrero Avenue · San Francisco, San Francisco County
Phone
(628) 206-6402
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 59 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. ALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 13 times and filed 10 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated September 23, 2025.

Most recent state visit
June 9, 2026
Occupancy at the October 25, 2023 visit
45 of 59 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 6 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 25, 2021 to October 25, 2023. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 6 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 3 of 10 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20251 state visit · 1 document
Sep 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20241 state visit · 1 document
Sep 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 25, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not provide computer to resident

On October 25, 2023 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the investigation findings. LPA met with Interim Administrator, Charisse Ann Li and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding to allegation of - facility did not provide computer to resident. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed resident - in - question (R1) and interim administrator. According to R1, there is no computer access for residents at the facility which made it impossible for R1 and other residents to search the internet and other activities. The interim administrator acknowledged that there is no electronic device for residents and it is vital for residents to have access to an electronic device. Therefore, the facility will be working on obtaining it for the residents. Based on interviews and observations during the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, this allegations were determined to be substantiated.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 25, 2023 · control 14-AS-20230817121522
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations1typical 1
Substantiated complaints1typical 2
Total complaints6typical 7
State visits on file13typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2014.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2025110202411020232212021460
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — San Francisco County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
If end-of-life care were ever needed, could they stay here? What’s the plan?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (628) 206-6402

Is San Francisco Rcfe licensed?

Yes — San Francisco Rcfe is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Francisco (San Francisco County): California license #385600399, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 59 residents. State records list 10 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated September 23, 2025, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can San Francisco Rcfe care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists San Francisco Rcfe with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory; it does not list dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. ALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY.

How much does San Francisco Rcfe cost?

California's public licensing record does not include San Francisco Rcfe's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Francisco County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does San Francisco Rcfe accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

San Francisco Rcfe is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

45 of 59 beds occupied (76%) when the state visited on October 25, 2023. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for San Francisco Rcfe?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 13 state visits and 10 dated documents since 2021 for San Francisco Rcfe; 6 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 25, 2023, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

6 transcribed reports on file

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not provide computer to resident
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On October 25, 2023 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the investigation findings. LPA met with Interim Administrator, Charisse Ann Li and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding to allegation of - facility did not provide computer to resident. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed resident - in - question (R1) and interim administrator. According to R1, there is no computer access for residents at the facility which made it impossible for R1 and other residents to search the internet and other activities. The interim administrator acknowledged that there is no electronic device for residents and it is vital for residents to have access to an electronic device. Therefore, the facility will be working on obtaining it for the residents. Based on interviews and observations during the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, this allegations were determined to be substantiated.CDSS inspection report, October 25, 2023 · control 14-AS-20230817121522
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is retaining residents with higher level of care needs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On July 21, 2023, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Grace Donato and Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint visit. LPAs met with Team Leader, Darren Page, and Program Director, Adela Morales joined shortly thereafter. LPAs explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that facility is retaining residents with higher level of care, according to the reporting party, the facility is retaining clients who require a higher-level of care and staff are not equipped to provide care for them. According to the reporting party, Resident 1 (R1) has breathing issues and needs oxygen, however facility can’t take anyone with oxygen, Resident 2 (R2) is obsessed with smoking and will wake residents up at night to ask for cigarettes, and Resident 3 (R3) has bad dementia and needs to be in a memory care facility. During the investigation, LPAs reviewed resident files and interviewed the Program Director and Team Leader. Based on interviews conducted with the Program DirecCDSS inspection report, July 21, 2023 · control 14-AS-20230711084418

2021

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident needs a higher level of care Residents are locked out the front door
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/21/2021, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannouced visit to deliver the investigtion findings. LPA Han met with the Administrator, Adela Morales and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA was properly screened by the receptionist at the main entrance. Regarding to allegation of- resident needs a higher level of care- LPA Han observed residents in question and all of them are independent with their Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and ambulation with the exception of one resident who requires some assistance with performing some of the ADLs due to a recent change of condition. According to the Physician's Reports, all of them are able to leave the facility unassisted and they have the capacity for self-care. Furthermore, according to staff, all the residents in question are independent with their ADLs but some of them need a little reminder and encouragement and others need more such as Resident #3 (R3) who needs a lot of convincing and encouragement toCDSS inspection report, October 21, 2021 · control 14-AS-20210930110757
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff touched resident in a sexual manner. Staff verbally abused resident.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 9/9/2021, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han and LPA Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced 10-day initial complaint inspection regarding the above allegations. LPA Han and LPA Charitra met with the Administrator, Adela Morales and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding to the allegations of staff touched resident in a sexual manner and staff verbally abused resident, these were reported to the Department in the past in reference to Complaint # 14-AS-20210310114055. At that time, the Department has addressed and completed the investigation and determined the allegations to be unfounded. Therefore, after review, this allegation is also unfounded. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without reasonable basis. This report is reviewed and discussed with the Administrator. A copy is provided. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, September 9, 2021 · control 14-AS-20210831111654
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff engaging in inappropriate interactions in the presence of resident's. Staff made an inappropriate comment towards resident.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 8/25/21, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mohamed Filouane conducted a follow-up visit regarding this complaint investigation. LPA Filouane met and spoke Administrator Adela Morales, explained the purpose of the visit, and then delivered the findings. Concerning the allegation of staff engaging in inappropriate interactions in the presence of residents, LPA Filouane interviewed the Administrator, the Director of Behavioral Health Center, Linda Sims, and facility staff members. The Administrator stated the resident in question believes that staff member interacts inappropriately when they sit close to each other or when staff are sitting in an alleged wrong manner at their desks. There is no additional evidence to support the inappropriate interactions allegation in the presence of residents. Concerning the allegation of staff making inappropriate comments to a resident, LPA Filouane interviewed the Administrator, the Director of Behavioral Health Center, Linda Sims, and facility stafCDSS inspection report, August 25, 2021 · control 14-AS-20210603123136
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff threatened resident. Facility staff spoke inappropriately to resident. Facility staff retaliated against resident for filing a complaint.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 8/25/21, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mohamed Filouane conducted a follow-up visit regarding this complaint investigation. LPA Filouane met and spoke Administrator Adela Morales, explained the purpose of the visit, and then delivered the findings. Concerning the allegation of staff threatening the resident in question, LPA Filouane interviewed the Administrator and facility staff members. The Administrator stated staff do not threaten the residents. There was no additional evidence submitted to the Communtiy Care Licensing Division (CLLD). The investigation revealed no witnesses were present during any of the times it was alleged that facility staff spoke inappropiately to the resident in question. After review, this allegation is unfounded. Concerning the allegation of facility staff speaking inappropriately to a resident, LPA Filouane interviewed the Administrator and facility staff. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, August 25, 2021 · control 14-AS-20210630093333

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 13 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
6
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
13
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(628) 206-6402
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run San Francisco Rcfe? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.