Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Rj Starlight Home

Mid-size home·Licensed for 12·San Francisco, California

Licensed since 2006Licence #385600340
  • Care approvals on fileNone on fileWheelchair, dementia, hospice, bedridden — ask the home
  • Estimated starting rate$4,500 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,550–$5,950
  • Home sizeLicensed for 12Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit10 of 12 beds occupiedJanuary 22, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitFebruary 25, 2026CDSS inspection record

Rj Starlight Home is a mid-size care home in San Francisco — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 12 residents since 2006. Hospice, dementia, wheelchair and bedridden approvals are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Rj Starlight Home

Is Rj Starlight Home licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Rj Starlight Home licensed for?

12 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Rj Starlight Home been cited?

1 Type A and 0 Type B citation since 2006, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.

Is Rj Starlight Home still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Rj Starlight Home cost?

$4,500 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,550–$5,950. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 12 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Francisco that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,215 to $5,500 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 12 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Rj Starlight Home take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Rj Starlight Home Corporation, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center is 0.4 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Rj Starlight Home keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”

Rj Starlight Home license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “RJ STARLIGHT HOME CORPORATION”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #385600340. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 12 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Rj Starlight Home Corporation, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2006, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 8 state inspection visits since 2006, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 0 Type B citation on file since 2006, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2006, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is February 25, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file · ask the home
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careNot on file · ask the home
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 YEARS AND OLDER. ALL (12) RESIDENTS MUST BE AMBULATORY. ACCEPTS MENTAL HEALTH RESIDENTS.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

5 questions to ask the home — nothing on file yet
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver not on file

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,500a month to start

Likely $3,550–$5,950

From 10 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,500a month

Likely $3,550–$6,100

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,500likely $3,550–$5,950

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,550–$6,100
$4,500
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,250–$9,050
$6,500
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

10 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,000–$5,500.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 10 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 2680 Bryant Street, San Francisco, CA 94110Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2023, the state has filed 6 documents for this home, and its records count 8 visits since 2006. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated February 25, 2026.

On file since
2023
State visits
8
Most recent visit
February 25, 2026
Occupied · January 22, 2025 visit
10 of 12 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated April 24, 2024 to January 22, 2025. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (1). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 1

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 327 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2006.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026110202522020242212023110

The last 36 months — 5 of 6 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Feb 25, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On February 25, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Yi Sam Jian arrived at the facility at to conduct an unannounced Annual 1-year required inspection. LPA met with Lorna Gonzales, Caregiver. The Administrator, Teresita Jomok joined later during the visit. Administrator gave permission to caregiver to sign the report. LPA toured the physical plant. This is a story building that consists of 6 rooms and 3 bathrooms. Bathrooms were observed to have the required grab bars. Fire extinguishers in the facility were observed to be fully charged. No food was expired. All bedrooms were sufficiently lit and had the required furniture. The backyard was clear from obstructions. No accessible bodies of water or hazards were observed. The facility's first aid was observed to be complete. The facility does not handle any cash resources. The facility was maintained at a comfortable temperature. All knives and sharp objects were observed to be locked and in-accessible to persons in care. All medications, soaps, and detergents were observed to be locked and in-accessible to persons in care. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. Facility staff turned down the temperature of the water down in the presence of the LPA. Technical Advisory Note provided for incomplete records of quarterly emergency drills. The report was reviewed with administrator and a copy was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2026

The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20252 state visits · 2 documents
Feb 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On February 27, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Yi Sam Jian arrived at the facility at to conduct an unannounced Annual 1-year required inspection. LPA met with Lorna Gonzales, Caregiver. The Administrator, Teresita Jomok joined later during the visit. LPA toured the physical plant. This is a story building that consists of 6 rooms and 3 bathrooms. Facility staff turned down the temperature of the water down in the presence of the LPA and inspected to be in compliant. Bathrooms were observed to have the required grab bars. Fire extinguishers in the facility were observed to be fully charged. No food was expired. The kitchen refrigerators and freezers temperature was within the required range. All bedrooms were sufficiently lit and had the required furniture. The backyard was clear from obstructions. No accessible bodies of water or hazards were observed. The facility's first aid was observed to be complete. The facility does not handle any cash resources. The facility was maintained at a comfortable temperature of 71 degrees Fahrenheit. All knives and sharp objects were observed to be locked and in-accessible to persons in care. All medications, soaps, and detergents were observed to be locked and in-accessible to persons in care. A review of Centrally stored medications indicated that medications for residents were properly labeled with instructions on dosage and times of day and matched the Centrally Stored Medication records kept at the facility. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. Technical Advisory Notes provided. The report was reviewed with administrator and a copy was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2025

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Jan 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Illegal eviction

On 1/22/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and was greeted by Amelia Arcinas, Lead Staff. LPA toured the facility, interviewed residents, staff and outside parties, reviewed resident records, and made observations during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges an illegal eviction towards resident (R1). Upon interviews with staff (S1 & S2), residents (R2 & R3) it was indicated that R1 had left the facility voluntarily and further stated that R1 was highly verbally aggressive towards staff and other residents. S1 further explained that the facility did not evict R1 but was R1’s decision to leave the facility with no further contact. The facility followed with appropriate reporting requirements from the incident. Reviewing R1’s medical assessment indicated that R1 can leave the facility unassisted. Additional interview with San Francisco Department of Public Health Social Worker, (I2) confirmed that R1 had left the facility voluntarily with no notice or contact to either the facility or I2. I2 is responsible for R1’s placement and indicated that R1 had left San Francisco area for approximately 1 month and returned around 10/25/2024. I2 stated that during the time frame that R1 was unable to be located; R1’s placement at the facility was ended by I2 after a two week hold on R1’s placement in case R1 returned. Upon R1’s return and contact with I2; R1 was admitted into a temporary shelter located in San Francisco. I2 stated that they were in the process of completing a medical assessment for R1, required for DPH clearance when transferring into another long term care facility. I2 further stated that R1 was not cooperative with completing the medical assessment, delaying R1 in being properly placed in a new facility. Continued onto LIC909-C Unfounded The agency has investigated the allegation and we have found that the complaint was UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted. This report was reviewed with the Director and a copy of the report left at the facility. No deficiency cited.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 22, 2025 · control 14-AS-20241025153119
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Apr 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility has pests.

On April 24, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced visit to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA met with caregiver and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding to allegation of- facility has pests, the reporting party stated that he/she witnessed resident scratching themselves and reporting party also reported that facility has bedbugs. As part of the investigation, LPA interview resident in question(R1), staff and administrator. The administrator acknowledged that the facility has bedbugs and it has been a chronic problem. In addition, the administrator stated that they have been getting monthly pest control services from Terminix to treat the bedbugs. LPA interviewed staff #1 (S1) who acknowledged that there is bedbugs in some of the resident's room and they clean the rooms everyday but the bedbugs remain. In addition, S1 stated that Terminix comes to the facility frequently to treat the bedbugs. Substantiated LPA interviewed R1 who stated that there is bedbugs on his/her mattress and he/she gets bit all the time at night. Based on documents provided by the facility, LPA observed Terminix services were provided on a regular basis. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be substantiated. Although the facility has regular Terminix services to treat the bedbugs and daily cleaning by staff, residents are still being affected. Based on interviews and record reviews during the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, this allegation is determined to be substantiated. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC9099-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report was discussed with caregiver and Administrator who was on the phone. A copy of this report and the Appeal Rights provided. According to staff #1(S1) who was at the facility during the incident. When R1 reported being hit by R2, S1 called the administrator immediately and reported the incident. S1 stated that they are monitoring both residents more frequently but it could be a challenge as both residents are ambulatory, and they come and go as they please. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated as R1 was hit by R2 on January 11, 2024. However, there is no indication of staff neglect as residents are ambulatory, physician's orders stated that they could leave the facility unassisted and they come and go multiple times on a daily basis. Regarding to the allegation of - staff are not ensuring that a resident is able to sleep at night, the reporting party stated that R1 is unable to sleep as R2 returns to the facility sometimes late at night after roaming around the city. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed the administrator and R1. According to the administrator, both residents are ambulatory and they can leave the facility unassisted. R2 leaves the facility everyday and R2 goes in and out of the facility frequently to smoke so R2 may be disturbing R1's sleep. The administrator has offered both of them room transfers but they declined. The administrator discussed room transfer with R1's responsible party who also declined. The administrator offered R1 to move to another facility and it was also declined and currently, the administrator is working with Public Health SW on seeking a different facility for R2. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated as the facility offered different interventions to ensure R1 gets sleep at night, however, all of them were declined by R1 and R1's responsible party. The administrator is working with Public Health SW to seek for another facility for R2. Although the above investigations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. This report is reviewed and discussed with caregiver and administrator on the phone. A copy is provided. Regarding to the allegation of - facility is illegally evicting a resident from the facility, the reporting party stated that the facility is trying to evict R2 as R2 assaulted R1 on January 11, 2024. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed the administrator who stated that the facility was advised by SF Department of Public Health Social Worker to issue an 3-day eviction notification to R2 and the administrator generated the letter and faxed it to CCL for approval. However, the letter was never given to R2 as the administrator did not get an approval from CCL. In addition, the administrator stated that they are working with SF Public Health to discharge R2. During the 10-day visit, LPA attempted to interviewed R2 but R2 did not want to be interviewed. Based on documents provided by the administrator, the facility faxed the eviction notification CCL for approval and the notification was not presented to R2 because an approval was not obtained from CCL. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unfounded because the facility requested an approval from CCL prior to delivering a 3-day eviction notification for R2 and it was not given to R2 as it was not approved by CCL. Based on interviews, the department has determined that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis, therefore the allegations are UNFOUNDED. This report is reviewed and discussed with caregiver and administrator over the phone. . A copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240214183731

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 25, 2024

87303 Maintenance and Operation..(a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review and interview, facility has bedbugs which poses an immediate health and safety risks to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2024

Plan of correction: The administrator/licensee shall develop a plan to ensure the facility is cleaned, safe and sanitary to all residents. The plan shall have a different intervention as the current plan is not working. The administrator will submit a copy of the plan to CCL by 4/25/2024.

Feb 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On February 13, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra arrived at the facility at 9:14 AM to conduct an unannounced Annual 1-year required inspection. LPA Calandra met with Amelia Arcinas, Caregiver. The Administrator, Teresita Jomok was unable to join the visit. LPA Calandra toured the physical plant. This is a story building that consists of 6 rooms and 3 bathrooms. Water in all bathrooms was measured above the 125 degrees Fahrenheit. Facility staff turned down the temperature of the water down in the presence of the LPA. Bathrooms were observed to have the required grab bars and anti-skid mats. Fire extinguishers in the facility were observed to be fully charged and last checked on April 12, 2023. The facility had the required 7 days of non-perishables and 2 days of perishables on site. No food was expired. The kitchen refrigerators and freezers temperature was within the required range. All bedrooms were sufficiently lit and had the required furniture. The backyard was clear from obstructions. No accessible bodies of water or hazards were observed. The facility's first aid was observed to be complete. The facility does not handle any cash resources. The facility was maintained at a comfortable temperature of 70 degrees Fahrenheit. All knives and sharp objects were observed to be locked and in-accessible to persons in care. All medications, soaps, and detergents were observed to be locked and in-accessible to persons in care. A review of Centrally stored medications indicated that medications for residents were properly labeled with instructions on dosage and times of day and matched the Centrally Stored Medication records kept at the facility. LPA Calandra reviewed 5 resident and 3 staff files. All were observed to be complete. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. The report was reviewed with Caregiver, Amelia Arcinas and a copy was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 13, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  4. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Francisco County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Francisco County