Large community · Licensed for 124 · San Francisco
Victorian Manor
1444 Mcallister Street, San Francisco, CA 94115Licensed since 2006
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Languages spoken: CantoneseThe home’s website · October 31, 2022
- Licensed for 124: a large care communityThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 124 residents
- Hospice
- Bedridden
Not on file: dementia approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. ALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. ALL ROOMS CLEARED FOR BEDRIDDEN STATUS.
985 - RCFE / HOSPICE
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
Care services
These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.
Assisted living
Reported on victorianmanorsf.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Help with bathing or showering
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Assistance with transfers
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Diabetic / carbohydrate-controlled diet
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Incontinence care
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Renal diet
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Low-sodium or cardiac diet available
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Respite / short-term stays
Reported on victorianmanorsf.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Help with dressing and grooming
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Building is wheelchair accessible
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Medication management
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Diabetes care
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Works with hospice
Reported on victorianmanorsf.com · source dated October 31, 2022.
24-hour supervision claimed
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Emergency call system
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
As needs change
Medicines
Level of medication service: reminders only
Caring.com · September 9, 2026
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Victorian Manor: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
This home’s starting rate
$6,000a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
Monthly cost breakdownWith a studio and basic help · room, care and fees$6,000likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$6,000this home
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $6,000–$6,600
- $6,000
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $6,000–$10,150
- $8,500
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes9 nearby homes publish starting rates of $4,525 to $9,600
9 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $5,600–$8,900.
- Rhoda Goldman PlazaSan Francisco · 0.5 mi · Large community$7,200Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The Sequoias San FranciscoSan Francisco · 0.7 mi · Large community$5,357Listed on its own website · garden courts studio starting fee · seen October 27, 2026
- Kokoro Assisted LivingSan Francisco · 0.8 mi · Large community$6,559Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Sagebrook Senior Living at San FranciscoSan Francisco · 0.8 mi · Large community$7,095Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The Carlisle-Ivy Signature LivingSan Francisco · 0.8 mi · Large community$8,695Listed on its own website · studio apartments · seen October 27, 2026
- Ivy Park at Cathedral HillSan Francisco · 0.8 mi · Large community$7,895Listed on its own website · studio apartments · seen October 27, 2026
- Coterie Cathedral HillSan Francisco · 0.9 mi · Large community$9,600Listed on its own website · coterie cathedral hill · seen October 5, 2026
- Heritage on the MarinaSan Francisco · 1.7 mi · Large community$4,525Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- The Ivy at Golden GateSan Francisco · 2.7 mi · Large community$8,595Listed on its own website · studio apartments · seen October 27, 2026
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.
Rooms & the spaces they will use (17)Private rooms · Outdoor space · Shared / companion rooms
Private rooms
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Outdoor spaceOutdoor common space · Patio · Garden · Walking paths
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Shared / companion rooms
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Common areasBistro · Grill · Dining room · Fitness room · Business room · Library · and 6 more
Bistro · Grill · Dining room · Fitness room · Business room · Library · Arts room · Activity room · Movie theater · Game room · Spa / sauna / wellness room — reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Indoor Common Areas — reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Private bathroom
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
LaundryDone by staff
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Room typesStudio
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Visitor parking
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Rooms come furnished
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
AmenitiesPiano · Fireplace · Concierge · Move-in coordination · Piano or Organ · Library
Piano · Fireplace · Concierge · Move-in coordination — reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Piano or Organ — reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Library — reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Wifi in resident rooms
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Housekeeping
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Air conditioning in the room
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Salon or barber
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Cable or satellite TV
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Kitchenette in the unit
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Telephone in the room
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Meals, preferences & familiar food (11)Dining style · Special diets supported · Meals are cooked in the home's own kitchen
Dining styleRestaurant style
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Special diets supportedLow / No Sodium · No Sugar · Low fat
Low / No Sodium — reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
No Sugar — reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Low fat — reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Meals are cooked in the home's own kitchen
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Vegetarian or vegan optionsVegetarian
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
All-day or flexible dining
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Cultural cuisine regularly servedChinese
Reported on victorianmanorsf.com · source dated October 31, 2022.
Meals served in the room
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Food allergy management
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Meals provided
Reported on victorianmanorsf.com · source dated October 31, 2022.
Professional chef
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Dining atmosphereDeliciously prepared meals
Reported on victorianmanorsf.com · source dated October 31, 2022.
Activities & the rhythm of a day (8)The shape of an ordinary day, as the home describes it · Activity types offered · Exercise or fitness program
The shape of an ordinary day, as the home describes itWe offer chair yoga
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Activity types offeredCompanionship · Discussion group · Arts and crafts · Activities that help residents develop close connections and friendships · Arts & crafts · Volunteer program · and 23 more
Companionship · Discussion group · Arts and crafts · Arts & crafts — reported on victorianmanorsf.com · source dated October 31, 2022.
Activities that help residents develop close connections and friendships — reported on victorianmanorsf.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Volunteer program · Music programs · Scheduled daily activities · Movie nights · Outdoor programs · Bible study group · Happy hour · Cooking classes · Live dance or theater performances · Holiday parties · Dances · Art classes · Trivia games · Live well programs · Has birthday parties · Has wii bowling · Has garden club — reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Community Service Programs · Birthday Parties · Activities On-site · Pet-focused Programs · Educational Speakers / Life Long Learning · Gardening Club · Live Musical Performances — reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Exercise or fitness programTai chi · Yoga/stretching
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Trips outside the home
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Resident-run activities
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Religious services at the home
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Religious services off site
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Intergenerational programs
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Faith, culture & language (2)Religious observance supported · Languages spoken by caregivers
Religious observance supportedOther religious services
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Languages spoken by caregiversCantonese · English · Spanish · Chinese · Korean · Mandarin · and 6 more
Cantonese — reported on victorianmanorsf.com · source dated October 31, 2022.
English · Spanish · Chinese · Korean · Mandarin · Tagalog · Portuguese · Vietnamese · Japanese · Filipino — reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Italian — reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Pets, routines & independence (2)Residents may bring a pet · Pet types allowed
Residents may bring a pet
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Pet types allowedDogs · Cats
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Visiting & staying involved (6)Support services for families · Transportation costs extra · Contact form
Support services for families
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Transportation costs extraReported no
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
- Open on the website
Contact form
Reported on victorianmanorsf.com · source dated March 3, 2020.
SettingUrban
Reported on victorianmanorsf.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Transport for group outings
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Transportation
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
About the home (3)Management company · For-profit or nonprofit · Family-owned claim
Management companyVictorian Manor
Reported on victorianmanorsf.com · seen October 5, 2026.
For-profit or nonprofitFor profit
Reported on victorianmanorsf.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Family-owned claim
Reported on victorianmanorsf.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Where it is
1444 Mcallister Street, San Francisco, CA 94115Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- UCSF Medical Center at Mount ZionHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list0.5 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #385600360 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 7 of 16 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Unsubstantiated” and 1 “Unfounded”.
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jun 17, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff removed personal property from resident's room without authorization.
On 6/17/2026 LPA Grace Donato conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint inspection. LPA Donato met with Administrator, Ana Pacheco and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation of Staff removed personal property from resident's (R1) room without authorization. R1 had a refrigerator brought in by a friend. Per facility protocol, items like refrigerators or microwave oven are not allowed in the residents rooms. R1 was advised by staff (S1) that the refrigerator will be removed and stored somewhere in the facility. LPA observed that other residents in the facility don't have these items on their rooms. Based on interviews and observations, the department has determined that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report is reviewed and copy is provided. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2026 · control 14-AS-20260615132947
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
On 12/16/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian conducted an unannounced annual Case Management - Incident visit and was greeted by Administrator, Ana Pacheco. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. On 12/05/25, the administrator submitted an incident report to Community Care Licensing (CCL) regarding an allegation that a staff member sexually assaulted a resident. The administrator reported that the staff involved in the allegation was removed from the work schedule pending further investigation. During the visit, LPA reviewed and collected facility records and conducted interviews with staff members and resident. No citations were issued during the visit. The report was reviewed with the administrator, and a copy was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2025
Nov 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 11/18/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian conducted an unannounced annual inspection and was greeted by staff, Anielka Rodriguez. Administrator, Ana Pacheco was contacted and arrived later in the visit. LPA toured facility with administrator. This is a four story building. The first floor contains the kitchen and common area; the second and third floors house the residents’ living quarters, including an open-air courtyard on the second floor. The rooftop on the fourth floor is not accessible to residents, and the basement serves as the car garage. All outdoor and indoor passageway were free and clear of obstruction. No accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. Medications, toxins and sharps stored appropriately and inaccessible to clients, a comfortable temperature was maintained, hot water temperature inspected to be compliant, furnishing and lighting was sufficient for comfort and safety. Fire extinguisher checked and fully charged. Facility is equipped with smoke and carbon monoxide detectors and fire safety systems monitored and serviced by outside agencies. Facility has at least one completed first aid kit. There was a sufficient supply of both perishable and nonperishable foods as required, with food stored in the kitchen, sufficient for residents in care. Food supply is replenished weekly and stored in proper conditions. Facility provides a wide variety of meal preferences and preparation while also ensuring proper dietary restrictions are followed. Deficiencies are cited under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, cited on the LIC 809D. A technical violation was noted due to a missing signature on the client's needs and service plan, as the facility is still in the process of obtaining signatures from the responsible party. The report was reviewed and discussed with Administrator. A copy of the report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 18, 2025
The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 12/11/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dominic Tobola conducted an unannounced annual inspection and was greeted by Licensee, Bernadette Joseph. Administrator, Ana Pacheco was contacted and arrived later in the visit. Facility provides care for 94 residents, none of which receiving hospice services and some of which with a diagnosis of dementia. LPA continued with a tour of the facility with staff, facility found to be clean and at a comfortable temperature with all exits free from obstruction. Resident’s bedrooms, common areas, kitchen & food storage areas were inspected. Fire Extinguishers located on each resident floor, kitchen and common spaces were found to be charged. Facility is equipped with smoke and carbon monoxide detectors and fire safety systems monitored and serviced by outside agencies. LPA tested multiple carbon monoxide detectors all of which were found to be in working order. There was a sufficient supply of both perishable and nonperishable foods as required, with food stored in the kitchen, sufficient for residents in care. Food supply is replenished weekly and stored in proper conditions. Facility provides a wide variety of meal preferences and preparation while also ensuring proper dietary restrictions are followed. Cleaning supplies and other toxins are safely stored in locked closets throughout each floor, all of which were secured upon inspection. There was a supply of hygiene products and paper products available for residents. All resident’s bedrooms have lighting & appropriate furnishings and bedding items. Residents that were out in the community during the inspection were observed interacting with staff and fellow residents in the common areas, participating in activities and exercise. LPA observed residents to have a positive relationship with staff and the Administrator. The facility encourages regular family visits with various common areas, private visitation room and a large patio space with shading for resident use. Continued onto LIC809-C LPA conducted a sample file review for residents and found dementia diagnosis residents' (R1 & R2) medical assessments in need of updating. All other resident records were found to be in order. Technical Violation. Upon a spot check of staff files, LPA found that caregiver staff have all annual training completed, however not all staff have 1st aid training completed. In addition, CPR certified staff were not present until the following afternoon shift. LPA found that the facility has previously been in contact with outside training agency for 1st aid & CPR but pending confirmed training date. Administrator to provide LPA with confirmed training date and proof of certification once completed. Technical Violations issued. Lastly, A spot check of medications was conducted and found that all medication counts, records and protocols are in order. Ana Pacheco's Administrator Certificate 7001634740 is currently active through 11/13/2025 LPA requested the following documents be sent to CCL by COB 12/31/2024: LIC 308 Designated Facility Responsibility LIC 500 Personnel Summary LIC 610 Emergency Disaster Plan Liability Insurance No deficiencies cited during today's visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 11, 2024
The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Feb 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: - Staff are minsmanagaing resident's medication - Staff refused to provide resident's authorized representative with menus - Staff are not meeting resident's needs
On --/--/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver the findings regarding the allegations received. LPA met with administrator Ana Pacheco and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the course of the investigation LPA conducted interviews, made observations, and reviewed documents related to the complaint. It is discovered that R1 had conditions that caused R1 to be hosptialized frequently. The facility did attempt to meet the needs of R1, but the needs of R1 began to take a toll on staffing and the abilities of the facility to meet the resident's needs, due to the frequent hospitalization. The resident had frequent medication changes due to R1's mental condition that would fluctuate almost daily and dietary modifications due to kidney condition. Continued on next page... Unsubstantiated LIC9099 - Page 2 In regards to medications being mismanaged, LPA reviewed the medication administration record (MAR) for R1 and it does show on the MAR that the resident did receive the questioned medication. Per interview with facility staff, the medication was a 30 day supply and they were using such supply before picking up the refill of the medication. Due to R1 being hospitalized for several days at a time, the medication went unused at the facility, so the facility had the excess supply they were using until needing to be refilled. In regards to facility menus, the facility does have menus posted for residents in the facility. Menus are posted for weekly meals. If a resident does have a prescribed diet, or modified diet, the facility will abide by such recommendations made by a physician. The facility does not have a dietician on staff to assess and provided each resident a personal diet plan. The facility does follow USDA standards and diabetic diets if needed. These allegations are unsubstantiated. Based on these observations, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are unsubstantiated at this time. Report is reviewed administrator. Copy is provided on this day.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 14, 2024 · control 14-AS-20230714142111
20232 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 27, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: - Resident sustained injuries in care - Facility failed to report injuries to responsible party
LPA Jeung interviewed staff and obtained additional information from resident's hospice file and facility visitor logs. Skin discoloration on client's leg was observed by staff on 12/2/23, and also observed by visiting nurse and family member. This was not documented by hospice nurse that day, nor following days. Assessment by facility LVN and administrator could not be done, as no discoloration or bruise was observed when family member reported bruise on 12/4/23. Based on investigation by the Community Care Licensing Division of the CA Department of Social Services, these allegations have been determined to be unfounded. This means that the allegations could not have happened and/or are without a reasonable basis. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 27, 2023 · control 14-AS-20231205160200
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Dec 11, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency page: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
As a follow up to case management visit on 10/2/23, LPA Jeung met with administrator to discuss citations issued on that day, and subsequent communications with regional office staff regarding client #1, referenced on LIC811 of 10/2/23. Ms. Pacheco advised that deficiencies were appealed, and are pending with CCLD. Based on Needs and Services Plan for client #1 dated 2/15/23--observed at facility on 10/2/23 as well as submitted to CCLD--Plan was not signed and acknowledged by client or his/her responsible party. Deficiency of the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, is cited on a following page.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 11, 2023
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87467(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 18, 2023
RESIDENT PARTICIPATION IN DECISIONMAKING ...the licensee shall arrange ... to prepare a written record of the care the resident will receive in the facility....review and revise the written record as specified, when there is a significant change in the resident's condition, or once every 12 months, whichever occurs first. This requirement was not met, based on review of Needs and Services Plan for client #1. Licensee failed to ensure that the written record was acknowledged and signed by resident or his representative, which posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 11, 2023
Plan of correction: Plan of correction to be submitted to CCLD BY DUE DATE, which shall acknowledge that signatures of clients or their responsible parties shall sign appraisals, needs and services and care plans.
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 9 documents
20234 state visits · 6 documents
Oct 2, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency pages: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
In response to Incident Report dated 8/2/23--submitted to CCLD on 8/8/23--regarding client #1, LPA Jeung met with business office manager. Physician's Report dated 6/2021 and Needs and Services Plan dated 2/2023 were submitted to CCLD and reviewed. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, are cited on a following page.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2023
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87705(c)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 9, 2023
CARE OF PERSONS WITH DEMENTIA Licensees who accept and retain residents with dementia shall be responsible for ensuring there is an adequate number of direct care staff to support each resident’s physical, social, emotional, safety and health care needs as identified in his/her current appraisal. This requirement was not met, as staff did not adequately supervise client on 8/3/23 when he eloped from facility. Licensee failed to ensure client's safety, which posed a potential health, safety or personla rights risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2023
Plan of correction: Plan/proof of correction to be submitted to CCLD BY DUE DATE, to ensure that this or similar incident is not repeated.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87705(c)(5)(A) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 9, 2023
CARE OF PERSONS WITH DEMENTIA Each resident with dementia shall have an annual medical assessment... and a reappraisal done at least annually, both of which shall include a reassessment of the resident’s dementia care needs. When any medical assessment, appraisal, or observation indicates that the resident’s dementia care needs have changed, corresponding changes shall be made in the care and supervision... This requirement was not met, as MD report is over 2 years old & appraisal does not adequately address wandering behavior.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2023
Plan of correction: Plan/proof of correction shall be developed and submitted to CCLD BY DUE DATE. This shall include updated MD report and Needs and Services Plan.
Sep 8, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident is being illegally evicted.
On 09/08/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator, Ana Pacheco and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation of resident (R1) being illegally evicted. Reporting party (RP) received a letter of immediate eviction from the facility. LPA confirmed that the facility sent out a letter stating immediate eviction of R1. LPA also interviewed Administrator and and a copy was provided. Based on record reviews, the reassessment of R1 determined that the facility is not able to provide the level of care that R1 needs. While an eviction is warranted, the facility gave an immediate eviction notice, per Title 22, a 30-day notice to R1 is required. Based on interviews and record reviews the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiency is cited under California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC 809D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report was discussed with Administrator. A copy of this report and the Appeal Rights are provided. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 8, 2023 · control 14-AS-20230829093022
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87224(a) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 9, 2023
87224(a) The licensee may evict a resident for one or more of the reasons listed in Section 87224(a)(1) through (5). Thirty (30) days written notice to the resident is required except as otherwise specified in paragraph (5). This requirement was not met as evidenced by : Based on interviews and record reviews the facility gave an immediate eviction notice, per Title 22, a 30-day notice to R1 is required which poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 8, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee shall amend eviction notice that provides 30 days from day letter is sent. Develop a plan and to ensure eviction procedures are followed in section 87224. Licensee to submit POC to Licensing by POC due date
Jul 5, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff handled resident in a rough manner Staff do not ensure that resident is adequately fed Food served to resident is cold
On 7/5/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the findings of complaint # 14-AS-20230616164015. LPA Han met with care coordinator and administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding to allegation of - staff handled resident in a rough manner- there is no additional information forthcoming from the complainant and the co-complainant. However during the initial reporting, the complainant and the co-complainant stated that resident-in-question (R1) experienced aggressive staff who were not gentle during care. As part of the investigation, LPA reviewed resident records, reviewed facility staff training records, interviewed R1, interviewed administrator and facility staff. Unsubstantiated LPA interviewed R1 who described staff roughness and aggression as they failed to listen to R1 when R1 asked them to slow down during care and they did not explain what they were doing resulted R1 feeling unsafe, and uncomfortable. However, R1 reported that improvements were made recently. LPA interviewed administrator who denied the allegation and stated that he/she met with R1 and R1 did not expressed facility staff was rough and/or was abusive. However, R1 reported that staff did not explain what they were doing during care which resulted R1 feeling scared especially due to R1's poor vision. The administrator also stated that he/she met with R1 and developed a plan to remind staff of R1's health condition and to explain what they were doing while providing care to R1. LPA interviewed six facility staff who were assigned to R1 on the AM and PM shifts and all of them denied being rough and aggressive towards R1. They stated that R1 would get extremely fearful and scared during care despite their communication while providing care. LPA interviewed 3 residents and 1 family member and all of them reported that facility staff is respectful, they provided them with the care that they or their loved one required and they have not experienced and/or witnessed staff being aggressive and rough. During the visit, LPA was provided with 2 copies of R1's needs and services plans; one did not reflect resident's current health condition and the other one did. According to facility director, the needs and services plan that reflects R1's current health condition was updated during LPA's visit and acknowledged that it should have been updated it when the facility was informed in May 2023 by Institute On Aging of R1's change in health condition. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated as the administrator has already met with R1 and resolved the allegation of staff was rough and aggressive. However, facility failed to update R1's needs and services plan to reflect R1's current health condition, This deficiencies will be cited on LIC809 and LIC809D under Case Management. Regarding to the allegation of staff do not ensure that resident is adequately fed, there is no additional information forthcoming from the complainant. However, during the initial reporting, the complainant stated that no one assisted R1 with feeding. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed R1, and administrator. According to R1, facility staff is assisting R1 with feeding now but it was difficult in the past, however, it has been resolved. LPA interviewed the administrator who denied the allegation and stated that R1 did not required assistance with feeding upon admission. However, R1's vision declined resulted assistance with feeding started a couple of months ago. LPA interviewed 6 facility staff who were assigned to R1 on the AM or PM shift and all of them reported that they fed R1 during meals. They also reported that on most days, R1's intake was low so they had to go back and forth to encourage R1 to eat more. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated. Regarding to allegation of- food served to resident is cold- there is no additional information forthcoming from the complainant and the co-complainant. However, during the initial report, the complainant stated that no one fed R1 resulted R1 ate cold food. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed R1, facility staff, residents and family member. According to R1, R1 was served cold food but staff warmed it up except for one time. LPA interviewed facility staff who stated that R1 is a slower eater with poor appetite so they fed R1 at R1's paste. They acknowledged that R1's food would get cold at times but when R1 requested it to be warmed up, they proceeded with that request. LPA interviewed 3 residents and a family member and all of them stated that they did not have any problems with the temperature of their meals or their loved one's meals. If they wanted it to be warmer, they asked staff to heat it up and they did it. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated. Although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. This report is reviewed and discussed with Care Coordinator and administrator. and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 5, 2023 · control 14-AS-20230616164015
Jul 5, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On 7/5/2023, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced case management visit to deliver the findings in reference to complaint # 14-AS-20230616164015. LPA met with Care Coordinator and administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. During the initial complaint visit on 6/21/2023, LPA was informed resident #1 (R1) was transferred to the hospital due to an incident, and the administrator provided a copy of the incident report (LIC624) stating that R1 was transferred to the hospital on 6/5/2023. However, the report did not indicate that the incident was reported to CCLD, and LTCO. In addition, there is no record at CCLD that this incident was reported by the facility. During the course of the complaint investigation, LPA observed the facility was notified by Institute on Aging in May 2023 of R1's change in health condition. However, R1's needs and services plan was updated during LPA's visit on 6/21/2023. According to facility director, R1's needs and services plan should have been updated in May 2023 when facility was notified by Institute On Aging of R1's changes in health condition. In addition, LPA observed R1's needs and services plan was not signed and dated by the resident, responsible party and facility representatives. LPA interviewed R1 who stated that he/she did not know what a needs and services plan was and he/she was not part of the care planning process. Deficient is cited under California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC809D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. This report is reviewed and discussed with care coordinator and administrator. a copy is provided and appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 5, 2023
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87463(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 14, 2023
87463 Reappraisals..(a) The pre-admission appraisal shall be updated,.. The reappraisals shall document changes in the resident's physical,.... This requirement is not met as evidenced by R1 had a change in health condition and needs and services plan was not updated in a timely fashion which posed a potential health risks to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 5, 2023
Plan of correction: The administrator/ licensee will develop a plan to ensure resident's needs and service plans are current reflecting resident's needs and health condition. This plan shall include staff training. The administrator will provide a copy of the plan and a copy of the staff training record to CCL by the plan of correction due date of 7/14/2023.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87468.2(a)(7) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 14, 2023
87468.2Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities..(a)In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1,..(7) To fully participate in planning their care, including the right to attend and participate in meetings or communications regarding care and services to be provided,..This requirement is not met as evidenced by R1's needs and services plan was updated on 6/21/2023, however, the signature page indicating it was reviewed by R1 was blank which posed a potential health risk to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 5, 2023
Plan of correction: The administrator will review the regulation and develop a plan to ensure residents and/or responsible parties are part of the care planning process and the care plan shall be reviewed and signed by all required reviewers. The plan shall include staff education. The administrator will provide a copy of such plan and a copy of staff education record to CCL by the plan of correction due date of 7/14/2023.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 14, 2023
87211 Reporting Requirements(a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department...(1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence.. The requirement is not met as evidenced by resident #1 was transferred to the hospital on 6/5/2023 and it was not reported to CCLD.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 5, 2023
Plan of correction: The licensee/administrator will develop a plan to ensure compliance and provide in-service to facility staff. The licensee/administrator will provide a copy of the plan and in-service records to CCL by 7/14/2023.
Jan 27, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not properly address resident being burned by another resident Facility staff are not meeting toileting needs of resident Facility lacks adequate staffing to meet residents care needs
On 1/27/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the findings of complaint # 14-AS-20220926122653. LPA Han met with administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding to allegation of- staff did not properly address resident being burned by another resident, there was no additional details forthcoming from the reporting party, however, during the initial reporting, the reporting party stated that resident #1 (R1) was severely burned by another resident. The administrator denied the above allegation and stated that when the administrator was informed of such incident, the administrator instructed resident care coordinator to assess R1. The resident care coordinator and another staff went to R1's room and R1 was combative and agitated and refused to be assessed, however, R1 reported that the incident as another resident (R2) followed R1 into R1's room, touched R1's belongings and when R1 asked R2 to stop, R2 grabbed the hot water that R1 was holding and threw it on R1. Unsubstantiated As part of the reporting requirement, the facility reported it to R1's physician , Long Term Care Ombudsman and R1's responsible party; subsequently, R1 was seen by R1's physician on the following day. The facility also attempted to collect more details from staff, but none of them had knowledge of such incident as it was witnessed. As prevention, facility offered R1 to move to another room on a different floor but R1 did not accept the offer. However, the facility was able to move R2 after a discussion with the responsible party. Since the room transfer, there was no further incidences. Based on the documents provided by the facility, LPA observed this incident was reported on 11/20/2020 (incident happened on 11/19/2020) via LIC 624 (Unusual Incident/Injury Report) indicating that it was reported to R1's responsible party, Long Term Care Ombudsman and R1 was seen by On-Lok Clinic. In addition, a SOC 341 ( Report of Suspected Dependent Adult/Elder Abuse) was also completed. Based on interviews, and record reviews during the course of the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated. Regarding to allegation of- facility staff are not meeting toileting needs of resident and facility lacks adequate staffing to meet resident's care needs, there is not additional information forthcoming from the reporting party. However, during the initial reporting, the reporting party stated that facility staff failed to change R1's soiled diaper and asked R1 to poop in R1's diaper. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed R1 who stated that it took the staff hours to change R1's soiled diaper. The administrator and the resident care coordinator denied the above allegation and stated that every morning before night shift staff ends their shift at 6:30am, they would clean, change, provide a bed bath and get R1 into a wheelchair to start R1's day. In addition, they have not heard any complaints from R1, the responsible party and the physician regarding this allegation. Furthermore, the administrator stated that the facility recently added additional staff to anticipate new residents from Laguna Honda. LPA interviewed staff #1 (S1) who stated that night shift staff would clean, change and get R1 ready for the day and when S1 arrived at work, R1 was already cleaned and up in a wheelchair. S1 was not aware of such allegation. In addition, S1 stated that staff assisted R1 to the toilet during the day and R1 performed self-care after toileting unless R1 requested for assistance. LPA interviewed 3 other residents regarding to the care that they received by staff including but not limiting to toileting needs and all of them reported that they were satisfied with the care that they received and staff was attentive to their needs. During the initial visit, LPA observed residents to be cleaned, comfortable and LPA did not smell any unpleasant odor at the facility. Based on observation and interviews during the course of the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated. Although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. LPA observed R1's medication administration record that indicated this specific medication was ordered for 5 days and 4x daily and the medication administration record indicated that it was properly administered by facility staff. Based on record review, and interviews during the course of the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unfounded. Regrading to allegation of facility staff are retaliating against the resident for filing a complaint- there is no additional information forthcoming from the reporting party and R1. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed the administrator who denied the allegation and stated that facility encouraged residents and their responsible parties to contact the advocates such as the Long Term Care Ombudsman and the Long Term Care Ombudsman information is posted in the facility. Therefore, this allegation is deemed to be unfounded as there is no details provided. . Regarding to staff did not prevent another resident from entering resident's room- there is no additional information forthcoming from the reporting party. The administrator denied the allegation and stated that this incident was not witnessed by facility staff and if it was, staff would have discouraged R2 from entering R1's room. LPA interviewed R1 who stated that when R2 followed R1 into R1's room, there was no staff around to stop R2 from doing that. Based on interviews during the course of the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unfounded. Regarding to allegation of- staff does not treat resident with respect, there is no additional information forthcoming from the reporting party. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed other residents who stated that facility staff is attentive, they treat residents with respect and dignity. Based on interviews during the course of the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unfounded. Based on the above information, the Department has found that this allegation to be UNFOUNDED, meaning that this allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 27, 2023 · control 14-AS-20220926122653
Jan 27, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 1/27/2023, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced annual inspection. LPA observed COVID-19 signs posted by the entrance. LPA was greeted by the Administrator, Ana Pacheco. LPA explained the purpose of the visit and LPA was screened at the front entrance. LPA toured facility and grounds. No accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. Infection control practices are reviewed: entry procedures, staff training and policies, resident and staff daily monitoring records (staff is being screened by the receptionist when they arrive and when they leave), containment strategies( the facility has reserved a private room with a private restroom and equipped with a PPE supply cart). PPE supply and the environmental cleaning supply are adequate, bathrooms are equipped with liquid soap, paper towels, hand washing instruction is posted by the hand washing stations. There are 2 dining rooms on the 2nd and 3rd floor, 1 nursing station on each floor and medication room is located on the 2nd floor. COVID-19 signs observed to be posted around the facility. The beds in the shared bedrooms are 6"feet apart. LPA observed COVID-19 signs are posted in the staff lounge. There are hand sanitizer dispensers installed in front of each elevator and in the nursing stations. The high touched areas are being disinfected every hour including the public phone on both floors. Medications, toxins and sharps are stored appropriately and inaccessible to resident; first aide kit inspected and complete; a comfortable temperature is maintained, lighting is sufficient for comfort. No deficiency cited today. This report is reviewed and discussed with the Administrator, Ana Pacheco. A copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 27, 2023
20222 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 10, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Health ChecksReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks
On 8/10/2022. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced health and welfare check. LPA met with the administrator and explained the purpose of today's visit. Today's visit is to follow-up on the health and welfare check that was conducted on 7/12/2022 concerning 3 residents who were admitted from a skilled nursing facility. The administrator reported that since LPA's last visit, the facility has not admitted any additional residents from the skilled nursing facility. However, the facility is anticipating to take more and the facility will follow the pre-admission process prior to admitting new residents such as reviewing the medical records, conducting an on-site assessment, completing the pre-admission appraisal and the LIC602 (Physician's Report). During today's visit, LPA met with the 3 residents and they stated that they are doing well. No deficient cited today. This report is reviewed and discussed with the administrator. A copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 10, 2022
Jul 12, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Health ChecksReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks
On 7/12/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Murial Han conducted an unannounced Health and Welfare check as the facility admitted 3 residents from a skilled nursing facility and is anticipating to admit additional residents from the same facility . LPA met with the administrator and explained the purpose of today's visit. According to the administrator, to ensure residents are appropriate for admission, the facility requests and reviews medical records, and conducts an on-site/ in-person assessment prior to admission. The administrator also stated that the facility has agreed to take additional residents from the same facility pending final review of their medical records. Furthermore, the administrator stated that the facility has increased its staffing level to accommodate the additional residents. During today's visit, LPA Han reviewed and collected these documents: Identification and Emergency Information, LIC 602 (Physician's Orders), Preplacement Appraisal Information, Service Plan, Medication List and Staffing Assignments/Work Schedule. In addition, LPA interviewed the 3 residents and they appeared with bright affect, they stated that the facility is providing the care that they needed but they need time to adjust as this is a new environment for them. LPA requested additional documents to be submitted by 7/15/2022: - Direct Care Staff Training Records - Updated LIC500 No deficiency today. This report is reviewed with the administrator. A copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 12, 2022
20211 state visit · 1 document
Dec 2, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 12/2/2021, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced annual inspection. LPA observed COVID-19 signs posted by the entrance. LPA was greeted by the Administrator, Ana Pacheco. LPA explained the purpose of the visit and LPA was screened at the front entrance. LPA toured facility and grounds. No accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. Infection control practices are reviewed: entry procedures, staff training and policies, resident and staff daily monitoring records (staff is being screened by the receptionist when they arrive and when they leave), containment strategies( the facility has reserved a private room with a private restroom and equipped with a PPE supply cart). PPE supply and the environmental cleaning supply are adequate, bathrooms are equipped with liquid soap, paper towels, hand washing instruction is posted by the hand washing stations and LPA recommended to replace some of the trash cans with the foot operated lids. COVID-19 signs observed to be posted around the facility. LPA observed many residents wearing face masks. The tables in the dinning rooms are spaced out at least 6" apart from each other. The beds in the shared bedrooms are 6"feet apart. The tables in the staff lounge is apart and LPA observed COVID-19 signs are posted. There are hand sanitizer dispensers installed in front of each elevator and in the nursing stations. The high touched areas are being disinfected every hour including the public phone on both floors. Medications, toxins and sharps are stored appropriately and inaccessible to resident, a comfortable temperature is maintained, lighting is sufficient for comfort. During today's inspection, LPA Han requested for the following documents to be submitted to the Regional Office by 12/7/2021: - Updated Administrator Certification - LIC 308 (Designation of Administrative Responsibility) - LIC 610E (Emergency Disaster Plan) - LIC 500 (Personnel Report) No deficiency cited today. This report is reviewed and discussed with the Administrator, Ana Pacheco A copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 2, 2021
97 of 124 beds were occupied at the June 17, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Sky Blue Health Inc., licensed since 2006.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2006, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 18
- Total complaints
- 6
- Substantiated allegations
- 1
- Type A citations
- 1
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2006, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 1 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 1 |
| Substantiated allegations | 1 | 2 |
| Total complaints | 6 | 6 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Victorian Manor
Is Victorian Manor licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Victorian Manor licensed for?
124 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Victorian Manor been cited?
1 Type A and 0 Type B citation since 2006, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 18 state visits over the same years.
Is Victorian Manor still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Victorian Manor cost?
$6,000 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.
Among 11 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Francisco that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $5,658 to $8,450 a month, and the middle figure is $7,200 (n = 11 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Victorian Manor take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Sky Blue Health Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
UCSF Medical Center at Mount Zion is 0.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Victorian Manor keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Victorian Manor license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “VICTORIAN MANOR”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #385600360. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 124 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Sky Blue Health Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2006, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 18 state inspection visits since 2006, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 1 Type A and 0 Type B citation on file since 2006, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 18 state visits in that period.
- 6 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2006, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is June 17, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in San Francisco County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$4,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$7,200 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$5,357 a month to start
Listed by the home on its own website · October 27, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$6,559 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,650 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,650–$6,100On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,750 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,750–$6,200On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore San Francisco County