Sea Cliff Assisted Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Huntington Beach, Orange County, California — state license #306006146, licensed for 84 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 26 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated June 16, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Sea Cliff Assisted Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 84 residents · Huntington Beach, CA · Orange County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #306006146, held since 2022 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
18851 Florida Street · Huntington Beach, Orange County
Phone
(714) 847-3999
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 44 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 84 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 44 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY (FIRST FLOOR). APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 31 times and filed 26 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated June 16, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 16, 2026
Occupancy at the February 15, 2026 visit
68 of 84 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 13 documents with transcribed findings, dated June 1, 2023 to February 15, 2026. 13 of the 13 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (4), “Unsubstantiated” (7). 13 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 13 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 20 of 26 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20264 state visits · 5 documents
Jun 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 15, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was exposed to scabies while in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Samer Haddadin conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings regarding the above-referenced allegation. Upon arrival, LPA Haddadin was greeted and granted entry by Parinaz Safari, Wellness Director. The investigation included interviews with six staff members and six residents, a review of facility records, and observations of the physical plant. It was alleged that “Resident was exposed to scabies while in care.” During record review, LPA Haddadin confirmed that on October 17, 2025, the facility notified Community Care Licensing and submitted an incident report documenting that one resident (R1) tested positive for scabies. The records reviewed did not identify any additional residents with a confirmed scabies diagnosis and did not indicate a scabies outbreak at the facility. LPA Haddadin interviewed six residents regarding whether they were notified of scabies exposure, experienced symptoms consistent with scabies, or had concernsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 15, 2026 · control 22-AS-20251023144519
Jan 15, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility staff failed to report scabies outbreak.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Samer Haddadin conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings to the above-referenced allegation. Upon arrival, LPA Haddadin was greeted and granted entry by Administrator Taylor Clark (AD). The investigation included interviews with six staff members and six residents, a review of facility records, and observations of the physical plant. It was alleged that “Facility staff failed to report scabies outbreak”. LPA Haddadin reviewed facility records and confirmed that, on October 17, the facility’s Wellness Director notified Community Care Licensing and submitted an incident report regarding one resident (R1) who tested positive for scabies. LPA Haddadin interviewed six residents, and six of six denied that the facility experienced an outbreak or failed to report. LPA Haddadin also interviewed six staff members, and all six denied the allegation. {***CONTINUE9099C***} Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 15, 2026 · control 22-AS-20251023144519
20258 state visits · 9 documents
Dec 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure resident is provided a comfortable living space. Staff does not ensure resident's health needs are being met

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of following up on the investigation of the allegations listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by facility staff after introducing himself and stating the purpose of the visit. Administrator Taylor Clark was present on the premises and assisted with the visit. An initial investigation visit was conducted on September 29, 2025. LPA requested and obtained records for six current residents. LPA accompanied by licensing staff completed a tour of the facility's first level and reviewed multiple shared and private units. LPA conducted three resident interviews and one staff interview during the visit. After the visit, facility staff provided LPA with the facility's current plan of operations, dementia care plan, visitor check-in log, resident daily sign-out sheet, charting notes for resident R1 for the month of September 2025, assistance log for R1, incontinencthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250925212426
Oct 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is understaffed.

On October 23, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Edward Kim conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Taylor Clark and explained the purpose of today’s visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Kim toured the facility with ED Taylor Clark. LPA Kim requested and obtained copies of the Resident and Staff Rosters, Plan of Operation, Staffing Schedule, Staffing Ratio Record, and other pertinent documentation. LPA conducted interviews with five residents and six staff. The investigation revealed the following: Continued on LIC9099C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250806104200
Sep 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident's window is broken Resident's shirt was soaked in urine

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff, witness and residents. Regarding the allegation that resident's window is broken and resident's shirt was soaked in urine, the investigation revealed the following: LPA observed the window in room 153 is broken and the window sill in room 162 is in need of repair (photos). LPA interviewed witness and staff regarding incontinence care. One out of one witness and three out of four staff confirm incontinence care is not always provided timely and residents sit unchanged for periods of time. Staff confirm instances of resident's clothing being soiled while waiting for incontinence care. Wellness Director indicated instances of staff being terminated for not providing propthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250711132039
Jul 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff handle resident in a rough manner

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of following up on the investigation of the allegation listed above and to deliver findings in the investigation. An initial investigation visit took place on May 5, 2025. During the visit, LPA requested the facility resident census, employee roster as well as the staff schedule for the day of the visit. Records were requested for a total of five residents and reviewed. LPA accompanied by staff toured the two levels of the facility. LPA additionally conducted five resident interviews and two staff interviews during the visit. Four additional witness interviews were conducted or attempted over the course of the investigation. During the follow-up visit, LPA conducted five additional staff interviews and toured the premises accompanied by staff. CONTINUED ON FORM LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 18, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250501152827
Jan 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Due to neglect, resident's health declined

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced visit regarding the complaint allegation above. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit upon entry. Before interviews began, LPA toured the interior and exterior patio area of the facility with staff. Staff led LPA Haley to the portion of the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) to observe the main kitchen area. Regarding the complaint allegation: Due to neglect, resident's health declined During the investigation, 3 of 4 individuals were successfully interviewed and all three provided information that contradicted the complaint allegation. During an interview with Witness 1 (W1), the witness explained they received an inquiry from a child of Resident 1 (R1) who wanted to R1 to stop taking a medication. Continued on LIC9099C Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 24, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250117163013
Jan 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff administered medication to resident without authorized representative consent

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Jospeh Alejandre and Brandon Lopez made an unannounced visit to conduct the required 10-day visit to begin the investiation into the allegation listed above. LPAs met with Administrator Taylor Clark and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation revealed the following. Resident 1 (R 1) moved into the assisted living facility on June 26, 2023. After R1 moved in, a family member (F1) provided a completed medical power of attorney (POA) dated August 9, 2022 making F1, R1's agent in all matters relating to health care. The Administrator reported that in May 2024 R1 was put on medications after a doctor's visit and F1 agreed. F1 could not be reached to verify this information. R1 continued taking medications and residing at the facility until November 8, 2024 after suffering a fall. R1 was sent to the hospital and from the hospital transferred to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) on November 13, 2024. R1 remained at the SNF until they were discharthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 9, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250102143150
20244 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Resident's dietary needs are not being met.

On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jenifer Tirre made an unannounced visit to iniate complaint investigation. LPA discussed purpose of the visit and allegations with Administrator Taylor Clark. Based on a facility record review and interview with Administrator Investigation revealed that Resident (R1) is a resident at Sea Cliff Healthcare Center Skilled Nursing not Sea Cliff Assisted Living. Sea Cliff Healthcare Skilled Nursing is an entity of California Department of Public Health. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging residents dietary needs are not being met. We have found that the complaint was UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of report was provided to facility. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 26, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240422151705
Apr 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained unexplained fracture while in care due to neglect

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation received on January 02, 2024. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Administrator (AD) Taylor Clark. LPA explained the reason for the visit. This Department has investigated the complaint alleging that Resident sustained unexplained fracture while in care due to neglect. Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on October 04, 2022. Documents reviewed included the Physician Report (LIC602) dated August 16, 2023 for R1. Per Physician report R1’s diagnoses are Status post joint replacement surgery, Alzheimer’s, Arthritis, Dementia and is Non-ambulatory. On June 13, 2023, R1 sustained a displaced femoral neck fracture while out of the facility with family. R1 went to a Skill Nursing Facility from June 2023 to August 2023. The Unusual Incident/Injury Report (UIIR) on December 26, 2023, reports R1 had an unwitnessed fall, hitthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 26, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240102092921
Mar 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff failed to meet residents’ needs.

This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of investigating the above-mentioned complaint allegation. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Taylor Clark and explained the reason for today’s inspection. The investigation into the allegation that the facility staff failed to meet residents’ needs revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed AD, staff, and residents, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster, staff roster, Resident #1’s (R1) Resident Appraisal dated 10/04/23, R1’s Needs and Services Plan dated 10/04/23, R1’s Physician’s Report dated 05/02/23, the facility’s Caregiver Resident Assignments, and the facility’s Incontinence Care Logs for 03/09/24. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240311130718
Mar 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 7, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 1
Type B citations2typical 1
Substantiated complaints4typical 2
Total complaints15typical 7
State visits on file31typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2022.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20264502025892202445020235502022330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (714) 847-3999

Is Sea Cliff Assisted Living licensed?

Yes — Sea Cliff Assisted Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Huntington Beach (Orange County): California license #306006146, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 84 residents. State records list 26 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 16, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Sea Cliff Assisted Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Sea Cliff Assisted Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 84 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 44 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY (FIRST FLOOR). APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.

How much does Sea Cliff Assisted Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Sea Cliff Assisted Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Sea Cliff Assisted Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Sea Cliff Assisted Living through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Orange County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

68 of 84 beds occupied (81%) when the state visited on February 15, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Sea Cliff Assisted Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 31 state visits and 26 dated documents since 2022 for Sea Cliff Assisted Living; 13 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated February 15, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

13 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was exposed to scabies while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Samer Haddadin conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings regarding the above-referenced allegation. Upon arrival, LPA Haddadin was greeted and granted entry by Parinaz Safari, Wellness Director. The investigation included interviews with six staff members and six residents, a review of facility records, and observations of the physical plant. It was alleged that “Resident was exposed to scabies while in care.” During record review, LPA Haddadin confirmed that on October 17, 2025, the facility notified Community Care Licensing and submitted an incident report documenting that one resident (R1) tested positive for scabies. The records reviewed did not identify any additional residents with a confirmed scabies diagnosis and did not indicate a scabies outbreak at the facility. LPA Haddadin interviewed six residents regarding whether they were notified of scabies exposure, experienced symptoms consistent with scabies, or had concernsCDSS inspection report, February 15, 2026 · control 22-AS-20251023144519
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff failed to report scabies outbreak.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Samer Haddadin conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings to the above-referenced allegation. Upon arrival, LPA Haddadin was greeted and granted entry by Administrator Taylor Clark (AD). The investigation included interviews with six staff members and six residents, a review of facility records, and observations of the physical plant. It was alleged that “Facility staff failed to report scabies outbreak”. LPA Haddadin reviewed facility records and confirmed that, on October 17, the facility’s Wellness Director notified Community Care Licensing and submitted an incident report regarding one resident (R1) who tested positive for scabies. LPA Haddadin interviewed six residents, and six of six denied that the facility experienced an outbreak or failed to report. LPA Haddadin also interviewed six staff members, and all six denied the allegation. {***CONTINUE9099C***} UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, January 15, 2026 · control 22-AS-20251023144519

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not ensure resident is provided a comfortable living space. Staff does not ensure resident's health needs are being met
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of following up on the investigation of the allegations listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by facility staff after introducing himself and stating the purpose of the visit. Administrator Taylor Clark was present on the premises and assisted with the visit. An initial investigation visit was conducted on September 29, 2025. LPA requested and obtained records for six current residents. LPA accompanied by licensing staff completed a tour of the facility's first level and reviewed multiple shared and private units. LPA conducted three resident interviews and one staff interview during the visit. After the visit, facility staff provided LPA with the facility's current plan of operations, dementia care plan, visitor check-in log, resident daily sign-out sheet, charting notes for resident R1 for the month of September 2025, assistance log for R1, incontinencCDSS inspection report, December 12, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250925212426
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is understaffed.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On October 23, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Edward Kim conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Taylor Clark and explained the purpose of today’s visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Kim toured the facility with ED Taylor Clark. LPA Kim requested and obtained copies of the Resident and Staff Rosters, Plan of Operation, Staffing Schedule, Staffing Ratio Record, and other pertinent documentation. LPA conducted interviews with five residents and six staff. The investigation revealed the following: Continued on LIC9099C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 23, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250806104200
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident's window is broken Resident's shirt was soaked in urine
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff, witness and residents. Regarding the allegation that resident's window is broken and resident's shirt was soaked in urine, the investigation revealed the following: LPA observed the window in room 153 is broken and the window sill in room 162 is in need of repair (photos). LPA interviewed witness and staff regarding incontinence care. One out of one witness and three out of four staff confirm incontinence care is not always provided timely and residents sit unchanged for periods of time. Staff confirm instances of resident's clothing being soiled while waiting for incontinence care. Wellness Director indicated instances of staff being terminated for not providing propCDSS inspection report, July 18, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250711132039
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff handle resident in a rough manner
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of following up on the investigation of the allegation listed above and to deliver findings in the investigation. An initial investigation visit took place on May 5, 2025. During the visit, LPA requested the facility resident census, employee roster as well as the staff schedule for the day of the visit. Records were requested for a total of five residents and reviewed. LPA accompanied by staff toured the two levels of the facility. LPA additionally conducted five resident interviews and two staff interviews during the visit. Four additional witness interviews were conducted or attempted over the course of the investigation. During the follow-up visit, LPA conducted five additional staff interviews and toured the premises accompanied by staff. CONTINUED ON FORM LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 18, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250501152827
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedDue to neglect, resident's health declined
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced visit regarding the complaint allegation above. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit upon entry. Before interviews began, LPA toured the interior and exterior patio area of the facility with staff. Staff led LPA Haley to the portion of the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) to observe the main kitchen area. Regarding the complaint allegation: Due to neglect, resident's health declined During the investigation, 3 of 4 individuals were successfully interviewed and all three provided information that contradicted the complaint allegation. During an interview with Witness 1 (W1), the witness explained they received an inquiry from a child of Resident 1 (R1) who wanted to R1 to stop taking a medication. Continued on LIC9099C UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, January 24, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250117163013
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff administered medication to resident without authorized representative consent
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Jospeh Alejandre and Brandon Lopez made an unannounced visit to conduct the required 10-day visit to begin the investiation into the allegation listed above. LPAs met with Administrator Taylor Clark and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation revealed the following. Resident 1 (R 1) moved into the assisted living facility on June 26, 2023. After R1 moved in, a family member (F1) provided a completed medical power of attorney (POA) dated August 9, 2022 making F1, R1's agent in all matters relating to health care. The Administrator reported that in May 2024 R1 was put on medications after a doctor's visit and F1 agreed. F1 could not be reached to verify this information. R1 continued taking medications and residing at the facility until November 8, 2024 after suffering a fall. R1 was sent to the hospital and from the hospital transferred to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) on November 13, 2024. R1 remained at the SNF until they were discharCDSS inspection report, January 9, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250102143150

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedResident's dietary needs are not being met.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jenifer Tirre made an unannounced visit to iniate complaint investigation. LPA discussed purpose of the visit and allegations with Administrator Taylor Clark. Based on a facility record review and interview with Administrator Investigation revealed that Resident (R1) is a resident at Sea Cliff Healthcare Center Skilled Nursing not Sea Cliff Assisted Living. Sea Cliff Healthcare Skilled Nursing is an entity of California Department of Public Health. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging residents dietary needs are not being met. We have found that the complaint was UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of report was provided to facility. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, April 26, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240422151705
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained unexplained fracture while in care due to neglect
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation received on January 02, 2024. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Administrator (AD) Taylor Clark. LPA explained the reason for the visit. This Department has investigated the complaint alleging that Resident sustained unexplained fracture while in care due to neglect. Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on October 04, 2022. Documents reviewed included the Physician Report (LIC602) dated August 16, 2023 for R1. Per Physician report R1’s diagnoses are Status post joint replacement surgery, Alzheimer’s, Arthritis, Dementia and is Non-ambulatory. On June 13, 2023, R1 sustained a displaced femoral neck fracture while out of the facility with family. R1 went to a Skill Nursing Facility from June 2023 to August 2023. The Unusual Incident/Injury Report (UIIR) on December 26, 2023, reports R1 had an unwitnessed fall, hitCDSS inspection report, April 26, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240102092921
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff failed to meet residents’ needs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of investigating the above-mentioned complaint allegation. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Taylor Clark and explained the reason for today’s inspection. The investigation into the allegation that the facility staff failed to meet residents’ needs revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed AD, staff, and residents, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster, staff roster, Resident #1’s (R1) Resident Appraisal dated 10/04/23, R1’s Needs and Services Plan dated 10/04/23, R1’s Physician’s Report dated 05/02/23, the facility’s Caregiver Resident Assignments, and the facility’s Incontinence Care Logs for 03/09/24. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 18, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240311130718

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 31 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
4
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
15
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
31
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(714) 847-3999
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Sea Cliff Assisted Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.