Orangewood Guest Home is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Anaheim, Orange County, California — state license #306004826, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 8 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated January 16, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

7 homes in view

Orangewood Guest Home

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Anaheim, CA · Orange County
LicensedWheelchairMemory care not on fileHospice not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #306004826, held since 2017 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1598 W. Orangewood Ave. · Anaheim, Orange County
Phone
(714) 583-8965
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 4 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
TWO (2) AMBULATORY AND FOUR (4) NON AMBULATORY ONLYState service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 8 times and filed 8 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated January 16, 2026.

Most recent state visit
January 16, 2026
Occupancy at the February 20, 2025 visit
5 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 3 documents with transcribed findings, dated May 22, 2024 to February 20, 2025. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (3). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 3 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 7 of 8 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jan 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20252 state visits · 2 documents
Feb 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff yelled at client Staff attempted to hit a client

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rose Ruppert made an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint received in our Regional Office on February 6, 2025. LPA was greeted and granted entry and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA met with both Administrators, Melissa Carbajal and Mindy Fajardo. A report was filed with our office where a vendor witnessed a facility staff member, who yelled at the client and attempted to hit the client. On February 5, 2025, at 7:50am, the client was being picked up for Day Program when the incident occurred. Based on LPA interviews with the eyewitness and two of two staff present in facility at time of incident, Staff #1 (S1) had reached for the client’s backpack and the client grabbed S1’s hand. Client is non-verbal and indicated she wanted the backpack on her back. S1 raised her voice to the client to, “Let go” and client complied. According to the two of two staff members and eyewitness, the incident was brief. The staff member, S1, then placethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 20, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250206160830
Jan 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was hit by a facility staff.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made unannounced visit to investigation a complaint received July 31, 2024. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit before entering the facility. The complaint investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, residents, witnesses, and document review. Regarding the allegation: Resident was hit by a facility staff. 5 of 8 individuals interviewed denied the complaint allegation above. During interview with multiple individuals, it was revealed Resident 1 (R1) has a history making false statements and having emotional outburst. Staff 1 (S1) explained R1 has outburst at the day program and has had outburst with the bus driver as well. S1 provided progress notes for R1 that document several of R1’s outburst. During an interview with Resident 2 (R2), the resident explained they get along with R1, and mentioned R1 yells and screams sometimes. Continued on LIC9099C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 8, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240731162025
May 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not ensure resident's food was protected against vermin.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made unannounced visit to start the investigation for a complaint received May 17, 2024. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit. The complaint investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, witnesses, and observations made during the complaint visit. Regarding the allegation: Facility staff did not ensure resident's food was protected against vermin. 3 of 5 individuals interviewed support the complaint allegation above. During an interview with Witness 2 (W2), the witness denied there’s a problem with vermin in the facility and said the facility is always clean. Witness 3 (W3) said the facility is sparkling clean and you can see your reflection on the floor. During the visit, LPA visually inspected the facility, made several observations, and closely examined the cleanliness of the physical plant. During the inspection LPA Haley observed Client 1’s (C1) lunch box, lunch bag(s), and observed how cliethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 22, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240517084014
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 11, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations0typical 0
Substantiated complaints0typical 0
Total complaints3typical 0
State visits on file8typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2017.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025220202433020231102022110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
If end-of-life care were ever needed, could they stay here? What’s the plan?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (714) 583-8965

Is Orangewood Guest Home licensed?

Yes — Orangewood Guest Home is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Anaheim (Orange County): California license #306004826, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 8 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated January 16, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Orangewood Guest Home care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Orangewood Guest Home with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory; it does not list dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordTWO (2) AMBULATORY AND FOUR (4) NON AMBULATORY ONLY

How much does Orangewood Guest Home cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Orangewood Guest Home's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Orangewood Guest Home accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Orangewood Guest Home is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

5 of 6 beds occupied (83%) when the state visited on February 20, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Orangewood Guest Home?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 8 state visits and 8 dated documents since 2022 for Orangewood Guest Home; 3 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated February 20, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

3 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff yelled at client Staff attempted to hit a client
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rose Ruppert made an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint received in our Regional Office on February 6, 2025. LPA was greeted and granted entry and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA met with both Administrators, Melissa Carbajal and Mindy Fajardo. A report was filed with our office where a vendor witnessed a facility staff member, who yelled at the client and attempted to hit the client. On February 5, 2025, at 7:50am, the client was being picked up for Day Program when the incident occurred. Based on LPA interviews with the eyewitness and two of two staff present in facility at time of incident, Staff #1 (S1) had reached for the client’s backpack and the client grabbed S1’s hand. Client is non-verbal and indicated she wanted the backpack on her back. S1 raised her voice to the client to, “Let go” and client complied. According to the two of two staff members and eyewitness, the incident was brief. The staff member, S1, then placeCDSS inspection report, February 20, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250206160830

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was hit by a facility staff.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made unannounced visit to investigation a complaint received July 31, 2024. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit before entering the facility. The complaint investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, residents, witnesses, and document review. Regarding the allegation: Resident was hit by a facility staff. 5 of 8 individuals interviewed denied the complaint allegation above. During interview with multiple individuals, it was revealed Resident 1 (R1) has a history making false statements and having emotional outburst. Staff 1 (S1) explained R1 has outburst at the day program and has had outburst with the bus driver as well. S1 provided progress notes for R1 that document several of R1’s outburst. During an interview with Resident 2 (R2), the resident explained they get along with R1, and mentioned R1 yells and screams sometimes. Continued on LIC9099C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 8, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240731162025
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not ensure resident's food was protected against vermin.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made unannounced visit to start the investigation for a complaint received May 17, 2024. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit. The complaint investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, witnesses, and observations made during the complaint visit. Regarding the allegation: Facility staff did not ensure resident's food was protected against vermin. 3 of 5 individuals interviewed support the complaint allegation above. During an interview with Witness 2 (W2), the witness denied there’s a problem with vermin in the facility and said the facility is always clean. Witness 3 (W3) said the facility is sparkling clean and you can see your reflection on the floor. During the visit, LPA visually inspected the facility, made several observations, and closely examined the cleanliness of the physical plant. During the inspection LPA Haley observed Client 1’s (C1) lunch box, lunch bag(s), and observed how clieCDSS inspection report, May 22, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240517084014

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 8 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
0
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
3
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
8
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(714) 583-8965
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Orangewood Guest Home? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.