Small home · Licensed for 6 · Carmel
Agape of Carmel
25527 Flanders Drive, Carmel, CA 93923Licensed since 1990
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · October 25, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 5 residents
- Hospiceup to 3 residents
Not on file: dementia and bedridden approvals.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 25, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
LICENSED TO SERVE AGES 60 AND OVER. FIVE MAY BE NON-AMBULARTORY. THIS LICENSE IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE HOSPICE WAIVER FOR THREE CLIENTS.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 25, 2026
Care services
These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.
Assisted living
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Help with bathing or showering
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
Works with hospice
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
Help with dressing and grooming
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
Activities of daily living the home lists help withDressing · Bathing
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
24-hour supervision claimed
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
Staff background checksEvery licensed home in California must do this.
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
Owner or administrator lives on site
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 25, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Agape of Carmel: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
This home’s starting rate
$6,000a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$6,000likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$6,000this home
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.
Shared room insteadAsknot on file
This home’s listed starting rate is for assisted living private room. A shared room, if one is offered, may cost less — ask.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $6,000–$6,600
- $6,000
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $6,000–$10,150
- $8,500
Lines marked “Ask” are not in the totals.
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes14 nearby homes publish starting rates of $1,500 to $7,000
14 homes like this within 40 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,650–$6,600.
- Flanders Court of CarmelCarmel · 0.2 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Carmel VillaCarmel · 2.7 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Carmelo ParkMonterey · 2.8 mi · Mid-size home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Villa Mirage of CarmelCarmel Valley · 11 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- El Camino Real ManorMarina · 11 mi · Small home$2,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Rachelle's Home IFreedom · 28 mi · Mid-size home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Twin Lakes ManorSanta Cruz · 30 mi · Mid-size home$1,500Listed on its own website · shared studios (starting at) · seen October 5, 2026
- The Maple HouseSanta Cruz · 30 mi · Mid-size home$5,500Listed on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026
- Seaview Guest HomeAptos · 30 mi · Small home$4,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Hanover Guest HomeSanta Cruz · 30 mi · Mid-size home$2,750Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Paradise Assisted CareSanta Cruz · 30 mi · Mid-size home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Valley Haven IIISanta Cruz · 30 mi · Mid-size home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Clearview CarehomesHollister · 33 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Whispering Pines InnHollister · 39 mi · Mid-size home$2,889Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.
Rooms & the spaces they will use (15)Private rooms · Outdoor space · Staff help residents use devices
Private rooms
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
Outdoor spaceDeck
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
Staff help residents use devices
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
Shared / companion roomsReported no
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
Common areasLiving room · Dining room · Common Living room · Dinning room areas
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
Private bathroom
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
LaundryDone by staff
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
Room typesPrivate rooms
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
AmenitiesWide screen television · Movie screenings
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
Residents may bring their own furniture
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
Housekeeping
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
Rooms come furnished
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
Roll-in / accessible shower
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
Cable or satellite TV
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
Telephone in the room
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
Meals, preferences & familiar food (3)Snacks available · Meals provided · Dining atmosphere
Snacks available
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
Meals provided
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
Dining atmosphereGourmet meal
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
Activities & the rhythm of a day (1)Activity types offered
Activity types offeredMovie screenings
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
Pets, routines & independence (1)Visiting hours
Visiting hoursOpen anytime
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
Visiting & staying involved (3)Office or phone hours as published · Notes on visiting access · Contact form
Office or phone hours as publishedDuring business hours
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
Notes on visiting accessCall ahead for a visit or a tour
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
- Open on the website
Contact form
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
About the home (3)Brand or trade name · Management company · For-profit or nonprofit
Brand or trade nameAGAPE OF CARMEL
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Management companyPrivately owned and operated
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
For-profit or nonprofitFor profit
Reported on agapeofcarmel.com · source dated October 10, 2019.
Where it is
25527 Flanders Drive, Carmel, CA 93923Address from the public record · October 25, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Community Hospital of the Monterey PeninsulaHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.9 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 25, 2026 · License #270708695 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 6 of 11 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Unsubstantiated”.
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jul 8, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 07/08/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban arrived unannounced to conduct Required Annual Inspection. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Miriam Fickewirth, certification number 7002605740 and expiration date 12/02/2027. LPA conducted facility tour inside and out of facility with staff. Residents observed at the facility after breakfast time. The facility was observed to be at a comfortable temperature of 74 degrees, clean, in good repair, and no passageway obstructions or fire hazards observed. Fire extinguisher was observed with a service date of 04/27/2026. Last fire drill recorded in May 2025 Dining area and Kitchen were toured. An adequate supply of perishable and non-perishable food was observed to be properly stored in freezer, refrigerator, and pantry. Food is delivered once a week. The facility is comprised of three level sections; three residents’ rooms on the upper level are not licensed by DSS. Main level comprised residents rooms, dining and kitchen. Lower level is three rooms and a laundry . The census during the visit six (6) assisted living residents. LPA toured resident bedrooms. Residents' rooms were toured and observed adequately furnished with bed, dresser, and adequate lighting. Hot water temperature tested at 113 degrees F. LPA observed securely fastened grab bar and non-skid mat in shower area. Medications were stored in a locked medication closet in the kitchen. The first Aid Kit was observed with all required items. LPA toured the laundry room and observed chemicals were stored and locked in for staff use only. The facility courtyard was toured and observed to be free from debris. There was outdoor seating available for the residents. LPA reviewed facility Plan of Operation, Infection Control Plan, Emergency Disaster Plan and number of staff and residents’ files requested and reviewed during the inspection visit. Deficiencies cited for incomplete residents and staff records and attached to D-form. Exit interview conducted. Report signed and its copy with appeal rights provided for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 8, 2026
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility has expired food Facility is uncleaned Residents are left in soiled diapers for an extended period of time
On 11/13/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban unannounced visited the facility to commence complaint investigation. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Miriam Fickewirth and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured the facility inside and out, performing safety checks and observed residents in care. During complaint investigation LPA toured the facility conducting health and safety checks, interviewed staff, visitors and administrator. Allegation: Facility has expired food. Based on observations the facility has three storage containers of non-perishable food that was observed in the shed. LPA also observed perishable food in the refrigerator. Administrator is the person does groceries shopping twice a week. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated Report continues on attached LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Allegation: Facility is uncleaned. Based on observation and interviews, the facility has two additional staff members with administrator present to provide residents’ care and keep facility clean. Interviews conducted with witnesses stated that they have not observed any issues with the facility being uncleaned. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Allegation: Residents are left in soiled diapers for an extended period of time. Based on observations and interviews, residents are checked every two hours and turned. Records reviewed did not indicate that the residents had injuries or sores. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. No deficiency cited during this visit. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy of this report provided to administrator for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 13, 2025 · control 24-AS-20251104102923
Jul 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 07/23/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban arrived unannounced to conduct Required Annual Inspection. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Miriam Fickewirth, certification number 7002605740 and expiration date 12/02/2025. LPA conducted facility tour inside and out of facility with staff. Residents observed at the facility after lunch time. The facility was observed to be at a comfortable temperature of 74 degrees, clean, in good repair, and no passageway obstructions or fire hazards observed. Fire extinguisher was observed with a service date of 04/10/2025 Last fire drill recorded in May 2025 Dining area and Kitchen were toured. An adequate supply of perishable and non-perishable food was observed to be properly stored in freezer, refrigerator, and pantry. Food is delivered once a week. The facility is comprised of three level sections; three residents’ rooms on the upper level, two residents’ rooms on main level with dining and kitchen, and lower level is three rooms and a laundry . The census during the visit is 4 assisted living residents. LPA toured resident bedrooms. Residents' rooms were toured and observed adequately furnished with bed, dresser, and adequate lighting. Hot water temperature tested at 115 degrees F. LPA observed securely fastened grab bar and non-skid mat in shower area. Medications were stored in a locked medication closet in the kitchen. The first Aid Kit was observed with all required items. LPA toured the laundry room and observed chemicals were stored and locked in for staff use only. The facility courtyard was toured and observed to be free from debris. There was outdoor seating available for the residents. LPA reviewed facility Plan of Operation, Infection Control Plan, Emergency Disaster Plan and number of staff and residents’ files requested and reviewed during the inspection visit. Exit interview conducted, no deficiency cited during this visit. Report signed and copy provided for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 23, 2025
20242 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not assist residents with care needs in a timely manner. Staff do not ensure facility cleanliness is maintained. Staff do not ensure the safety of food served to residents. Licensee does not ensure a safe and healthful environment is provided for residents. Staff do not seek timely medical attention for residents. Licensee does not provide residents with adequate food service. Licensee does not provide planned activities for residents. Staff did not dispense medication to resident as prescribed.
On 12/26/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban visited the facility to deliver findings. During this visit LPA met with facility Administrator (AD) Miriam Fickewirth and stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured the facility inside and out, performing safety checks and observed residents in care. Allegation: Staff do not assist residents with care needs in a timely manner. During this visit LPA observed facility, interviewed staff, residents, and residents’ responsible parties. Based on statement provided above, no concerns form staff, residents, or resident responsible parties or LPA observation observed or reported. 5 out of 6 residents pleased with facility operations and reported no to concerns. One out of six resident is on hospice and unable to speak, although POA for that resident responded no to concerns. Allegation: Staff do not ensure facility cleanliness is maintained. Based on facility tour including residents’ rooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common area and outside yard. LPA also interviewed facility staff and residents during which no concerns observed or/and reported during file review. Based on staff interviews the facility cleaned by staff daily. Unsubstantiated Staff do not ensure the safety of food served to residents. Based on kitchen tour, food supply review of perishable and non-perishable food storage no violations observed. During facility visit on 8/22/24, residents and staff interviews no food concerns reported and /or observed. Per interviews that staff does groceries shopping twice a week. Allegation: Licensee does not ensure a safe and healthful environment is provided for residents. Based on observations during facility visits, residents’ interviews and records review no concerns observed or reported. Allegation: Staff do not seek timely medical attention for residents. Based on residents and family interviews the facility provide services as expected. Based on staff interviews all staff aware contacts for medical attention when needed. Based on observations, the facility had emergency contact numbers posted. Allegation: Licensee does not provide residents with adequate food service. Based on residents and family interview no concerns of food served to residents reported and/or provided. Based on records reviews all residents receive meals according to residents' diet records. Allegation: Licensee does not provide planned activities for residents. Based on observation during facility visit on 08/22/24 residents spent time outdoor touring the property, feeding birds outside by a large bird cage. Based on family interviews residents are taken on outings by family couple times a week. Allegation: Staff did not dispense medication to resident as prescribed. Based on records review, 6 out of 6 residents medications provided as prescribed. Although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there are not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy of this report provided to administrator for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 26, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240821091523
Dec 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type A, Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On 12/26/2024, LPA V Gorban visited the facility to conduct case management revealed during complaint investigation. During this visit LPA questioned Administrator regarding incident report provided by staff on 08/16/2024 regarding Resident 1 (R1). Based on staff and administrator interviews resident (R1) fall incident was not reported to Fresno Licensing Office. During the complaint investigation, administrator interview and records review of Guardian and Licensing Information System shows S2 is not associated to the facility while providing care to residents during the days of 8/14/2024 to 08/18/2024. Deficiency for both events cited on the attached LIC809-D in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and an immediate civil penalty is being assessed in the amount of $500. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Miriam Fickewirth. Appeal Rights provided. Report signed on-site by Administrator, whose signature on the form confirms receipt with of this document.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 26, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(a) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 27, 2024
87355 Criminal Record Clearance (a) The Department shall conduct a criminal record review of all individuals specified in Health and Safety Code section 1569.17 and shall have the authority to approve or deny a facility license, or employment....This requirement was not observed as evidenced by: The facility Administrator failed to follow regulations requirements by ensuring 1 out of 2 staff members is cleared and associated to the facility roster. This poses immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 26, 2024
Plan of correction: The facility administrator ensure to follow Licensing requirements and staff that is not cleared to be present at the facility is no longer there.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87211(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 30, 2024
87211 Reporting Requirements. (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited.... This requirement was not observed as evidenced by: The facility administrator failed to follow Licensing regulation by providing written report for incident hat occurred on 08/16/24 to Licensing Agency, which poses potential health and safety risk to persons in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 26, 2024
Plan of correction: The facility administrator will review Licensing regulation and ensure all incident reports to be provided to Fresno Licensing Office by fax or email.
Jul 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 07/22/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban arrived unannounced at the above facility to conduct an Annual Inspection. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and was granted entry to the facility. LPA toured the facility with facility Administrator Miriam Fickewirth, certification number 7002605740 and expiration date 12/02/2025. The facility was observed to be at a comfortable temperature, of 76 degrees F. Facility is free of debris, in good repair, and no passageway obstructions or fire hazards were observed. Common areas were properly furnished and well-lit throughout. LPA observed some residents in common area during breakfast watching television, others in their rooms resting. Department phone number and infection prevention information signs were posted thought the facility. Inspecting kitchen LPA observed the required 7-day supply of non-perishable food and 2- day supply of fresh perishables to be properly stored. An emergency disaster supply was observed. A fire extinguisher was observed in compliance. Private residents’ bedroom observed to be at comfortable temperatures. The bathroom’s water temperature was tested and recorded reading of 113 degrees F. Medications records storage observed to be locked in a cabinet in the common area. Cleaning supplies were observed to be in a locked cabinet in the storage it the laundry room. An outdoor seating area was observed operational for residents in care. LPA reviewed staff files. No deficiencies were observed and cited during this visit. Exit interview conducted. A report was signed, and a copy of this report was provided for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 22, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 5 documents
20231 state visit · 1 document
Jul 6, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 7/6/2023, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) D. Ayers arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct a Required Annual Inspection. LPA met with Licensee Miriam Fickerwirth and Co-Administrator Michael Hagerty. LPA toured the facility inside and outside. Pathways and doors were clear and free from obstruction. Smoke-detectors and carbon-monoxide detectors were present and operational. Facility was clean and odor free. LPA observed sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable foodstuffs. Common areas were clean, adequately furnished, and adequately lit. Resident bedrooms were clean and had required minimum furnishings. Resident bathrooms were clean, odor free, and water temperature was within required temperature range. Sharp items were secured in a locked drawer. A locked cabinet was observed to store resident medications, and medications appeared to be administered properly. LPA reviewed facility plan of operations and emergency disaster plan. LPA reviewed a sample of resident files. During Records Review, LPA observed that Resident 1, who was diagnosed with dementia, had a most recent physician's report LIC 602A which was dated 5/25/2021. See attached 809D for deficiency cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations Title 22, Division 6, chapter 8, Article 12, Section 87705(c)(5). LPA requested the following documents: LIC 500 Personnel Report, LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility, LIC 610-E the Emergency Disaster Plan, and a copy of current Administrator’s Certificate to update the facility file. Exit interview conducted with Licensee and a copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 6, 2023
20222 state visits · 3 documents
Apr 10, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not seek medical attention Facility staff not following doctors orders Facility did not provide proper notice of fee increase
On 4/10/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaclyn Avila conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations and met with Miriam Fickewirth Administrator/Licensee. Prior to initiating the complaint visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: Surgical mask California Department of Social Services (CDSS) Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated this complaint and found the allegation(s) to be unfounded. This department has reviewed the admission agreement signed by both licensee and conservator dated 2/25/2019. On 1/27/2020, Licensee provided Conservator with a memo stating there would be a rate increase due to level of care now needed due to a decline in the resident. On page 7 of the admission agreement initialed by the conservator, the agreement states the resident or responsible party will be notified within 2 days of a change of condition requiring additional care which the facility did as per the signed agreement. Cont'd on 9099-C Unfounded The licensee upon noticing signs and symptoms of an infection, contacted the resident’s doctor as required by regulation. The doctor prescribed medication which was given as directed by the doctor beginning 11/13/2020. When licensee noticed the medication was not effective the licensee had the resident sent to the hospital on 11/16/2020. The licensee responded appropriately to the needs of the resident. Unfounded: This agency has investigated the complaint alleging: Facility staff did not seek medical attention, Facility staff are not following doctor’s orders, and Facility did not provide proper notice of fee increase. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basisthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 10, 2022 · control 26-AS-20201120155158
Mar 21, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility not walker/wheelchair accessible
On 3/21/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaclyn Avila conduc On 3/21/22, this department conducted an inspection and found that not all outed an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations, and met with Miriam Fickewirth Administrator/Licensee. Prior to initiating the complaint visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: N95. California Department of Social Services (CDSS) Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated this complaint and following are the findings: tdoor and indoor passageways are being kept free of obstruction. The obstructions observed do not allow for someone who depends on assistive devices such as a walker or wheelchair to utilize these passageways. Cont'd on LIC 9099-C Substantiated At 8:30 AM, this department observed the passage way to the patio from the dining room to be obstructed by two bird cages. Administrator moved the birds outside however they were still obstructing ones ability to exit if dependant on a wheelchair. At 9:22 AM, this department observed room #5. This department observed the passage way to the outside was obstructed by an upholstered wooden chair and an ottoman. The resident in this room utilizes both a walker and a cane. Resident stated its difficult to move the furniture due to physical limitations but does like to open the exit door in order to get fresh air. The exterior exit leads to a sun room that has an exit to the outside. Substantiated: Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division & Chapter number), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Appeal Rights were explained and provided to the facility representative listed above and an Exit Interview was conducted. If any of the cited deficiencies are not corrected by the noted due dates; civil penalties may be assessed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2022 · control 26-AS-20201013130409
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87307(d)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 22, 2022
87307(d)(6)-Personal Accommodations and Services-All outdoor and indoor passageways and stairways shall be kept free of obstruction. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based upon observation and interview the Licensee failed to ensure all outdoor and indoor passageways are free from obstruction This poses an immediate Health, Safety and/or Personal Rights risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to keep passageways free of obstructions. Licensee will review regulation 87307, 87303 and 87705 and familiarize staff. Licensee will submit a letter of understanding to LPA via e-mail on 3/22/22
Mar 21, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On 3/21/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaclyn Avila conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit, and met with Miriam Fickewirth Administrator/Licensee and Herman Fickewirth. Prior to initiating the complaint visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: N95. During the course of the complaint visit, LPA conducted an inspection with Herman Fickewirth at Marie's direction, to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. LPA observed the following deficiencies: At 8:47 AM, LPA inspected outside storage containers that were locked behind a gate on the patio behind the facility. LPA observed a sample of the stored food and found expired Tomato sauce as of April 17, 2020, Expired Miso Broth as of March 22 2021, expired dill pickles as of July 2017, expired broccoli cream soup as of October 31, 2021. At 9:42 AM, LPA inspected the inside kitchen fridge with Miriam and found expired juice as of November 20, 2020, expired nutrition shake as of March 2016, expired dressing September 1st, 2021, expired yogurt as of 11/24/2020, expired Gatorade as of December 04, 2021, expired cashews as of April 2014, expired deli meat as of November 9th, 2021. At 9:39 AM and at 9:53 AM, LPA found 2 of 2 fire extinguisher observed were last serviced Nov 11, 2019. LPA Contacted the Cypress Fire Protection Agency and left a message for Fire Marshall John Reynolds. LPA requested a call back regarding local fire regulations. The following deficiencies were cited per Title 22 of the California Code of Regulation See 809D. Appeal Rights were explained and provided to the facility representative listed above and an Exit Interview was conducted. If any of the cited deficiencies are not corrected by the noted due dates; civil penalties may be assessed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2022
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87555(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 22, 2022
87555(a) General Food Service Requirements- The total daily diet shall be of the quality and in the quantity necessary to meet the needs of the residents ...All food shall be selected, stored, prepared and served in a safe and healthful manner. This requirement is not met as evidenced by Based upon observationthe Licensee failed to ensure the quality of food at the facility. Expired non-perishable food was located ouside in storage and expired perishable food was located in the kitchen fridge accessible to residents in care. This poses an immediate Health, Safety and/or Personal Rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2022
Plan of correction: LIcensee agrees to audit food once a month. Licensee will provide LPA Avila with a scheduled day each month and provide the schedule via e-mail on 3/22/22
20211 state visit · 1 document
Jul 9, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marybeth Donovan conducted an unannounced Required - 1 Year Annual Inspection Infection Control site visit and met with Miriam Fickewirth Administrator and Michael Hagerty Co-Administrator. LPA toured the facility inside and out to include the entry, bedrooms and bathrooms, kitchen, dining room, living room, laundry room, storage and exterior. All fire exit routes were free and clear of obstructions. Medications are stored in a locked medication cabinet in the kitchen. Toxins, cleaning supplies, knives and sharp objects are secured. Facility observed to have designated entry point for universal symptom screening with questionnaire. Bathrooms observed to be supplied with hygiene products. Hand washing signs were posted in bathrooms. Hand sanitizer available to residents and visitors. LPA observed to have adequate supply of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). LPA reviewed the facility policies and procedures to include screening, isolation, disinfecting, staffing, training, supplies, PPE usage and social distancing. No citations were issued per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. LPA reviewed report with Miram Fickewirth Administrator and Michael Hagerty Co-Administrator and a copy provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 9, 2021
4 of 6 beds were occupied at the November 13, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Fickewirth, Miriam S., licensed since 1990.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 1990, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 9
- Total complaints
- 3
- Substantiated allegations
- 0
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 1990, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 0 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 3 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Agape of Carmel
Is Agape of Carmel licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
How many residents is Agape of Carmel licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
Has Agape of Carmel been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 1990, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.
Is Agape of Carmel still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Agape of Carmel cost?
$6,000 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.
Among 5 other homes of a similar licensed size across Monterey County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,250 to $6,250 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 5 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Agape of Carmel take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Fickewirth, Miriam S., per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Community Hospital of the Monterey Peninsula is 1.9 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Agape of Carmel keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
Agape of Carmel license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “AGAPE OF CARMEL”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #270708695. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
- Licensed to Fickewirth, Miriam S., per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
- First licensed in 1990, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
- 9 state inspection visits since 1990, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 1990, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
- 3 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 1990, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is July 8, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Monterey County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$4,395 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$6,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$6,795 a month to start
Listed by the home on its own website · October 27, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,250 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,300–$6,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,200 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,300–$5,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,650 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,650–$6,950On the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Monterey County