Small home · Licensed for 6 · Carmel
Archway of Carmel
3262 Taylor Road, Carmel, CA 93923Licensed since 2011
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Hospiceup to 4 residents
Not on file: dementia and bedridden approvals.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
LICENSED TO SERVE 60 YEARS AND OVER. ALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. LICENSE IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE HOSPICE WAIVER FOR FOUR (4).
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Archway of Carmel: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$5,250a month to start
Likely $4,300–$6,500
From 14 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$5,250likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$5,250likely $4,300–$6,500
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes and similar homes within 35 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,300–$6,650
- $5,250
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,050–$9,800
- $7,750
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes14 nearby homes publish starting rates of $1,500 to $7,000
14 homes like this within 35 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,750–$6,500.
- Flanders Court of CarmelCarmel · 0.7 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Agape of CarmelCarmel · 0.8 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Carmel VillaCarmel · 3.0 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Carmelo ParkMonterey · 3.5 mi · Mid-size home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Villa Mirage of CarmelCarmel Valley · 11 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- El Camino Real ManorMarina · 12 mi · Small home$2,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Rachelle's Home IFreedom · 28 mi · Mid-size home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Twin Lakes ManorSanta Cruz · 30 mi · Mid-size home$1,500Listed on its own website · shared studios (starting at) · seen October 5, 2026
- The Maple HouseSanta Cruz · 30 mi · Mid-size home$5,500Listed on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026
- Hanover Guest HomeSanta Cruz · 31 mi · Mid-size home$2,750Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Paradise Assisted CareSanta Cruz · 31 mi · Mid-size home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Valley Haven IIISanta Cruz · 31 mi · Mid-size home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Seaview Guest HomeAptos · 31 mi · Small home$4,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Clearview CarehomesHollister · 34 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes and similar homes within 35 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
3262 Taylor Road, Carmel, CA 93923Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Community Hospital of the Monterey PeninsulaHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list2.5 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #275202260 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 3 of 8 documents
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jun 19, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 06/19/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct a Required Annual Inspection. LPA met with lead Caregiver Maria Molina who invited Licensee Cyril Tupino to assist with the visit due to language barrier. LPA announced the purpose for the inspection to Licensee Cyril who assisted LPA conducting health and safety inside and outside facility tour . LPA observed restricted pathways downstairs restricting pathway out through kitchen. During observation LPA notice missing carbon monoxide detectors. While touring the kitchen, LPA observed sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable foodstuffs which were stored properly. Common areas were clean, adequately furnished, and adequately lit. Resident bedrooms were clean and had required minimum furnishings. Resident bathrooms were clean, odor free, and water temperature was within required temperature range. A locked cabinet downstairs in the kitchen was observed to store resident medications, and medications appeared to be administered properly. The facility failed to provide for review requested emergency disaster plan and infection control plan. LPA reviewed resident and staff files. Residents files missing updated medical evaluation and reassessment. Staff files missing first aid/CPR and required annual training. During outside walk LPA observed that an outdoor area which was accessible to residents contained a standing broken clothes dryer, and other miscellaneous appliances and items which could be hazardous to residents. During resident file review, it was observed that three out of four residents' files did not contain re assessment and medical evaluation. Three out of four residents diagnosed with dementia did not have records of appropriate reappraisals conducted within the last twelve months. See attached for deficiencies cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations Title 22, Division 6. Administrator was provided with a copy of the report and appeal rights. During Licensing inspection Licensee left facility and have not returned. Exit interview conducted with facility staff, report signed and copy of this report with appeal right provided for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Jun 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 06/27/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban arrived unannounced at the above facility to conduct an Annual Inspection. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and was granted entry to the facility. LPA toured the facility with facility staff Sheila Tupino, administrator was notified of licensing certification number 7002185740 and expiration date 09/03/2025. The facility is two story building with four residents room on upper level and two residents private rooms on lower level was observed to be at a comfortable temperature, of 74 degrees F. Facility is free of debris, in good repair, and no passageway obstructions or fire hazards were observed. Common areas were properly furnished and well-lit throughout. LPA observed some residents in common area during breakfast watching television, others in their rooms resting. Department phone number and infection prevention information signs were posted thought the facility. Inspecting kitchen LPA observed the required 7-day supply of non-perishable food and 2- day supply of fresh perishables to be properly stored. An emergency disaster supply was observed. A fire extinguisher was observed in compliance with service date 12/02/2024 Last fire drill recorded on 06/15/2025 Private residents’ bedroom observed to be at comfortable temperatures. The bathroom’s water temperature was tested and recorded reading of 120 degrees F. Medications records storage observed to be locked in a cabinet in the dinning area. Cleaning supplies were observed to be in a locked cabinet in the storage it the garage. An outdoor seating area was observed operational for residents in care. Staff and residents records reviewed. Deficiencies were observed and cited during this visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report with appeal rights provided for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 27, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
May 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 5/21/2024, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) D. Ayers arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct a Required Annual Inspection. LPA met with lead Caregiver Maria Carrillo and spoke with Administrator Cyril Tupino via telephone. LPA announced the purpose for the inspection. LPA toured the facility inside and outside. Pathways and doors were clear and free from obstruction. Smoke-detectors and carbon-monoxide detectors were present and operational. Facility was clean and odor free. LPA observed sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable foodstuffs which were stored properly. Common areas were clean, adequately furnished, and adequately lit. Resident bedrooms were clean and had required minimum furnishings. Resident bathrooms were clean, odor free, and water temperature was within required temperature range. Sharp items and detergents were secured in a locked cabinet in the kitchen. A locked cabinet in the garage was observed to store resident medications, and medications appeared to be administered properly. LPA reviewed facility plan of operations and emergency disaster plan. LPA reviewed resident and staff files. At 10:00 am LPA observed that a bathroom cabinet containing bleach and other cleaning supplied was unlocked and accessible to residents. It was also observed in the same bathroom that there was no non-skid mat in the shower or available to be placed in the shower. At 11:00am, it was observed that an outdoor area which was accessible to residents contained a standing motorcycle, a broken clothes dryer, and other miscellaneous appliances and items which could be hazardous to residents. During resident file review, it was observed that two out of four residents' files did not contain admission agreements. Also, two out of three residents diagnosed with dementia did not have records of appropriate reappraisals conducted within the last twelve months. See attached for deficiencies cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations Title 22, Division 6. Administrator was provided with a copy of the report and appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2024
Earlier years2023 · 5 documents
20233 state visits · 5 documents
Oct 12, 2023Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file
Type of visit: POC
On 10/12/2023, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) D. Ayers arrived unannounced to conduct a Proof of Correction inspection. LPA met with Administrator Cyril Tupino and announced the purpose of the inspection. This visit was conducted to verify that the Administrator had followed the agreed upon plan of correction for the deficiency which was cited on 8/29/2023. LPA toured the facility. LPA reviewed staff training logs and medication administration records. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection. A copy of the report was provided and exit interview conducted with Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 12, 2023
Aug 29, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not maintain accurate records regarding resident in care. Food services are inadequate. Facility does not provide accurate information to resident(s) regarding how to file grievances in regard to facility. Staff do not follow adequate food safety practices. Staff used medication to restrain resident in care. Staff did not respond to requests for communication regarding resident in a timely manner.
On 8/29/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) D. Ayers conducted an unannounced complaint inspection. LPA met with caregiver Maria and contacted Licensee Cyril Tupino. The purpose of this visit is to deliver the finding of the investigation completed by the Department. Licensee granted permission for staff to sign this report on his behalf. LPA conducted a tour of the facility, interior and exterior, to ensure there are no potential or immediate health and safety risk at the facility. During the course of the investigation, the department inspected the facility, conducted interviews, and reviewed records. Facility medication administration records were complete, and medications appeared to be administered properly. Facility staff only administered pro re nata(PRN) medications on an as needed basis and properly documented doses. Facility staff adhere to a monthly meal menu which meets requirements and offer alternative options to residents. LPA observed staff to utilize gloves and proper sanitary practices when preparing meals and washing dishes. Resident admission agreements include information on how to file grievances, and required postings on grievances are posted in the facility in a prominent place. Unsubstantiated Based on the interviews conducted, documentation obtained and reviewed, and the information received during this investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 29, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230410092729
Aug 29, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff gave resident crushed medication(s) without a doctor's order.
On 8/29/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) D. Ayers conducted an unannounced complaint inspection. LPA met with caregiver Maria Carrillo and contacted Licensee Cyril Tupino. The licensee agreed that staff could sign the reports on his behalf. The purpose of this visit is to deliver the finding of the investigation completed by the Department. LPA conducted a tour of the facility, interior and exterior to ensure there are no potential or immediate health and safety risk at the facility. During the course of the investigation, the department inspected the facility, conducted interviews, and reviewed records. Based off of interviews and records, facility staff did crush Resident 1's(R1) medications and place them in food. Although facility staff claimed that this was due to R1's inability to swallow and was done at the request of R1's responsible party, medications were crushed without a physician's order. Continued on LIC9099C Substantiated Based on the interviews conducted, documentation obtained and reviewed, and the information received during this investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be substantiated at this time. Per the California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, the following deficiency was observed and cited on LIC 9099-D. Failure to correct the deficiency may result in civil penalties. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report provided. Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) was provided to facility staff, whose signature below confirms receipt of these rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 29, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230407155801
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(5)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 5, 2023
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care: (a)(5)(D)Assistance with self-administration does not include forcing a resident to take medication, hiding or camouflaging medications in other substances without the resident's knowledge and consent, or otherwise infringing upon a resident's right to refuse to take a medication. This Requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews comducted and records reviewed, facility staff crushed R1's medications and placed them in food without having physician's orders to do so for 1 out of 5 residents, which presents a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 29, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to provide staff with training regarding proper handling of medications. Licensee agreed to provide statement of understanding regarding requirements for physician orders for medications.
Aug 29, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not properly manage resident's incontinence care resulting in infections. Staff did not seek timely medical care for resident. Staff did not ensure that resident received their medication in a timely manner. Staff did not put appropriate measures into place for a resident who was a fall risk. Staff did not inform resident's responsible person of resident's incidents. Staff handled resident in a rough manner. Staff did not respond to resident’s requests for assistance in a timely manner. Staff did not assist resident with their hygiene needs in a timely manner.
On 8/29/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) D. Ayers conducted an unannounced complaint inspection. LPA met with caregiver Maria and contacted Licensee Cyril Tupino. The purpose of this visit is to deliver the finding of the investigation completed by the Department. Licensee granted permission for staff to sign this report on his behalf. LPA conducted a tour of the facility, interior and exterior to ensure there are no potential or immediate health and safety risk at the facility. During the course of the investigation, the department inspected the facility, conducted interviews, and reviewed records. Resident 1(R1) was admitted to the facility on 12/22/2022. R1 developed a unirary tract infection on 3/24/2023. Facility staff requested the hospice agency order medications to treat the infection that same day. R1 fell from their wheelchair on 3/24/2023: R1's responsible party was informed of the incident on 3/25/2023. According to statements from witnesses who did not work for the facility, R1's hygeine needs were being met and staff were properly managing their incontinence care. Unsubstantiated Based on the interviews conducted, documentation obtained and reviewed, and the information received during this investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 29, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230407155801
Jun 29, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 6/29/2023, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) D. Ayers arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct a Required Annual Inspection. LPA met with lead Caregiver Maria Carrillo and spoke with Licensee Cyril Tupino via telephone. Administrator certificate was current with expiration date 10/28/2023. There were 2 residents on hospice at the time of the inspection. LPA toured the facility inside and outside. Pathways and doors were clear and free from obstruction. Smoke-detectors and carbon-monoxide detectors were present and operational. Facility was clean and odor free. LPA observed sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable foodstuffs. Common areas were clean, adequately furnished, and adequately lit. Resident bedrooms were clean and had required minimum furnishings. Resident bathrooms were clean, odor free, and water temperature was within required temperature range. Sharp items and detergents were secured in a locked cabinet in the kitchen. A locked cabinet in the garage was observed to store resident medications, and medications appeared to be administered properly. The fence had a self-locking latch mechanism, and there was adequate outdoor seating for residents. LPA reviewed facility plan of operations and emergency disaster plan. LPA reviewed resident files: staff files will be reviewed on another date. LPA requested the following documents: LIC 500 Personnel Report, LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility, LIC 610-E the Emergency Disaster Plan, and a copy of current Administrator’s Certificate to update the facility file. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection, exit interview conducted with Licensee, a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 29, 2023
6 of 6 beds were occupied at the August 29, 2023 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Cyril Eugene S. Tupino, licensed since 2011.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2011, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 8
- Total complaints
- 2
- Substantiated allegations
- 1
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 1
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2011, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 1 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 1 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 2 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Archway of Carmel
Is Archway of Carmel licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Archway of Carmel licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Archway of Carmel been cited?
0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2011, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.
Is Archway of Carmel still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 12, 2026.
What does Archway of Carmel cost?
$5,250 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,300–$6,500. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes and similar homes within 35 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 6 other homes of a similar licensed size across Monterey County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,500 (n = 6 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Archway of Carmel take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Cyril Eugene S. Tupino, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Community Hospital of the Monterey Peninsula is 2.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Archway of Carmel keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Archway of Carmel license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “ARCHWAY OF CARMEL”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #275202260. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Cyril Eugene S. Tupino, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2011, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 8 state inspection visits since 2011, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2011, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
- 2 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2011, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is September 14, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Monterey County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$6,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$6,795 a month to start
Listed by the home on its own website · October 27, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$6,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,200 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,300–$5,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,650 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,650–$6,950On the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,300 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,350–$6,550On the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Monterey County