Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Cottages of Carmel

Large community·Licensed for 78·Carmel, California

Licensed since 2024Licence #277209489
  • Care approvals on fileDementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,800 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,550–$7,400
  • Home sizeLicensed for 78Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit57 of 78 beds occupiedApril 16, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJuly 2, 2026CDSS inspection record

Cottages of Carmel is a large care community in Carmel — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 78 residents since 2024. Wheelchair and non-ambulatory care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Cottages of Carmel

Is Cottages of Carmel licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Cottages of Carmel licensed for?

78 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Cottages of Carmel been cited?

0 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 11 state visits over the same years.

Is Cottages of Carmel still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Cottages of Carmel cost?

$5,800 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,550–$7,400. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 communities with 50 or more beds within 40 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 6 other homes of a similar licensed size across Monterey County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,795 to $4,595 a month, and the middle figure is $4,445 (n = 6 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Cottages of Carmel take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by 26245 Carmel Rancho Blvd. Opco LLC;Oakmont Mgmt., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Oakmont Mgmt — at least 8 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Community Hospital of the Monterey Peninsula is 2.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Cottages of Carmel keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Cottages of Carmel license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “COTTAGES OF CARMEL”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #277209489. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 78 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to 26245 Carmel Rancho Blvd. Opco LLC;Oakmont Mgmt., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2024, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 11 state inspection visits since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 11 state visits in that period.
  • 6 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 2, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file · ask the home
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 4 residents

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 78 NON-AMBULALORY, OF WHICH 4 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER GRANTED FOR (15).

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,800a month to start

Likely $4,550–$7,400

From 14 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,800a month

Likely $4,550–$7,550

With a studio and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,800likely $4,550–$7,400

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 communities with 50 or more beds within 40 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,550–$7,550
$5,800
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,400–$10,450
$7,800
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 communities with 50 or more beds within 40 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

14 homes like this within 40 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,550–$5,600.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 14 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 26245 Carmel Rancho Blvd., Carmel, CA 93923Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2024, the state has filed 9 documents for this home, and its records count 11 visits since 2024. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 2, 2026.

On file since
2024
State visits
11
Most recent visit
July 2, 2026
Occupied · April 16, 2026 visit
57 of 78 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 6 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated July 10, 2025 to April 16, 2026. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (6). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 6 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations2typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations2typical 2
  • Total complaints6typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2024.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202622020254602024110

The last 36 months — 9 of 9 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 2, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vadim Gorban conducted an unannounced visit today to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Administrator Kellie Shearer, and explained the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured the facility and observed residents in care. The facility reported incident on June 24th, 2026 that occurred on June 23rd, 2026 with resident (R1) while providing care by staff (S1) in unpleasant manner. Staff made resident feel uncomfortable and scared by staff getting in personal space and raising her voice toward resident. Administrator was notified of the incident , Staff was immediately suspended pending investigation. LPA requested facility files for review by 7/10/26 . Exit interview conducted with Administrator, report signed and copy of this report with appeal rights provided for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 2, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 10, 2026

87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities. (1) To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This requirement was not observed as evidenced by: The facility failed to provide safe accommodation to one out of 56 residents, which poses potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 2, 2026

Plan of correction: The facility administrator will provide corrective actions and will submit to LPA by email by POC due date.

Apr 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not documenting residents medication Staff are not meeting resident's hygiene needs Unqualified staff are administering medications

On 04/16/2026 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gorban unannounced visited the facility to commence complaint investigation. LPA introduced self and met by Administrator; LPA stated purpose of the visit and was allowed entry. During the complaint investigation LPA toured the facility conducting health and safety checks, reviewed records, and interviews. Allegations: Staff are not documenting residents’ medication, Staff are not meeting resident's hygiene needs, and Unqualified staff are administering medications. Based records reviews resident’s medications record confirmed medication records confirmed proper documentation. Based on staff interviews, resident will maintain own dental hygiene. Based on records review and staff interviews, training on medication administration provided to staff that have access to med cart. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Report continues on attached LIC9099-A Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 16, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260115090814

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 21, 2026

87411 Personnel Requirements - General. (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. This requirement was not observed as evidenced by: The facility dementia resident was observed in the morning with facial injuries unknown to staff. Based on interviews, R1 did not have facial injuries day prior, which poses potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 16, 2026

Plan of correction: Administrator will review and provide a written plan of correction to LPA by email by POC due date.

20254 state visits · 6 documents
Nov 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not properly addressing resident’s pressure injuries Staff are not meeting resident’s incontinence needs Staff are not providing quality food service to residents Staff do not respond to residents calls for help

On 11/26/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban conducted subsequent complaint inspection. LPA met with HSD. The purpose of this visit is to deliver the findings of the investigation completed by the Department. During the visit, LPA conducted a tour of the facility, interior and exterior to ensure there is no potential or immediate health and safety risk at the facility. Allegation: Staff are not properly addressing resident’s pressure injuries. Based on records review no pressure injuries observed, reported or documented. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Report continues on attached LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff are not meeting resident’s incontinence needs. Based on staff interviews, residents are checked every two hours. Based on observation skin is intact and no redness or skin breakdown observed. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff are not providing quality food service to residents. Based on observations during facility visits, food were observed to be stored according to regulation standards. The facility employs CA certified nutritionist/ dietitian. No concerns from residents were reported based on interviews conducted. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff do not respond to residents’ calls for help. Based on interviews and records reviewed, facility employs three staff members per shift that provide care only for memory care section of the facility. Each resident room is equipped with call light system that is observed operational. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Report continues on attached LIC9099-Athe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 26, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250822153020

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 1, 2025

87303 Maintenance and Operation. a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement was not observed as evidenced by: The facility staff failed to ensure to follow title 22 regulation regarding facility cleanness, which poses potential health and safety to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 26, 2025

Plan of correction: The facility administrator will provide Licensing office plan of correction by POC due date (12/01/2025) describing (in formal letter) the measure taken to ensure regulation followed.

Sep 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 09/25/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct Required Annual Inspection. LPA met with interim administrator Andrea Ramirez. LPA conducted tour inside and out of facility. Residents observed at the facility during lunch time. The facility was observed to be at a comfortable temperature of 76 degrees, clean, in good repair, and no passageway obstructions or fire hazards observed. Fire extinguisher was observed with a service date of 06/16/2025. Last disaster drill recorded on August 07,2025 Dining area and Kitchen were toured. An adequate supply of perishable and non-perishable food was observed to be properly stored in freezer, refrigerator, and pantry. Food is delivered by Sisco Foods twice a week on Mondays and Thursdays. Refrigerator temperature was maintained at 40.0-degree F. and freezer was maintained at -1-degree F. Residents' rooms were toured and observed with adequately furnished with bed, dresser, and adequate lighting. Hot water temperature tested and within regulation requirements. LPA observed securely fastened grab bar and non-skid mat in shower area. All three facility buildings equipped with its medication room and storage. Medications records were reviewed. First Aid Kit was stored in medication room and observed with all required items. Adequate PPE supplies was observed. LPA toured laundry room and observed chemicals were stored and locked for staff use only. Facility courtyard was toured and observed to be free from debris. There was outdoor seating available for the residents. Report continues on attached LIC809-C Residents’ files were reviewed to have updated emergency contact, Admission agreement, Needs and Services Plan and Pre-Appraisal Plan. A sample of staff files were reviewed. Staff files were observed to have current First Aid/CPR, Health screening, and Personnel record. Community Care Licensing (CCL) is always striving to have facility files that reflect the most accurate & up to date information for your facility. In an effort to maintain your facility file, please submit the most current & complete forms &/or information as identified below: Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE): · LIC 308 Designation of Facility Responsibility · LIC 309 Administrative Organization Please submit the above forms/information to Fresno CCL by: 09/29/2025 As an operator of a Community Care Licensed facility it is your responsibility to be aware of and in compliance with all regulations, including Chaptered Legislation. Go to www.ccld.ca.gov to stay updated and informed. No deficiencies issued during this inspection. An exit interview was conducted with the SEA. A copy of this report was given to the SEA, whose signature confirm receipt of this report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2025
Aug 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that resident's toileting needs were met. Staff did not seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner. Facility is not adhering to infectious control protocols.

On 08/25/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban conducted subsequent complaint inspection. LPA met with administrator Nelson Rubio. The purpose of this visit is to deliver the findings of the investigation completed by the Department. During the visit, LPA conducted a tour of the facility, interior and exterior to ensure there are no potential or immediate health and safety risk at the facility. Regarding Staff did not ensure that resident's toileting needs were met. Based on observations and interviews no concerns reported or observed regarding patient care. Based on interviews, staff check on residents every two hours. Regarding Staff did not seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner. Based on interviews and record reviews resident R1 was taken to the hospital and responsible party was notifies on the day of the incident, May 11th, 2025. Report continues on attached LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Regarding Facility is not adhering to infectious control protocols. Based on observations facility have substantial amount of PPE, based on interviews and records reviews, facility infection control requirements files are up to date. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there are not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report provided to administrator for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 25, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250707165437
Aug 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility allowed untrained staff to work independently with dementia care residents Facility does not have a certified administrator on the premises

On 08/25/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban conducted subsequent complaint inspection. LPA met with administrator Nelson Rubio. The purpose of this visit is to deliver the findings of the investigation completed by the Department. During the visit, LPA conducted a tour of the facility, interior and exterior to ensure there are no potential or immediate health and safety risk at the facility. Regarding the allegations: Facility allowed untrained staff to work independently with dementia care residents and Facility does not have a certified administrator on the premises. Base on interview and records reviews staff (S1) completed required training to work at the facility with dementia residents and facility provided files of certified administrator. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there are not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report provided to administrator for facility records. No deficiencies were cited during the visit. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 25, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250821093230
Jul 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not provide adequate supervision, resulting in sexual behavior amongst residents. Facility staff did not notify authorized representative of incidents. Facility staff do not ensure facility is free of pests. Facility staff do not ensure the facility is not clean/sanitary.

On 07/10/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban conducted an unannounced complaint inspection. LPA met with administrator Julie Estrellado. The purpose of this visit is to deliver the finding of the investigation completed by the Department. During the visit, LPA conducted a tour of the facility, interior and exterior to ensure there are no potential or immediate health and safety risk at the facility. On 05/13/2025, the Department received a report alleging that facility staff did not provide adequate supervision, resulting in sexual behavior amongst residents. According to the reporting party, the reporting party was told by other staff (name unknown) that Resident R1 sexually touched Resident R2 and Resident R3. However, the reporting party did not witness the incident. Staff denied any incidents involving R2. On 12/07/2024, there was an incident where R1 put R1’s hand inside R3’s pants. Staff intervened and separated both residents. Staff checked on R3 and no injuries or signs of discomfort were noted. Staff reported the incident to the licensing agency when it occurred. Report continues on attached LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Regarding Facility staff did not notify authorized representative of incidents, facility administrator notified both responsible parties regarding the incident. Records reviewed and interviews were conducted were administrator confirmed notifying both responsible parties of the incident on 12/07/2024. Regarding the Facility staff do not ensure the facility is free of pests. Based on interviews and records review the facility utilize services by pest control agency to keep the facility in sanitary condition. The maintenance director placed additional traps for rodents when observed close to facility entries. Regarding Facility staff do not ensure the facility is not clean/sanitary. Per observation during facility visits, interviews and records review staff keep facility maintenance in sanitary and good repair. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation is unsubstantiated, at this time. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report provided to administrator for facility records. No deficiencies were cited during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 10, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250513123829
Jul 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is malodorous Staff leave residents sleeping in common areas Staff do not assist residents in changing into sleeping clothes Staff do not treat residents with respect Staff do not properly store food

On 07/10/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban conducted an unannounced complaint inspection. LPA met with administrator Julie Estrellado. The purpose of this visit is to deliver the findings of the investigation completed by the Department. During the visit, LPA conducted a tour of the facility, interior and exterior to ensure there are no potential or immediate health and safety risk at the facility. Regarding the allegation Facility is malodorous. Based on observations, interview and record reviews no concerns observed and/or reported. Interviews revealed the housekeeping staff able to complete assignment and maintain the facility clean and in good repair. Regarding staff leave residents sleeping in common areas. Staff interviews reported that residents spend evening time in the common room prior to be assisted back to the room for nigh time sleep. Based on family interviews, alleged violation is not witnessed or reported. Based on interviews residents spend time resting, watching television or playing games with other residents or family members. Report continues on attached LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Regarding staff do not assist residents in changing into sleeping clothes. Based on interviews and records reviews no alleged violations observed or reported. Based on observations, each resident has personal belongings / sleep wear available for bed time. Based on interviews, residents assisted with dressing those that require assistance, for the rest, sleep clothes prepared for residents to be dressed by self when ready. Regarding Staff do not treat residents with respect. During the investigation, the department interviewed staff, family, and administrator. During record reviews no alleged violations observed or reported. Based on administrator interview no reports of alleged violation recorded or provided to administrator. Regarding staff do not properly store food. Based on observations during facility visit and staff interviews, food stored in refrigerating units in all three sections of the facility. The units observed to be operational with in the requirements. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation is unsubstantiated, at this time. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report provided to administrator for facility records. No deficiencies were cited during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 10, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250602094900
20241 state visit · 1 document
Sep 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

On 09/17/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban conducted an announced Pre-licensing visit. LPA identified himself and discussed the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted the inspection with the facility Administrator (AD) Julie Estrellado. An inside and outside tour of the facility was conducted with AD. Home is fire cleared for 74 (seventy four) non-ambulatory and 4 (four) bed ridden residents. The facility provides 16 private rooms in memory care and 58 private rooms on assisted living portion of the facility. Resident’s each room have adequate furnishings and lighting and all the required furnishings. Mattress and linen appeared to be in good condition. LPA observed a supply of extra bed linens. Bathrooms were properly equipped, and trash cans had a fitting lid. Hot water temperature was observed to be 109 degrees F. Kitchen observed to have dishes, plates, utensils. Sharps/knives and medications are locked in the kitchen. Groceries are delivered to the facility every other day by Sysco food company. Cleaning supplies are stored. First aid kit contains all the required items. The facility equipped with fire pool boxes throughout. Fire extinguishers are present and was serviced on 06/27/2024. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide are combined in one unit and were operating properly. Outside of the facility toured. Exits open free of obstruction. Gate is self-latching. No outside hazards were observed. All required postings are posted. Facility phone number will be 831-620-1800. Component III conducted during pre-licensing inspection. No deficiencies were observed during this inspection. LPA will submit documentation to CAB in Sacramento for final review prior to license being issued. Pre-Licensing is complete, and this facility has no deficiencies. Exit interview conducted, report is signed and copy of the report provided to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 17, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Monterey County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Monterey County