Small home · Licensed for 6 · Atwater
LLC Retirement Homes II
1944 Faxon Dr, Atwater, CA 95301Licensed since 2020
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Hospiceup to 3 residents
- Bedriddenup to 4 residents
Not on file: dementia approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. SIX (6) NONAMBULATORY OF WHICH FOUR (4) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ANY ROOM. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR THREE (3).
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for LLC Retirement Homes II: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,450a month to start
Likely $3,650–$5,500
From 16 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,450likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$4,450likely $3,650–$5,500
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 small homes and similar homes within 37 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,650–$5,700
- $4,450
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,300–$8,900
- $6,950
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes16 nearby homes publish starting rates of $1,900 to $6,000
16 homes like this within 37 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,850–$4,950.
- Integrated Health CareMerced · 4.0 mi · Small home$3,700Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Kazlin Infinite CareMerced · 4.4 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Trinity Valley CareTurlock · 18 mi · Mid-size home$3,650Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Lifespring Senior Campus, A Wellness CommunityTurlock · 19 mi · Mid-size home$1,900Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Anaya Elder CareLos Banos · 23 mi · Small home$3,900Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Malonzo EldercareModesto · 31 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Safe Haven Central ValleyModesto · 33 mi · Small home$4,900Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- St. Stephen's HomeModesto · 33 mi · Small home$2,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Patterson CarehomePatterson · 33 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Sisters Assisted LivingModesto · 33 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Crossroads ManorRiverbank · 33 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Graceful Living at RiverbankRiverbank · 34 mi · Small home$3,300Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Astoria at OakdaleOakdale · 34 mi · Mid-size home$2,150Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Dutchollow Suites IModesto · 35 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Graceful Living at ModestoModesto · 37 mi · Small home$3,300Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Brighter LivingModesto · 37 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on its own website · *starting base price · seen October 5, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 small homes and similar homes within 37 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
1944 Faxon Dr, Atwater, CA 95301Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #247209026 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 6 of 10 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated” and 1 “Unsubstantiated”.
20263 state visits · 4 documents
Jun 5, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced visit on June 5, 2026 to conduct a Case Management visit. LPA met with Licensee Lindsey Lamerson over the phone and explained the purpose of today's visit. LPA returned file/ records for former facility Resident 1. No deficiencies cited or observed during visit. Exit interview conducted with Licensee, Lindsey Lamerson, and copy of report left at facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2026
May 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident sustained bruises and fractures due to physical abuse Staff do not report injuries to resident's responsible party Staff do not provide responsible party with resident's records Staff do not ensure that resident is hydrated Staff are not distributing resident's medications as prescribed Staff are not adhering to resident's dietary plan Staff do not communicate with responsible party regarding resident's care Staff did not assist resident with obtaining care Staff did not provide a safe environment for resident in care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced facility visit to open a complaint investigation. LPA met with Licensee, Lindsey Lamerson and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation that resident sustained bruises and fractures due to physical abuse, interviews and records reviewed did not reveal evidence that facility staff physically abused the resident. Medical records documented the resident had multiple chronic medical conditions, mobility impairment, chronic knee and hip pain, edema, fall risk, use of blood thinners, and a history of bruising easily. Records further documented prior falls, fractures, weakness, and the resident’s need for assistance with ambulation and transfers. Home health documentation reflected bruising concerns were evaluated and monitored, including recommendations to pad bedrails and wheelchair components to reduce accidental bruising. During interviews, the reporting party acknowledged they never witnessed staff physically abuse the resident and stated they were unsure whether bruising was intentional or related to incompetence or accidental causes. Ombudsman documentation reviewed by LPA reflected no concerns of abuse at the facility and noted the bruising was believed related to blood thinner use and the resident’s medical condition. The Investigations Bureau reviewed the complaint and declined further investigation after determining records and statements obtained did not show evidence of physical abuse. Based on interviews and records reviewed, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation that staff did not report injuries to the resident’s responsible party, records and interviews indicated the responsible party was notified regarding falls, medical concerns, appointments, bruising observations, and hospitalization's. The reporting party acknowledged receiving calls, texts, photographs, and updates from facility staff regarding incidents and changes in the resident’s condition. Although the reporting party expressed dissatisfaction regarding the timeliness or adequacy of certain communications, evidence obtained did not demonstrate staff failed to notify the responsible party of injuries or medical concerns. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation that staff did not provide the responsible party with resident records, LPA reviewed the written request for records submitted by the reporting party through legal counsel. The request sought extensive facility and medical documentation and additionally requested information regarding the cost associated with reproduction of records. Facility records reviewed by LPA included copies of the requested records assembled by facility staff, mailing documentation, certified mail receipts, and postage records demonstrating the records were mailed to the reporting party. Although the licensee generated an invoice reflecting copying and preparation costs, interviews confirmed no payment was requested prior to release and the records were nevertheless provided. Based on documentation reviewed, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation that staff did not ensure the resident was hydrated, LPA reviewed medical records, resident interviews, and observations made during facility visits. Medical records documented the resident received ongoing medical monitoring, physician follow-up appointments, home health services, and hospital care when needed. Resident interviews conducted by LPA revealed residents stated staff routinely provide beverages, meals, and assistance as needed. During facility visits, LPA observed beverages and water accessible to residents throughout the facility. No evidence was obtained showing facility staff intentionally withheld fluids or failed to provide hydration. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation that staff were not distributing medications as prescribed, LPA reviewed available records and conducted interviews. Records reviewed reflected the resident routinely attended medical appointments and received ongoing physician oversight. No evidence was obtained establishing staff intentionally withheld medications or failed to administer medications as ordered. Interviews conducted during the investigation further indicated residents receive medications routinely and timely. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation that staff were not adhering to the resident’s dietary plan, records reviewed reflected the resident was recommended a low sodium diet; however, records and interviews further demonstrated the resident remained under ongoing physician monitoring and continued attending routine medical appointments throughout residency. Interviews indicated the resident was verbal and capable of expressing food preferences and participating in decisions regarding activities and meals. Facility staff did offer salads, healthy choices, and rarely used salt in day to day cooking. No evidence was obtained demonstrating the resident suffered injury or harm due to meals provided by the facility. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation that staff did not communicate with the responsible party regarding the resident’s care, interviews indicated the concern partially related to the resident attending a Mother’s Day brunch outing without prior notification to the responsible party. Interviews and records reviewed reflected the resident was verbal, capable of expressing preferences, and elected to attend the outing. Evidence obtained during the investigation demonstrated ongoing communication occurred between facility staff and the responsible party through calls, text messages, photographs, appointment coordination, and medical discussions. While disagreements existed regarding decision-making and care preferences, evidence did not support that facility staff failed to communicate regarding the resident’s care. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation that staff did not assist the resident with obtaining care, records reviewed demonstrated the resident routinely attended physician appointments, hospital visits, home health services, hospice services, therapy services, and follow-up care throughout residency. Interviews further indicated facility staff assisted with transportation coordination, medical follow-up, and implementation of physician recommendations. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation that staff did not provide a safe environment for residents in care, LPA conducted resident interviews and facility observations. Residents interviewed stated they felt safe residing at the facility and denied witnessing abuse or mistreatment. Residents further stated staff responded when assistance was needed and treated them appropriately. LPA observed residents to appear appropriately dressed, clean, and comfortable within the facility environment. Although records documented the resident experienced falls and bruising, evidence obtained did not establish the facility intentionally created or maintained an unsafe environment. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted with Licensee, Lindsey Lamerson and copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 9, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260116102232
May 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaged residents medication records
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced facility visit to deliver findings on the allegations lsited above. LPA met with Licensee, Lindsey Lamerson and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation that staff mismanaged resident’s medication records, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted interviews and reviewed facility records including physician orders, over the counter PRN medication administration records, medication logs, and additional documentation maintained by facility staff regarding physician notification for over the counter PRN medication administration. LPA reviewed multiple over the counter PRN medication administration records maintained by the facility for the resident. Records reviewed documented over the counter PRN medications administered for symptoms including pain, anxiety, and other symptoms. LPA reviewed handwritten documentation maintained by the facility reflecting staff communication with the house manager and/or physician regarding over the counter PRN medication administration. Documentation reviewed reflected the facility maintained an internal process in which staff notified the house manager and/or physician when over the counter PRN medications were needed for the resident.. LPA identified documentation deficiencies within the PRN medication records. LPA observed several entries on the over the counter PRN medication administration records which contained incomplete documentation including missing times, incomplete results documentation, missing follow-up entries regarding effectiveness of medication administration, and inconsistent documentation regarding symptom resolution following administration of over the counter PRN medications. LPA did not observe evidence indicating the resident suffered harm related to the medication administration practices reviewed. However, the facility failed to ensure over the counter PRN medication records were consistently and accurately completed as required. . Based on interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. The following deficincies are being cited Per title 22 regulations. Exit interview conducted with Licensee, Lindsey Lamerson and copy of report provided along with appeals rights provided. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 9, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260501091427
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(d) · Plan of correction due date: May 23, 2026
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (d) If the resident is unable to determine his/her own need for a prescription or nonprescription PRN medication, and is unable to communicate his/her symptoms clearly, facility staff designated by the licensee, shall be permitted to assist the resident with self-administration provided all of the following requirements are met: (1) Facility staff shall contact the resident's physician prior to each dose, describe the resident's symptoms, and receive direction to assist the resident in self-administration of that dose of medication. (2) The date and time of each contact with the physician, and the physician's directions, shall be documented and maintained in the resident's facility record. (3) The date and time the PRN medication was taken, the dosage taken, and the resident's response shall be documented and maintained in the resident's facility record. The following requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Resident 1's PRN tracking log was not accurate and did not include all times PRN given, and results, which poses a potential, health, safety, or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 9, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to complete the following: Review and audit all resident PRN medication records to ensure documentation includes:date and time administered,medication administered, reason for administration,staff initials/signature,resident response/results following administration, and follow-up documentation when required, and submit proof to LPA by POC date of 05/23/2026.
Jan 28, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced visit today for the facility’s annual inspection. LPA met with Licensee, Lindsey Lamerson, Continual Administrator's Certification expires 02/05/2027. There are currently 6 residents who reside at this home and there is 1 residents on hospice at this time. LPA inspected the interior and the exterior of the facility including the common living spaces, resident bedrooms and bathrooms, activity rooms, medication storage, kitchen, garage and outdoor areas. Bedrooms were clean and in good repair. There is a locked storage for medications. Food supply is adequate for 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable. Fire extinguisher is within the safety regulation period. Smoke alarms were tested and are operational. The home has a carbon monoxide detector and performs disaster drills as required. Water temperature was tested at degrees. First Aid kit is on site and complete. Toxins and cleaning supplies are locked and inaccessible. Required hospice training is not inside Resident 1's hospice binder. There were no deficiencies observed or cited during today's inspection per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. LPA requested the following documents: LIC 500 Personnel Report, LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility, LIC 610-E the Emergency Disaster Plan and copy of current Administrator’s Certificate to update the facility file. Listed documents shall be sent to Licensing. Exit interview conducted with Licensee, Lindsey Lamerson, and copy of report left at facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 28, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Jan 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced visit today for the facility’s annual inspection. LPA met with facility Licensee Lindsay Lamerson, Continual Administrator's Certification for Licensee Lindsay Lamerson expires 02/05/2025. There are currently 6 residents who reside at this home and there is 1 resident on hospice at this time. LPA inspected the interior and the exterior of the facility including the common living spaces, resident bedrooms and bathrooms, activity rooms, medication storage, kitchen, garage and outdoor areas. Bedrooms were clean and in good repair. There is a locked storage for medications. Food supply is adequate for 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable. Fire extinguisher is within the safety regulation period. Smoke alarms were tested and are operational. The home has a carbon monoxide detector and performs disaster drills as required. Water temperature was tested at 110 degrees. First Aid kit is on site and complete. Toxins and cleaning supplies are locked and inaccessible. LPA reviewed 3 facility staff files, and 3 facility resident files. LPA reviewed your Infection Control Plan, and Emergency Disaster Plan. Resident 1 is missing Pre Admission assessment. There were no deficiencies observed or cited during today's inspection per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. LPA requested the following documents: LIC 500 Personnel Report, LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility, LIC 610-E the Emergency Disaster Plan and copy of current Administrator’s Certificate to update the facility file. Listed documents shall be sent to Licensing. Exit interview conducted with facility Licensee Lindsay Lamerson, and copy of report left at facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 17, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Jan 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced visit today for the facility’s annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Lindsey Lamerson, Continual Administrator's for Administrator, Lindsey Lamerson 02/05/2025. There are currently 5 residents who reside at this home and there is 3 residents on hospice at this time. LPA inspected the interior and the exterior of the facility including the common living spaces, resident bedrooms and bathrooms, activity rooms, medication storage, kitchen, garage and outdoor areas. Bedrooms were clean and in good repair. There is a locked storage for medications. Food supply is adequate for 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable. Fire extinguisher is within the safety regulation period. Smoke alarms were tested and are operational. The home has a carbon monoxide detector and performs disaster drills as required. Water temperature was tested at 111 degrees. First Aid kit is on site and complete. Toxins and cleaning supplies are locked and inaccessible. LPA Hurt confirmed all staff present is background cleared. The facility has an updated Emergency Disaster Plan. There were no deficiencies observed or cited during today's inspection per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. LPA's requested the following documents: LIC 500 Personnel Report, LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility, LIC 610-E the Emergency Disaster Plan and copy of current Administrator’s Certificate to update the facility file. Listed documents shall be sent to Licensing. Exit interview conducted with Administrator, Lindsey Lamerson and copy of report left at facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 22, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 4 documents
20231 state visit · 1 document
Feb 3, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not administer resident's medication as prescribed Facility staff speak inappropriately to resident's Facility staff restrict residents from filing complaints
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced facility visit to deliver findings on a complaint investigation. LPA met with Licensee, Lindsey Lamerson and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation Facility staff did not administer resident's medication as prescribed. Based on facility records reviewed the facility staff did administer resident’s medication as prescribed. LPA Hurt reviewed Medication Administration Records for Resident 1 documenting all medications given as prescribed. Therefore, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that an allegation is unsubstantiated means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. Continued on 9099C... Unsubstantiated ...Continued from 9099 Regarding the allegation Facility staff speak inappropriately to residents. Based on interviews conducted the facility staff is not speaking inappropriately to residents. LPA Hurt interviewed four facility staff who all stated they have never heard any staff speak inappropriately to residents inappropriately. Reporting party stated Staff 1 witnessed facility Staff 2 tell them “they would give them their medications when they wanted and not when he wanted.” LPA Hurt interviewed Staff 1 who stated they never heard any conversation between Reporting Party, and Staff 2 about medications. Therefore, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that an allegation is unsubstantiated means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. Regarding the allegation Facility staff restrict residents from filing complaints. Based on facility records reviewed this facility staff is not restricting residents from filing complaints. LPA Hurt reviewed facility "Admissions Agreement" Page 13 reads "Filing Complaints. Any person (not just residents or family members) or organization have the right to file a complaint with Community Care Licensing at 844-538-8766." LPA Hurt reviewed "Attachment to Admission Agreement #9: Grievances Procedures" documenting facility residents rights to file complaints. LPA Hurt observed residents have access to a phone at all times to use if they chose to file a complaint. Therefore, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that an allegation is unsubstantiated means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. No Deficiencies cited today Per Title 22 Regulations. Exit interview conducted with Licensee, Lindsey Lamerson and copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 3, 2023 · control 24-AS-20221110160235
20222 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 15, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced visit today for the facility’s annual inspection. LPA met with Licensee, Lindsey Lamerson Continual Administrator's Certification expires 02/05/2023. There are currently 5 residents who reside at this home and there is 1 resident on hospice at this time. LPA inspected the interior and the exterior of the facility including the common living spaces, resident bedrooms and bathrooms, activity rooms, medication storage, kitchen, garage and outdoor areas. Bedrooms were clean and in good repair. There is a locked storage for medications. Food supply is adequate for 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable. Fire extinguisher is within the safety regulation period. Smoke alarms were tested and are operational. The home has a carbon monoxide detector and performs disaster drills as required. Water temperature was tested at 112 degrees. First Aid kit is on site and complete. Toxins and cleaning supplies are locked and inaccessible. LPA confirmed all facility staff present is background cleared. LPA confirmed staff present has a COVID 19 vaccine card or exemption on file. There were no deficiencies observed or cited during today's inspection per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. LPA's requested the following documents: LIC 500 Personnel Report, LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility, LIC 610-E the Emergency Disaster Plan and copy of current Administrator’s Certificate to update the facility file. Listed documents shall be sent to Licensing. Exit interview conducted with Licensee, Lindsey Lamerson and copy of report left at facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 15, 2022
Feb 7, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility denied authorized representative entry into the facility
On 02/07/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Walton arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and reqeusted to meet with the Administrator. Administrator was not present upon LPAs arrival, LPA contacted Administrator via telephone. Administrator gave verbal permission to meet with Caregiver. LPA met with Caregiver, Estella Mendoza. On 01/10/2022, Administrator was notified that LPAs, Ombudsman, Hospice nurses, Physical Therapist, and Occupational Therapists are exempt from testing for COVID-19 on site, providing test results and/or providing documentation of proof of vaccination prior to entry as they are considered essential visitors. On the same date, Administrator updated facility policies to reflect the new information. CONTINUED TO LIC9099C Unsubstantiated Based on interviews conducted and review of records, the allegation: Facility denied authorized representative entry into the facility is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. No deficiencies issued during this inspection. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report will be provided via email as a COVID-19 precautionary measure. Report signed on site by Facility Representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 7, 2022 · control 24-AS-20220111133129
20211 state visit · 1 document
Dec 13, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 12/13/2021, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) A. Walton and K. Kaur arrived unannounced to conduct an Annual Inspection - Infection Control. LPA introduced selves stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with the Administrator. LPAs met with Administrator, Norma Ceja. Facility has one central entrance and exit. LPAs observed a visitor log/temperature check upon entry. Facility tour conducted with Administrator. All pathways, entrances and exits were clear from obstructions. LPAs observed signs promoting hand-washing, social distancing, and cough/sneeze etiquette. Facility staff observed to be wearing facial coverings. LPAs toured the facility kitchen. LPAs observed a 7-day supply of perishable foods and a 2-day supply of perishable foods. LPAs observed a 30 day supply of PPE and cleaning supplies. Resident at the above facility have private bedrooms. Bedrooms were stocked with hand sanitizer. Facility bathrooms were stocked with paper towels and liquid soap. Hand-washing signs were not observed in resident bathrooms. LPAs checked residents' medication and observed a 30 day supply. Resident temperature checks are documented daily. Resident records have updated emergency contact information. Facility staff records reviewed for good health and infection control training. No deficiencies issued during this inspection. LPAs are requesting the following documents be submitted to the Fresno CCL office by 12/27/2021: Current copy of Administrator Certificate, Designation of Facility Responsibility (LIC308), Administrator Organization (LIC 309), Affidavit regarding Client/Resident Cash Resources (LIC 400), Liability Insurance, Emergency and Disaster Plan (LIC 610E), Personnel Report (LIC500), Register of Facility Clients/Residents for LIC9020A Exit interview conducted. As a COVID-19 precautionary measure, a copy of this report will be provided via email and an electronic read receipt confirms receiving this document. Facility Representative signature on file.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 13, 2021
6 of 6 beds were occupied at the May 9, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
LLC Retirement Homes II, licensed since 2020.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2020, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 11
- Total complaints
- 4
- Substantiated allegations
- 1
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 1
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2020, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 1 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 1 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 4 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about LLC Retirement Homes II
Is LLC Retirement Homes II licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is LLC Retirement Homes II licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has LLC Retirement Homes II been cited?
0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 11 state visits over the same years.
Is LLC Retirement Homes II still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 10, 2026.
What does LLC Retirement Homes II cost?
$4,450 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,650–$5,500. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 small homes and similar homes within 37 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does LLC Retirement Homes II take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by LLC Retirement Homes II, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Can LLC Retirement Homes II keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
LLC Retirement Homes II license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “LLC RETIREMENT HOMES II”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #247209026. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to LLC Retirement Homes II, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 11 state inspection visits since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 11 state visits in that period.
- 4 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is June 5, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Merced County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,050 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,300–$5,000On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$3,700 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,400 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,600–$5,450On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,600 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,800–$5,700On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,600 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,800–$5,700On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,700 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,850–$5,750On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Merced County