Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Sisters Assisted Living

Small home·Licensed for 6·Modesto, California

Licensed since 2020Licence #502700748
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Starting rate$3,000 a monthListed by the home on A Place for Mom · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit3 of 6 beds occupiedJuly 21, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJuly 21, 2026CDSS inspection record

Sisters Assisted Living is a small care home in Modesto — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2020. Bedridden care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Sisters Assisted Living

Is Sisters Assisted Living licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Sisters Assisted Living licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Sisters Assisted Living been cited?

0 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 14 state visits over the same years.

Is Sisters Assisted Living still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Sisters Assisted Living cost?

$3,000 a month to start — listed by the home on A Place for Mom · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on A Place for Mom, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 5 other homes of a similar licensed size in Modesto that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,175 to $5,175 a month, and the middle figure is $3,500 (n = 5 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Sisters Assisted Living take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Sisters Independent Living and Assisted Living LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Doctors Medical Center is 1 mile away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Sisters Assisted Living keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Sisters Assisted Living license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “SISTERS ASSISTED LIVING”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #502700748. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Sisters Independent Living and Assisted Living LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 14 state inspection visits since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 14 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 21, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 4 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 4 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR (4) NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR (4).

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$3,000a month to start

Listed by the home on A Place for Mom · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$3,000a month

Likely $3,000–$3,600

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$3,000this home

    The home lists this starting rate on A Place for Mom, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,000–$3,600
$3,000
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,000–$7,100
$5,000
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on A Place for Mom, seen September 9, 2026.

9 homes like this within 15 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,850–$5,200.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 9 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 1006 Durant Street, Modesto, CA 95350Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 12 documents for this home, and its records count 14 visits since 2020. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on July 21, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”

On file since
2021
State visits
14
Most recent visit
July 21, 2026
Occupied at that visit
3 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated August 21, 2023 to July 21, 2026. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations2typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations2typical 0
  • Total complaints4typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2020.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611120251102024341202333020221102021120

The last 36 months — 8 of 12 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Jul 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff has not provided refund after resident's death.

LPA arrived to the facility on 7/21/26 at 9:09Am to conduct a complaint investigation into the above allegations, LPA met with administrator Karen Fomby to explain the purpose of the visit. As to the allegation that Staff has not provided refund after resident's death, the LPA reviewed the cash resources of the resident. in interview with the administrator it was learned the client had paid basic services from march through to the end may in advance, and had passed on 4/19/26, leaving a month and some days of funds that should be returned. LPA reviewed a photo of the sent check for 4160 drafted 5/16/26 payable to "the estate of jack manning" and a recipt for certified mail dated 5/21/26 with the client representative's signiture verifying it was recieved. the check has not been cashed as of 7/21/26 and the facility remains in control of the funds. In interview it was learned the check is likely not been cashed due to the payable line not being directed to the clients representative, in this case the clients offspring who has durable power of attourney. the amount may come into dispute, the facility is obligated to return a prorated value, calculated as the basic services divided by the number of days in the month after the clients property has been removed. The original check value is for 10 prorated days days + 1 month on its purpose line. Continued on C,page. Substantiated Supplemental to the second allegation, record review of the MAR indicated that the prescriptions were given as ordered and PRN administration was documented appropriately. It's unclear by the mar documentation, that a particular medication was given too often, or another medication was not given often enough, as the client has multiple regular medications which can cause chemical restraint type effects. Review of the 602 and medical records both indicated a certain level of psychotropic medication was needed to address agitation with physical violence. LPA gave guidance that if the medication is being noticed as too effective at sedating a client, that would bear health and personal rights risks that should be addressed with client and their the primary care provider/psych. As to the fifth allegation, it was learned in interview with the hospice care nursing administrator that no order for bedrails existed, and no bedrails were supplied to the facility. 602 doesnt indicate the need for bedrails, no doctors order for bedrails is on file at the facility. as to the sixth allegation, it was learned in interview with the administrator that the clients property was released to the clients representative on 4/21/26, for which a previous arrangement was reached on the 4/19. the recovery of the property did not include a signed receipt, as the representative of the client refused to sign, but they allowed a picture of thiery drivers license be taken. LPA gave guidance that per regulation the licensee must allow reasonable access to the property for the collection of safeguarded valuables. LPA toured the facility and the list of safeguarded valuables is not currently within the facility. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. a copy of the report was read and given to the administrator, no citations issued, exit interview was conducted. The LPA issued guidance that the facility is required by regulation to collect a signed receipt of the property that was returned to the clients representative. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations,is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. A copy of the report was read and given to the administrator, appeal rights were provided. exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 21, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260514144343

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87217(j)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 19, 2026

87217 Safeguards for Resident Cash, Personal Property, and Valuables (j) Upon the death of a resident, all cash resources, personal property, and valuables of that resident shall immediately be safeguarded. (3) If no executor or administrator has been appointed, the responsible person shall be notified, and the cash resources, personal property, and valuables shall be surrendered to said person in exchange for a signed itemized receipt. This requirement was not followed as evidenced by, record review of the check is issued to the estate without evidance of an executor or administrator of the estate seperate from the DPOA, Not following this requirement posed a risk to the clients in care, via health, saftey, or personal rightsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 21, 2026

Plan of correction: LPA suggested the POC should include canceling the current check and reissuing the refund to the clients representative and sent certified. Licensee agreed to cancel and reissue, sending the LPA pictures of the rewritten check and the signed back certified mail reciept by the poc date

20251 state visit · 1 document
Nov 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived unannounced to conduct a 1 year/required annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Karen Fomby and explained the reason for the visit. Census:5 LPA Lund & Administrator Karen Fomby toured/inspected the physical plant to ensure the health and safety of the residents in care. Areas inspected are including but not limited to the kitchen, resident bedrooms; resident bathrooms, living and dining room and outdoor areas. LPA observed the facility to be free of odor, clean and in good repair. LPA observed that all rooms are equipped with the required furniture and sufficient lighting throughout the facility. LPA measured the water temperature, temperature measured at 112 degrees F which does the 105-120 degree Fahrenheit regulation. LPA observed facility staff turn down hot water and purchased a new digital thermometer to ensure hot water temperature. LPA observed sufficient seven- day non-perishable and two- day perishable food supplies. Fire extinguishers (11/3/2025) and smoke detectors are current and in compliance with fire safety. LPA notes the facility had the required carbon monoxide detectors. First aid kit was checked and is complete. LPA observed centrally stored medications secure from residents. No deficiencies are cited during today's inspection. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report left.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 19, 2025
20243 state visits · 4 documents
Nov 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived unannounced to conduct a 1 year/required annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Karen Fomby and explained the reason for the visit. Census:5 LPA Lund & Administrator Karen Fomby toured/inspected the physical plant to ensure the health and safety of the residents in care. Areas inspected are including but not limited to the kitchen, resident bedrooms; resident bathrooms, living and dining room and outdoor areas. LPA observed the facility to be free of odor, clean and in good repair. LPA observed that all rooms are equipped with the required furniture and sufficient lighting throughout the facility. LPA measured the water temperature, temperature measured at 112 degrees F which does the 105-120 degree Fahrenheit regulation. LPA observed facility staff turn down hot water and purchased a new digital thermometer to ensure hot water temperature. LPA observed sufficient seven- day non-perishable and two- day perishable food supplies. Fire extinguishers (11/15/2024) and smoke detectors are current and in compliance with fire safety. LPA notes the facility had the required carbon monoxide detectors. First aid kit was checked and is complete. LPA observed centrally stored medications secure from residents. No deficiencies are cited during today's inspection. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report left.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 21, 2024
May 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not allow a resident a choice of hospice services Facility staff signed a hospice transfer request form without the resident's family authorization Facility staff caused delays in residents at the facility receiving timely hospice services

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived unannounced to complete a complaint investigation. LPA Lund met with Care Staff Princess Major-Banks and explained the reason for the visit. Care Staff called Administrator Karen Fomby who could not make today visit. Administrator Karen Fomby gave permission to have Care Staff Princess Major-Banks sign any required paperwork. Census:3 Facility staff did not allow a resident a choice of hospice services- Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted with Administrator Karen Fomby, Reporting Party (RP) and witnesses. Resident (R1) was admitted to Home Health with Progressive Home Health & Hospice on 5/9/2023 through 1/19/2024. Conservator of R1 made the choice to change hospice services on 1/19/2024 from Bristol Hospice Services to Progressive Home Health & Hospice because the familiarity of staff working with R1. Unsubstantiated Based on records review, interviews with, Administrator Karen Fomby, RP and witnesses the information provided, it was unclear if facility staff did not allow a resident a choice of hospice services therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. Facility staff signed a hospice transfer request form without the resident's family authorization- Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted with Administrator Karen Fomby, Reporting Party (RP) and witnesses. Resident (R1) was admitted to hospice on 1/17/2024 while at the hospital and was discharged to the facility on 1/18/2024. Conservator for Resident (R1) gave permission to Administrator Karen Fomby to sign the transfer request of Hospice services for R1. Based on records review, interviews with, Administrator Karen Fomby, RP and witness the information provided, it was unclear if facility staff signed a hospice transfer request form without the resident's family authorization therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. Facility staff caused delays in residents at the facility receiving timely hospice services- Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted with Administrator Karen Fomby, Reporting Party (RP) and witness. Resident (R1) was admitted to hospice on 1/17/2024 and discharged to the facility on 1/18/2024. The transfer on hospice services from Bristol Hospice Services to Progressive Home Health & Hospice was on 1/19/2024. Records indicate that Progressive Home Health & Hospice Services started services with R1 on 1/19/2024 one day after returning from the hospital on hospice. Based on records review, interviews with, Administrator Karen Fomby, RP and witness the information provided, it was unclear if facility staff caused delays in residents at the facility receiving timely hospice services therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. The Department (CCLD) has found the allegations. Unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint allegation(s) are UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegation(s) may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s) occurred. An exit interview was, and report left.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 9, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240124192506
May 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived unannounced to conduct a proof of correction (POC) visit. LPA Lund met with Care Staff Princess Major-Banks and explained the reason for the visit. Care Staff called Administrator Karen Fomby who could not make today visit. Administrator Karen Fomby gave permission to have Care Staff Princess Major-Banks sign any required paperwork. Census:3 LPA Lund received proper POC documentation for the deficiency cited on 2/2/2024. No deficiencies were observed and cited during this visit. Exit interview conducted and report left.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 9, 2024
Feb 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff abandoned a resident at the hospital

On 2/22/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived unannounced to amend a complaint investigation. LPA Lund met with Administrator Karen Fomby and explained the reason for the visit. LPA Lund had to do a new LIC9099 based not having a LIC9099 D on the previous complaint. Facility staff abandoned a resident at the hospital- Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted with Administrator Karen Fomby, Reporting Party (RP) and witness. Resident (R1) was admitted as a patient at Dignity Health Mercy Medical Center in Merced California. R1 was admitted at the hospital with no responsible party. On September 20, 2022, the hospital paid the admission fee for R1 to stay at the facility. The facility got paid for the three months of service for R1. From January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023 the facility didn't get paid for services rendered. Substantiated On September 20, 2023, the facility filled an Unlawful detainer (UD-23-001136) on September 26, 2023, R1 and Mercy Medical Center was served. On October 6, 2023, the Superior of Court of California County of Stanislaus signed a right to possession. On 12/31/2023 R1 was dropped off at the Emergency Room Dignity Health Mercy Medical Center in Merced California. On 12/31/2023 The licensee left a note with R1 when dropped off which stated R1 has not been paid in 9 months. Based on records review, interviews with, Administrator Karen Fomby, RP and witness the information provided, it was clear that the facility staff abandoned a resident at the hospital therefore the allegation was deemed SUBSTANTIATED. Based on LPA’s observations and interviews which were conducted and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 22, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240102142039

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 7, 2024

87468.1 (a)(1) to be accorded dignity in their person relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This requirement was not met by: Based on interviews, the licensee left a note with R1 when dropped off which stated R1 has not been paid in 9 months. This poses a potential Health, Safety or Personal Rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 22, 2024

Plan of correction: Administrator will look over the regulation and email LPA Lund confirming they understand the regulation.

20232 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 16, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived unannounced to complete a proof of correction visit. LPA Lund met with Administrator Karen Fomby and explained the reason for the visit. LPA Jason Lund received documentation (Proof of correction) for the two deficiencies from the visit on 11/3/2023. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Karen Fomby and report left.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 16, 2023
Nov 3, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 11/3/23 at 12:30pm Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould arrived at Sisters Assisted Living for the purpose of conducting a required 1 year annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Karen Fomby and together conducted a tour of the home. LPA observed a licensed capacity of 4 residents with 6 residents in placement. Administrator was able to provide LPA with documentation of new fire clearance with a capacity for 6 and communication with the department for an updated capacity and documents required to change capacity. An advisory note was issued in consultation with Licensing Program Manager. LPA and Administrator evaluated the physical plant to ensure the health and safety of the residents in care. Areas inspected are including but not limited to the kitchen, resident bedrooms; resident bathrooms, living and dining room and outdoor areas. LPA observed the facility to be free of odor, clean and in good repair. LPA observed that all rooms are equipped with the required furniture and sufficient lighting throughout the facility. LPA measured the water temperature, temperature measured at 142 degrees F which does not meet the 105-120 degree Fahrenheit regulation. LPA observed facility staff turn down hot water and purchased a new digital thermometer to ensure hot water temperature. LPA observed sufficient seven day non-perishable and two day perishable food supplies. Fire extinguishers and smoke detectors are current and in compliance with fire safety. LPA notes the facility had the required carbon monoxide detectors. First aid kit was checked and is complete. LPA observed centrally stored medications secure from residents. LPA requested a copy of the facility liability insurance and facility representative stated they do not have one. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 the following deficiencies are cited during today's inspection. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report and appeal rights were left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 3, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

Meals, preferences & familiar food

  • Meals provided

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Special diets supportedLow / No Sodium · No Sugar

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Texture-modified dietsPureed

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Activities & the rhythm of a day

  • Activity types offeredActivities On-site · BBQs or Picnics · Birthday Parties

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Trips outside the home

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved

  • Transportation costs extra

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Public transit access claimed

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Stanislaus County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Stanislaus County