Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Umbrella Residential Care

Small home·Licensed for 6·Santa Clara, California

Licensed since 2024Licence #435202918
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,150 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,200–$6,350
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedJuly 31, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 20, 2026CDSS inspection record

Umbrella Residential Care is a small care home in Santa Clara — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2024. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Umbrella Residential Care

Is Umbrella Residential Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Umbrella Residential Care licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Umbrella Residential Care been cited?

1 Type A and 0 Type B citation since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.

Is Umbrella Residential Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Umbrella Residential Care cost?

$5,150 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,200–$6,350. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 7 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 80 other homes of a similar licensed size across Santa Clara County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,850 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,200 (n = 80 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Umbrella Residential Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Simlorence LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital-Santa Clara is 5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Umbrella Residential Care keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Umbrella Residential Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “UMBRELLA RESIDENTIAL CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #435202918. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Simlorence LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 8 state inspection visits since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 0 Type B citation on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 20, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 2 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 2 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 AMBULATORY OF WHICH 2 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY AND 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN BEDROOM #2, HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,150a month to start

Likely $4,200–$6,350

From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,150a month

Likely $4,200–$6,500

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$5,150likely $4,200–$6,350

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 7 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,200–$6,500
$5,150
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,900–$9,600
$7,150
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 7 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

24 homes like this within 7 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$5,850.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 4623 Mangrum Drive, Santa Clara, CA 95054Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2024, the state has filed 8 documents for this home, and its records count 8 visits since 2024. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated August 20, 2026.

On file since
2024
State visits
8
Most recent visit
August 20, 2026
Occupied · July 31, 2026 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated July 31, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (1). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2024.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202635120251102024220

The last 36 months — 8 of 8 documents

20263 state visits · 5 documents
Aug 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Simi Rai conducted an unannounced visit to amend a report issued on 07/31/2026. LPA Rai met with Staff, Susan Cunan and stated the purpose of today’s visit. LPA Rai spoke with Administrator Anabelen Vallarta over the phone and stated the purpose of today's visit. LPA Rai obtained verbal confirmation from Administrator Anabelen for Staff, Susan Cunan to sign the report on Anabelen's behalf. During today's visit, LPA Rai amended the report dated on 07/31/2026 due to additional information provided to the Department. LPA Rai spoke with Administrator and stated Title 22 regulations do not address accepting cash advance from resident and/or resident's responsible parties. Administrator understood the concern of accepting rent advances from residents for future services as services may change and/or resident may no longer be part of the facility. Administrator understood charging resident for services and accepting payment for services rendered to the resident. Long Term Care Ombudsmans were present in the facility. Exit interview conducted with Staff, Susan Cunan and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 20, 2026
Jul 31, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility staff is financially abusing resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Simi Rai conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation. LPA Rai met with the Administrator, Anabelen Vallarta and stated the purpose of today’s visit. This report has been amended. On 05/01/2026, the Department received a complaint with the above allegations. On 05/08/2026, the Department conducted an initial investigation at the facility. On 07/13/2026, the Department conducted a follow up investigation at the facility. It was alleged that the Administrator asked to borrow $22,500 from resident (R1)’s funds in September 2025 and November 2025. Continuation on LIC 9099-C, page 1 of 2. Unfounded Page 2 of 2. On 05/08/2026, LPA Rai interviewed 2 staff, S1 and Administrator (ADM) Anabelen Vallarta. S1 stated is not aware of R1’s financial situation and is involved in the care and supervision of R1. ADM stated R1 is not managing their finances and R1’s responsible party (RP) is R1’s Durable Power of Attorney for Finance and Medical (DPOA). ADM stated R1’s DPOA is managing R1’s medical and financial responsibility. ADM stated R1’s POA is responsible to making payments for R1’s care and rent. ADM stated R1’s POA authorized three months advance payment to the facility for the rent invoices for October 2025, November 2025 and December 2025. ADM stated R1’s POA provided a signed letter to stated their intention to pay in advance for the rent invoices for the three months. ADM stated she did not request for an advance nor did ADM request for the rent invoices to be paid in advance. ADM stated R1's DPOA initiated the conversation of paying the facility in advance and provided the letter and check to cover for R1's expenses at the facility. ADM denied allegation and stated her staff and herself are not financially abusing R1 and she had not heard or informed of any of the facility staff taking any unauthorized money from R1. On 07/13/2026, LPA Rai interviewed 5 residents (R1-R5). 4 Out of 5 residents (R2-R5) refused to be interviewed. R1 stated he/she was not aware of anything related to the allegation. R1 stated his/her POA and ADM take care of things on their behalf, such as arranging for medical care/appointments, following up on ordering medications, but not related to any financial issues as R1 has a DPOA. Based on review of R1’s Admission Agreement, on 06/27/2025 signed by R1 and R1’s DPOA on page 5, it states under Payment Provision: “The resident will be billed by the first day of the month for processing month’s room and services charges. Payment is due by the 1st day of the month. The method payment will be by check or money order.” Based on review of R1’s Physician’s Report dated 10/4/2025, R1 is not able to manage own cash resources and R1 has a neurocognitive disorder. Based on the review of R1’s DPOA signed letter dated October 23, 2025, R1’s DPOA stated they authorized the three month’s advance payment to the facility for a total of $22,500. Based on review of the invoice of October 2025, November 2025 and December 2025, the total amount R1’s DPOA’s payment to the facility staff was $22,500. During this investigation, LPA Rai attempted to reach out to R1’s DPOA three times but was not successful. The Department has completed the investigation of the above allegations. Based on interviews conducted and record reviews, the department has found that the above allegations were UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or are without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies cited from California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit interview conducted with Administrator Anabelen Vallarta and a copy of the report was provided. On 08/20/2026, the report was amended due to additional information provided during the investigation.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 31, 2026 · control 26-AS-20260501145914
Jul 31, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is not arranging, or assisting resident, for medical and/or dental care appropriate wherein resident missed his/her appointments.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Simi Rai conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation. LPA Rai met with the Administrator (ADM) Anabelen Vallarta and stated the purpose of today’s visit. On 07/13/2026, the Department received a complaint with the above allegations. On 07/13/2026, the Department conducted an initial investigation at the facility. It was alleged that resident (R1) had a medical appointment on 07/10/2025 which was missed by facility staff. Continuation on LIC 9099-C, Page 1 of 2. Substantiated Page 2 of 2. On 07/13/2026, LPA Rai and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Romeo Manzano conducted an interview with Administrator (ADM) Anabelen Vallarta. ADM stated resident (R1) had a scheduled appointment on 07/10/2026 which R1’s Power of Attorney (POA) informed ADM about three weeks prior to the appointment. ADM stated she forgot about the appointment after ADM had noted the medical appointment on the facility calendar. ADM stated the appointment was for 07/10/2026 and ADM called R1’s medical office to reschedule the appointment for a later date in the month. The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on interview, record review and observation of the above allegation the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegation is substantiated. Deficiency was cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. See LIC9099-D. This report was reviewed with Administrator, Anabelen Vallarta and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 31, 2026 · control 26-AS-20260713113340

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87456(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 1, 2026

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a)(2) The licensee shall provide assistance in meeting necessary medical and dental needs… This was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, R1 was not provided assistance in meeting necessary medical needs wherein R1 missed their medical appointment due to ADM forgetting about the appointment which pose/posed a potential health, safety and/or Personal Right’s risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 31, 2026

Plan of correction: Administrator (ADM) stated to submit a written plan of action understanding regulations and ensuring facility staff provide assistance in meeting resident’s necessary medical needs by POC due date.

Jul 31, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Simi Rai conducted an unannounced case management visit to following up on the deficiencies cited on 07/13/2026. LPA Rai met with Administrator (ADM) Anabelen Vallarta and stated the purpose of today's visit. LPA Rai observed 2 staff and 5 residents at the facility. During visit, LPA Rai observed resident (R2) in the living room watching tv with another resident. LPA Rai observed R2 was free from restraint and did not observe the gait belt tying resident to the wheelchair. LPA Rai observed the office area and the garage area was not being using as habitual space. ADM stated staff are no longer using the garage as habitual space. LPA Rai observed cleaning solutions such as laundry detergents in the garage with an locked door and were not accessible to residents in care. On 07/23/2026, the facility was approved by the Fire Department for 5 rooms to be occupied by residents for 5 non-ambulatory residents and 1 bedridden resident for room #2. LPA Rai provided Administrator the Letter of Deficiency Citations Cleared for deficiencies issued during today's visit. No deficiencies cited from California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit interview conducted with Administrator Anabelen Vallarta and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 31, 2026
Jul 13, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Simi Rai conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA Rai met with Administrator, Anabelen Vallarta and stated the purpose of today's visit. LPA Rai observed 5 residents and 2 staff at the facility. During visit, LPA and LPM observed resident (R2) tied to the wheelchair. There was a thick grey and black gait belt that tied the resident's torso with the back of wheelchair. The buckle of the gait belt was at the back of the wheelchair which was inaccessible to resident. Staff (S1) stated they use the gait belt to make sure R1 does not slide down on the wheelchair. ADM stated R2's family requested facility staff to use the gait belt to tie against the wheelchair. ADM and staff stated that R2 slides from the wheelchair. During visit, LPA and LPM observed the office area and the garage area was being observed as a living space. Staff S1 stated they sleep in the office area and two other staff sleep in the garage area. ADM confirmed 2 staff use the garage as habitual space. The facility does not have a building permit for the garage to be used as a habitual space. LPM observed 5 residents' beds except 1 hospice had half-bed rails attached to the bed. ADM stated resident's have physician's order for half-bed rail for mobility. LPM and LPA reviewed 2 resident files and ADM needs to be aware of resident's responsible party and/or resident has been signed and dated. Continuation on LIC 809-C, Page 1 of 2. Page 2 of 2. LPM and LPA addressed ADM needed to ensure staff had access to resident's file at all times. Deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, please see LIC 809-D. Failure to correct the cited deficiency(ies), on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. This report was reviewed with Administrator, Anabelen Vallarta and a copy of the report was provided. Appeal Rights was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 13, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87307(a)(2)(B) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 14, 2026

87307 Personal Accommodations and Services (a) (2) (B) No room commonly used for other purposes shall be used as a sleeping room for any resident. This includes any hall, stairway, unfinished attic, garage storage area, shed or similar detached building. This requirement is not met as evidence as: Based on observation, S1 and ADM admitted to staff living in the garage and hallway leading towards exit which poses/posed an immediate health, safety and/or Personal Rights to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 13, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator stated to submit a written plan of action to ensure garage and hallway are not being used as habitual space by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87468.1(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 14, 2026

87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a)(3) To be free from punishment, humiliation, intimidation, abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature, such as withholding residents’ money or interfering with daily living functions such as eating, sleeping, or elimination. This requirement is not met as evidence as: Based on observation, R2 was tied to the wheelchair with a gait belt wherein R2 was not able to go to restroom on their own without staff removing the gait belt around the torso which poses/posed an immediate health, safety, and/or Personal Rights tothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 13, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator stated to submit a written plan of action to ensure resident is not being held against the wheelchair with a gait belt by POC due date. (con't) residents in care.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87309(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 14, 2026

87309 (a)...the licensee shall ensure that disinfectants, cleaning solutions, poisonous substances... and other similar items which could pose a danger to residents are in locked storage and are not left unattended if outside the locked storage. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, LPA and LPM observed cleaning solutions such as laundry detergents in the garage with an unlocked door which was accessible to residents in care which poses/posed an immediate health, safety and/or Personal Rights to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 13, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator stated to submit a written plan of action to ensure cleaning solutions such as laundry detergents is in locked storage and not left attended by POC due date.

20251 state visit · 1 document
Oct 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced Required 1 Year visit and met with Administrator Anabelen Vallarta. During visit, LPA Marrufo toured the facility inside and out. LPA toured the kitchen area and observed there to be locked drawers and cabinets for sharp objects and cleaning supplies. LPA observed the first aid kit was complete. LPA toured five out of five bedrooms. Each bedroom had working lights and available bedding and clothing storage areas. LPA toured 3 out of 3 bathrooms. Each bathroom had working lights and available soap and paper towels. The water temperatures in the bathrooms ranged from 110 F to 112 F. LPA tested two out of two carbon monoxide detectors and the smoke detectors in the hallways and resident bedrooms. All carbon monoxide and smoke detectors functioned properly when tested. LPA toured the outside area and found the exits were clear of obstruction. LPA reviewed the Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Records for residents R1-R5. Resident R1 had five medications missing. R2 had three medications missing. R3-R5 did not have any medications missing. See LIC809-C page for more information. Page 1 of 2. LPA reviewed the resident records of R1-R5 and found them to be complete. LPA reviewed two staff records and found them to be complete. The emergency disaster drill log indicates the last drill occurred on 09/03/2025. LPA Marrufo requests that updated copies of the following records be submitted to the department within seven calendar days: LIC500 Personnel Report LIC308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility Liability Insurance LIC610E Emergency Disaster Plan A deficiency was cited as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. See LIC809-D page for more information. This report was reviewed with Administrator Anabelen Vallarta and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Page 2 of 2. END REPORTthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Simi Rai and Marcella Tarin arrived announced to conduct the facility's pre-licensing visit. LPAs met with Applicant, Anabelen Vallarta. There are no clients present on site. This facility address is not currently licensed. During visit, LPAs toured the inside and outside of the facility to include the kitchen, dining, living room, garage, activity room, 3 resident rooms, 1 staff room, 1 office room and 3 bathrooms. All fire exit routes were free and clear of obstruction. LPAs observed 2 sheds in the backyard which will be used for storage and not habitual space. Toxins observed secured. Facility has an approved fire clearance for 3 ambulatory, 2 non ambulatory residents and 1 bedridden resident in Bedroom #2. Bathrooms supplied with hygiene products and paper supplies. LPAs observed the smoke and carbon monoxide detectors to be in working condition. Hot water temperature maintained between 108.9 - 109.4 degrees Fahrenheit. Facility temperature maintained at 70 degrees Fahrenheit. First aid kit supplied with tweezers, bandages, gauze, scissors, and thermometer. Medications will be stored in a locked cabinet. The facility will lock sharp supplies in a locked cabinet in the kitchen. The following posters observed to include the emergency telephone numbers, personal rights, and facility sketch. Fire extinguisher was inspected on 08/28/2024. No issues noted during this pre-licensing inspection. COMP III was reviewed during visit. LPA observed the facility is ready to be licensed. However, this report will be submitted to the Central Application Bureau (CAB) and a final review of the application will be conducted. This facility is not yet licensed and is subject to final approval by CAB. Additional requirements may still be required. This report was reviewed with Applicant, Anabelen Vallarta. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 18, 2024
Aug 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Office

COMP II by CAB successfully completed Facility Type: RCFE Application Type: Initial Capacity: 6 Census (if any clients in care): 0 Method: Telephone call with CAB COMP II Participants: Anabelen Vallarta, Administrator/Owner; Shannon Betker, analyst. Applicant/administrator participated in COMP II at CAB via telephone call with analyst at CAB. Identification of the applicant and administrator was verified by confirming driver’s license number. During COMP II, applicant and administrator confirmed the understanding of Title 22. Component II was successfully completed. Applicant and administrator were advised to email/fax signed LIC 809 with copy of photo ID to CAB. During COMP II, CAB analyst confirmed Applicant/Administrator’s understanding of following areas: 1. Facility operation: License type, client/resident populations, and program 2. Admission Policies 3. Staffing requirements & Training 4. Restrictive/Prohibited Health Conditions 5. General provisions 6. Emergency Preparedness 7. Complaints & Reporting 8. Pre-licensing readinessthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 12, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Santa Clara County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Santa Clara County