Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Evonne's Residential Care Home #1
Mid-size home·Licensed for 7·San Jose, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
- Starting rate$3,000 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
- Home sizeLicensed for 7Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit6 of 7 beds occupiedMay 7, 2026 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitMay 7, 2026CDSS inspection record
Evonne's Residential Care Home #1 is a mid-size care home in San Jose — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 7 residents since 2014. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.
Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Evonne's Residential Care Home #1
Is Evonne's Residential Care Home #1 licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
How many residents is Evonne's Residential Care Home #1 licensed for?
7 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Has Evonne's Residential Care Home #1 been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 10 state visits over the same years.
Is Evonne's Residential Care Home #1 still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Evonne's Residential Care Home #1 cost?
$3,000 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
Among 50 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Jose that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,600 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,200 (n = 50 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Evonne's Residential Care Home #1 take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Philomena Agbontaen, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Regional Medical Center of San Jose is 1.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Evonne's Residential Care Home #1 keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Evonne's Residential Care Home #1 license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “EVONNE'S RESIDENTIAL CARE HOME #1”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #435202392. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed for 7 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed to Philomena Agbontaen, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- First licensed in 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 10 state inspection visits since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 10 state visits in that period.
- 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is May 7, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 7 residents
- Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 2 residents
- BedriddenNot on file · ask the home
State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
LICENSED TO SERVE SEVEN (7) ELDERLY RESIDENTS AGES 60 AND ABOVE. ALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. LICENSE IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TWO (2).
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
4 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation not on file
Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”
What it costs here
This home’s starting rate
$3,000a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing
Likely monthly total
$3,000a month
Likely $3,000–$3,600
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$3,000this home
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,000–$3,600
- $3,000
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,000–$7,100
- $5,000
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
14 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,850–$5,350.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 14 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Cjcp RCFESan Jose · 0.6 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Lorrie Residential Care Home IVSan Jose · 0.6 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Olga's Care Home for the ElderlySan Jose · 1.2 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- A Heavenly Care HomeSan Jose · 1.8 mi · Small home$2,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Bristolwood HomeSan Jose · 2.4 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Casa LaurelSan Jose · 2.6 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Amor Residential Care HomeSan Jose · 2.9 mi · Mid-size home$4,300Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Bonnevie Residence and CareSan Jose · 3.2 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Santo Nino Residential Care Home #1San Jose · 3.8 mi · Small home$1,600Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- River Park Homes IISan Jose · 4.5 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Grace Garden RCFESan Jose · 4.5 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Laurel HavenSan Jose · 4.5 mi · Mid-size home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Marilag's Care HomeSan Jose · 4.5 mi · Small home$4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Rose Garden CourtSan Jose · 4.8 mi · Mid-size home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · memory care shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
Where it is
- 2719 Penitencia Creek Rd., San Jose, CA 95132Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2023, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 10 visits since 2014. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on May 7, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unfounded.”
- On file since
- 2023
- State visits
- 10
- Most recent visit
- May 7, 2026
- Occupied at that visit
- 6 of 7 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated May 7, 2026. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations0typical 0
- Substantiated allegations0typical 0
- Total complaints1typical 1
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 327 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2014.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 8 of 10 documents
May 7, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff handled residents in a rough manner Facility staff did not intervene in resident altercation. Facility staff do not accord residents with dignity and respect
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Monter conducted an unannounced complaint inspection to deliver the findings on the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Philomena Agbontaen. On April 13, 2026, the Department received a complaint alleging staff handled residents in a rough manner On April 21, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst Manuel Monter interviewed residents R2-R7. 6 Out 6 residents (R2-R7 ) stated they have never observed staff handling residents in a rough manner. On April 21, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst Manuel Monter interviewed Administrator Philomena Agbontaen, referred to as S1 and staff S2. Both staff interviewed (S1 and S2) stated facility staff have never handled residents in a rough manner. Page 1 Out of 5. Unfounded On April 21, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst Manuel Monter interviewed Witness W1. W1 stated he/she visits the facility frequently. W1 stated he/she has never observed staff handling residents in a rough manner. On May 6, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst Manuel Monter interviewed resident R1. R1 stated, facility staff were never rough with him/her. R1 stated he/she never saw the staff being rough when providing care to other residents. R1 stated he/she didn’t see any instance of the staff being rough when providing care. On May 6, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst Manuel Monter interviewed witness W2. W2 stated he/she didn’t observe any instance where staff where handling residents in a rough manner. The Department has completed the investigation of the above allegations. Based on interviews conducted and records review, the department has found that the above allegations were UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or are without a reasonable basis. Facility staff did not intervene in resident altercation. On April 13, 2026, the Department received a complaint alleging Facility staff did not intervene in resident altercation. On April 21, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst Manuel Monter interviewed residents R2-R7. 6 Out 6 residents (R2-R7 ) stated they are not aware of any resident on resident altercations or incidents where residents throw objects at each other. Page 2 Out of 5. On April 21, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst Manuel Monter interviewed Administrator Philomena Agbontaen, referred to as S1 and staff S2. S1 stated there hasn’t been any resident on resident altercations at the facility. S1 stated there was an incident on the last day R1 was at the home. S1 stated on April 3, 2026, around 10:30-11:00pm, she and S2 heard a sound and R1 began making a commotion. S1 stated when she and S2 entered the room, they asked R1 what had happened. R1 stated his/her phone fell. R1 stated he/she was upset with his/her family member. S1 stated resident R2, was laying in his/her bed asleep. S1 stated R1’s phone was on the ground, near the side of R1’s bed, near the foot area. S1 stated R2 does not have a cell phone. S1 stated when she did ask R1 what had happened, R1 started saying racial slurs, saying negative things regarding R2 race, skin color and also began saying racial things about her and S2. S2 stated on the last night R1 was at the home, around 10:30-11:00pm, he/she and the S1 heard a loud sound, or something falling. S2 stated he/she and the S1 then went to R1 and R2’s room. S2 stated as they approached, they could hear R1 making a commotion yelling. S2 stated they asked R1 what happened, and R1 stated he/she threw his/her “f-ing” phone. R1 stated he/she threw the phone because he/she can and told staff to pick it up. S1 stated the phone was on the ground close to R1’s right foot. S2 stated he/she observed that R2 was asleep, as he/she entered the bedroom. On April 21, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst Manuel Monter interviewed Witness W1. W1 stated he/she isn’t aware of any resident on resident altercations or instances where residents are throwing objects at each other. On May 6, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst Manuel Monter interviewed resident R1. R1 stated his/her cell phone had fallen off the bed. R1 stated the S1 came running to room. R1 stated he/she didn’t have any altercations with the other residents. R1 stated he/she didn’t throw his/her phone at another resident. R1 stated no resident threw their phone at him. R1 stated the issue was when he/she dropped his/her phone by accident, it fell and made a loud sound. R1 stated the staff misunderstood. Page 3 Out of 5 The Department reviewed R1’s Progress notes dated April 3, 2026. The progress note stated, R1 threw phone across bedroom. S1 came in urgently due to noise. R1 was asked what that sound was since R1 was the only one awake. R1 replied, “ I threw my fucking phone. Go fucking pick it up.” S1 picked up the phone and asked why R1 threw it. R1 responded, “because I can, you work for me. I tell you what to do.” The Department has completed the investigation of the above allegations. Based on interviews conducted and records review, the department has found that the above allegations were UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or are without a reasonable basis. Facility staff do not accord residents with dignity and respect On April 13, 2026, the Department received a complaint alleging Facility staff do not accord residents with dignity and respect On April 21, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst Manuel Monter interviewed residents R2-R7. 6 Out 6 residents (R2-R7 ) stated the facility staff treat them with respect. 6 Out 6 residents (R2-R7 ) stated they have never observed the staff treat residents in a disrespectful manner. On April 21, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst Manuel Monter interviewed Administrator Philomena Agbontaen, referred to as S1 and staff S2. Both staff interviewed (S1 and S2) stated facility staff accorded all residents with dignity and respect. Both staff (S1 and S2) stated they have never observed staff not accord residents with dignity and respect. On April 21, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst Manuel Monter interviewed Witness W1. W1 stated he/she visits the facility frequently. W1 stated he/she has never observed the staff treat residents in a disrespectful manner. Page 4 Out of 5. On May 6, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst Manuel Monter interviewed resident R1. R1 stated R1 stated he/she felt disrespected because the staff were not interacting with him/her. R1 stated the staff treated his/her roommate with kindness and attentiveness. R1 stated when his/her phone fell, staff came running in and asking R2 how he/she was. R1 stated staff didn’t look his/her way. LPA attempted multiple times for R1 to explain how the facility staff didn’t treat him/her with dignity or respect. R1 wasn’t answering the question and digressing to how he/she didn’t like his roommate and didn’t believe the S1 was a nurse. On May 6, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst Manuel Monter interviewed witness W2. W2 stated, when he/she went out to the facility, and saw the residents he/she didn’t see any issues. W2 stated he/she didn’t observe any instance of staff treating residents in a disrespectful manner or with a lack of dignity. The Department reviewed R1’s Progress notes dated April 3, 2026. The progress note stated, R1 threw phone across bedroom. S1 came in urgently due to noise. R1 was asked what that sound was since R1 was the only one awake. R1 replied, “ I threw my fucking phone. Go fucking pick it up.” S1 picked up the phone and asked why R1 threw it. R1 responded, “because I can, you work for me. I tell you what to do.” The Department has completed the investigation of the above allegations. Based on interviews conducted and records review, the department has found that the above allegations were UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or are without a reasonable basis. Page 5 Out of 5. End of Report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 7, 2026 · control 26-AS-20260413162742
Feb 25, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit, and met with Administrator Philomena Agbontaen. During the visit, LPA observed 6 residents and 2 staff. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility inside out with ADM which included the Living room, kitchen, dining room, 3 restrooms and 6 residents bedrooms. There was no obstruction to block the walkways. The staff area of the facility was also inspected. The front yard and backyard were inspected. while touring the facility kitchen with ADM, LPA observed there was no staff or residents in kitchen. LPA observed an unsecured half orange tablet on the kitchen table. S1 stated the half tablet belonged to resident R4. S1 stated there is a hold parameters for medication M1, based on the blood pressure. ADM stated R4's blood pressure was too low and the medication was on hold. S1 stated he/she had forgotten to put the medication tablet back. Two-day perishable food supplies and seven day nonperishable food supplies were observed. LPA observed the medication storage area, knives storage area, and cleaning product storage area as locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Room temperature was at 75 degrees F, and hot water temperature was measured at 112 degrees F in resident bathrooms. Fire extinguisher was serviced in May 12, 2025. The facility was equipped with smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. Smoke detectors was tested by ADM, and were functional. LPA observed facility first aid kit and facility fire/earthquake drill log. The facility's last drill was on December 23, 2025. LPA reviewed 3 staff records. LPA reviewed facility records for 3 residents. LPA observed 3 Out of 3 resident (R1-R3) Needs and services plans were not updated. ADM stated she has not had the chance to update them. LPA reviewed 3 resident medications and centrally stored medication records. R3 had 4 medications bubble packs that were not listed. Furthermore, R3's had a medication bubble pack start date that was incorrect. R1 had two medications that were not listed on the centrally stored medication record. R2 had 1 medication not listed on the centrally stored medication record. A deficiencies are being cited during today's visit, see LIC809-D. This report was reviewed with Administrator Philomena Agbontaen and a copy of the signed report was provided. Appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2026
Sep 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted an unannounced case management - other visit and met with Administrator (ADM) PHILOMENA AGBONTAEN. LPA observed 4 residents in the facility and 3 residents went to day program. LPA toured the facility inside and out with ADM. 5 resident rooms, 1 staff live-in room, 2 restrooms, living room, family room, kitchen and garage were inspected. LPA interviewed 4 residents )R1, R2, R3, R4). 4 out of 4 residents stated they like to live in the facility. 4 out of 4 residents stated the facility does not have change recently, and the facility operates as usual. 4 out of 4 residents stated they do not have any complaint. LPA interviewed ADM. ADM stated the facility operates normally as before. ADM stated he/she is waiting for the underwriter to document to the bank. ADM stated he/she will conform with LPA for the formal purchase closure date of the house. LPA toured the backyard, 1 storage room was observed at the backyard. No obstruction was observed to block the walkway. Exit interview was conducted with ADM. The report was provided to ADM for signature. A copy of the report was provided to ADM.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 12, 2025
Jul 31, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Office
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Romeo Manzano met with Licensee (LCN) Philomena Agbontaen and Administrator (ADM/daughter of LCN) Evonne Evien, who came to office requested a meeting with LPA and LPM. During the meeting, ADM has left the meeting due to work. During the meeting, LCN and ADM stated the property landlord is retiring and selling the property and has offered the opportunity for the LCN and her daughter/ADM to purchase the property. LCN stated that they applied for a business loan with her ADM/daughter. LCN inquired if her daughter/ADM can be added into the RCFE license for business loan purposes and/or requirements. Facility license is sole proprietorship to LCN Philomena Agbontaen. LCN stated the close date of the loan is 08/20/2025. LCN stated that if they do not meet the bank's requirements then the landlord's option is to put property on the market. LPA provided Centralized Application Bureau to contact on the procedure about adding a new licensee. LCN will submit a copy of their lease agreement. LCN stated that their lease agreement supposed to end approximately 3 years from now. The facility currently have 7 residents and LCN has been advised to inform residents and their family members regarding the sell of property and their plans, and also, to notify their designated LTCO - Ombudsman. Exit interview was conducted with LCN. This report was provided to LCN. No deficiency cited during today's visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 31, 2025
Feb 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marcela Yanez conducted an unannounced Required 1 Year visit and met with Evonne Evien, Designated Administrator. LPA announced the purpose of the visit. LPA observed 6 resident and 2 staff. During visit, LPA toured the facility inside and out. LPA toured the garage area and observed food storage areas and locked cabinets for cleaning supplies. LPA observed the kitchen area and observed locked cabinets for medications, sharp objects, and cleaning supplies. LPA observed perishable food supply of at least two days and a non-perishable food supply of at least seven days. Refrigerator temperature was measured at 43 degrees F and freezer temperature measured at 1 degrees F. LPA toured 6 residents bedrooms. Each bedroom had available bedding and clothing storage areas as well as functioning lights. LPA toured two out of two resident bathrooms. Each bathroom had available soap and paper towels and functioning lights. The water temperatures in the bathroom sinks measured with thermometer at 111-113 degrees F. LPA toured the outside area and found the exits to be clear of obstructions. LPA observed fire extinguisher was last serviced on 03/13/2023. LPA reviewed Fire and Earthquake log last disaster drill was conducted on 11/12/2024. ADM tested the smoke detectors in the hallway and found the smoke detector to function properly when tested. LPA reviewed 3 resident records and 3 staff records. LPA observed 3 staff records to be incomplete missing required documents. ADM reviewed 3 resident Centrally Stored Medication. Deficiency was cited as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. This report was reviewed with Designated Administrator Evonne Evien and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 14, 2025
Dec 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Collateral
On 12/4/24 LPA's David Marrufo and Santino Fortes conducted an unannounced facility visit and met with Philomena Agbontaen to conduct a collateral visit to deliver a complaint for Evonne's Residential Care Home #3. No deficiencies were cited at this time as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. This report was reviewed with Philomena Agbontaen and a copy of this report was providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 4, 2024
Apr 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced Case Management visit, to verify the change of capacity. LPA met with Administrator Philomena Agbontaen and explained the purpose of the visit. On April 24, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst Manuel Monter conducted a CM inspection to verify the change of capacity from 6 to 7 Non Ambulatory. According to Licensee/ADM, the facility did not have major construction; however they have an additional room herein they can convert to a resident's room. Fire clearance was granted on June 15, 2023, for an additional capacity in bedroom #6. No deficiencies cited during today's visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2024
Feb 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit, and met with Administrator (ADM) Philomena Agbontaen. During the visit, LPA observed 7 residents and 2 staff. LPA toured the facility inside out with ADM which included the Living room, kitchen, dining room, 3 restrooms and 5 residents bedrooms. The staff area of the facility was also inspected. The front yard and backyard were inspected. There was no obstruction to block the walkways. Two-day perishable food supplies and seven day nonperishable food supplies were observed. LPA observed the medication storage area, knives storage area, and cleaning product storage area as locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Room temperature was at 70 degrees F, and hot water temperature was measured at 110 degrees F in both resident bathrooms. Fire extinguisher was serviced in March 13, 2023. The facility was equipped with smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. Smoke detectors was tested by ADM, and were functional. LPA observed facility first aid kit and facility fire/earthquake drill log. The facility's last drill was on September 2, 2023. LPA reviewed facility records for 3 staff. LPA reviewed facility records for 3 residents. LPA reviewed R1's facility file. R1's physicians report states R1 has dementia. R1's most current physicians report is dated September 6, 2022. ADM stated the physicians report has not been updated. LPA requested to review residents weight record log. ADM stated she doesn't have a log for the residents weights. LPA reviewed 3 resident medications and centrally stored medication records. LPA conducted interviews with 2 staff (S1 to S2) and 2 residents (R1-R2). Deficiencies are being cited during today's visit. This report was reviewed with Administrator Philomena Agbontaen and a copy of the signed report was provided. Appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 14, 2024
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Santa Clara County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Heatherfield Inn
San Jose · Mid-size home · 0.1 mi away
$4,700 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Orchid Meadows
San Jose · Small home · 0.4 mi away
$5,400 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Cjcp RCFE
San Jose · Small home · 0.6 mi away
$3,500 a month to start · Listed by the home
Lorrie Residential Care Home IV
San Jose · Small home · 0.6 mi away
$5,500 a month to start · Listed by the home
Duraliza Manor II
San Jose · Small home · 0.6 mi away
$5,350 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Amy's Senior Care
San Jose · Small home · 0.6 mi away
$4,550 a month to start · Covelight estimate