Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

St. Mary's Residential Care Home II

Small home·Licensed for 6·Sunnyvale, California

Licensed since 2008Licence #435294284
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,700 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,850–$5,750
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedAugust 18, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitMay 20, 2026CDSS inspection record

St. Mary's Residential Care Home II is a small care home in Sunnyvale — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2008. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about St. Mary's Residential Care Home II

Is St. Mary's Residential Care Home II licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is St. Mary's Residential Care Home II licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has St. Mary's Residential Care Home II been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2008, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 6 state visits over the same years.

Is St. Mary's Residential Care Home II still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does St. Mary's Residential Care Home II cost?

$4,700 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,850–$5,750. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 7 other homes of a similar licensed size in Sunnyvale that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,250 to $7,125 a month, and the middle figure is $5,500 (n = 7 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does St. Mary's Residential Care Home II take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Arimas, Mariluz B. & Merlino C., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital-Santa Clara is 4.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can St. Mary's Residential Care Home II keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

St. Mary's Residential Care Home II license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ST. MARY'S RESIDENTIAL CARE HOME II”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #435294284. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Arimas, Mariluz B. & Merlino C., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2008, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 6 state inspection visits since 2008, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 6 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is May 20, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 2 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. ALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. LICENSE IS SUBJECT TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TWO RESIDENTS.

985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,700a month to start

Likely $3,850–$5,750

From 12 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,700a month

Likely $3,850–$5,950

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,700likely $3,850–$5,750

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,850–$5,950
$4,700
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,500–$9,050
$6,700
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

12 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,900–$5,950.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 12 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 1265 Socorro Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 6 documents for this home, and its records count 6 visits since 2008. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 20, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
6
Most recent visit
May 20, 2026
Occupied · August 18, 2025 visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated August 18, 2025. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2008.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026110202522020241102022220

The last 36 months — 4 of 6 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
May 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

LPA Audrey Jeung toured facility and grounds, including detached storage building, which is locked and inaccessible. There are 5 client bedrooms, two full bathrooms, one staff bedroom--with 2 beds--living/dining room, and kitchen. Clothes washer and dryer are located in two car garage. The backyard is level, fenced and mostly paved. Medications are secured in locked cabinet in kitchen. There are no accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. Carbon monoxide detector is tested and operable. Hot water temperature is tested in bathroom. A comfortable room temperature is maintained, and lighting is sufficient for safety. First-aid kit is maintained and complete. Perishable and non-perishable fruits, vegetables and protein are maintained, as well as supplies of bed and bath linens and hygiene products. A Disaster and Mass Casualty Plan is posted. Criminal record clearances or exemptions for facility staff or other individuals who have client contact have been reviewed, as well as staff records. Client files are reviewed, including Centrally Stored Medications Records. Mariluz Arimas (x 11/26), Merlito Arimas (x 9/26) and Mialynn Arimas (x 12/27) are certified RCFE administrators that oversee facility operations. The following licensing forms are requested to be completed and submitted to CCLD BY 6/3/26: - Emergency Disaster Plan (LIC610) - Personnel Report (LIC500) Proof of current liability insurance is given to LPA today. Deficiencies of the RCFE California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 are observed and cited on following pages. Also, see Technical Advisory Note--8 pages.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2026
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not provide resident with care, supervision, and services Facility did not allow home health nurse visit to a resident while in care

On August 18, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kiran Jain arrived at the facility to deliver and discuss the findings of a complaint allegation and investigation. Upon arrival, LPA met with caregiver (S1), Karen Marcela and disclosed the purpose of the visit. On 05/23/2025, the Department received a complaint with allegations that “Facility staff did not provide resident with care, supervision, and services” and “Facility did not allow home health nurse visit to a resident while in care”. On 08/05/2025, during the facility visit, LPA observed R1 sitting in a wheelchair in the living room watching TV, with S1 seated next to R1 and attending to R1. Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated On 05/28/2025 and 08/05/2025, LPA interviewed three (3) staff members (ADM, S1, and S2) and R1’s POA. R1’s POA stated that facility staff attended to R1’s needs very well, consistently monitored R1, and provided daily updates on R1’s condition. Medications were always administered on time. POA stated that they visit R1 at the facility 6 to 7 days a week. The ADM and staff provided the best possible care, and there was no neglect. R1 ate well, and a food assistant was available. R1’s POA expressed being very satisfied with the care provided, stating that R1 was receiving the best care possible for R1’s condition. R1 was not on total care and did not have ulcers, falls, or bruises. R1’s POA stated that the RP was not helpful, refused to come on 05/20/2025 to evaluate R1, did not want to know R1’s symptoms, and offered the ER as the only option, and instructed staff to take R1 to the hospital. R1’s POA further stated that they decided not to allow RP to visit the facility on 05/21/2025 to see R1, as they have already changed the home health agency and expressed being very satisfied with the new agency, noting improved communication. ADM stated that on 05/20/2025, staff showered R1, and R1 ate all meals, did not vomit, and did not have a fever. R1 appeared tired, confused, and was not walking around. Staff updated R1’s POA when the POA visited the facility that evening. The POA called RP and asked RP to visit the facility to evaluate R1; however, RP refused to come and instructed the POA to take R1 to the hospital. The POA and ADM decided not to call 911 since R1 was sleeping and instructed staff to observe R1 throughout the night and call 911 if there was an emergency. The next day, the POA and ADM decided to have R1 transported to the hospital via ambulance for evaluation. While at the hospital, the POA requested a change of home health agency. When RP called ADM on 05/21/2025, ADM informed RP not to come to the facility as R1 was in the hospital and the POA had already requested a new home health agency. ADM further stated that R1 was not on total care. R1 walked with a walker, received PT at the facility for exercises, could feed themself, and could get up from bed. R1 had not experienced any falls and never had bruises or injuries. Occasionally, R1 experienced episodes of hallucinations, and some medications caused R1 to feel tired. Continued on LIC9099-C S1 stated that they were not working on 05/20/2025; however, the next day, they observed R1 to be weak, remaining in bed and unable to get up. ADM and R1’s POA came to check on R1 and decided to have R1 taken to the hospital for evaluation. S1 stated that they observed changes in all residents and communicated with ADM or called 911 if needed. S1 further stated that it was R1’s POA who wanted to change the home health agency, as RP had refused to come to evaluate R1. S2 stated that on 05/20/2025, R1 was very sleepy, and RP called ADM requesting that 911 be called to take R1 to the hospital. ADM asked S2 to check on R1, and S2 informed ADM that R1 was sleeping. The next day, R1’s POA came to the facility and decided to have R1 taken to the hospital, as R1 was unable to stand. S2 stated that they had no idea why ADM did not allow RP to come to the facility. On 05/28/2025, LPA received and reviewed R1’s LIC602 Physician’s Report, dated 03/24/2025, which stated that R1’s diagnosis was Parkinson’s Dementia, with mental condition noted as confused, and that R1 was able to communicate needs and feed themself. On 05/28/2025, LPA received and reviewed R1’s LIC625 Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan, dated 03/01/2024 and signed by R1’s POA on 08/11/2024, which stated that R1 required assistance with transferring in and out of bed and was able to walk using a walker. On 05/28/2025, LPA received and reviewed R1’s LIC9172 Functional Capability Assessment, dated 11/17/2022, which stated that R1 was confused at times, required assistance with transferring, could feed themself completely or with help from another person, walked with support, and used a walker and/or wheelchair. On 05/28/2025, LPA received and reviewed R1’s progress notes for 05/20/2025, which stated that R1 was more confused than usual, was weak, unable to get up from bed, and that R1’s POA was called regarding R1’s condition. On 05/28/2025, LPA received and reviewed R1’s hospital discharge report, dated 05/25/2025, which stated that R1 had a urinary tract infection (UTI). Continued on LIC9099-C Based on observations, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the facility staff provided R1 with care, supervision, and services. R1’s POA visited the facility frequently, received regular updates, and expressed high satisfaction with the care provided. There was no evidence of neglect or failure to meet R1’s care needs. The refusal for RP to come on 05/21/2025 occurred when R1 was already in the hospital, and the decision to change home health agency originated from R1’s POA, not from a facility policy to deny access while R1 was in care. The timing and circumstances did not demonstrate that the facility wrongfully denied necessary medical services. The Department has determined that the allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the allegation(s) are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies were cited under the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. An exit interview was conducted with the Caregiver. A copy of this report was discussed and provided to the Caregiver, Karen Marcela, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 18, 2025 · control 26-AS-20250523163931
May 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On May 15, 2025, at 09:50 AM, the Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kiran Jain arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct a Required 1-Year Annual inspection. The LPA met with the caregiver, Karen Marcela, and disclosed the purpose of the inspection. The caregiver informed the LPA that the facility had (6) residents in care and (2) staff members present at the time. At 10:06 AM, the LPA initiated a walk-through of the facility, accompanied by the caregiver. LPA inspected the kitchen and found it clean, with no food preparation and cooking in progress at the time. The appliances were checked and observed to be in working order. The LPA inspected a locked cabinet containing knives and sharp objects, and a locked cabinet under the sink with detergents and cleaning supplies. The refrigerator and pantry cabinets were inspected, and sufficient supplies of fresh perishable food for (2) days and nonperishable staples for (7) days were observed. No expired food or stored medications were noted. LPA inspected the dining area adjacent to the kitchen and found it clean. The dining table and chairs were observed to accommodate the residents, and all the furniture was in good repair. The indoor temperature reading of 72°F on a thermostat was observed in the hallway at the time of the visit. LPA inspected the living room and observed it clean, with all furniture in good repair. There were sofa sets, chairs, tables, and a television in the living room. (2) residents were observed sitting in the living room watching TV. LPA inspected the fire extinguisher mounted on the wall in the living room and found it fully charged, with the Continued on LIC809-C last service tag dated 07/29/2024. The caregiver tested the smoke and carbon monoxide detector located in living room in the LPA's presence, and it was found to be functional. Additional smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were observed in all bedrooms and common areas of the facility during the visit. LPA inspected the garage and found it clean. A washer, a dryer, a refrigerator and a freezer containing additional food supplies, storage racks shelves with non-perishable food items, incontinence supplies, file cabinets, suitcases and cabinets containing pillowcases, mattress pads, bedsheets, and towels were observed inside the garage. LPA toured the backyard and found ramps and passageways in good condition, clear of obstructions, with no blocking or tripping hazards. No bodies of water were noted. LPA inspected (1) storage shed in the backyard and noted a Hoyer lift, wheelchairs, and mattresses stored. LPA reviewed five (5) staff personnel records and five (5) resident records. The LPA observed that 5 of 5 residents had an Admission Agreement, Physician's Report, Appraisal Needs and Services Plan, and CSDMR. LPA observed that 5 of 5 staff members had LIC 508 Criminal Record Statements and LIC 503 Health Screening and confirmed that 5 of 5 staff members were associated with the facility. LPA observed locked centrally stored medication cabinet in the kitchen. Medications were organized separately for each resident. All medication bottles and bubble packs were properly labeled. Centrally Stored Medication Records were reviewed and found to be complete. LPA inspected the first aid kit and found it fully stocked. Emergency Drill Logs were reviewed, and it was observed that Emergency Disaster (Fire and Earthquake) Drills were conducted every two months, with the most recent drill completed on 05/07/2025. The following updated forms are requested to be submitted to CCLD by 05/22/2025: 1) LIC 500: Personnel Report 2) LIC 308: Designation of Facility Responsibility 3) Certificate of Liability Insurance 4) Administrator Certificate(s) No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted with the caregiver. A copy of this report was left with the caregiver, Karen Marcela, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of the report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
May 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit, and met with Administrator (ADM) Mariluz Arimas. During the visit, LPA observed 6 residents and 3 staff. LPA toured the facility inside out with ADM which included the Living room, kitchen, dining room, 2 restrooms and 5 resident bedrooms. The staff area of the facility was also inspected. The front yard and backyard were inspected. There was no obstruction to block the walkways. Two-day perishable food supplies and seven day nonperishable food supplies were observed. LPA observed the medication storage area, knives storage area, and cleaning product storage area as locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Room temperature was at 74 degrees F, and hot water temperature was measured at 118 degrees F in both resident bathrooms. Fire extinguisher was serviced in July 20, 2023. The facility was equipped with smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. Smoke detectors was tested by ADM, and were functional. LPA requested to see the facility first aid kit and facility fire/earthquake drill log. LPA reviewed the facility fire/earthquake drill log, which only had the last documented drill at January 8, 2021. ADM stated the facility's last drill was on January 13, 2024. ADM stated she could not find the documentation for fire/earthquake drills for the year 2023-2024. LPA reviewed facility records for 3 staff and 3 residents. While reviewing resident R3's records, LPA observed resident R3 has dementia. R3's last physicians report is dated November 15, 2022. ADM stated she did not have an updated physicians report for resident R3. LPA requested to review residents R1-R3's weight record log. ADM stated she does not have a weight record log. Page 1 Out of 2 LPA reviewed 3 resident medications and centrally stored medication records. LPA conducted interviews with 1 staff and 2 residents. Deficiencies are being cited during today's visit, see LIC809-D. This report was reviewed with Administrator Mariluz Arimas and a copy of the signed report was provided. Appeal Rights were provided. Page 2 Out of 2. END OF REPORTthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 8, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Santa Clara County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Santa Clara County