Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Casa Alice Care Home
Small home·Licensed for 6·Mountain View, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
- Starting rate$3,900 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
- Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedOctober 3, 2025 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitJune 23, 2026CDSS inspection record
Casa Alice Care Home is a small care home in Mountain View — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2014. Dementia care is not on file.
Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Casa Alice Care Home
Is Casa Alice Care Home licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
How many residents is Casa Alice Care Home licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Has Casa Alice Care Home been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 10 state visits over the same years.
Is Casa Alice Care Home still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Casa Alice Care Home cost?
$3,900 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.
Among 79 other homes of a similar licensed size across Santa Clara County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,825 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,200 (n = 79 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Casa Alice Care Home take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Ping Jing Zhao, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
El Camino Health is 1.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Casa Alice Care Home keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Casa Alice Care Home license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “CASA ALICE CARE HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #435202415. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed to Ping Jing Zhao, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- First licensed in 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 10 state inspection visits since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 10 state visits in that period.
- 3 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is June 23, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
- Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 2 residents
- BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident
State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
LICENSED TO SERVE SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY ELDERLY RESIDENTS AGES 60 AND OVER OF WHICH ONE (1) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. LICENSE SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TWO (2) WITH TOTAL CARE COMPONENT.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
4 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation not on file
Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”
What it costs here
This home’s starting rate
$3,900a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing
Likely monthly total
$3,900a month
Likely $3,900–$4,500
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$3,900this home
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.
Shared room insteadAsknot on file
This home’s listed starting rate is for assisted living private room. A shared room, if one is offered, may cost less — ask.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,900–$4,500
- $3,900
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,900–$8,000
- $5,900
Lines marked “Ask” are not in the totals.
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.
8 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,900–$7,500.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 8 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Casa Pastel Care HomeMountain View · 0.6 mi · Small home$3,900Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Madera Villa Residential CareSunnyvale · 1.0 mi · Mid-size home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Paradise Care HomeMountain View · 1.1 mi · Small home$3,900Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Hidden Lane VillaLos Altos · 1.8 mi · Small home$7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunny Orchard PlaceSunnyvale · 2.1 mi · Small home$7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Wisteria HomeSunnyvale · 2.3 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunflower Care HomeSunnyvale · 2.3 mi · Mid-size home$7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- El Sereno HomeLos Altos · 2.9 mi · Small home$5,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 809 Alice Avenue, Mountain View, CA 94040Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2022, the state has filed 9 documents for this home, and its records count 10 visits since 2014. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 23, 2026.
- On file since
- 2022
- State visits
- 10
- Most recent visit
- June 23, 2026
- Occupied · October 3, 2025 visit
- 6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated June 14, 2024 to October 3, 2025. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations0typical 0
- Substantiated allegations0typical 0
- Total complaints3typical 0
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2014.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 8 of 9 documents
Jun 23, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 6/23/2026, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra arrived at the facility to conduct the Annual 1-year required inspection. LPA Calandra was greeted by Ping Jing Zhao, Administrator/Licensee and explained the purpose of the facility. LPA toured the physical plant. This facility is a 1-story building with 6 bedrooms(5 for residents and 1 for staff), 6 bathrooms, a kitchen, dining room, living room, office, garage, and front and backyards. No accessible bodies of water or hazards were observed. All bedrooms had the required furniture and sufficient lighting. All bathrooms had anti-skid flooring and grab bars. The facility's hot water temperature was within the required 105-120 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility's fire extinguisher was observed to be fully charged and last checked on 4/2/2026. The facility had the required 7 days of perishables and 2 days of perishables on hand. No food was expired. The facility's first aid kit had all of the required items. All sharp objects, soap, detergents, and poisons were observed to be locked and in-accessible to persons in care. LPA reviewed 4 resident files and 5 staff files. All were observed to be complete. LPA requested the facility send the following documents by 6/30/2026: LIC 500(Personnel Summary Report), Current Liability Insurance. A review of Centrally Stored Medications indicated that medications for residents were properly labeled with During file review, LPA Calandra observed that the facility did not have documentation of their quarterly emergency drills. A Type B citation was issued for this deficiency. instructions on dosage and times of day and matched the Centrally Stored Medication Records(CSMR) kept at the facility. Deficiencies are cited under the California Code of Regulations. Failure to correct the deficiencies by the POC due date may result in Civil Penalties. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of the report along with Appeal Rights were provided to the Administrator/Licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 23, 2026
Oct 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff speaks to resident in an inappropriate manner. Staff leaves resident soiled for extended periods of time. Facility does not have proper equipment to assist resident in care. Staff do not properly store resident's food. Staff does not treat resident with dignity or respect.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Becky Bi. On 01/11/2023, the department received a complaint with the above allegations. On 01/19/2023, LPA Marrufo conducted an initial complaint investigation visit. On 03/21/2025 and 09/24/2025, LPA Marrufo conducted additional complaint investigation visits. Allegation: Staff speaks to resident in an inappropriate manner. During visit on 01/19/2023, LPA Marrufo interviewed resident R1 and staff S1 and S2, as well as Administrator (ADM) Becky Bi. See LIC9099-C pages for more information. Page 1 of 5. Unsubstantiated During interview on 01/19/2023, R1 stated that S1 and S2 speak to R1 in an inappropriate manner by verbalizing disrespectful things to him/her such as saying R1 has “cow shit” or “pig shit” when they assist R1 with changing undergarments. R1 stated S1 and S2 say they don’t like R1 and say they will retire because of R1. During interview on 01/19/2023, S1 and S2 stated to have not spoken to R1 inappropriately. ADM stated during interview that staff do not speak to residents inappropriately. During interview on 09/24/2025, ADM stated that ADM and the staff knew that R1 had complained about R1’s previous care giver, so ADM and the staff did not want to risk talking to R1 inappropriately. On 01/19/2023, the Department obtained copies of R1’s Physician’s Report dated 07/27/2021 and R1’s Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan dated 10/20/2021. Allegation: Staff leaves resident soiled for extended periods of time. R1’s Physician’s Report states R1 had bowel impairment and bladder impairment, R1 was dependent on all his/her Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), and was unable to transfer independently to and from bed.R1’s Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan states two staff would provide lifting during transfers and staff would provide full services with R1’s shower and daily dressing. R1’s Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan states R1 was not able to go to the toilet and R1 wears incontinent supplies. The Physical/Health Method of Evaluating Progress section states, “remind [him/her] to relax [his/her] legs while we are changing [his/her] depends.” The Functioning Skills section states R1 has the following needs: “ambulation, showering, dressing, eating, toileting, [and] incontinence.” The Functioning Skills section includes the following objectives: “provide two people lifting with transfers, ensure [he/she] is safe, provide full services with [his/her] shower, provide full services with [his/her] daily dressing, assist with set up, independent with feeding, not able to go to toilet, [he/she] wears incontinent supplies, [he/she] is incontinent for both urine and bowel.” During interview on 01/19/2023, R1 stated staff S1 and S2 do not take R1 to the bathroom and only change R1’s diaper twice per day. R1 stated staff change R1 at 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM. R1 stated to have no way to notify staff if R1 needs help. R1 stated to not have a bell or the phone number of the staff. R1 stated that he/she text messages the “director of the program.” Page 2 of 5. On 04/01/2025, the Department obtained screenshots of text messages from ADM that ADM stated were between ADM and R1. The text messages include a text from R1 requesting ADM to have staff provide R1 with a ride to the hospital on 10/02/2022. During interview on 01/19/2023, S1 stated staff changed R1’s diapers twice a day. S1 stated if R1’s diapers were wet at lunch time, R1 would verbally call to the staff for help. S1 stated R1 would call for help once per day. S1 stated staff would check on R1 in the afternoon. During interview on 01/19/2023, S2 stated staff check on bedridden residents every two hours. S2 stated if the bedridden residents are wet, the staff will change them. S2 stated staff would check on R1, but R1 does not like to be moved. S2 stated R1 will say he/she is not wet, but he/she would be wet. S2 stated that staff would tell R1 to call for staff to help when he/she is wet. During interview on 01/19/2023, ADM stated that if a resident is unable to go to the bathroom, staff will help residents with toileting at least three to four times a day or as needed. ADM stated at nighttime, staff will place a liner on the bed and there will be a nighttime change. ADM stated staff check on R1 after every meal. ADM stated that S2 asked ADM what to do if R1 refused a toileting needs check, and ADM told S2 to ask R1 again later. During interview on 09/24/2025, ADM stated nighttime staff would provide R1 with a diaper change as needed. ADM stated if R1 refused diaper changes, then ADM would try to convince R1 and talk to R1’s social worker. ADM stated if R1 continued to refuse diaper changes, then ADM and the staff would not force R1 to change diapers. ADM stated R1 would sometimes refuse diaper changes and always refused to be showered. ADM stated staff would need to sponge bathe R1 because R1 refused to shower. Allegation: Facility does not have proper equipment to assist resident in care. During interview on 01/19/2023, R1 stated that R1 needs a Hoyer lift. R1 stated R1’s Physical Therapist told R1 that he/she needs a Hoyer lift. Page 3 of 5. During interview on 01/19/2023, S2 stated that R1’s Physical Therapist said R1 needs a Hoyer lift to transfer R1 to his/her wheelchair and give R1 a shower. S2 stated to not know what happened to the Physical Therapist’s request. During interview on 01/19/2023, ADM stated R1’s Physical Therapist never gave the facility any suggestion about transfer equipment. During interview on 09/24/2025, ADM stated R1 did not want to be transferred from bed. ADM stated R1’s physical therapist never gave ADM any documentation about a Hoyer lift for R1. ADM stated R1 would never give ADM any documentation from R1’s physical therapist or occupational therapist. ADM stated to not be able to remember if ADM had a conversation with R1’s physical therapist about getting a Hoyer lift for R1. Allegation: Staff do not properly store resident's food. When the department received the complaint, it was alleged that the facility staff do not put R1’s food that requires refrigeration in the facility refrigerator, causing the food to spoil. During interview on 01/19/2023, R1 stated R1 orders food from Walmart. R1 stated staff keep R1’s food that requires refrigeration in the refrigerator. During interview on 01/19/2023, S2 stated some of R1’s personal food is stored in R1’s room and some is stored in the facility refrigerator. S2 stated R1 currently does not have any of R1’s own food. S2 stated R1 already consumed R1’s own food. During interview on 09/24/2025, ADM stated R1’s food that needed refrigeration was kept in the facility refrigerator and the rest of the food was kept in R1’s room. Allegation: Staff does not treat resident with dignity or respect. Page 4 of 5. When the department received the complaint, it was alleged that staff were not allowing R1 to put personal items on R1’s desk. During interview on 01/19/2023, R1 stated to have personal items such as a Bible, journal, and crossword puzzles. R1 stated the staff put R1’s items away in a box on the drawer by R1’s bed. R1 stated other objects are covering the box. R1 stated the box with R1’s personal items are out of reach to R1. During interview on 01/19/2023, S1 stated staff give R1 his/her crossword puzzles whenever R1 asks for them. S1 stated staff assist R1 with his/her personal belongings whenever he/she asks. During interview on 01/19/2023, S2 stated R1 has a laptop, an iPad, a Bible, and coloring books. S2 stated R1 does not use his/her belongings and watches television instead. S2 stated R1’s belongings began to pile up on R1’s table. S2 stated S2 put the belongings R1 was not using in a box. During interview on 01/19/2023, R1 stated staff “rip” R1’s legs open when changing R1. R1 stated the way staff change R1 is demeaning and condescending. During interviews on 09/24/2025, S1 and S2 stated to never open R1’s legs in a disrespectful way when cleaning R1 and changing R1’s diapers. During interview on 09/24/2025, ADM stated to not know where R1 is currently located. ADM stated R1 did not provide the contact information for R1’s physical therapist. ADM stated R1’s physical therapist would either call the house phone or speak with R1 directly. ADM stated R1’s physical therapist did not contact ADM on ADM’s cell phone. ADM stated that when R1 was a resident at the facility, the only staff were S1 and S2. Based on information from interviews conducted with staff, and records reviewed, although the allegations listed above may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegations are unsubstantiated. No Deficiencies were cited under California Code of Regulations Title 22. This report was reviewed with Becky Bi and a copy of this report was provided. Page 5 of 5. END REPORT. During interview 01/19/2023, ADM stated staff use a pot of warm water and a towel to clean up R1. ADM stated staff use non-rinse shampoo in R1’s hair. ADM stated when R1 had leg braces after surgery, staff could not shower R1. During interview on 09/24/2025, S1 stated to have never told R1 that it is not S1’s job to help R1 into the shower seat and shower. S1 stated to have never observed another staff say that helping R1 into the shower is not their job. S1 stated R1 did not like to be moved. S1 stated R1 would refuse to be changed if R1 was in pain. S1 stated if R1 were in pain but very wet, then R1 would not refuse to be changed. S1 stated if R1 refused to be changed, then S1 would return to R1 later to ask to change R1 again. During interview on 09/24/2025, S2 stated to have not stated that it was not S2’s job to help R1 into the shower seat and into the shower. S2 stated S1 would offer R1 a shower, but R1 would refuse. S2 stated to have never observed another staff tell R1 that it was not their job to help R1 into the shower seat and into the shower. S2 stated R1 would refuse to be changed if R1 was in pain. S2 stated staff would return later to ask R1 again to be changed if R1 previously refused to be changed. During interview on 09/24/2025, ADM stated that R1 would schedule his/her own doctor and hospital appointments and keep the hospital discharge documentation. ADM stated to not have any documentation on R1’s hospital visits, because R1 kept the documentation for those visits. ADM stated there was no shower log maintained for R1. During interview on 09/24/2025, ADM stated the only part of R1’s care plan that changed after R1’s surgery was the staff needed to be careful about R1’s knee braces. ADM stated that even before R1’s surgery, R1 was in bed for toileting. ADM stated R1 did not like to shower because it was too painful for R1’s legs. LPA Marrufo conducted a telephone interview with witness W1 on 10/03/2025. W1 stated to have not been made aware by R1 or the facility staff that the staff were cleaning R1 with a pot of warm water, drying R1 with a towel, and cleaning R1’s hair with non-rinse shampoo after R1 had tendon surgery. Page 2 of 3. This agency has investigated the complaint allegations listed. Based on interviews and review of records, the CCLD has found that the complaint allegation is unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. This report was reviewed with Becky Bi and a copy of this report was provided. page 3 of 3. END REPORTthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2025 · control 26-AS-20230111131603
Oct 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced Case Management visit and met with Becky Bi. The purpose of the visit was to follow up on resident R1's Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan that was reviewed as part of the complaint investigation received on 01/11/2023. During the investigation, LPA Marrufo observed that R1's Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan had not been updated after R1 had undergone a surgery. LPA also observed that the Background Information section was left blank. An Advisory Note was issued. See LIC9102 form for more information. No deficiencies were cited at this time as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. This report was reviewed with Becky Bi and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2025
May 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On May 19, 2025, the Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kiran Jain arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct a Required 1-Year Annual inspection. The LPA met with the Administrator, Becky Bi, and disclosed the purpose of the inspection. The Administrator informed the LPA that the facility had (6) residents in care and (2) staff members present at the time. At 11:04 AM, the LPA initiated a walk-through of the facility, accompanied by the Administrator. LPA inspected the kitchen and found it clean, with lunch preparation and cooking in progress at the time. The appliances were checked and observed to be in working order. The LPA inspected a locked cabinet containing knives and sharp objects, detergents, disinfectants, and cleaning supplies. The refrigerator and pantry cabinets were inspected, and sufficient supplies of fresh perishable food for (2) days and nonperishable staples for (7) days were observed. No expired food items were noted. A locked box containing medications was observed. LPA inspected the dining area adjacent to the kitchen and found it clean. The dining table and chairs were observed to accommodate the residents, and all the furniture was in good repair. One (1) resident was observed sitting in the dining area. LPA inspected the living room and observed it clean, with all furniture in good repair. There were a sofa sets, coffee table, piano and a television in the living room. LPA inspected the fire extinguisher mounted on the wall in the dining area hallway and found it fully charged, with the last service tag dated 01/21/2025. Continued on LIC809-C The Administrator tested the smoke and carbon monoxide detector located in the living room in the LPA's presence, and it was found to be functional. Additional smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were observed in all bedrooms and common areas of the facility during the visit. There were six (6) bedrooms and six (6) bathrooms designated for residents' use. All (6) resident rooms were single occupancy. LPA inspected all (6) resident rooms and found them clean, well-lit, and equipped with the required furniture. Storage closets with incontinence supplies were observed in every room. LPA inspected six (6) full bathrooms and found them clean, sanitary, and in good working condition. The bathrooms contained soap, grab bars, paper towels, a trash can, a shower chair, and non-slip flooring. The hot water temperature at the sink faucet measured 113.7°F and 115.1°F. The hallway closets were observed to contain clean linens and towels for residents’ use. LPA inspected the locked garage located behind the house in the backyard and observed a washer, a dryer, mattresses, suitcases, and furniture items. LPA toured the backyard area and found ramps and passageways in good condition, clear of obstructions, with no blocking or tripping hazards. The backyard has a set of a patio table, chairs, and shaded areas for resident use. No bodies of water were noted. LPA reviewed five (5) staff personnel records and (5) resident records. The LPA observed that 5 of 5 residents had an Admission Agreement, Physician's Report, Appraisal Needs and Services Plan, and CSDMR. LPA observed that 5 of 5 staff members had LIC 508 Criminal Record Statements and LIC 503 Health Screening and confirmed that staff members were associated with the facility. LPA observed a locked centrally stored medication cabinet inside the dining area. Medications were organized in separate bins for each resident. All medication bottles were properly labeled. Centrally Stored Medication Records were reviewed and found to be complete. LPA inspected the first aid kit and found it fully stocked. Emergency Drill Logs were reviewed, and it was observed that Emergency Disaster Drills were conducted quarterly, with the most recent drill completed on 03/19/2025. Continued on LIC809-C The following updated forms are requested to be submitted to CCLD by 05/26/2025: LIC 500: Personnel Report LIC 308: Designation of Facility Responsibility Certificate of Liability Insurance Administrator Certificate(s) No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted with the Administrator. A copy of this report was left with the Administrator, Becky Bi, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of the report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 19, 2025
Feb 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility is neglecting resident by not caring for resident's foot
On 2/19/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit at the facility. LPA met with Care Staff Carmen Duran and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation of Facility is neglecting resident by not caring for resident's foot, according to RP client's (R1) foot is dark purple. RP believes the staff workers are causing R1s foot to deteriorate by not taking R1 out to walk. RP believes staff should be taking the client for walks/exercising it. By not moving the foot (blood circulation) and keeping it elevated is worsening the condition of the foot. RP states he/she is not certain if the facility is following through with physical therapy for the client. page 1 of 2 Unsubstantiated LPA Kabariti interviewed 2 staff members. S1 states that R1 is always sitting in the chair and they cannot stop R1 from doing what he/she wants. They encourage R1 to elevate his/her leg while sitting on the chair throughout the day, but R1 does not listen, but R1 is good at elevating his/her leg while sleeping. The doctor knows about R1s foot and encourages R1 to elevate his/her legs but never does that. S2 is one of the main people who takes care of R1. S2 states that they encourage R1 to elevate his/her foot while sitting on the chair everyday and throughout the day but R1 doesn't listen. S2 encourages walks around the house but needs a 2-person assist because R1 is of risk of falling. R1 takes a really long time to take a few steps. From the living room to R1s room it can take 45 minutes but staff are always there to watch and assist. The doctor encourages to elevate R1s foot and do physical therapy. According to records review, part of the reappraisal of the resident dated before the complaint was filed, it is stated that R1s feet are more swollen and staff encourage R1 to keep feet up as much as possible. R1s ambulation will be addressed by providing two people lifting with transfers and ensure that R1 is safe due to fall risk being high. Based on visitation logs provided by the facility, there was a scheduled physical therapist doing visits to R1. Based on interviews & records review , although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the above allegations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies cited today. Report is reviewed and copy is provided. Page 2 of 2the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 19, 2025 · control 26-AS-20220324131206
Jun 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Facility did not provided requested documents to POA in a timely manner.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Administrator Becky Bi. On 06/03/2024, the Department received a complaint with the above allegation. LPA Marrufo conducted an initial complaint investigation visit on 06/13/2024. On 06/14/2024, LPA Marrufo received a telephone call and an email from resident R1's Power of Attorney (POA) stating that POA received the requested records of R1 on 06/11/2024 and does not want to move forward with the complaint. LPA Marrufo obtained a copy of Administrator Becky Bi's Proof of Delivery which states the documents were delivered to POA on 06/10/2024. This agency has investigated the complaint allegation listed. Based on interviews and review of records, the CCLD has found that the complaint allegation is unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. This report was reviewed with Administrator Becky Bi and a copy of this report was provided. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 14, 2024 · control 26-AS-20240603152426
Jun 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced Case Management - Annual Continuation visit and met with Administrator Becky Bi. During visit, LPA Marrufo toured the kitchen area and garage area. LPA Marrufo observed there to be a perishable food supply of at least two days and a non-perishable food supply of at least seven days. The garage area was locked and contained cleaning supplies. LPA Marrufo observed the first aid kit and found it to be complete. LPA Marrufo toured the outside area and found the exits to be clear of obstructions. LPA Marrufo reviewed the Centrally Stored Medications and Destruction Records and Resident Records for 6 out of 6 residents and found them to be complete. LPA Marrufo reviewed 3 staff files and found them to be complete. No deficiencies were cited at this time as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. This report was reviewed with Administrator Becky Bi and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 14, 2024
Jun 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced Required 1 Year visit and met with Administrator Becky Bi. During visit, LPA Marrufo conducted interviews with 2 staff and 2 residents. LPA Marrufo tested the detectors of smoke and carbon monoxide in each bedroom and hallway and each detector functioned properly when tested. LPA Marrufo toured 6 out of 6 resident bathrooms. Each bathroom had water temperatures between 105 F to 108 F. Each bathroom had available soap and paper towels. LPA toured 6 out of 6 resident bedrooms and each bedroom had working lights and available bedding and clothing storage areas. Due to time constraints, the annual inspection will need to be continued at a later time. No deficiencies were cited at this time as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. This report was reviewed with Administrator Becky Bi and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 13, 2024
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
Find a detail about life at this home.
Rooms & the spaces they will use
Shared / companion rooms
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Room typesPrivate Rooms
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Pets, routines & independence
Residents may bring a petReported no
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Santa Clara County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Casa Pastel Care Home
Mountain View · Small home · 0.6 mi away
$3,900 a month to start · Listed by the home
Sunrise of Sunnyvale
Sunnyvale · Large community · 0.7 mi away
$7,904 a month to start · Listed by the home
Peninsula Senior Living Magnolia
Sunnyvale · Mid-size home · 0.7 mi away
$5,650 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Madera Villa Residential Care
Sunnyvale · Mid-size home · 1.0 mi away
$6,000 a month to start · Listed by the home
Sunnyside Gardens
Sunnyvale · Large community · 1.1 mi away
$5,200 a month to start · Listed by the home
Paradise Care Home
Mountain View · Small home · 1.1 mi away
$3,900 a month to start · Listed by the home