Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Amor Residential Care Home

Mid-size home·Licensed for 24·San Jose, California

Licensed since 1992Licence #430706162
  • Care approvals on fileNone on fileWheelchair, dementia, hospice, bedridden — ask the home
  • Starting rate$4,300 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 24Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit23 of 24 beds occupiedDecember 14, 2022 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 6, 2026CDSS inspection record

Amor Residential Care Home is a mid-size care home in San Jose — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 24 residents since 1992. Hospice, dementia, wheelchair and bedridden approvals are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Amor Residential Care Home

Is Amor Residential Care Home licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Amor Residential Care Home licensed for?

24 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Amor Residential Care Home been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 1992, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.

Is Amor Residential Care Home still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Amor Residential Care Home cost?

$4,300 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 50 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Jose that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,200 (n = 50 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Amor Residential Care Home take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Amor T. Ador-Dionisio, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Regional Medical Center of San Jose is 1.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Amor Residential Care Home keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”

Amor Residential Care Home license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “AMOR RESIDENTIAL CARE HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #430706162. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 24 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Amor T. Ador-Dionisio, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 1992, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 9 state inspection visits since 1992, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 1992, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 1992, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 6, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file · ask the home
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careNot on file · ask the home
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

5 questions to ask the home — nothing on file yet
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver not on file

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$4,300a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$4,300a month

Likely $4,300–$4,900

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,300this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,300–$4,900
$4,300
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,300–$8,400
$6,300
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

11 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $1,950–$5,050.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 11 nearby homes behind this estimate
  • Bonnevie Residence and CareSan Jose · 0.8 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Casa LaurelSan Jose · 0.9 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • A Heavenly Care HomeSan Jose · 1.2 mi · Small home
    $2,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Santo Nino Residential Care Home #1San Jose · 1.5 mi · Small home
    $1,600Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Laurel HavenSan Jose · 1.7 mi · Mid-size home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Olga's Care Home for the ElderlySan Jose · 1.9 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Marilag's Care HomeSan Jose · 2.8 mi · Small home
    $4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Rose Garden CourtSan Jose · 2.8 mi · Mid-size home
    $6,000Listed on Seniorly · memory care shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
  • Evonne's Residential Care Home #1San Jose · 2.9 mi · Mid-size home
    $3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Lorrie Residential Care Home IVSan Jose · 2.9 mi · Small home
    $5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Cjcp RCFESan Jose · 2.9 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026

Where it is

  • 32 North 21St Street, San Jose, CA 95116Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 9 documents for this home, and its records count 9 visits since 1992. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated August 6, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
9
Most recent visit
August 6, 2026
Occupied · December 14, 2022 visit
23 of 24 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated December 14, 2022. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 2
  • Total complaints1typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 1992.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026110202533020242202022330

The last 36 months — 6 of 9 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Aug 6, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maria (Mita) Partoza conducted an unannounced Annual Required Inspection at the facility. LPA met with Licensee/Administrator (LIC/ADM) Amor and Virgil Valin and stated the purpose of the visit. The facility is licensed to serve residents age 60 and over. The facility has a licensed capacity of 24 residents. The facility is approved for 20 non-ambulatory residents. At the time of the visit, LPA observed 6 residents at the front of the facility with 2 staff supervision. Other residents were in their respective rooms. The facility has 4 building. Building #32 has no resident, the office is located at building #32. Building #34, has 5 bedroom 3 out of 5 are shared, 1 private bathroom and 1 hallway bathroom. Building #36 has 3 bedrooms that are shared, hallway bathroom and 1 private bathroom. Building #38 has 5 bedrooms, 3 out of 5 are shared, 1 private bathroom and 1 hallway bathroom. LPA inspected all resident rooms of each building and observed that each room has credenzas and closet, shared by residents to hold their personal belongings. The bathrooms have grab bars. The facility has two kitchen set up one in the dining area in building #36 and a separate kitchen for preparing meals and behind the kitchen is the pantry that holds 2 days of perishable food supply and 7 days of non-perishable food supply. The indoor temperature measured 70 degrees Fahrenheit and was within regulatory range. Hallways, passageways, and exits were observed without obstruction. Lighting was operational in the hallways and no obstruction or tripping hazard was observed, Each building has a side ramps and accessible for a person limited mobility. page 1 of 2 LPA inspected the kitchen and food storage areas. Knives, sharp objects, cleaning supplies, chemicals, and other items that may pose a risk to residents were stored in locked areas and were inaccessible to residents. The kitchen water temperature measured 116.7 degrees Fahrenheit and was within regulatory range. Bathroom water temperatures measured between 116.7 degrees Fahrenheit and were within regulatory range. Medications were centrally stored in a locked area and were inaccessible to residents. LPA inspected the first-aid kit and observed the required supplies. Cleaning supplies and laundry products were stored in locked areas. The washer and dryer were operational at the time of the visit. Smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and produced an audible signal. The facility was equipped with a fire alarm system. The facility has a wall pull alarm system and fire extinguishers, which were last serviced on 02/23/2026 and 02/24/2026. Emergency exits were observed without obstruction. LPA reviewed 6 resident records and 3 staff records. Resident records reviewed included admission agreements, physician’s reports, appraisal or needs and services plans, medication administration records, personal and incidental funds records, and other required documentation. Staff records reviewed included criminal record clearances, health screenings, first-aid and cardiopulmonary resuscitation certifications, training records, and personnel documentation. Based on record review the staff had criminal record clearances and were associated with the facility. Staff training and certification records reviewed were current on the date of the visit. The facility conducts fire and earthquake drills monthly for each shift. Records reviewed showed that the most recent drills were conducted on 07/14/2026. No deficiencies were cited during today’s visit based on the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. An exit interview was conducted with licensee/administrator (LIC/ADM) Amor and Virgil Valin. A copy of the report was reviewed and provided. end of reportthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 6, 2026
20253 state visits · 3 documents
Aug 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marcela Yanez conducted an unannounced Required 1 Year visit and met with Virgil and Amor Valin, Administrators. LPA announced the purpose of the visit. LPA observed 3 residents in front porch, 6 residents in courtyard watching tv and 5 in backyard sitting area and 5 staff. During visit, LPA toured the facilities building #32, #34, #36 and #38. LPA observed 1 staff at the gate of the facility monitoring the front gate entrance to the facility grounds. LPA toured 18 resident bedrooms. Each bedroom had available bedding and clothing storage areas as well as functioning lights. ADM tested the smoke detector in the office and found the smoke detector to function properly when tested. LPA toured 6 resident bathrooms. Each bathroom had available soap and automatic dryer and functioning lights. The water temperatures in the bathroom sinks measured with thermometer at 105 to 119.0 F. LPA toured the dining area in building #36 and kitchen area used for resident dining. LPA observed a separate kitchen area used for cooking and a separate room for kitchen food storage and pantry. LPA observed food storage areas and locked cabinets for cleaning supplies. LPA observed the kitchen area and observed locked cabinet for medications, sharp objects, and cleaning supplies. LPA observed perishable food supply of at least two days and a non-perishable food supply of at least seven days. page 1 of 2 LPA toured the outside area and found the exits to be clear of obstructions. LPA observed courtyard with seating area and shade for resident to sit. Courtyard was observed clear of obstruction and maintained. LPA observed fire extinguisher was last serviced on 01/16/2025. The facility has a pull fire alarm serviced on 01/16/25. LPA reviewed Fire and Earthquake log. The facility conducted the disaster drill on 08/04/25 LPA reviewed resident records for 5 residents. LPA reviewed 4 staff records. ADM reviewed the centrally stored medication for 3 residents. No deficiency were cited as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. This report was reviewed with Amor and Virgil Valin, Administrators and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 18, 2025
Apr 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maria (Mita) Partoza conducted an unannounced case management visit for the incident that was reported on 10/23/2024 and investigation was initiated on 10/24/2024. LPA met Licensee/Administrator Amor Valin and Virgil Valin and stated the purpose of the visit is to amend the report that was delivered on 1/8/2025 based on additional information. On 10/24/2024, the Department conducted a case management visit to for the incident report received on 10/23/2024 regarding resident (R1) who left the facility without staff's knowledge. R1 was found the next day by law enforcement (10/24/2024). On 10/24/2024, the Department interviewed 3 staff (S1, S2 & S3). 3 Out of 3 staff stated on 10/23/2024 during lunch time, approximately noon, they observed R1 was present at the facility. Staff S2 stated during snack time which was served at 3:00pm observed that R1 was not present at the facility. Staff reported to ADM that R1 was missing and law enforcement was called as soon as R1 was confirmed to be missing from the facility. The facility staff searched within the 3 mile radius but was not able to locate R1. Based on staff interview, 3 Out of 3 staff, stated that R1 recently moved to the facility and will always go to the gate, wanting to leave. 3 Out of 3 staff stated that ADM have instructed all staff to watch over R1 because R1 is new and is not familiar with his/her current surroundings. 3 Out of 3 staff stated that there will always be a staff by the gate to watch over the residents who are coming and going through the gate. Continuation on LIC 9099-C, Page 1 of 3. Based on observation and interview with staff, the gate is equipped with a bell alarm system alerting staff when a person/individual opens the gate. 3 Out of 3 staff stated R1 appears to have a wandering behavior and does not communicate well in English. Staff stated that R1 likes to speak with his/her roommate who spoke the same language as himself/herself. Staff stated based on R1s assessment, R1 can leave the facility unassisted. Staff were instructed by ADM because of the fact that R1 was new and still adjusting to his/her new environment should be supervised and assisted until R1 adjust to the new environment. 3 Out of 3 staff stated R1 was recently admitted and been in the facility for less than a month. 3 Out of 3 staff stated that during the time of the incident 10/23/2024, around 2:00 p.m. ADM called for a staff meeting and most staff were present except for one. 2 out of 3 staff stated the door was closed because it was cold. 1 out of 3 stated that the door was open. 3 Out of 3 stated they did not see R1 leave because they were all facing towards the office. 3 Out of 3 staff stated, one staff was left behind to look after all the resident's coming and going while the meeting is in progress. 3 Out of 3 staff stated the meeting lasted for less than an 30 minutes. 3 Out of 3 staff stated they were alerted that a resident opened the gate because of the loud alarm when the gate opened, but did not see R1 leave. 3 Out of 3 stated it was another resident that they saw. 3 out of 3 staff stated that the window in the office is huge so they can see residents passing when the gate alarms. R1 was found on 10/24/2024 by law enforcement and R1 was brought to the hospital for assessment. R1 returned back to the facility at approximately 7:00 p.m. On 4/9/2025, the Department interviewed ADM who stated that new residents are supervised at the facility for the first month after admission. ADM stated the day of 10/23/2024, R1 did not sign out of the log before leaving the facility and was not seen on the surveillance camera. LIC/ADM stated R1 was displaying wandering behavior during the first couple of days of admission. R1 would leave the facility building and walk towards the main gate, however, staff is able to stop R1 prior to the incident from leaving because staff was always present by the front gate. ADM stated R1 can understand English and speak English. Continuation on LIC 9099-C, Page 2 of 3 On 4/9/2025, LPA Partoza, attempted to interview R1 by asking questions. R1 would respond with one word answers which are "yes" or "no" . R1 was not able to state his/her name, date of birth or today's date but will communicate with ADM and facility staff. Based on review of R1’s Physician’s Report dated 7/25/2024, R1 is able to leave facility unassisted but does not specify if R1 is confused/disoriented or has wandering behavior. Based on review of R1’s Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan 9/25/2024, states R1 is monolingual and does not speak English. Based on review of Visitor Sign In/Sign Out log, R1 did not sign out the day of 10/23/2024. Based on information provided by R1’s conservators (CO), the incident on 10/23/2024 was the first time out in the community and R1 was unfamiliar with the area and is very confused. CO stated R1 has been in a locked facility for 5 years (3/30/2019-10/2/2024) R1 was admitted to the facility on 10/3/2024. Based on interviews and observation/inspection of the facility, the preponderance of evidence has been met therefore the above allegations is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies were cited from California Code of Regulations, Title 22 on 1/8/2025 visit, see LIC 9099-D. However the case does not meet the criteria of absence of supervision, there for no civil penalty is warranted. The Plan of Correction (POC) have been submitted to Community Care Licensing (CCL). An exit interview was conducted with LIC/ADMs Virgil Valin and Amor Valin and a copy of the report was provided. Page 3 of 3 End of Reportthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 9, 2025
Jan 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Simi Rai and Marcela Yanez conducted an unannounced case management visit to conclude the investigation initiated on 10/24/2024. LPAs met Licensee/Administrator Amor Valin and Administrator Virgil Valin and stated the purpose of today’s visit. On 10/24/2024, the Department conducted a case management visit to follow up on an incident report received on 10/23/2024 regarding resident (R1) left the facility without staff knowledge and was reported missing by facility staff. On 10/24/2024, 3 staff were interviewed. 3 Out of 3 staff stated on 10/23/2024 during lunch time, approximately noon, they observed R1 present in the facility. Staff S2 stated during snack time which was at approximately 3:00pm, staff observed R1 was not present at the facility. Staff waited for R1 to return to the facility until dinner time at approximately 5pm and realized resident was not back at the facility. The facility staff searched around 3-mile radius but were not able to locate R1. R1 was reported to local law enforcement as missing person. 3 Out of 3 staff stated R1 had wandering behaviors and staff ensured R1 did not leave the facility and did not leave R1 alone. Staff stated they were not able to communicate and assess the R1’s needs because R1 did not speak English and they did not speak R1’s language. During today’s visit, LPAs interviewed ADM and LIC. R1 returned back to the facility on 10/24/2024 at 7pm. ADM stated all residents are supervised at the facility for the first month following their admission to the facility. ADM stated the day of 10/23/2024, R1 did not sign out of the log before leaving the facility. LIC stated R1 was displaying wandering behavior during the first couple of days of admission where R1 would leave the facility building and walk towards the gate located at the front of the facility. ADM stated R1 can understand English and speak English. Continuation on LIC 9099-C, Page 1 of 2. Page 2 of 2. During today's visit, LPAs interviewed R1. LPAs asked R1 questions and R1 would respond with one word answers such as "Yes" and "No". R1 was not able to answer basic questions as R1's name, date of birth or today's date. R1 is able to understand nonverbal cues such as pointing to the door when asked to close the door or pointing to the head when asked if R1's head hurts. Based on review of Incident Report 10/23/2024, Administrator stated the residents who leave the facility would return for dinner. Based on review of R1’s Physician’s Report dated 7/25/2024, R1 is able to leave facility unassisted but does not specify if R1 is confused/disoriented or has wandering behavior. Based on review of R1’s Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan 9/25/2024, R1 is monolingual and does not speak English. Based on review Visitor Sign In/Sign Out log, R1 did not sign out the day of 10/23/2024. Based on information provided by R1’s conservators (CO), the incident on 10/23/2024 was the first time out in the community and R1 was unfamiliar with the area and is very confused. CO stated R1 has been in a locked facility from 3/30/2019-10/2/2024 and R1 was admitted to the facility on 10/3/2024. Based on interviews and observation/inspection of the facility, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met therefore the above allegations is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies were cited from California Code of Regulations, Title 22 during today’s visit, see LIC 9099-D. A civil penalty is being assessed for the amount of $500 for the absence of supervision at the facility. Please see LIC421IM. Failure to correct the cited deficiency(ies), on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. This report was reviewed with Licensee/Administrator Amor Valin and Administrator Virgil Valin and a copy of the report was provided. Appeal Rights was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 8, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 1562.6(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 9, 2025

1562.6(a)The administrator of an adult residential care facility that provides services for residents who have mental illness shall ensure that a written intake assessment is prepared by a licensed mental health professional prior to acceptance of the client... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review of R1, R1 has a mental illness, and a written intake assessment was not prepared by a licensed mental health professional prior to acceptance of the client which poses/posed an immediate Health, Safety, orthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 8, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator stated to submit a written plan of action understanding regulation and will esnure residents have a written intake assessment prior to admission to the facility by POC due date. Licensee/Administrator agreed and understood. (con't) Personal Rights risk to persons in care.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87468.2(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 9, 2025

87468.2 Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities (a)(4) To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs ... by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted, resident R1 left the facility without the knowledge of the staff on 10/23/2024, staff did not provide R1 with care, supervision, and communication to meet his/her needs which poses/posed an immediate Health, Safety or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 8, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator stated to submit a written plan of action understanding regulation and will train staff on providing care and supervision by POC due date. Licensee/Administrator agreed and understood.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 9, 2025

87468.1 Personal Rights: (a)(2) Each resident shall be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, on 10/23/2024 resident R1 left the facility without signing out on the logbook and staff were unaware of R1 leaving the facility for approximately 3 hours which poses/posed an immediate Health, Safety or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 8, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator stated to submit a written plan of action understanding regulation and will train staff on providing care and supervision by POC due date. Licensee/Administrator agreed and understood.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maria (Mita)Partoza, conducted an unannounced case management inspection for the incident report that was received by the Department on 10/23/2024 regarding a resident who eloped and was reported missing. LPA was met by Lourdes Basconcillo who stated she's the lead staff/house manager (LS/HM) for the facility. The licensee/administrator Virgil Valin and Amor Valin was not present and stated that they were flying out to attend a seminar. At 10:40 a.m. LPA toured the facility with LS/HM inside and outside and observed that walkways and pathways on the side and the front area are free from obstruction. LPA interviewed 3 staff (S1, S2, S3). 3 out of 3 staff stated that resident (R1) was very quiet and does not talk and likes to sit at the courtyard with other residents. R1 has a roommate (R2) who speaks the same language as R1. R2 stated that R1 does not say much and is quiet. 3 Out of 3 staff stated R1 was last seen by them in the morning and at lunch time. S2 stated he/she did not notice R1 during snack time at 3:00 p.m. LPA requested documents from LS/HM. Due to insufficient information this case management will remain open until further investigation. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted with Lead Staff/House Manager Lourdes Basconcillo. A copy of the report was provided. end of reportthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 24, 2024
Aug 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 8/15/2024, at 8:45 a.m. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maria (Mita) Partoza conducted an unannounced Required - 1 Year visit and met with Lourdes Bansoncillo lead staff (LS) for the facility. LS called the administrator Amor and Valin Virgil. ADMs stated that they out of town due to family emergency and have authorized LS to sign for the report. The facility services adults 60 years and over capacity of 24 of which 20 may be non-ambulatory. The facility has a current census of 17 residents who are ambulatory. At 9:00 a.m. LPA reviewed facility record, 5 of 17 resident record including their Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction record, 4 of 4 facility staff record and found all records to be complete and updated. The fire and earthquake drill are up to date. At 10:45 a.m. LPA toured the facility inside and outside, including 2 kitchen and 1 common dining area. The facility has four buildings #32, #34, #36 & #38. LPA observed no sharps, knives or toxic under the sinks, shelves and cabinets. LPA observed building maintenance is ongoing. LPA observed resident of which 5 of 17 are in their bedroom resting, 2 of 17 are in the common living room, 4 of 17 are watching TV at the covered porch 1 of 17 seated at the gazebo, and 2 of 17 by the courtyard seated and resting. LPA observed food supplies are stored in as separate area/building and shed. LPA observed 2 days of perishable and 7 days of non-perishable food, to LPA observed there to be a perishable food supply of at least two days and a non-perishable food supply of at least seven days. See 809-C for more information. Page 1 of 2 LPA observe 7 fire extinguishers with service tags dated on 8/8/2023. LPA observed smoked, and carbon monoxide detectors that are functioning properly when tested. LPA observed resident bedrooms and observed each room to have functioning lights, drawers and smoke detectors. LPA observed the drawers to be free of sharps or unsecured medications and each bed to have sheets, blankets, and bed covers. LPA observed that all residents bedrooms have sufficient storage space for personal belongings and are kept sanitary and organized. LPA observed walkways and hallways to be free from obstructions, the courtyard is free from debris and kept maintained. The common living area was kept organized and sanitary. LPA observed four resident bathrooms and observed each bathroom to have functioning lights and showers with grab bars. The bathroom water temperatures measured from 97.7 degree F to 105 degree F. LPA observed that bathroom at building #38 located on the hallway has standing water in the shower area and along the toilet seat. Building #32 does not have any resident. LPA observed the shower curtain lining of the bathroom at bldg #32 is frayed/ripped at the bottom and stained with soap & water residue and observed that the sink has a counter marble block back splash that peeled off from the wall (photos were taken). LPA discussed with lead staff and administrator via a telephone call regarding housekeeping such as but not limited to changing shower liners, and ensuring bathrooms have no standing water and water temperature measures at 105 degree F to 120 degree F. LPA gave technical advisory. LPA requested a copy of the following: LIC 500, LIC 308, Liability Insurance, Administrator Certificate and resident roster. No deficiency was issued during today's visit based on California Code of Regulation and a copy of the report was provided. An exit interview was conducted with lead staff Lourdes Basconcillo. page 2 of 2 end of reportthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 15, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  4. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Santa Clara County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Santa Clara County