Small home · Licensed for 6 · Roseville
Signature Living on Camelia Avenue
904 Camelia Ave, Roseville, CA 95678Licensed since 2021
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Hospiceup to 6 residents
- Bedriddenup to 1 resident
Not on file: dementia approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Signature Living on Camelia Avenue: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$5,250a month to start
Likely $4,300–$6,450
From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$5,250likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$5,250likely $4,300–$6,450
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,300–$6,600
- $5,250
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,050–$9,800
- $7,750
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes24 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,500 to $9,000
24 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$6,350.
- Broadway Senior LivingRoseville · 0.4 mi · Small home$6,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Roseberry CareRoseville · 1.2 mi · Mid-size home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Sapphire Senior CareRoseville · 1.7 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on its own website · shared room · seen October 5, 2026
- Citrus Pines Senior LivingCitrus Heights · 1.7 mi · Small home$4,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Angels Assisted LivingRoseville · 1.9 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- The Elderly Inn IIICitrus Heights · 2.4 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Aaa CareCitrus Heights · 2.5 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Foothills Senior CareRoseville · 3.1 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Splendor Oaks Senior Living 2Roseville · 3.2 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Best Life Home CareCitrus Heights · 3.3 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Aunt Dottie's PlaceRoseville · 3.4 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Vista Hills Senior Care 2Roseville · 3.4 mi · Small home$5,200Listed on its own website · shared room · seen October 27, 2026
- Glorious Homes #1Citrus Heights · 3.5 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Bridgeway Senior CareRoseville · 3.6 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Comfort & CareOrangevale · 3.7 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Love You MomOrangevale · 3.8 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Glen Creek Villa II-Res. Care Fac. for the ElderlyOrangevale · 3.9 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Par Place Senior LivingRocklin · 4.0 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Placer StarcareRocklin · 4.0 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Oasis for Seniors at Heaven's GardenRocklin · 4.0 mi · Small home$3,600Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Wood Creek Senior CareRoseville · 4.3 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Mount Hood Serenity CareSacramento · 4.3 mi · Small home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- All Seasons HialeahFair Oaks · 4.7 mi · Small home$9,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Ettys' CareOrangevale · 4.8 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
904 Camelia Ave, Roseville, CA 95678Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Kaiser Foundation Hospital - RosevilleHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.6 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #315002853 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 8 of 11 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Substantiated”.
20253 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly arrived at the facility unannounced on 11/25/25 to conduct a Annual Inspection utilizing the CARE inspection tool. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. House manager, Jacob, assisted with the visit. LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility together with staff to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen, laundry room, and backyard. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA discussed deep cleaning of the kitchen, R2's blinds replacement and dresser knobs, and the condition of the property fence. Facility records review found absence of quarterly emergency drills. LPA reviewed 3 resident and 2 staff files. Files were complete for residents. Staff training on file was insufficient. LPA requested the following documents to update the facility file: Liability insurance and LIC 500. As a result of this inspection, deficiencies are cited. The following deficiencies were cited on 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6. (B) This poses a potential Health and Safety risk, or personal rights violation, to clients/residents in care. Exit interview conducted with Ayunasia "Jacob" Sogari and copy of report and appeal rights left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 25, 2025
The state marks this report as 7 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Oct 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are mismanaging resident's medication Staff are not meeting resident's dietary needs
On 10/22/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly spoke to caregiver, designee to deliver complaint findings for the above allegation. LPA reviewed resident records, facility records and conducted interviews. LPA finds that the allegations cited above are substantiated. For a period of time there was some confusion and inconsistencies regarding an ointment and cream regiment for a wound to R1's head that lead to R1 not receiving medications as prescribed. The orders have since been clarified and the situation is resolved. R1 has a physician's order for a high protein diet for healing wounds that have been present at admission. Facility staff did not have a written plan to ensure protein intake and integrated R1's food preferences. A written plan is now in place and R1's preferences are accomodated. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (S) Substantiated - A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. The following deficiencies were cited on 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6. (B) This poses a potential Health and Safety risk, or personal rights violation, to clients/residents in care. Report reviewed withdesignee . Copy of this report and appeal rights provided. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 22, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250813104454
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 23, 2025
Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a) (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed.This requirement was not met for R1 based on records and interviews. This posed a potential risk to R1.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 22, 2025
Plan of correction: At this visit, LPA observed that R1 is receiving medications as prescribed. POC cleared by visit.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(7) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 23, 2025
General Food Service Requirements (b) (7) Modified diets prescribed by a resident's physician as a medical necessity shall be provided. This requirement was not met for R1 based on records and interviews. This posed a potential risk to R1.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 22, 2025
Plan of correction: At this visit, LPA observed that R1 is receiving required and preferred foods as prescribed. POC cleared by visit.
May 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure resident is provided incontinence care in a timely manner
On 5/1/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly spoke to caregiver and house manager (by phone) to deliver complaint findings for the above allegation. LPA reviewed resident records, facility records and conducted extensive interviews. LPA interviewed R1 during this visit. LPA finds that the allegations cited above are substantiated. Statements by R1 and caregivers found that there had been a prior incident where R1 had incontinence and the caregiver present was not able to do incontinence care alone. The other staff for the shift had checked with R1 before leaving for a break and R1 did not have a care need. While that staff was on break, R1 experienced incontinence. The incontinence care was provided when there were two staff present. This caused a delay in R1's care. The facility has since made changes to staff scheduling and there have been no further incidents. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (S) Substantiated - A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. The following deficiencies were cited on 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6. (B) This poses a potential Health and Safety risk, or personal rights violation, to clients/residents in care. Report reviewed with caregiver . Copy of this report and appeal rights provided. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 1, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250225091336
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87625 · Plan of correction due date: May 2, 2025
Managed Incontinence (b)(3) Ensuring that incontinent residents are kept clean and dry and that the facility remains free of odors from incontinence. This requirement was not met based on statements by resident and staff. This posed a potential risk to R1.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 1, 2025
Plan of correction: The licensee has corrected this situation by instituting scheduling changes to ensure adequate number of qualified staff are present for resident needs. This POC is cleared by this visit.
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly arrived at the facility unannounced on 10/23/24 to conduct a Annual Inspection utilizing the CARE inspection tool. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA requested for staff to notify Administrator that LPA is present at the facility to conduct an annual inspection. Administrator was unavailable to assist. LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility together with staff to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen, laundry room, and backyard. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. The home is very clean and residents stated they are happy with care. LPA provided advisories regarding various topics. Citations issued for documentation of emergency training and drills. LPA reviewed 6 resident files. Files are complete and well organized. LPA advised more thorough Needs and Services and Home Health care plans. PIN 22-24-ASC provided. LPA reviewed 2 staff files. Increased training documentation needed Deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted with Caregiver. Due to Printer malfunction, copy of report and appeal rights are to be emailed to Licenseethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2024
Jan 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On 1/19/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly, conducted a case management visit while delivering complaint findings and met with designee, Shenel Phang . LPA spoke with Administrator by phone regarding the report and findings. On 12/14/23, LPA Mknelly, conducted a visit and issued a citation based on the information available at the facility at the time regarding an incident report received by the department on 12/12/23. The 12/12/23 incident report was regarding a hospital visit for R1 on 12/7/23. LPA conducted a records review regarding R1. Records found that R1 was admitted to this facility on 10/25/23. Discharge instructions from the referring hospital identified R1 as having wounds that require daily ongoing wound care. Between 10/25/23 and 12/7/23 R1 did not receive home heath wound care at the facility. Following the 12/14/23 visit, LPA Mknelly collected the following additional records regarding R1’s wounds care history: referring hospital wound care and discharge status of wounds, area hospital records for 12/7/23- 12-9/23, and current home health records. Referring hospital wound care records, received from the hospital by LPA on 1/11/24, showed that on 10/25/23, R1 was transferred to this facility with a stage IV Sacrococcygeal pressure injury, a Full thickness (non- pressure) injury to left thigh, contractures requiring continued physical therapy. Report continued... 10/25/23 discharge instructions recommended daily dressing changes to the Sacral and sacrococcygeal pressure injuries and dressing change to the left thigh wound every other day. An appointment for a tele-health follow-up call on 1/30/23. Licensee did not present a record that the 10/30/23 tele-health call occurred. R1’s LIC 602- physician’s report, dated 9/19/23, noted non-healing wounds. R1’s LIC 625- Appraisal Needs and Services Plan, dated 11/29/23, listed severe deformity and contractures requiring exercise. There was no wound care plan developed. On 12/7/23- 12/9/23 area hospital records noted: HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: (R1) brought in by ambulance sent to the emergency department by board and care facility for wound check. Patient reports (R1) is worried for infection as (R1) was just admitted into the hospital one month ago for chronic pressure wounds to his coccyx, elbows, and lower extremities. (R1) is concerned for infection and states the wound to his left lower extremity is more red and starting to become black. Emergency department diagnosis: Pressure ulcer of sacral region, unspecified stage; Pressure ulcer of left hip, unspecified stage; Pressure ulcer of right hip, unspecified stage and Abrasion of scalp, initial encounter. R! was admitted for wound care evaluation and for case management to discuss resources for discharge planning. On wound care evaluation patient was found to healing pressure ulcers to sacrum and bilateral hips as well as healing open wound to left anterior thigh unclear etiology as well as abrasion to posterior scalp again of unclear etiology. R1 returned to the facility on 12/9/24 with orders for Home Health which began on 12/10/24. Home health records showed that on 12/22/23 R1 was assessed to have two (2) stage III pressure injuries. One to the coccyx and to low right buttocks. (Note: the buttocks pressure injury was no noted at discharge from the referring hospital.) The injuries were explicitly identified to facility staff. Staff, Nerryrose Kreig , who was informed by Home Health, did not take immediate action to request and exception from licensing or to have R1 seen at a hospital until 1/2/23, at the prompting by LPA Mknelly, for this prohibited health condition. ER doctor determined that R1’s wounds were stage II or less and R1 returned to the facility with continued Home Health Wound care. Therefore, medical records review found that in addition to the citation issued on 12/14/23 for a lack of a wound care plan for R1, R1 was admitted and knowing retained at the facility with prohibited conditions of Stage III and IV pressure injuries. Those healing wounds were also neglected by facility staff between 10/25/23 and 12/7/23 which severely risked R1’s health and safety. The following deficiencies were cited on 809-D, per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6. (A)This poses an immediate Health and Safety risk to clients/residents in care. (B) This poses a potential Health and Safety risk, or personal rights violation, to clients/residents in care. An immediate civil penalty in the amount of $500.00 is to be assessed for a resident sustaining a serious bodily injury while in care at this facility. As a result of resident’s injury, the violation warrants a civil penalty assessment based on health and safety code 1569.49. At this time, the civil penalty assessment is under review. LPA will return at a future date to assess a civil penalty if warranted. Report reviewed. Copy of report and appeal rights providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 19, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87615(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 22, 2024
Prohibited Health Conditions (a) Persons who require health services for or have a health condition including, but not limited to, those specified below shall not be admitted or retained in a residential care facility for the elderly: (1) Stage 3 and 4 pressure injuries. This requirement was not met based on records review which showed R1 was admitted to the facility with stage IV injuries. This posed an immediate risk to resident health and safety.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 19, 2024
Plan of correction: R1 is currently stable and receiving appropriate care. Licensee will submit proof of scheduled training for preappraisals and prohibitted conditions to CCL by the POC date of 1/22/24. Scheduled training must be completed within 30 days from this date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87465(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 22, 2024
Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility…by compliance with the following: (1) The licensee shall arrange, or assist in arranging, for medical and dental care appropriate to the conditions and needs of residents. This requirement was not met based on records review and statements that found R1 had recommendations for wound care that were not arranged for by the licensee. This posed an immediate risk to the resident. Civil Penalties are applied.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 19, 2024
Plan of correction: R1 is currently stable and receiving appropriate care. Licensee will develop procedures to address, staff knowledge of resident conditions, staff observation for changes to known conditions and response, up to call to 9-1-1, when resident conditions need medical care. Procedure will include staff training. Procedure to be submitted by the POC date of 1/22/24.
20233 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 20, 2023Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file
Type of visit: POC
On 12/20/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Kevin Mknelly, conducted a plan of correction visit (POC) inspection for deficiencies issued on 12/14/23. LPA was greeted by caregiver. On 12/14/23 deficiencies were cited for failure to provide for wound care as needed for R1. Licensee has not submitted the POC for the citation that was due by 12/15/23. LPA spoke by phone with Nerryrose Kreig, designated responsible staff, and explained that civil penalties are being issued and that the plan of correction continues to be due. LPA also met with R1. R1 stated they are receiving regularly scheduled Home Health and that care at the home is meeting their needs. No additional deficiencies are cited for today's visit. An exit interview was conducted with caregiver. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2023
Dec 14, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
On 12/14/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly, met with facility staff to conduct a case management visit. LPA was following up on an incident report received by the department on 12/12/23. The report was regarding a hospital visit for R1 on 12/7/23. LPA conducted a records review regarding R1. Records found that R1 was admitted to this facility on 10/25/23. Discharge instructions from the referring hospital identified R1 as having wounds that require daily ongoing wound care. Between 10/25/23 and 12/7/23 R1 did not receive home heath wound care ar the facility. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (S) Substantiated - A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. The following deficiencies were cited on 809-D, per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6. (A)This poses an immediate Health and Safety risk to clients/residents in care. (B) This poses a potential Health and Safety risk, or personal rights violation, to clients/residents in care. Report reviewed. Copy of report and appeal rights providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 14, 2023
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87631(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 15, 2023
Healing Wounds (a), the licensee shall be permitted to accept or retain a resident who has a healing wound under the following circumstances: (1) When care is performed by or under the supervision of an appropriately skilled professional. This requirement was not met based on records review and interviews. This posed and immediate risk to the resident.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 14, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee will submit a wound care plan for R1, which includes but is not limited to: Staging of R1's current wounds, schedule for home health, training of caregivers, reposition schedule if ordered and a communication system to record wound care performed at every home health visit. This POC is due 12/15/23 by 5PM.
Nov 29, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly arrived at the facility unannounced on 11/29/23 to conduct a Annual Inspection utilizing the CARE inspection tool. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA requested for staff to notify Administrator that LPA is present at the facility to conduct an annual inspection. Administrator arrived to assist. LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility together with staff to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen, laundry room, and backyard. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. Advisories issued. The home is very clean and residents stated they are happy with care. Water temperature exceeded 125' F. LPA reviewed 6 resident files. Files are complete and well organized. Two resident files missing admission agreements and and appraisals. LPA reviewed 2 staff files. Files are complete. Advisories issued for documentation of training for restricted conditions. Licensee will submit LIC 9020, LIC 500, current facility sketch, training records for R2 (from other facility) and new Liability Insurance certificate. Deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted with licensee and copy of report left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 29, 2023
The state marks this report as 11 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Earlier years2021 to 2022 · 3 documents
20221 state visit · 2 documents
Nov 1, 2022Facility evaluation reportPost LicensingReport on file
Type of visit: Post Licensing
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly arrived unannounced to conduct a required annual. LPA met with , Administrator on call arrived to the facility. Prior to initiating today's inspection, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols and confirmed the facility does not currently have any positive Covid-19 diagnoses. LPA was screened per Covid-19 precautionary measures upon entering the facility. and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: surgical mask. LPA toured the interior of the facility together with staff to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen, laundry room. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA, Administrator, and Infection control Leader completed the infection control domain and facility was found to be in substantial compliance at this time. LPA reviewed 2 resident files and 1 staff file. LPA advised Staff and Resident files be on site and complete, FIT test employees who may work with Covid residents, maintain fire drill records on site. There are no deficiencies issued during today's inspection. Exit interview. Copy of report provided to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 1, 2022
Nov 1, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly arrived unannounced to conduct a required annual. LPA met with , Administrator on call arrived to the facility. Prior to initiating today's inspection, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols and confirmed the facility does not currently have any positive Covid-19 diagnoses. LPA was screened per Covid-19 precautionary measures upon entering the facility. and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: surgical mask. LPA toured the interior of the facility together with staff to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen, laundry room. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA, Administrator, and Infection control Leader completed the infection control domain and facility was found to be in substantial compliance at this time. LPA requested LIC 500, LIC 308 and Liability Insurance certificate. LPA advised FIT test employees who may work with Covid residents. There are no deficiencies issued during today's inspection. Exit interview. Copy of report provided to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 1, 2022
20211 state visit · 1 document
Dec 7, 2021Facility evaluation reportPrelicensingReport on file
Type of visit: Prelicensing
On 12/7/21, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly conducted a Pre-licensing visit with Administrator Jeese Ocampo and Nerryrose Kreig at approximately 1:00 PM. LPA followed current Covid precautions- self screened, hand sanitized and surgical mask worn. Was screened upon arrival. LPA toured Physical Plant, Food Service, Common Areas, Bedrooms, Bathrooms, Kitchen and Medication Storage. Fire extinguisher is current and First Aid is fully stocked. Kitchen was clean and good repair. Licensee has knowledge of (7) seven (2) two day supply of non-perishable and perishable, and required emergency shelter in place supplies. Rooms inspected have appropriate items and are in good repair. Water temperatures requirements were reviewed. LPA observed centrally stored medications and toxins are to be kept locked and inaccessible to residents. Staff and resident files are to be set up to contain required documents. Covid 19 guidelines and signage discussed. Facility will accept total capacity of six elderly residents. LPA observed this facility appears to be clean, safe, and secured. All common areas appear to be free from hazards, clean and in good repair. Infection control measures are in place. LPA confirmed the pre-licensing certification completed. As of this date, the Department has received the fire clearance. During this visit, this facility is in substantial compliance and meets the minimum requirements for a RCFE license. Component III was waived.. Application is pending further review. Exit interview conducted and copy of report left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 7, 2021
5 of 6 beds were occupied at the October 22, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Signature Living on Camelia Avenue, LLC, licensed since 2021.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2021, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 14
- Total complaints
- 2
- Substantiated allegations
- 3
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 3
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2021, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 3 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 3 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 2 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Signature Living on Camelia Avenue
Is Signature Living on Camelia Avenue licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Signature Living on Camelia Avenue licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Signature Living on Camelia Avenue been cited?
0 Type A and 3 Type B citations since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 14 state visits over the same years.
Is Signature Living on Camelia Avenue still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 9, 2026.
What does Signature Living on Camelia Avenue cost?
$5,250 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,300–$6,450. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 9 other homes of a similar licensed size in Roseville that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,375 to $5,625 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 9 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Signature Living on Camelia Avenue take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Signature Living on Camelia Avenue, LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Roseville is 1.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Signature Living on Camelia Avenue keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Signature Living on Camelia Avenue license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “SIGNATURE LIVING ON CAMELIA AVENUE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #315002853. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Signature Living on Camelia Avenue, LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 14 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 3 Type B citations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 14 state visits in that period.
- 2 complaints and 3 substantiated allegations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is November 25, 2025, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Placer County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$3,200 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$6,800 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,950 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,050–$6,050On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,650 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,800–$5,750On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,800 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,900–$5,900On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,200 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,250–$6,400On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Placer County