Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Signature Living on Camelia Avenue
Small home·Licensed for 6·Roseville, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$5,300 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,300–$6,500
- Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedOctober 22, 2025 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitNovember 25, 2025CDSS inspection record
Signature Living on Camelia Avenue is a small care home in Roseville — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2021. Dementia care is not on file.
Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Signature Living on Camelia Avenue
Is Signature Living on Camelia Avenue licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
How many residents is Signature Living on Camelia Avenue licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Has Signature Living on Camelia Avenue been cited?
0 Type A and 3 Type B citations since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 14 state visits over the same years.
Is Signature Living on Camelia Avenue still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Signature Living on Camelia Avenue cost?
$5,300 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,300–$6,500. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 8 other homes of a similar licensed size in Roseville that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $5,750 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 8 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Signature Living on Camelia Avenue take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Signature Living on Camelia Avenue, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Roseville is 1.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Signature Living on Camelia Avenue keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Signature Living on Camelia Avenue license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “SIGNATURE LIVING ON CAMELIA AVENUE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #315002853. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed to Signature Living on Camelia Avenue, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 14 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 3 Type B citations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 14 state visits in that period.
- 2 complaints and 3 substantiated allegations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is November 25, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
- Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
- BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident
State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 13, 2026
4 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation not on file
Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$5,300a month to start
Likely $4,300–$6,500
From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$5,300a month
Likely $4,300–$6,650
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$5,300likely $4,300–$6,500
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,300–$6,650
- $5,300
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,050–$9,750
- $7,300
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
24 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$6,400.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Broadway Senior LivingRoseville · 0.4 mi · Small home$6,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Brookdale RosevilleRoseville · 1.0 mi · Mid-size home$3,200Listed on Seniorly · memory care second person fee · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
- Roseberry CareRoseville · 1.2 mi · Mid-size home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Citrus Pines Senior LivingCitrus Heights · 1.7 mi · Small home$4,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Angels Assisted LivingRoseville · 1.9 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- The Elderly Inn IIICitrus Heights · 2.4 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Aaa CareCitrus Heights · 2.5 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Foothills Senior CareRoseville · 3.1 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Splendor Oaks Senior Living 2Roseville · 3.2 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Best Life Home CareCitrus Heights · 3.3 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Aunt Dottie's PlaceRoseville · 3.4 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Glorious Homes #1Citrus Heights · 3.5 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Bridgeway Senior CareRoseville · 3.6 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Comfort & CareOrangevale · 3.6 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Love You MomOrangevale · 3.8 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Glen Creek Villa II-Res. Care Fac. for the ElderlyOrangevale · 3.9 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Par Place Senior LivingRocklin · 4.0 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Placer StarcareRocklin · 4.0 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Oasis for Seniors at Heaven's GardenRocklin · 4.0 mi · Small home$3,600Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Mount Hood Serenity CareSacramento · 4.3 mi · Small home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Wood Creek Senior CareRoseville · 4.3 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- All Seasons HialeahFair Oaks · 4.7 mi · Small home$9,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Ettys' CareOrangevale · 4.8 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- A Bright FutureAntelope · 4.9 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 904 Camelia Ave, Roseville, CA 95678Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2021, the state has filed 11 documents for this home, and its records count 14 visits since 2021. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated November 25, 2025.
- On file since
- 2021
- State visits
- 14
- Most recent visit
- November 25, 2025
- Occupied · October 22, 2025 visit
- 5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated May 1, 2025 to October 22, 2025. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations3typical 0
- Substantiated allegations3typical 0
- Total complaints2typical 0
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2021.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 8 of 11 documents
Nov 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly arrived at the facility unannounced on 11/25/25 to conduct a Annual Inspection utilizing the CARE inspection tool. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. House manager, Jacob, assisted with the visit. LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility together with staff to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen, laundry room, and backyard. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA discussed deep cleaning of the kitchen, R2's blinds replacement and dresser knobs, and the condition of the property fence. Facility records review found absence of quarterly emergency drills. LPA reviewed 3 resident and 2 staff files. Files were complete for residents. Staff training on file was insufficient. LPA requested the following documents to update the facility file: Liability insurance and LIC 500. As a result of this inspection, deficiencies are cited. The following deficiencies were cited on 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6. (B) This poses a potential Health and Safety risk, or personal rights violation, to clients/residents in care. Exit interview conducted with Ayunasia "Jacob" Sogari and copy of report and appeal rights left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 25, 2025
The state marks this report as 7 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Oct 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are mismanaging resident's medication Staff are not meeting resident's dietary needs
On 10/22/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly spoke to caregiver, designee to deliver complaint findings for the above allegation. LPA reviewed resident records, facility records and conducted interviews. LPA finds that the allegations cited above are substantiated. For a period of time there was some confusion and inconsistencies regarding an ointment and cream regiment for a wound to R1's head that lead to R1 not receiving medications as prescribed. The orders have since been clarified and the situation is resolved. R1 has a physician's order for a high protein diet for healing wounds that have been present at admission. Facility staff did not have a written plan to ensure protein intake and integrated R1's food preferences. A written plan is now in place and R1's preferences are accomodated. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (S) Substantiated - A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. The following deficiencies were cited on 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6. (B) This poses a potential Health and Safety risk, or personal rights violation, to clients/residents in care. Report reviewed withdesignee . Copy of this report and appeal rights provided. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 22, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250813104454
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 23, 2025
Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a) (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed.This requirement was not met for R1 based on records and interviews. This posed a potential risk to R1.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 22, 2025
Plan of correction: At this visit, LPA observed that R1 is receiving medications as prescribed. POC cleared by visit.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(7) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 23, 2025
General Food Service Requirements (b) (7) Modified diets prescribed by a resident's physician as a medical necessity shall be provided. This requirement was not met for R1 based on records and interviews. This posed a potential risk to R1.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 22, 2025
Plan of correction: At this visit, LPA observed that R1 is receiving required and preferred foods as prescribed. POC cleared by visit.
May 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure resident is provided incontinence care in a timely manner
On 5/1/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly spoke to caregiver and house manager (by phone) to deliver complaint findings for the above allegation. LPA reviewed resident records, facility records and conducted extensive interviews. LPA interviewed R1 during this visit. LPA finds that the allegations cited above are substantiated. Statements by R1 and caregivers found that there had been a prior incident where R1 had incontinence and the caregiver present was not able to do incontinence care alone. The other staff for the shift had checked with R1 before leaving for a break and R1 did not have a care need. While that staff was on break, R1 experienced incontinence. The incontinence care was provided when there were two staff present. This caused a delay in R1's care. The facility has since made changes to staff scheduling and there have been no further incidents. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (S) Substantiated - A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. The following deficiencies were cited on 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6. (B) This poses a potential Health and Safety risk, or personal rights violation, to clients/residents in care. Report reviewed with caregiver . Copy of this report and appeal rights provided. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 1, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250225091336
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87625 · Plan of correction due date: May 2, 2025
Managed Incontinence (b)(3) Ensuring that incontinent residents are kept clean and dry and that the facility remains free of odors from incontinence. This requirement was not met based on statements by resident and staff. This posed a potential risk to R1.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 1, 2025
Plan of correction: The licensee has corrected this situation by instituting scheduling changes to ensure adequate number of qualified staff are present for resident needs. This POC is cleared by this visit.
Oct 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly arrived at the facility unannounced on 10/23/24 to conduct a Annual Inspection utilizing the CARE inspection tool. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA requested for staff to notify Administrator that LPA is present at the facility to conduct an annual inspection. Administrator was unavailable to assist. LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility together with staff to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen, laundry room, and backyard. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. The home is very clean and residents stated they are happy with care. LPA provided advisories regarding various topics. Citations issued for documentation of emergency training and drills. LPA reviewed 6 resident files. Files are complete and well organized. LPA advised more thorough Needs and Services and Home Health care plans. PIN 22-24-ASC provided. LPA reviewed 2 staff files. Increased training documentation needed Deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted with Caregiver. Due to Printer malfunction, copy of report and appeal rights are to be emailed to Licenseethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2024
Jan 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On 1/19/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly, conducted a case management visit while delivering complaint findings and met with designee, Shenel Phang . LPA spoke with Administrator by phone regarding the report and findings. On 12/14/23, LPA Mknelly, conducted a visit and issued a citation based on the information available at the facility at the time regarding an incident report received by the department on 12/12/23. The 12/12/23 incident report was regarding a hospital visit for R1 on 12/7/23. LPA conducted a records review regarding R1. Records found that R1 was admitted to this facility on 10/25/23. Discharge instructions from the referring hospital identified R1 as having wounds that require daily ongoing wound care. Between 10/25/23 and 12/7/23 R1 did not receive home heath wound care at the facility. Following the 12/14/23 visit, LPA Mknelly collected the following additional records regarding R1’s wounds care history: referring hospital wound care and discharge status of wounds, area hospital records for 12/7/23- 12-9/23, and current home health records. Referring hospital wound care records, received from the hospital by LPA on 1/11/24, showed that on 10/25/23, R1 was transferred to this facility with a stage IV Sacrococcygeal pressure injury, a Full thickness (non- pressure) injury to left thigh, contractures requiring continued physical therapy. Report continued... 10/25/23 discharge instructions recommended daily dressing changes to the Sacral and sacrococcygeal pressure injuries and dressing change to the left thigh wound every other day. An appointment for a tele-health follow-up call on 1/30/23. Licensee did not present a record that the 10/30/23 tele-health call occurred. R1’s LIC 602- physician’s report, dated 9/19/23, noted non-healing wounds. R1’s LIC 625- Appraisal Needs and Services Plan, dated 11/29/23, listed severe deformity and contractures requiring exercise. There was no wound care plan developed. On 12/7/23- 12/9/23 area hospital records noted: HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: (R1) brought in by ambulance sent to the emergency department by board and care facility for wound check. Patient reports (R1) is worried for infection as (R1) was just admitted into the hospital one month ago for chronic pressure wounds to his coccyx, elbows, and lower extremities. (R1) is concerned for infection and states the wound to his left lower extremity is more red and starting to become black. Emergency department diagnosis: Pressure ulcer of sacral region, unspecified stage; Pressure ulcer of left hip, unspecified stage; Pressure ulcer of right hip, unspecified stage and Abrasion of scalp, initial encounter. R! was admitted for wound care evaluation and for case management to discuss resources for discharge planning. On wound care evaluation patient was found to healing pressure ulcers to sacrum and bilateral hips as well as healing open wound to left anterior thigh unclear etiology as well as abrasion to posterior scalp again of unclear etiology. R1 returned to the facility on 12/9/24 with orders for Home Health which began on 12/10/24. Home health records showed that on 12/22/23 R1 was assessed to have two (2) stage III pressure injuries. One to the coccyx and to low right buttocks. (Note: the buttocks pressure injury was no noted at discharge from the referring hospital.) The injuries were explicitly identified to facility staff. Staff, Nerryrose Kreig , who was informed by Home Health, did not take immediate action to request and exception from licensing or to have R1 seen at a hospital until 1/2/23, at the prompting by LPA Mknelly, for this prohibited health condition. ER doctor determined that R1’s wounds were stage II or less and R1 returned to the facility with continued Home Health Wound care. Therefore, medical records review found that in addition to the citation issued on 12/14/23 for a lack of a wound care plan for R1, R1 was admitted and knowing retained at the facility with prohibited conditions of Stage III and IV pressure injuries. Those healing wounds were also neglected by facility staff between 10/25/23 and 12/7/23 which severely risked R1’s health and safety. The following deficiencies were cited on 809-D, per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6. (A)This poses an immediate Health and Safety risk to clients/residents in care. (B) This poses a potential Health and Safety risk, or personal rights violation, to clients/residents in care. An immediate civil penalty in the amount of $500.00 is to be assessed for a resident sustaining a serious bodily injury while in care at this facility. As a result of resident’s injury, the violation warrants a civil penalty assessment based on health and safety code 1569.49. At this time, the civil penalty assessment is under review. LPA will return at a future date to assess a civil penalty if warranted. Report reviewed. Copy of report and appeal rights providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 19, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87615(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 22, 2024
Prohibited Health Conditions (a) Persons who require health services for or have a health condition including, but not limited to, those specified below shall not be admitted or retained in a residential care facility for the elderly: (1) Stage 3 and 4 pressure injuries. This requirement was not met based on records review which showed R1 was admitted to the facility with stage IV injuries. This posed an immediate risk to resident health and safety.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 19, 2024
Plan of correction: R1 is currently stable and receiving appropriate care. Licensee will submit proof of scheduled training for preappraisals and prohibitted conditions to CCL by the POC date of 1/22/24. Scheduled training must be completed within 30 days from this date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87465(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 22, 2024
Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility…by compliance with the following: (1) The licensee shall arrange, or assist in arranging, for medical and dental care appropriate to the conditions and needs of residents. This requirement was not met based on records review and statements that found R1 had recommendations for wound care that were not arranged for by the licensee. This posed an immediate risk to the resident. Civil Penalties are applied.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 19, 2024
Plan of correction: R1 is currently stable and receiving appropriate care. Licensee will develop procedures to address, staff knowledge of resident conditions, staff observation for changes to known conditions and response, up to call to 9-1-1, when resident conditions need medical care. Procedure will include staff training. Procedure to be submitted by the POC date of 1/22/24.
Dec 20, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: POC
On 12/20/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Kevin Mknelly, conducted a plan of correction visit (POC) inspection for deficiencies issued on 12/14/23. LPA was greeted by caregiver. On 12/14/23 deficiencies were cited for failure to provide for wound care as needed for R1. Licensee has not submitted the POC for the citation that was due by 12/15/23. LPA spoke by phone with Nerryrose Kreig, designated responsible staff, and explained that civil penalties are being issued and that the plan of correction continues to be due. LPA also met with R1. R1 stated they are receiving regularly scheduled Home Health and that care at the home is meeting their needs. No additional deficiencies are cited for today's visit. An exit interview was conducted with caregiver. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2023
Dec 14, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
On 12/14/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly, met with facility staff to conduct a case management visit. LPA was following up on an incident report received by the department on 12/12/23. The report was regarding a hospital visit for R1 on 12/7/23. LPA conducted a records review regarding R1. Records found that R1 was admitted to this facility on 10/25/23. Discharge instructions from the referring hospital identified R1 as having wounds that require daily ongoing wound care. Between 10/25/23 and 12/7/23 R1 did not receive home heath wound care ar the facility. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (S) Substantiated - A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. The following deficiencies were cited on 809-D, per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6. (A)This poses an immediate Health and Safety risk to clients/residents in care. (B) This poses a potential Health and Safety risk, or personal rights violation, to clients/residents in care. Report reviewed. Copy of report and appeal rights providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 14, 2023
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87631(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 15, 2023
Healing Wounds (a), the licensee shall be permitted to accept or retain a resident who has a healing wound under the following circumstances: (1) When care is performed by or under the supervision of an appropriately skilled professional. This requirement was not met based on records review and interviews. This posed and immediate risk to the resident.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 14, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee will submit a wound care plan for R1, which includes but is not limited to: Staging of R1's current wounds, schedule for home health, training of caregivers, reposition schedule if ordered and a communication system to record wound care performed at every home health visit. This POC is due 12/15/23 by 5PM.
Nov 29, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly arrived at the facility unannounced on 11/29/23 to conduct a Annual Inspection utilizing the CARE inspection tool. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA requested for staff to notify Administrator that LPA is present at the facility to conduct an annual inspection. Administrator arrived to assist. LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility together with staff to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen, laundry room, and backyard. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. Advisories issued. The home is very clean and residents stated they are happy with care. Water temperature exceeded 125' F. LPA reviewed 6 resident files. Files are complete and well organized. Two resident files missing admission agreements and and appraisals. LPA reviewed 2 staff files. Files are complete. Advisories issued for documentation of training for restricted conditions. Licensee will submit LIC 9020, LIC 500, current facility sketch, training records for R2 (from other facility) and new Liability Insurance certificate. Deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted with licensee and copy of report left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 29, 2023
The state marks this report as 11 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Placer County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Broadway Senior Living
Roseville · Small home · 0.4 mi away
$6,800 a month to start · Listed by the home
Loredana Care Home
Roseville · Small home · 0.5 mi away
$4,750 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Delight in Care
Roseville · Small home · 0.6 mi away
$5,000 a month to start · Covelight estimate
The Terraces of Roseville
Roseville · Large community · 0.6 mi away
$3,200 a month to start · Listed by the home
A Loving and Joyful Home RCFE
Roseville · Small home · 0.6 mi away
$5,250 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Oak Ridge Home Care
Roseville · Small home · 0.8 mi away
$4,500 a month to start · Covelight estimate