Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Raksha 13 Care Home

Mid-size home·Licensed for 13·Albany, California

Licensed since 2007Licence #15601285
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,100 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,700
  • Home sizeLicensed for 13Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit10 of 13 beds occupiedNovember 24, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitMay 22, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderRaksha International, Inc.Since 2007 · 2 licensed homes

Raksha 13 Care Home is a mid-size care home in Albany — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 13 residents since 2007. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Raksha 13 Care Home

Is Raksha 13 Care Home licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Raksha 13 Care Home licensed for?

13 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Raksha 13 Care Home been cited?

1 Type A and 1 Type B citations since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 14 state visits over the same years.

Is Raksha 13 Care Home still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Raksha 13 Care Home cost?

$5,100 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,000–$6,700. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 34 other homes of a similar licensed size across Alameda County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,000 to $5,735 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 34 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Raksha 13 Care Home take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Raksha International, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Raksha International, Inc. — at least 3 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Alta Bates Summit Medical Center-Herrick Campus is 2.3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Raksha 13 Care Home keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Raksha 13 Care Home license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “RAKSHA 13 CARE HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #15601285. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 13 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Raksha International, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 14 state inspection visits since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 1 Type B citations on file since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 14 state visits in that period.
  • 3 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is May 22, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 13 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 4 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. ALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. SUBJECT TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF HOSPICE WAIVER FOR FOUR (4) RESIDENTS.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,100a month to start

Likely $4,000–$6,700

From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,100a month

Likely $4,000–$6,850

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$5,100likely $4,000–$6,700

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,000–$6,850
$5,100
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,800–$9,750
$7,100
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

24 homes like this within 15 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$6,950.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 906 Cornell Avenue, Albany, CA 94706Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 13 documents for this home, and its records count 14 visits since 2007. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 22, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
14
Most recent visit
May 22, 2026
Occupied · November 24, 2025 visit
10 of 13 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated October 21, 2022 to November 24, 2025. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations2typical 0
  • Total complaints3typical 1

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 327 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2007.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020254412024110202322020223312021220

The last 36 months — 6 of 13 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
May 22, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 05/22/2026 at 11:15AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrew Christy arrived unannounced to conduct the 1-Year Annual Required inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Nalini Bhutani, and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility currently houses 12 residents with a max capacity of 13 residents. LPA toured facility including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common area, and backyard. All outdoor and indoor passageways are kept free of obstruction. No bodies of water were observed. A comfortable indoor temperature is maintained at 69.0 degrees Fahrenheit. The hot water temperature in the residents’ shared bathroom was measured at 105.1 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. There is a minimum of one week supply of non-perishable and 2 day of perishable foods. Centrally stored medication and sharps were locked and inaccessible to residents. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 05/06/2026 and have an appointment for servicing the extinguishers in June. At 12:30PM, LPA reviewed five (5) resident files and five (5) staff files, all found to be complete. The emergency disaster plan was last reviewed 05/06/2026. Quarterly emergency drills were last conducted 05/06/2026. A review of resident medications and the Medication Administration Record (MAR) found no outstanding errors. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 22, 2026
20254 state visits · 4 documents
Nov 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff overcharged a resident for services not received

On 11/24/2025 at 5:30pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), L. Hall arrived unannounced to deliver a complaint finding for the allegation above. LPA met with Elsabet Tufa, Caregiver, and explained the reason for the visit. LPA L. Hall spoke with Co-Administrator, Nalini Bhutani, via telephone and was given approval for signature. During the course of the investigation the Department conducted interviews with staff, witnesses, and residents, obtained and reviewed records. Allegation: Staff overcharged a resident for services not received Continued on LIC9099C. Substantiated Continued from LIC9099. During the investigation the complainant stated R1 was charged additionally for basic services and therapy. LPA reviewed the admission agreement and observed the additional services in section F (Level of Care) which were also included in section B (Basic Services), except for therapy. S3 stated R1 did receive therapy from home health as well as the staff. Based on LPA’s interviews which were conducted and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the appeal rights and this report provided. Continued from LIC9099. During the investigation the complainant stated R1 requested information regarding medication and R1’s financial contract to be made available to his family members and staff were not allowing an authorized representative to access R1’s records. During interview with W1, it was stated that the facility gave all information requested. LPA reviewed the durable power of attorney notarized January 26, 2023, and the advanced health care directive notarized on November 21, 2024. Both named R1’s responsible person that was able to make decisions. Allegation: Staff are unable to communicate effectively During the review of complaint submitted the complainant stated R1 reported that the staff often spoke limited English or was hard to understand which made staff unable to communicate effectively mostly at night. W1 stated during investigation there was not any problem communicating with the staff. LPA spoke with staff at the facility and did not have any problem communicating. Allegation: Staff demonstrated inappropriate form of discipline towards a resident During the review of complaint submitted the complainant stated R1 reported being punished/neglected for asking for help at night, which demonstrated staff conducting inappropriate form of discipline towards a resident. The complaint stated R1 received mental abuse. W1 stated during interview that R1 was never disciplined or Continued on LIC9099C. Continued from LIC9099C. neglected. W1 stated the facility took care of R1 to the best of their disability. S3 stated there was no report of any type of punishment or discipline towards any of the residents. Allegation: Staff did not answer timely to the facility telephone During the review of complaint submitted the complainant stated the facility staff never answered the facility telephone and the voicemail box was always full. LPA reviewed text messages dated December 20, 2024, between the reporting party and S3 regarding R1’s phone and the facility phone. S3 stated that the staff answers the phone but there were times when the staff is busy and not able to answer or assist R1 with his phone. S3 also stated R1’s family members called and visited the facility and there weren’t any problems. Allegation: Staff mishandled a resident's medication During review of the complaint submitted the complainant stated staff continued to administer medication and the medication was increased over the five (5) month period that R1 resided at the facility. Complainant also stated there were no visits to the doctor to justify the increase. LPA reviewed the facility assessment notes, the physician’s orders, and the medication administration (MAR) records from October 2024 until March 2025. LPA observed on the MAR’s and physician reports there were notes where the medicine was changed and discontinued. LPA observed from the assessment notes indicating there were visits and a meeting from the EASE Care nurse Continued on LIC9099C. Continued from LIC9099. for R1. S3 stated there were never any changes without the responsible party being aware. Allegation: Staff interfered with a resident's medical decisions During review of the complaint submitted the complainant stated R1 verbally expressed he did not want additional medication, but staff continued to administer the medication. LPA reviewed R1’s Advance Health Care Directive notarized November 21, 2024, which named the person responsible for R1’s medical decisions. S3 stated there were not any changes done unless the nurse makes the request and it had to be ordered by the physician. The facility staff cannot increase, decrease, or add any type of medication whether a prescription is needed or if it’s over the counter to any of the residents. Allegation: Staff did not abide to the admission agreement During review of the complaint submitted the complainant stated the facility did not abide by the admission agreement. During interviews with S1, S2, S3, and W1 it was stated that the facility did abide to the admission agreement. After reviewing the admission agreement, it was identified that the facility did abide by the admission agreement. Based upon the information obtained during investigation. The above allegations are unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview conducted and a copy of report was given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 24, 2025 · control 15-AS-20250818120528

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87464(f)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 5, 2025

(f) Basic services shall at a minimum include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c). This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on interviews and record reviews the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above in charging R1 for services that are included in basic services, which poses a potential personal rights risk to person in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 24, 2025

Plan of correction: Co-Administrator agreed to break down additional charges that is not included in basic services and refund monies and submit proof to CCLD by POC date.

Aug 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Office

On 8/19/2025 at 10:30 AM, the Oakland CCLD Adult & Senior Care Regional Office conducted a virtual meeting with representatives for Raksha 13 to review the plan of corrections for violations dated 08/08/2025. CCLD Licensing Program Manager, Yvonne Flores-Larios, discussed the fire clearance violations, plans to get back into compliance, questions, and clarifications were addressed. Meeting Participants: • Isaac Taggart– Licensing Regional Manager, CCLD, Oakland ASC • Yvonne Flores-Larios – Licensing Program Manager, CCLD, Oakland ASC • Lisha Holmes – Licensing Program Analyst, CCLD, Oakland ASC • Shalini Bhutani – Administrator, Raksha 13 • Sheeva Bhutani – Administrator, Raksha 4 • David Ridley – City of Albany Fire Inspector This report was emailed to Shalini Bhutani for signatures and to be returned to CCLD Oakland Regional Office.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 19, 2025
Aug 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

On 08/08/25 at 12:00 PM, LPA L. Holmes conducted a case management visit to discuss the implementation of a fire watch and a plan going forward to bring the facility into compliance. Lpa met with Nalini Bhutani, Co-Administrator. LPA and ADM discussed the details of the fire watch, required requested documents by CCLD, and the results from the fire drill conducted on 08/01/25 at Raksha 4. On 08/01/25, LPA requested the following documentation as soon as possible in addition to the Albany Fire Department requesting a strategy by close of business on 08/01/25 for Raksha 4 and Raksha 6; documentation was not received. Interviews with S1 and W1, revealed that R1 was admitted to the facility on 07/25/25, is bedridden, and the facility has not received approval from CCLD. Deficiency is cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC9099D. Failure to submit proof of correction (POC) by plan of correction due date and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted, Appeal Rights, and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 8, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87202(a) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 11, 2025

87202 Fire Clearance (a) All facilities shall maintain a fire clearance approved by the city...Prior to accepting or retaining any of the following types of persons, the applicant or licensee shall notify the licensing agency and obtain an appropriate fire clearance approved... by the city, county, or city and county fire department, or district providing fire protection services, or the State Fire Marshal. -This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Licensee/Administrator did not obtain approval for bedridden residents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 8, 2025

Plan of correction: 1.Licensee/ED to review regulation 2. Advise and consult the RP's regarding discharge and/or eviction by POC.

May 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 05/06/25 around 10:15 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Holmes arrived unannounced to conduct a required Annual Inspection. LPA was greeted by one Care Staff upon entry and explained the purpose of the visit; Nalini Bhutani, Co-Administrator (ADM) arrived about 10 minutes later. The facility’s fire clearance was approved for thirteen (13) non-ambulatory residents; hospice waivers for four (4). LPA requested the resident roster, staff roster, three (3) staff files, five (5) resident files. LPA observed a visitor sign-in log at the entry. Emergency Disaster Plan is posted. LPA and ADM toured the facility, including but not limited to bedrooms, two (2) bathrooms (BA), kitchen, common area, front yard and backyard. All indoor passageways were free of obstruction. There were not any bodies of water present. Residents were lounging and watching television, one (1) went on a walk, the others were either sleeping, or engaged in something else. A comfortable temperature for residents was maintained at 72 degrees Fahrenheit (F), and the water temperature measured at 129.6 (F) in BA #1 and 118.2 in BA #2. LPA observed lighting in all rooms to be adequate for the comfort and safety of all the residents. The bathrooms were safe, sanitary and in operating condition. Hand washing posters, paper towels, and soap observed at all hand washing stations. Linen and hygiene supplies were available for all residents. PPE and paper goods remain sufficient. There is a minimum supply of 2-day perishables and 7-days of non-perishable foods. continued on LIC809C... ...continued from LIC809 Smoke detectors/carbon monoxide were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher last serviced on 11/22/24, first aid kit is stored in a locked medication room, and the last emergency disaster drill was conducted on 02/2024 with the fire department; next quarterly drill to include all staff and residents. The following forms are to be updated: -LIC308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility -LIC610D Emergency Disaster Plan to be updated. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided to Nalini Bhutani, Co-Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 6, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
May 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 05/03/24 around 09:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Holmes arrived unannounced to conduct a required Annual Inspection. LPA was greeted by one Care Staff upon entry and explained the purpose of the visit; Nalini Bhutani, Co-Administrator (ADM) arrived about 20 minutes later. The facility’s fire clearance was approved for thirteen (13) non-ambulatory residents; hospice waivers for four (4). LPA reviewed the resident roster, staff roster, five (5) staff files, five (5) resident files and the Emergency Disaster Plan. LPA observed a visitor sign-in log at the entry. LPA and ADM toured the facility, including but not limited to bedrooms, two (2) bathrooms (BA), kitchen, common area, front yard and backyard. The facility consists of seven (7) total bedrooms. All indoor passageways were free of obstruction. There were not any bodies of water. Five (5) residents were lounging in the front yard, one (1) reading a newspaper, the others were either sleeping, watching television or engaged in electronics in the facility. A comfortable temperature for residents was maintained at 72 degrees Fahrenheit (F), and the water temperature measured at 111 (F) in BA #1. LPA observed lighting in all rooms to be adequate for the comfort and safety of all the residents. The bathrooms were safe, sanitary and in operating condition. Hand washing posters, paper towels, and soap observed at all hand washing stations. Linen and hygiene supplies were available for all residents. PPE and paper goods remain sufficient. There is a minimum supply of 2-day perishables and 7-days of non-perishable foods. continued on LIC809C... ...continued from LIC809 Smoke detectors/carbon monoxide were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher last serviced on 01/22/24, first aid kit is stored in a locked medication room, and the last emergency disaster drill was conducted on 04/01/24 with all staff; next quarterly drill to include staff and residents. The following forms are to be updated: -LIC500 Personnel Report -LIC308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility -LIC610D Emergency Disaster Plan to be updated. -An updated copy of Administrator Certificate(s) -Update personnel files Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided to Nalini Bhutani, Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 3, 2024

The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Raksha International, Inc., licensed since 2007, operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Alameda County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Alameda County