Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Pacific Pines Assisted Living Facility

Mid-size home·Licensed for 15·Angelus Oaks, California

Licensed since 2024Licence #365530184Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileDementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,100 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,050–$6,700
  • Home sizeLicensed for 15Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit13 of 15 beds occupiedApril 22, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · September 23, 2026
  • Last state visitSeptember 9, 2026CDSS inspection record

Pacific Pines Assisted Living Facility is a mid-size care home in Angelus Oaks — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 15 residents since 2024. Wheelchair and non-ambulatory care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Pacific Pines Assisted Living Facility

Is Pacific Pines Assisted Living Facility licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Pacific Pines Assisted Living Facility licensed for?

15 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Pacific Pines Assisted Living Facility been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.

Is Pacific Pines Assisted Living Facility still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Pacific Pines Assisted Living Facility cost?

$5,100 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,050–$6,700. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 74 other homes of a similar licensed size across San Bernardino County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,700 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,000 (n = 74 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Pacific Pines Assisted Living Facility take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, September 23, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Redlands Rehab and Healthcare Systems, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Can Pacific Pines Assisted Living Facility keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 10 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Pacific Pines Assisted Living Facility license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “PACIFIC PINES ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #365530184. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 15 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Redlands Rehab and Healthcare Systems, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 9 state inspection visits since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is September 9, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file · ask the home
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 10 residents
  • BedriddenApproved by the state

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 15 BEDRIDDEN. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR (10).

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 10 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,100a month to start

Likely $4,050–$6,700

From 19 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,100a month

Likely $4,050–$6,850

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,100likely $4,050–$6,700

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,050–$6,850
$5,100
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,800–$9,750
$7,100
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, September 23, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

19 homes like this within 15 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,600–$6,150.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 19 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 5850 N Manzanita Ave, Angelus Oaks, CA 92305Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2023, the state has filed 9 documents for this home, and its records count 9 visits since 2024. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on April 22, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2023
State visits
9
Most recent visit
September 9, 2026
Occupied · April 22, 2026 visit
13 of 15 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated November 14, 2024 to April 22, 2026. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (4). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints4typical 1

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 327 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2024.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026220202511020245502023110

The last 36 months — 9 of 9 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
Apr 22, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not provide water Facility did not provide operable call lights Staff are not CPR certified Staff verbally abuse residents in care

On 04/22/2026 at 9:30AM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renese Howell-Small conducted an unannounced visit to the facility in order to investigate and deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator, Doug Hicks. The investigation consisted of interviews, observation and record review. In regards to the allegation of facility did not provide water: LPA interviewed four (4) staff and five (5) residents. LPA observed cups of water available in resident rooms. LPA observed a water cooler in the main dining area with additional gallons of water in the pantry. Staff denied the allegation and stated that water is always available. Residents stated that staff provide water. Based on interviews and observation, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. In regards to the allegation of facility did not provide operable call lights: LPA interviewed five (5) residents which stated that the call lights/buttons work. LPA observed call buttons Unsubstantiated in resident rooms. LPA randomly tested call buttons and observed the signal alert staff in main dining room area. Staff denied the allegation. LPA observed call buttons within reach for Resident 3 (R3) and Resident 4 (R4). Based upon interviews and observation, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. In regards to the allegation that staff are not CPR certified: LPA reviewed all current staff records which revealed valid CPR/First Aid certification and completed health screenings with tuberculosis (Tb) test result for each staff. Based on observation, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. In regards to the allegation that staff verbally abuse residents in care: Four (4) out of five (5) residents interviewed stated that staff are nice and treat residents well. Staff denied the allegation and stated that the residents are like family. Staff 3 (S3) stated that most of the residents are asleep during their shift. Based on interview, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. UNSUBSTANTIATED is defined as the allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s) occurred. An exit interview was conducted where this report LIC9099, LIC9099C was discussed and a copy was provided to the Administrator, Doug Hicks.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 22, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260323142957
Mar 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 03/27/2026 at 9:50AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renese Howell-Small arrived unannounced to conduct the required annual visit to the facility. LPA met with Administrator, Doug Hicks and introduced self and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA was informed that there are currently eleven (11) residents in care. The facility has five cabins with two (2) rooms, one room is private and the other is shared. Each room has its own restroom. There is a kitchen/dining area, living room, office, laundry, and backyard area with (3) three sheds. LPA completed a walk through of facility, review of records and medication audit. Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature of 75 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, night stands, storage space, chairs and sufficient lighting. LPA inspected resident bathrooms; bathrooms were clean and appliances were found functional. Water temperatures tested at 114 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility is equipped with operational smoke detectors/ carbon monoxide alarms and fire extinguishers which were tested and serviced by a third party on 02/06/2026 and first aid kit with book. Postings: Posters such as; the personal rights, emergency disaster plan, CCLD complaint poster and ombudsman were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept locked and inaccessible to residents. There was a designated storage space for resident/staff files. Medications were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. There is no swimming pool, firearms or ammunition in the facility. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for residents in care. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for residents in care. Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Yards/Outside: LPA observed two (2) shaded patio areas and several outdoor benches in the courtyard area. Record Review: LPA reviewed staff and administrator files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, trainings, and health screenings. LPA reviewed resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. All of the files reviewed were complete. Two deficiencies were cited and four (4) Technical Violations were given during this visit. An exit interview was conducted where this report LIC809, LIC809C , LIC809D, LIC9102 and Appeal Rights were discussed and copies were provided to Administrator, Doug Hicks.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2026

The state marks this report as 8 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20251 state visit · 1 document
May 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 05/13/2025 at 9:15AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renese Howell-Small arrived unannounced to conduct the required annual visit to the facility. LPA met with Administrator Doug Hicks and introduced self and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA was informed that there are currently fourteen (14) residents in care. The facility has five cabins with two (2) rooms, one room is private and the other is shared. Each room has its own restroom. There is a kitchen/dining area, living room, office, laundry, and backyard area with (3) three sheds. LPA completed a walk through of facility, review of records and medication audit. Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature of 75 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, night stands, storage space, chairs and sufficient lighting. LPA inspected resident bathrooms; bathrooms were clean and appliances were found functional. Water temperatures tested at 114 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility is equipped with operational smoke detectors/ carbon monoxide alarm which was tested during the visit, charged fire extinguishers and first aid kit. Postings: Posters such as; the personal rights, emergency disaster plan, CCLD complaint poster and ombudsman were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept locked and inaccessible to residents. There was a designated storage space for resident/staff files. Medications were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. There is no swimming pool, firearms or ammunition in the facility. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for residents in care. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for residents in care. Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Yards/Outside: LPA observed two (2) shaded patio areas and several outdoor benches in the courtyard area. Record Review: LPA reviewed staff and administrator files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, trainings, and health screenings. LPA reviewed resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. One (1) Technical Violation was given during this visit. An exit interview was conducted where this report LIC809, LIC809C and LIC9102 were discussed and copies were provided to Administrator, Doug Hicks.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 13, 2025

The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20245 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is violating residents' personal rights Staff is providing care while under the influence of drugs

On 12/23/2024 at 9:05AM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renese Howell-Small conducted an unannounced visit to the facility in order to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with House Manager, Doug Hicks. LPA also interviewed and met with Administrator, Joel Zamora. LPA conducted a brief tour of the facility. The investigation consisted of interviews and record review. In regards to the allegation of facility is violating residents' personal rights: LPA interviewed five (5) staff and ten (10) residents. LPA observed some residents in their rooms and in the main kitchen area interacting with each other and staff members. Residents were observed to be talkative, friendly and content. Residents interviewed confirm that they are treated well and get the help that they need. LPA observed four (4) staff providing care, confirmed staff cleaning schedule and observed residents eating breakfast and a staff preparing a hot lunch for residents in care. The allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Unsubstantiated In regards to the allegation of staff is providing care while under the influence of drugs: LPA interviewed five (5) staff and ten (10) residents. Both staff and residents deny witnessing staff provide care while under the influence of drugs. LPA observed the four (4) staff working at the facility during the visit to be alert, attentive to residents and able to answer LPA's questions clearly and with confidence. The allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. UNSUBSTANTIATED is defined as The allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted where this report LIC9099 and LIC9099C was discussed and a copy was given to House Manager, Doug Hicks.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 23, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240925153435
Nov 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure that residents are utilizing the stairs in a safe manner. Staff do not ensure that the facility is secure and free from wildlife.

Second Complaint: Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA Beena Singh met with Facility Manager Doug Hicks and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and review of records. First allegation, Staff do not ensure that residents are utilizing the stairs in a safe manner. During interviews with residents, all six residents who were interviewed denied having safety issues in the facility. Residents were happy with safety measures facility takes to keep them safe. Stairs are used only for residents who can walk on their own, but staff supervises them. Staff reported that there is a ramp built at the facility which allows residents to use their wheelchairs or four-wheel walkers. During an evacuation facility staff helped supervise residents. Unsubstantiated Second allegation, Staff do not ensure that the facility is secure and free from wildlife. During interviews with residents, all six residents who were interviewed denied having any issues with wild animals. Residents deny any issues with wildlife sighting at the facility, Staff reported that bins are kept clean and with heavy padlock, so no wild animals have access to food waste bins. Based on the evidence found during the investigation, LPA Beena Singh found the allegations listed above to be Unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiated: A finding that the complaints are Unsubstantiated means although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 20, 2024 · control 56-AS-20241112155216
Nov 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not ensure facility evacuation plan provides safe temporary accommodations for residents.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA Beena Singh met with Facility Manager Doug Hicks and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and review of records. First Complaint: Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Manager Doug Hicks and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and review of records. First allegation: Licensee did not ensure facility evacuation plan provides safe temporary accommodations for residents. Staff reported that the facility has two designated evacuation sights in Calimesa. During a recent fire the facility was required to evacuate, and residents were relocated to a motel. No evacuation chair needed, according to the fire department pre-licensing report. According to six out of six residents the motel provides food and accommodation. Unsubstantiated Residents stated staff provide supervision at the motel and staff reporting providing supervision to the resident while staying at the hotel, Staff provided day and night supervision while staying at the evacuation site Calimesa motel. Based on the evidence found during the investigation, LPA Beena Singh found the allegations listed above to be Unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiated: A finding that the complaints are Unsubstantiated means although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was discussed and provided to Facility Manager Doug Hicks.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 14, 2024 · control 56-AS-20241113114026
Oct 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Collateral

On 10/03/2024 at 1:30PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Renese Howell-Small and Melody Brown conducted an unannounced visit at this location to commence a health and safety check. LPAs Howell-Small and Brown identified themselves and discussed the purpose of the visit with House Manager, Douglas Hicks due to complaint # 56-AS-20240925153435. Fourteen (14) residents in care were present during visit. LPAs observed imminent health and/or safety concerns observed at the time of visit as LPAs conducted a medication audit for three (3) residents and noted that multiple medications were not given per their doctor’s order. Deficiency will be issued. LPAs observed health and/or safety hazards at this location as no sufficient staff coverage were observed to provide appropriate care and supervision to residents in care. During the visit, LPAs observed that only one (1) staff working from 6:00 AM to 2:00 PM and there are fourteen (14) residents of which three (3) residents are on hospice and three (3) residents have dementia. Deficiency will be issued. Furthermore, LPAs observed no emergency supplies available. Deficiency will be issued. Also, LPAs inspected the outside perimeter at this location and observed no health and/or safety hazards. LPAs inspected the food supplies at this location and observed an adequate supply of perishable and non-perishable food. The needs of the residents in care appear not being met during this inspection. An exit interview was conducted where this report, LIC809, LIC809D and Appeal Rights were discussed and provided to House Manager, Douglas Hicks.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 4, 2024

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall... (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and records review, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not ensuring that staff are providing the required medication assistance to Resident #1 (R1), Resident #2 (R2) and Resident #3 (R3) as prescribed by their physician which poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee has agreed to conduct Medication Training on CCR 87465(a)(4) to all staffs dispensing medications to residents and submit proof to LPA Howell-Small on Plan of Correction (POC) due date

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 4, 2024

87411 Personnel Requirements – General (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs…This requirement is not met evidenced by: Based on observation, interview and records review, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not ensuring that there are sufficient number of staff working at this location as evidenced of LPAs observed during the visit at this location that only one (1) staff working the morning shift from 06:00 AM to 02:00 PM which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee stated to schedule additional staff to work at this location and submit proof of updated staff schedule to LPA Howell-Small on Plan of Correction (POC) due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.695(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 7, 2024

HSC 1569.695 Emergency Plans (a) In addition to any other requirement of this chapter, a residential care facility for the elderly shall have an emergency and disaster plan that shall include, but not be limited to, all of the following: (2) Plans for the facility to be self-reliant for a period of not less than 72 hours immediately following any emergency or disaster, including, but not limited to... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not ensuring that this location has the required emergency supplies/kits and emergency food which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee stated to obtain and prepare the required emergency supplies/kits and emergency food and submit proof to LPA Howell-Small on Plan of Correction (POC) due date.

Mar 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Anna Bueno conducted an announced pre-licensing inspection of the facility. LPA met with Licensees Joel and Lailanie Zamora who were informed of the purpose of today's visit. There are currently no residents in care. Application: The application is for a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly. Fire clearance has been granted for fifteen (15) non ambulatory, with rooms having been approved for bedridden residents . Fire inspection was on conducted on December 13,2023 by the San Bernardino County Office of the Fire Marshal. Buildings and Grounds: The facility is composed of six (6) one-story buildings. Five (5) buildings have two resident bedrooms and bathrooms. One common use building (main lodge) houses the kitchen, dining area, and medication room. The main office is attached to a resident building and the supply closet and laundry room is attached to another resident building. LPA and Licensees toured the interior and exterior of the facility. This facility has no bodies of water. A shaded siting area is available for residents. LPA and Licensees observed that ramps and walkways are free of obstruction. The facility has a working telephone for residents use. LPA and Licensees observed charged fire extinguishers. The facility had a complete first aid kit and manual. The facility has an operable signal system that transmits audio signals. Fire safety installations such as extinguishers, sprinklers, and alarms are monitored by a third party authorized fire inspection company and LPA observed proof of inspection completed in November 2023. Fire extinguishers were observed to be charged and last inspected on 02/29/2024. Storage and Supplies: Activities were observed to be available in the main lodge and appear to be a sufficient amount for the requested census. A locked medication room has resident medication, some supplies, and resident medical files. The main office is available for other facility files and staff and resident records. Linens, and equipment are all in good repair and sufficient for approved census. Food Service and Laundry: Utensils and dishware are sufficient for the requested capacity. The refrigerator and stove are in working order. There is a secured storage for sharps, and cleaning supplies and toxins were locked in a closet. Bedrooms and Bathrooms: Resident bedrooms were adequately furnished appropriate closet space, appropriate linens and hygiene provisions, adequate lighting, and an operational smoke alarm and signal system. Bathrooms have a working toilet, wash basin, and shower with an adequate supply of towels and paper supplies. Water temperature measured from the main lodge and five (5) bathrooms from 5 resident buildings are between 108-120 degrees Fahrenheit. Component III was discussed with Licensee. The pre-licensing inspection is complete and this facility has no deficiencies. Licensee has satisfied all requirements in accordance with Title 22, California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed with and a copy was provided Licensee at the conclusion of the inspection.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 13, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 26, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Office

Facility Type: Residential Care Facility for the Elderly Application Type: Change of ownership Capacity: 15 Census (if any clients in care): 14 COMP II Participants: Joel Zamora, Lailanie Zamora Interview Method: Telephone interview On December 26, 2023, applicant/administrator participated in COMP II. Identification of the applicant and administrator was verified through interview questions based on photo ID and other identifying personal information. During COMP II, applicant and administrator confirmed the understanding of the California Code Title 22 Regulations. Signed LIC 809 with copy of photo ID have been obtained. During COMP II, CAB analyst confirmed Applicant/Administrator’s understanding of following areas: 1. Facility operation: License type, client/resident populations, and program 2. Admission Policies 3. Staffing requirements & Training 4. Restricted/Prohibited Health Conditions 5. General provisions 6. Emergency Preparedness 7. Complaints & Reporting 8. Pre-licensing readinessthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 26, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Bernardino County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Bernardino County